Woman Rescues a 'Scary' German Shepherd—Then Notices a Shift in Strangers
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
After owning a dog, one woman had only ever experienced people nonstop asking to pet him, but when she rescued a German shepherd, she realized the "scary" canine persona truly changes people's opinions.
Essala, who is known on Reddit as ShoddyTown715, welcomed home Josie, a German shepherd, about a year ago after finding her on the side of the road. She told Newsweek via Reddit messaging that Josie had just given birth to puppies.
"I was driving home from school when I saw Josie tied up with a rope around her neck to a speed limit sign on my neighborhood road," she said. "She was skinny and looked like she just had pups, and when I pulled over to let her off the rope, she just ran to my car and jumped into the front seat."
Essala didn't plan on bringing home another dog, especially a German shepherd. She said she was raised to believe they were "unpredictable biters."
An article from Fobres reported that German shepherds are responsible for about 17.8 percent of dog bite incidents, only after pit bulls and mixed breeds.
However, Essala took a chance on Josie, quickly undoing her prejudice. She fell in love with Josie, who is "all love and zero brain cells." But, while Essala knows Josie is harmless, she started to notice a shift in how others acted toward her as soon as she brought the dog home.
Photos of Josie, a German shepherd, who Essala rescued last year after finding her tied to a speed limit sign.
Photos of Josie, a German shepherd, who Essala rescued last year after finding her tied to a speed limit sign.
ShoddyTown715/Reddit
She shared in a Reddit post to the subreddit channel r/germanshepherds that since having Josie by her side, she discovered how quickly people will back off her. Not that it's a bad thing to her. In fact, it calms her and makes her feel safe as she travels across country.
The change she noticed is mostly with men. Previously, men would try to approach and talk with her, but now, with Josie next to her, they will walk the other direction. Meanwhile, women and children love seeing Josie.
"I find that the people who give bad vibes don't like her, but the people who seem legitimately nice and friendly do," she said.
What Do the Comments Say?
Last week's Reddit post, which amassed over 9,400 upvotes and 514 comments, quickly drew in support for owning a large dog as a means of protection, with many sharing photos of their "scary" German shepherds.
"German shepherds have a magical way of making other people very polite," wrote a Redditor.
A second added: "I love my scary dog privilege."
Some shared similar experiences: "I've always had small dogs, so it's taken me a while to adjust to the reactions I get with my dog. People will cross the street or just freeze when we take our walks..."
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Colleges Should Begin Putting Science First
One of my pet peeves is going to the drug store and seeing necessary items locked behind a plastic case. Whether it's razor blades, Advil, or skin cream, drug store shelves have become pharma jail cells as chains like CVS and Walgreens take draconian measures to combat shoplifting. A recent Washington Post column showed I'm not alone in my drug store distress, but rather part of community of curmudgeonly customers. In CVS was so worried about shoplifting that it stole its own soul, Matt Bai makes a convincing case that 'someone has turned the CVS I knew into a Museum of the American Pharmacy.' When we encounter a necessary item locked away, we're instructed to ring the service bell for assistance. So we ring and, after a minute or two, an employee shows up and opens the case. As Matt points out, the problem for infrequent shoppers is that most of the time we don't know exactly what we want. In Matt's case, his son asked for teeth whitening strips. So Matt's in a pickle: In the old CVS, I'd have happily spent five minutes idly breaking down the pros and cons. But now, this poor woman is standing there watching and waiting, and I'm self-conscious. She's the only one working here. She has things to do. It's not like the CVS has assigned me a personal shopper. I ask her for advice, and I can tell she wants to be helpful, but this is the CVS, and we all know that the employees are basically silent observers… 'I think they're pretty much the same,' she says hopefully… The pressure I'm feeling here is more than I can stand. I grab a random box, and the woman quickly locks the case before I can change my mind. Then the same thing happens two aisles over: When my new friend reappears and opens the case, I grab the first three bottles of bodywash I see. I cannot subject her to another round of anguished vacillation. We're not picking out a puppy here. Ring the service bell for assistance. Of course, he buys the wrong things. I've known Matt for 30 years since he worked with my (then future) wife at Newsweek. That's back when Newsweek was a respected weekly magazine owned by the Washington Post's Graham family – one where an old-school beverage cart provided libations to journalists working late Friday nights to 'close the book.' And back when CVS was a needed respite from our under-air-conditioned New York apartment, not a locus of stress and frustration. Matt's not a total crank – at least no more than me. And he's clearly onto something about likely consequences for organizations that close themselves off to the world. That's certainly the case in higher education. Colleges have locked themselves behind a plastic case in the two most important ways imaginable. First, programs of study haven't been responsive to economic needs. Nearly all schools continue to offer the same degree programs they've run for generations. The list of most popular majors – starting with