‘Democracy takes precedence': Denmark moves to extend veil ban to schools, targets prayer rooms in universities
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
'You have the right to your faith and to practice your religion, but democracy takes precedence,' Frederiksen was quoted by Danish news agency Ritzau. She added, 'God has to step aside.'
Denmark first introduced a public ban on full-face coverings in 2018. However, the law has so far not applied to educational institutions. Frederiksen said this was a gap in legislation that needed to be closed. 'There are gaps in the legislation that allow Muslim social control and oppression of women at educational institutions in Denmark,' she told domestic media, according to Euronews.
The prime minister, who also leads the ruling Social Democrats, said her government intends to begin dialogue with universities and schools to extend the veil ban and to remove prayer rooms from campuses. While she did not call for a blanket legal prohibition on such rooms, Frederiksen made her stance clear, 'We are actively taking a position that we don't want them because they are used as a mechanism of oppression against girls and potentially boys as well,' she was quoted as saying by Ritzau.
Frederiksen also said that while she did not know how widespread the use of prayer rooms was, her concern was about the principle. 'I'm the prime minister of Denmark. I'm also a woman. And I can't tolerate the oppression of women,' she said.
The announcement comes in response to recommendations made by Denmark's Commission for the Forgotten Women's Struggle, which earlier this year urged action on what it called religious social control in public institutions.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In 2022, the same body proposed banning hijabs in primary schools, but the measure was ultimately dropped after sparking backlash and protests.
The new proposal has drawn criticism from human rights organisations.
As per news AFP, groups such as Amnesty International have long opposed Denmark's public veil ban, calling it discriminatory and a violation of women's freedom of expression and religion. 'All women should be free to dress as they please and to wear clothing that expresses their identity or beliefs,' Amnesty International had said in 2018.
Frederiksen defended the new measures as necessary to preserve democratic values within education. 'You're welcome to have your religion,' she said, 'but when you're at school, you're there to be at school and take part in your education,' reported Euronews.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
Eviction drive under way for second day in Assam to clear encroachment on 1,500 hectares of forest land
'A massive eviction drive to clear alleged encroachment on nearly 1,500 hectares of forest land in Assam's Golaghat district continued for the second day on Wednesday (July 30, 2025),' officials said. 'The exercise, once completed, will displace around 1,500 families, mostly from the Muslim community,' they added. The eviction drive started on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) to uproot illegal settlements on almost 11,000 bighas (nearly 1,500 hectares) of land in the Rengma Reserve Forest in Uriamghat along the Assam-Nagaland border in Sarupathar sub-division. Assam begins eviction drive to clear encroached forest land on Nagaland boundary "Today, the eviction drive started at Sonari Beel and Pithaghat area from around 9 a.m. So far, everything is progressing as per plans and peacefully," a district administration official told PTI. Although the government has claimed that the area was encroached, senior officials acknowledged that there were houses under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Gramin (PMAY-G) and water connection under Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM). They also admitted that there were government schools under Sarba Siksha Abhiyan (SSA), sub-health centre under National Health Mission (NHM) and electricity connections to almost every household, besides markets, mosques, madrassas and churches. Assam, Mizoram draft rules to curb illegal immigration On Tuesday (July 29, 2025), the major eviction drive started from the main market area in the Bidyapur area, followed by residential locations. 'During the drive, around 120 'illegal' commercial structures spread over approximately 4.2 hectares of forest land were demolished,' the official said. The operation was led by the Forest Department with active support from the Golaghat district administration and the Assam Police in close coordination with the Government of Nagaland and the Nagaland Police. To ensure smooth and peaceful execution of the operation, an extensive security arrangement, including the deployment of CRPF personnel, was put in place. The district official claimed that around 10,500 bighas to 11,000 bighas of land were encroached upon by the people. Assam govt prepares for mega eviction drive in Golaghat, to affect 2,000 families "Around 2,000 families are living in those areas. Out of them, notices were served to about 1,500 families, who illegally settled here. The remaining families are forest dwellers and have certificates from the Forest Rights Committee (FRC)," he added. 