Top Court To Examine High Court's Order On Girl's ' Sambandh ' Remark In Sexual Assault Case
The Supreme Court today agreed to examine the controversial Delhi High Court order acquitting a 22-year-old man in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences case, saying use of the words 'sambandh banaya' (established physical relationship) in a minor's statement is not sufficient to establish an offence of sexual assault under Section 3 of the POCSO Act or Section 376 IPC.
The top court today issued notice on the plea against the High Court order. The Delhi High Court order had acquitted the man on the grounds that the phrase "sambandh" and "physical relation" cannot be interpreted as 'sexual intercourse'.
A Special Leave Petition has been filed against the Delhi High Court's order acquitting a 22-year-old man accused of raping a 14-year-old.
A bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice AG Masih issued notice in a petition filed by NGO 'Just Rights for Children Alliance', returnable in four weeks.
Additional Solicitor General Archana Dave, appearing for the Delhi Police, informed the top court today that they support the petitioner's case and will file an appeal against the acquittal.
The trial court had sentenced the accused to life imprisonment by interpreting the phrase "sambandh" and "physical relation" to imply sexual intercourse and thereby sexual assault, given that the complainant was a minor and there was a considerable age difference between the two.
In the December 2024 order, the high court asserted that the leap from physical relations or 'sambandh' to sexual assault and then to penetrative sexual assault must be established by evidence and cannot be deduced as an inference.
"The mere fact that the survivor is below 18 years cannot lead to a conclusion that there was penetrative sexual assault. The survivor, in fact, used the phrase 'physical relations', but there is no clarity as to what she meant by using the said phrase," the court said in the judgement passed on December 23.
Even the use of the words 'sambandh banaya' is not sufficient to establish an offence under Section 3 of the POCSO Act or under Section 376 IPC. Though consent would not matter if the girl is a minor under the POCSO Act, the phrase 'physical relations' cannot be converted automatically into sexual intercourse, let alone sexual assault, the court held.
The high court said the benefit of doubt ought to be in favour of the accused and, therefore, ruled, the trial court's judgment completely lacks any reasoning and also does not reveal or support any rationale for the conviction.
The complaint in this case was lodged in March 2017 by the girl's mother, alleging that her 14-year-old daughter had been lured and kidnapped from her home by an unknown person.
The minor was found in Faridabad along with the accused, who was arrested and subsequently convicted for the offence of rape under IPC and penetrative sexual assault under POCSO in December 2023 and later awarded imprisonment for the remainder of his life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Surrogacy racket accused sent to 5-day police custody
The Hyderabad police on Friday took Dr Athaluri Namratha (65), the owner of Universal Srushti Fertility Centre at Secunderabad, and the prime accused in the fake surrogacy racket into five-day custody for further questioning, officials familiar with the development said. Surrogacy racket accused sent to 5-day police custody Namratha, who was arrested along with seven others, by Gopalapuram police on July 27, were remanded to judicial custody by a Nampally criminal court on the same day. On Thursday, the court granted custody of the accused to the police for questioning for five days, starting Friday. After conducting the mandatory medical examination at Gandhi Hospital, the police shifted Namratha to the office of the deputy commissioner of police (north zone) in the afternoon. 'I did not commit any crime. It was a fabricated case based on false allegations made by an army guy. I shall disclose all the details shortly,' Namratha told reporters at Gandhi Hospital. However, investigations by the police revealed that this was not the first time that Namratha indulged in the business of illegal child trafficking and fake surrogacy. 'She is a habitual offender with several cases pending against her in different police stations across Telangana and Andhra Pradesh,' said the remand report submitted by the Hyderabad police before the court. HT has seen the report. Namratha was booked for cheating the patients with fake IVF procedure cases in 2010 and 2013 in Visakhapatnam and Guntur respectively. Between 2020 and 2023, she was booked in nine other cases, including five in Gopalapuram police station in Secunderabad and four in Visakhapatnam. 'She was charged with kidnapping (IPC Section 363), trafficking of persons (Section 370), forgery for the purpose of cheating (Section 468) and pretending fake documents to be genuine (Section 471). In two cases registered in the Maharanipeta police station in Visakhapatnam, she was also charged under Section 81 and 87 of Juvenile Justice Act, which deals with the sale and purchase of children,' the report said. The remand report explained in detail the modus operandi adopted by Namratha in the latest instance of buying a new born male child from an Assam couple and selling them to a Rajasthani couple, claiming that he was born through surrogacy at Visakhapatnam. The couple, who have been in Hyderabad since 2024, had approached Namratha at her Universal Srushti Fertility Centre, seeking the birth of a baby through IVF method. After conducting tests on the mother, Namratha told her that the IVF method would not work out for her and she could obtain a child through surrogacy. The couple were told that the doctors will use their sperm and eggs for surrogacy. The baby would be handed over after DNA confirmation by arranging a woman from the clinic and charged over ₹30 lakh from their service. However, the doctor used different sperm and eggs for surrogacy. After a woman conceived, she was shifted to Visakhapatnam where the woman delivered a baby boy in June this year. Later, the baby was handed over to the couple who left for Rajasthan. When the couple asked the doctor to conduct the DNA tests for the child, Namratha resisted first and later took the samples from husband for a DNA test. When there was no response from the fertility centre for several days, the couple got the tests conducted at a DNA forensic lab in Vasant Kunj in Delhi, whose reports indicated that the baby was not biologically connected to the father. When the couple tried to contact Namratha with the genuine DNA reports, she blocked their mobile numbers and started avoiding them over the phone. On June 23, 2025, the couple visited the clinic at Secunderabad and met Namratha 'Namratha admitted her mistake in handing over the wrong surrogacy child to the parents on pretext of fabricated IVF and surrogacy process. She deliberately cheated the couple by collecting huge amounts from the couple,' the remand report said. The report also pointed out that an anaesthetist from Gandhi Hospital was found to be hand in glove with Namratha in conducting the fertility tests at her centre. 