business, nursing, psychology, biology, and engineering – looks like it could be wearing a poodle skirt, love beads, or sideburns. (Or if shopping in a drug store, buying Lustre-Crème Shampoo, Dippity-Do Hair Gel, and a carton of Chesterfields.) Only computer science (#11) would have been out of place when our grandparents were college-age, and we're merely missing classics and agricultural sciences. Unless forced by budgetary exigencies, colleges never discontinue programs in order to redirect teaching resources to more productive uses. In an economy that's experienced radical changes in the last few decades, this level of movement is glacial. Second, the people teaching at colleges and universities aren't responsive to economic needs. Tenured faculty – the highest paid, permanent faculty – are required to have terminal degrees, almost always PhDs. And having a doctorate typically means a straight line from college to graduate school to employment at a postsecondary institution. It's even true at community colleges. When full-time positions open up, competition is fierce and candidates without doctorates stand as little chance as cold symptoms after taking Nyquil, or heartburn post-TUMS. This means the people educating and preparing students for work in the real economy have never worked in the real economy. Just as CVS employees can't help us choose, faculty without real-world experience can't provide helpful career guidance. And because academic departments control curriculum and faculty control departments, the lack of real-world experience produces the museum-like quality of university offerings. With college safely locked away, undergraduate majors rarely offer a straight line to good first jobs. Lightcast has documented the lack of direct pathways: a swirl from the most popular majors to the most popular jobs. The unemployment rate for the last five classes of college graduates is up 40% in the last two years and 12% of grads in their 20s are currently unemployed, particularly men. Meanwhile, underemployment for college grads one year out is at 52%. Between the Scylla of unemployment and the Charybdis of underemployment, two-thirds to three-quarters of the class of 2025 are struggling to launch. Like CVS customers, college graduates need to ring for assistance. In response to these criticisms, colleges and universities have offered bromides – i.e., vague ideas intended to placate, not Bromo-Seltzer which is no longer available at CVS – about building industry or employer partnerships. But partnerships ebb and flow and nothing really changes. Sooner or later, higher education will need to meet the problem head-on by addressing the source of the economic change we've witnessed over the past half-century: scientific progress and digital transformation. Prioritizing science worked for higher ed during the Cold War when, in search of solutions to military challenges, federal funding skyrocketed like CVS sales of Wegovy and other semaglutides. Today's biggest problems are environmental, socioeconomic, and biological. But if and when they are solved, they're more likely to be solved by science/tech than other disciplines. If more colleges and universities led with science, they'd launch more economically relevant programs. According to one study of new programs, only 15% were STEM; 75% were in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. And schools would be more likely to discontinue unproductive programs. Science tends to move on faster than other fields of study. After all, no college still offers programs in phrenology or alchemy. They'd also focus more resources on higher value programs. One of higher education's unsung scandals is enrollment caps for the most remunerative majors, namely the most technical and scientific. While student demand for quantitative programs – computer science, engineering, data science, and now machine learning/AI – doubles and doubles again, colleges and universities have added faculty slower than it now takes to shop at CVS. The result: not nearly enough seats, particularly at public institutions. Many publics play a bait-and-switch game, admitting students as freshmen then rejecting them from higher value technical programs as sophomores and juniors – ostensibly via use of outdated prerequisites, weed-out courses, and GPA requirements, but actually due to lack of capacity. So nearly half of all students who say they want to complete these programs never do. What would it mean to make science primus inter pares in American higher education? Here's a modest proposal: The education and labor market challenges we're facing are not unique to the U.S. As they're a byproduct of digital transformation of the economy and education's failure (so far) to keep up, everyone is in the same boat. A recent OECD survey of high school students across 80 countries found 'high levels of career uncertainty and confusion' because 'job expectations… bear little relationship to actual patterns of labor market demand.' Career-launch confrères in Canada and the UK are struggling like never before to land good first jobs. But all the more reason to build new educational models to keep up with economic change. New STEM programs delivered by faculty with industry experience are likely to provide straighter lines to more good first jobs. As America leads the world in digital transformation, we should lead in our response to digital transformation. A science-first system of higher education would also give us a better shot at preserving our AI lead because universities would attract more research funding. The federal government – at least this Administration – is more likely to provide Cold War-era levels of research support to universities that privilege and prioritize science. Although STEM faculty and researchers are the primary victims of Trump Administration attempts to