'The families whose houses are being demolished belong to the Muslim community, while those having FRC certificates are from Bodo, Nepali, Manipuri and other communities,' the official said. "Around 80% of the families who had received notices have already vacated their illegal settlements in the last few days. We are only demolishing their homes," he added. While speaking to PTI, the affected families, however, questioned the rationale of the eviction drive and claimed that they were brought to this location by the earlier governments to protect the area from the alleged invasion of Nagaland. Notably, the Assembly was informed in March that almost 83,000 hectares of land belonging to Assam were being occupied by four neighbouring states, and Nagaland captured the highest amount of land in Assam — 59,490.21 hectares. They claimed that most of the alleged encroachers' previous generation was settled in the forest by the Janata Party government, headed by ex-CM Golap Borbora, in 1978-79 and the first Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) government, which came to power in 1985. The government-run Bidyapur Lower Primary School was established in 1978, according to the sign board on the school building. This supports the public claim that many people were living in the area from around 1975. All the government schools in the alleged encroached area have been converted into forest camps before the start of the eviction drive. Ali Kazi, an evicted person, told PTI that they have been cooperating with the authorities in this drive. "We only requested the government to settle us somewhere else, but they refused. We now have no option but to stay under tents. We are not even given drinking water; forget about any food. It's very inhuman," he added. The encroached area, as claimed by the government, was provided with electricity, schools, JJM water connections, health centres and houses under PM Awas Yojana, among other benefits from the State. When asked about these government infrastructure, a senior official of the Forest Department accepted that such facilities were provided by the authorities and some of the installations were made even after 2016 when the BJP came to power for the first time in Assam. 'I do not know why these were sanctioned and established in this area. These were set up before I came here. There were also mosques and madrassas among the Muslim community, while churches were set up by the Bodo people,' the official said. 'For carrying out the eviction drive across 12 villages, the authorities have divided the entire area into nine zones and are doing the survey accordingly,' he added. A district administration official said that proper notices were served by the Forest Department to the alleged encroachers, giving them seven days to vacate the place. The Assam Police stationed a senior official from its headquarters in Golaghat to oversee the law and order situation in the course of the eviction drive. Nagaland also issued an advisory to the bordering districts to keep a strict vigil so that displaced people cannot cross into the State in the event of the proposed eviction drive.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Malegaon blast verdict likely on July 31, 17 years after deadly attack
Almost 17 years after a blast killed six persons and left more than 100 injured in Maharashtra's communally sensitive Malegaon town, a special NIA court is likely to deliver its verdict in the case on Thursday. Seven accused, including BJP leader and former MP Pragya Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, faced trial in the case for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code. Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni are the other accused in the case. The National Investigation Agency (NIA), which conducted the probe into the case, has sought "commensurate punishment" for the accused. The trial, which started in 2018, got over on April 19, 2025, and the case was reserved for judgement. Six persons were killed and more than 100 injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in the town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008. In its final argument, the NIA submitted that the blast in Malegaon - a town with a sizable Muslim population - was orchestrated by the conspirators to terrorise a section of Muslim community, disrupt essential services, create communal tensions, and threaten the state's internal security. The NIA has said that based on "relevant, admissible, cogent, trustworthy, wholly reliable and proved evidence" it "conclusively and cogently" established the crucial circumstances to form a complete chain of events. It was established that the accused were "directly involved in the part of larger conspiracy hatched amongst themselves and (were) instrumental in causing a bomb explosion," the prosecution contended. The blast took place during the holy month of Ramzan, just before the Navratri festival, the NIA pointed out, claiming the intention of the accused was to strike terror in a section of the Muslim community. The case was initially probed by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) before being transferred to the NIA in 2011. The trial in the case began in 2018 after the court framed charges against the seven accused. The charges comprised UAPA sections 16 (committing terrorist act) and 18 (conspiring to commit terrorist act) and various IPC sections, including 120 (b) (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 153 (a) (promoting enmity between two religious groups). During the trial, the prosecution presented 323 witnesses, of whom 37 turned hostile. Thakur, in her final statement, submitted that her implication in the case is "totally illegal, bad in law and contrary to the law of the land and with malafide intention and ulterior motive". Citing the testimony of Mohan Kulkarni, an ATS officer who was part of the probe, Thakur claimed his statement "clearly shows she is an innocent person". Further referring to the officer's testimony, the BJP leader alleged she has been "implicated in this case by manipulating evidence with a prejudiced mind as it was pre-decided to implicate her". Purohit has submitted that "there is no material evidence" linking him to the alleged offence. "The prosecution's case rests on fabricated and contradictory witness statements that are devoid of any independent corroboration and fail to meet the evidentiary