'The anaesthetist Nargula Sadanandam, who was aware of the illegal operations at Universal Srushti Fertility Centre and was knowingly administering anaesthesia to patients who were undergoing tests. He was also among the arrested,' the report said. Namratha also engaged agents in Visakhapatnam, Hyderabad and Vijayawada, who would lure financially vulnerable women to act as surrogate donors, offering them money and introducing them to her. One of the agents Dhanasri Santoshi, a housewife, was also arrested along with Namratha. The police said Mohammed Ali Adik and Nasreen Begum, the child's biological parents are currently imprisoned in Chanchalguda jail. Their biological child, who was offered to the Rajasthani couple, was shifted to Sisu Vihar, belonging to the Telangana state women and child welfare department. A case has been registered against Namratha, the biological parents and others under sections 61 (criminal conspiracy), 316 (criminal breach of trust), 335 (making a false document), 336 (forgery), and 340 (forged document or electronic record and using it as genuine) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and sections 38, 39 and 40 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Pesticide found in govt school water tank; case registered
Shivamogga: A case has been registered after a water tank at a government primary school in Hosanagara taluk of Shivamogga district was allegedly found contaminated with pesticides on Friday, police said. Thanks to the alertness of the staff, a major tragedy was averted as none of the students consumed the contaminated water, they added. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has taken serious note of the incident and directed police to conduct a thorough probe, identify those responsible, and ensure strict action against them. A senior police officer said preliminary inquiry revealed that the school had two tanks—one with sufficient water and the other, which had less water, was found laced with a large quantity of pesticides. A pesticide bottle was also recovered near the suspected tank. 'The school staff noticed the contamination in time and alerted authorities,' the police officer said. 'We are treating this matter very seriously and have registered a case under Section 123 (causing hurt by poison with intent to commit an offence) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Two teams have been formed to trace the culprits, and an investigation is underway,' he added. Taking to 'X', Siddaramaiah termed the act as 'malicious' and equated it to a 'terrorist attack intended to cause mass killing of innocent children.' 'I commend the kitchen staff for their timely intervention. I've directed police to ensure the culprits are given the strictest punishment,' he said, adding, 'The very mindset of poisoning drinking water reflects the moral decline of humanity among us. It's something we must all reflect on.'
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
MP Prajwal Revanna To Be Sentenced In Rape Case Today
The court on Friday pronounced Revanna guilty in the obscene video and rape case. Judge Santhosh Gajanana Bhat delivered the verdict. The court is scheduled to announce the quantum of punishment on Saturday, after allowing the convict, Prajwal Revanna, and his counsel to make their final submissions on the conviction. Prajwal Revanna was produced before the court, and as soon as the verdict was pronounced, he was seen with tears in his eyes, wiping them while seated inside the courtroom. After stepping out of the court hall, he sat down in a chair in visible despair and broke down, unable to process the shock. The court deferred the judgment on July 30, citing the need for certain clarifications. After seeking inputs from both sides and issuing directions, the matter was adjourned until this day. He was arrested last year and has been in jail for 14 months. The case in question pertains to a rape complaint and other charges filed by a domestic worker from K.R. Nagar against Prajwal Revanna. The court has reviewed 26 pieces of evidence in connection with the case. Prajwal Revanna faces three other similar cases. Videos allegedly showing Prajwal Revanna sexually assaulting women and recording the acts surfaced during the 2024 Lok Sabha election period. Following this, Prajwal fled the country. A victim from Holenarasipura initially filed a police complaint against him. Upon his return to Bengaluru on May 31, 2024, he was arrested by the Bengaluru Police. His return came after public appeals from former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda and Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy. Prajwal was lodged in Bengaluru Central Jail, and his multiple bail pleas were outrightly rejected by all courts. One of the videos that caused widespread outrage during the election period shows the alleged sexual assault on an elderly domestic worker at a farmhouse in Holenarasipura. In the video, the woman is seen pleading with Prajwal to spare her, stating that she had served food to his father and other family elders. The Special Investigation Team (SIT) had filed cases under IPC Sections 376(2)(n) (repeated rape on the same woman), 506 (criminal intimidation), 354A(1) (unwelcome physical contact and advances, sexual demands), 354B (use of criminal force with intent to disrobe), 354C (voyeurism -- capturing images of a woman engaged in a private act without her consent), along with relevant sections of the Information Technology Act. Police had collected strong evidence in this particular case. They recorded the statement of the victim, collected the samples of semen of Prajwal Revanna from the clothes of the victim, and also obtained the video of the sexual assault.