cut federal research funding by a third, higher education's political and public funding challenges have hardly stemmed from STEM. Prioritizing science anew doesn't mean no room for arts, humanities, and social sciences. We need them not only to graduate well-rounded students, but also to push back when science yields inhumane outcomes (like locking up the pharamaceutical products you need). But that doesn't mean that 70% of students should concentrate in these fields, certainly not without a hybrid-tech component. The recent increase in double majors indicates that many students already intuit as much. And note that our economic rival, China, isn't putting humanities professors in charge of universities. The vast majority of Chinese university presidents are scientists, engineers, or economists. Not surprisingly, China is pulling ahead of us across a panoply of scientific metrics. If this isn't another Sputnik moment, I don't know what is. The alternative is to remain closed off from our changed world. Matt Bai notes one survey showed that 'less than 1 in 3 shoppers are willing to hang around once they realize that the item they want is behind glass.' So let's make CVS stand for Colleges Value Science rather than a Museum of the American University. Unless and until we begin putting science and technology first, colleges and universities will have a problem that neither teeth whitening strips nor body wash will fix.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Ingredient You'll Never Find in Martha Stewart's Recipes
The Ingredient You'll Never Find in Martha Stewart's Recipes originally appeared on Parade. For years, Martha Stewart has been sharing her genius recipes and whip-smart cooking tips. Three of our favorites? Her easiest one-pot pasta, the genius hacks for her mom's coffee cake recipe and how to use olive oil on a budget. On her website, Martha has even shared an extensive list of the essential pantry ingredients every home cook needs. There's a lot on the lineup, which makes you think there's nothing missing, but there's one ingredient Martha avoids at all costs. 'Oh, I would never use truffle oil, oh never," the culinary figure told the Today Show back in 2018. And in a separate Reddit Ask Me Anything session, Martha replied to one commenter, saying that truffle oil "doesn't belong in anyone's kitchen." Let's unpack Martha's feelings about this pungent condiment, shall we? Related: I'm Martha Stewart. Ask me almost anything! It's a good thing. by u/ThisIsMarthaStewart in IAmA What is Truffle Oil? For the uninitiated, truffle oil is olive oil infused with truffles, a member of the fungi family. Truffles are revered by fans for their woodsy, earthy, umami-packed flavor and a musky aroma that's hard to compare to anything else. Home cooks often use truffle oil in sauces and to finish pastas and soups. But for every truffle oil fan, there's a hater, which makes it a true love-it-or-hate-it delicacy. And Martha is definitely in the hate-it camp. Related: 😋😋SIGN UP to get delicious recipes, handy kitchen hacks & more in our daily Pop Kitchen newsletter🍳🍔 Why Does Martha Stewart Hate Truffle Oil? 'It's bad," Stewart told the Today Show. "They've done many studies on truffle oil. It's synthetic, it's fake, it's horrible. It clings to your taste buds. It's a hideous thing. Forget truffle oil.' Before you start wondering if Martha is being overly dramatic, you should know that while real truffle oil is certainly available, a vast percentage of commercially produced truffle oils are made with synthetic flavorings. Truffles are extremely expensive and hard to harvest, but synthetic truffle flavoring can be manufactured on a dime and many say it provides a close-enough flavor to that of real truffles. Of course, that doesn't fly with some purists, including Martha, but also chef Gordon Ramsay, who called it "pungent and overrated" in an episode of Hot Ones. Related: What's the Best Way to Use Truffle Oil? We know that Martha isn't going to be using truffle oil anytime soon, but if all this truffle oil talk has made you curious about the ingredient, there are a few things to keep in mind. First, according to America's Test Kitchen, seeing the word "natural" on the label doesn't really mean that the oil is made with real truffles. The USDA doesn't regulate the term "natural," unless the word appears on the packaging for meat and poultry. If you're able to get a sample of a truffle oil before fully committing, try to do that. Once you have your truffle oil home, make sure to use it as a finishing oil by adding a small drizzle or droplets over dishes to elevate them with a subtle, savory, earthy pop. The truffle flavor will be compromised if the oil is exposed to high heat, so you should avoid using it as a cooking Ingredient You'll Never Find in Martha Stewart's Recipes first appeared on Parade on Jul 1, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 1, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
9 hours ago
- Newsweek
Experts Hopeful for 'Once-in-a-Lifetime' Treaty to Tackle Plastic Waste