threshold required in law," his final arguments claimed. He alleged the investigation was "tainted by serious procedural irregularities and a complete disregard for standard legal protocols". "These lapses not only vitiate the fairness of the proceedings but also render the prosecution's case wholly speculative and unreliable," he added. The other accused, too, have made similar submissions. The intervenor, representing the victims' side, contended the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case "is a classic example where the defense lacks a reasoned argument". "Some of the accused claim the bombing never happened, while others blame it on SIMI (Students Islamic Movement of India). Each of the seven accused has advanced different and often conflicting defenses which are contrary to each other's claim which itself strengthens the case of prosecution," the victims said in their final submission. The present prosecuting agency, NIA, has established beyond reasonable doubt the involvement of all the accused in the bomb blast, they submitted.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Malegaon blast case verdict likely on July 31, 17 years after deadly attack
Almost 17 years after a blast killed six persons and left more than 100 injured in Maharashtra's communally sensitive Malegaon town, a special NIA court is likely to deliver its verdict in the case on Thursday. Seven accused, including BJP leader and former MP Pragya Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, faced trial in the case for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Analytics Degree Design Thinking Management Project Management Finance MCA Artificial Intelligence CXO Others PGDM Leadership Data Science healthcare MBA Product Management Operations Management Public Policy Technology Data Science others Digital Marketing Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Applied Business Analytics Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Applied Business Analytics Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni are the other accused in the case. The National Investigation Agency (NIA), which conducted the probe into the case, has sought "commensurate punishment" for the accused. The trial, which started in 2018, got over on April 19, 2025, and the case was reserved for judgement. Live Events Six persons were killed and more than 100 injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in the town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008. In its final argument, the NIA submitted that the blast in Malegaon - a town with a sizable Muslim population - was orchestrated by the conspirators to terrorise a section of Muslim community, disrupt essential services, create communal tensions, and threaten the state's internal security. The NIA has said that based on "relevant, admissible, cogent, trustworthy, wholly reliable and proved evidence" it "conclusively and cogently" established the crucial circumstances to form a complete chain of events. It was established that the accused were "directly involved in the part of larger conspiracy hatched amongst themselves and (were) instrumental in causing a bomb explosion," the prosecution contended. The blast took place during the holy month of Ramzan, just before the Navratri festival, the NIA pointed out, claiming the intention of the accused was to strike terror in a section of the Muslim community. The case was initially probed by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) before being transferred to the NIA in 2011. The trial in the case began in 2018 after the court framed charges against the seven accused. The charges comprised UAPA sections 16 (committing terrorist act) and 18 (conspiring to commit terrorist act) and various IPC sections, including 120 (b) (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 153 (a) (promoting enmity between two religious groups). During the trial, the prosecution presented 323 witnesses, of whom 37 turned hostile. Thakur, in her final statement, submitted that her implication in the case is "totally illegal, bad in law and contrary to the law of the land and with malafide intention and ulterior motive". Citing the testimony of Mohan Kulkarni, an ATS officer who was part of the probe, Thakur claimed his statement "clearly shows she is an innocent person". Further referring to the officer's testimony, the BJP leader alleged she has been "implicated in this case by manipulating evidence with a prejudiced mind as it was pre-decided to implicate her". Purohit has submitted that "there is no material evidence" linking him to the alleged offence. "The prosecution's case rests on fabricated and contradictory witness statements that are devoid of any independent corroboration and fail to meet the evidentiary threshold required in law," his final arguments claimed. He alleged the investigation was "tainted by serious procedural irregularities and a complete disregard for standard legal protocols". "These lapses not only vitiate the fairness of the proceedings but also render the prosecution's case wholly speculative and unreliable," he added. The other accused, too, have made similar submissions. The intervenor, representing the victims' side, contended the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case "is a classic example where the defense lacks a reasoned argument". "Some of the accused claim the bombing never happened, while others blame it on SIMI (Students Islamic Movement of India). Each of the seven accused has advanced different and often conflicting defenses which are contrary to each other's claim which itself strengthens the case of prosecution," the victims said in their final submission. The present prosecuting agency, NIA, has established beyond reasonable doubt the involvement of all the accused in the bomb blast, they submitted.