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The amount of plastic waste around the world continues to grow, ushering in a rising environmental, economic and public health crisis that affects everyone and everything on the planet. A 2022 report from the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) projects that humans produce about 460 million tons of plastic each year. Without immediate action, that amount is projected to triple by 2060. On Thursday, July 24, environmental experts gathered for Turning the Tide on Plastic Waste: A Newsweek Live Event hosted by Newsweek's Environmental and Sustainability Editor Jeff Young. During the hour-long virtual event, panelists discussed the state of the plastics issues and how the global community is coming together to help solve it. The panelists included Steve Alexander, president and chief executive officer of the Association of Plastic Recyclers (APR); Dr. Douglas McCauley, a professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara and adjunct professor at UC Berkeley; and Erin Simon, the vice president and head of plastic waste and business at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). This panel comes weeks before the UN meets again in hopes of finalizing a historic treaty that would address the full lifecycle of plastic, from production and design to collection, disposal and recycling. Talks began three years ago and the last round of talks in December ended in a stalemate without a treaty. McCauley said the scale of the plastics problem the global community is facing is "immense," which makes the opportunity to solve it with new negotiations "really exciting." As a marine biologist, he outlined the real negative impacts of plastic pollution. There is a threat to biodiversity and the habitats of marine life, and a human health impact with the rise of microplastics in our food and water supply. In terms of climate change, McCauley said that without a solution, greenhouse gas emissions from continued plastic production will increase by 37 percent. "It's pretty serious for us, pretty serious for our planet, and the problem is only growing," he said. "Without intervention, without a strong treaty, business as usual will take us to a 2050 where we double the amount of plastic pollution on our planet." So what's the solution? Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Erin Simon has been present at the previous rounds of UN negotiations and is optimistic that the next meeting will yield positive and impactful results. She said that while there is "no silver bullet" for the problem of plastic waste, the opportunity for a collective global agreement has the potential to accelerate humanity's ability to solve it. While the final draft of the treaty is still in the works, Simon said the 193 countries are aligned on a few measures. This includes getting "problematic" materials out of production, designing more sustainable plastic, financing the transition to a recycling infrastructure and making sure these agreements can be strengthened over time. "In this next session, it is our hope that we set the glide path for all of those in the right direction," she said. "It is our hope that we find ways to build more bridges than we seem to have burned in the last sessions of negotiations." At APR, Steve Alexander said the organization has design and testing guides for plastic packaging and recycling that are referenced around the world. While these guidelines, and many others related to sustainability and recycling, are helpful, they are also voluntary. He said the UN treaty needs to have some level of standardization. Having a global standard will allow countries to work together along the plastic waste chain to promote a more circular system of reuse and recycling at every stage of life for plastics. Simon agrees with this point, noting that the policies of individual companies, states or countries are not enough to solve the overall problem. "That's why we have the process to develop global agreements, because those come about when countries realize they cannot solve a problem on their own, that it needs to be something that is coordinated," she said. "It's not going to solve for everything, but it has the ability to create this coordination [and] standardization." In the three Rs of sustainability, reduction comes before reuse and recycling. The panelists agreed that the first step to reducing waste is to reduce the production of new, or virgin, plastics. Alexander said that using recycled materials instead of virgin materials reduces energy utilization and greenhouse gas emissions by about 80 percent. He added that policymakers and other stakeholders say they would love to use more recycled material, but the price is too high. "When you're taking a material and you're adding to it, there is a cost," he said. "And typically, recycled costs more money than virgin. That is the reason or excuse that is used a lot for why we don't have a market for recycled material." But McCauley notes that the cheaper upfront cost of producing virgin plastic is "deceptive" because countries will have to bear the environmental and public health costs of increased plastic waste. By pairing incentives, such as the threat of hefty fees for non-recyclable plastics, with investments in recycling and waste management, the panelists explained, countries can drive job growth and economic activity while achieving substantial environmental benefits. For example, Maryland and Washington recently joined California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota and Oregon in adopting extended producer responsibility (EPR) policies that hold plastic producers accountable for the costs of dealing with the management of end-of-life plastics. "There's just money on the table for us through EPR systems because it creates a more valuable product, more jobs, it creates more domestic production and for companies, it helps them to have clear guidelines of how they can produce, where they design, and where it should go so that they can get it back again and use it over and over again," Simon said. Looking ahead to the next round of UN treaty talks in Geneva, Switzerland, next month, the panelists were overall hopeful and determined to get a result that will make a real impact. "I am, by construction, an optimist," McCauley said. "I think that the world has got the memo that this is a grand problem. I'll underline again, that this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for us to actually come together and solve this. So this makes me want to move as far forward as we can with this international solution."
