logo
SASSA puts concerns to rest: Grants continue throughout review period

SASSA puts concerns to rest: Grants continue throughout review period

The Citizen10-07-2025
The South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) has assured beneficiaries that no social grants have been suspended amid ongoing eligibility reviews currently underway.
SASSA confirmed that while some grants may experience momentary delays during the review process, this does not amount to a suspension. The review aims to confirm eligibility, prevent fraudulent claims, and ensure public funds are used responsibly.
'This review is not a punitive measure to deliberately exclude any deserving beneficiary,' said SASSA CEO Themba Matlou. 'It is intended to ensure continued eligibility and prevent misuse of public funds.'
Why the review is happening
The review process helps SASSA:
Confirm changes in beneficiaries' financial, medical, or legal circumstances.
Prevent grants from being paid to deceased individuals or those who have relocated without updating records.
Detect cases where individuals receive grants while appearing on other payroll systems.
Matlou reminded beneficiaries of their legal obligation to disclose all sources of income during their initial application and to report any changes in financial circumstances. Failure to do so may lead to corrective action.
What affected beneficiaries should do
Beneficiaries affected by the review process are urged to visit their nearest SASSA office with the following documents:
Valid SA ID (green barcoded ID or smart ID card).
Proof of income (e.g., payslips, pension slips, or affidavits if unemployed).
Bank statements for the last three months for all active accounts.
Proof of residence (e.g., utility bill).
Medical referral report (if applicable).
Marriage certificate or divorce decree (if applicable).
Death certificate (if applicable).
Relevant documents for the grant type (e.g., birth certificates for Child Support Grants).
If a beneficiary is bedridden, a procurator can be appointed to represent them. Contact your local SASSA office for assistance in appointing one.
SASSA has urged beneficiaries to comply with review requests promptly. Failing to respond to official communication may result in delays in payments, suspension or lapsing of grants, and possible legal action.
SASSA is working to automate the review process by introducing online self-service platforms to ease the burden on local offices and reduce queues.
Updated asset and income thresholds
As of 1 April 2025:
Older persons, disability, and war veterans' grants: Single asset threshold: R1,524,600 Married asset threshold: R3,049,200 Annual income limit: R107,880 (single), R215,760 (married)
Child Support Grant: Annual income limit: R67,200 (single), R134,400 (married)
Care Dependency Grant: Annual income limit: R277,200 (married)
Covid-19 Social Relief of Distress: R624 monthly means test remains applicable.
For more information, beneficiaries are encouraged to visit their nearest SASSA office or visit www.sassa.gov.za.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Polokwane to Pretoria in 90 minutes? Bullet train project moves ahead
Polokwane to Pretoria in 90 minutes? Bullet train project moves ahead

The Citizen

timean hour ago

  • The Citizen

Polokwane to Pretoria in 90 minutes? Bullet train project moves ahead

POLOKWANE – Plans for a high-speed bullet train connecting Gauteng and Limpopo are steadily gaining traction as both provincial governments confirm progress in the pre-construction phase of the ambitious Limpopo-Gauteng Speed Train Project. First introduced in 2023, the project aims to develop a 500km high-speed rail line linking Pretoria to Polokwane, with the potential to extend as far as Musina, transforming long-distance travel in South Africa's northern corridor. Read more: Feasibility study for Gauteng-Limpopo speed train begins In a joint statement, the Limpopo and Gauteng governments stated that feasibility studies and environmental impact assessments are currently underway and are expected to be concluded by mid-2025. These evaluations are critical to ensuring compliance with safety, economic, and environmental standards before construction can commence. One of the primary concerns under investigation is the acquisition of land. The proposed railway must pass through privately owned properties and communities, and negotiations with landowners will play a pivotal role in determining the project's pace and success. If these early stages proceed as planned, construction could begin in late 2026, with the first phase – between Pretoria and Polokwane – potentially operational by 2030. You might also want to read: Inter-provincial speed train idea gains momentum Currently, the intended route's distance of five hours takes five to six hours by car. The bullet train, travelling at high speeds, could reduce this travel time to approximately 90 minutes, dramatically improving mobility for residents, tourists and business travellers alike. The project is designed in two phases: Phase 1: High-speed rail from Pretoria to Polokwane. Phase 2: Expansion beyond Polokwane to key stops, including Hammanskraal, Bela-Bela, Mokopane, Louis Trichardt and Musina. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

SARS refunds R10.6 billion to 5.8 million auto assessed SA tax payers
SARS refunds R10.6 billion to 5.8 million auto assessed SA tax payers

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

SARS refunds R10.6 billion to 5.8 million auto assessed SA tax payers

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has hailed a significant milestone in its digital transformation drive, confirming that 5.8 million taxpayers were issued auto assessments this year – an increase from 5 million in 2024. According to SARS Commissioner Edward Kieswetter, 99.6% of these assessments remained unchanged by taxpayers, underscoring the growing accuracy and public trust in the automated system. So far, R10.6 billion in refunds have been paid to qualifying taxpayers – within 72 hours of assessment. That's an average refund of R1 828. 'Auto assessment has truly been a game changer,' Kieswetter said. 'We are delivering faster, more efficient services that remove the need for in-person visits, making it easier for taxpayers to comply.' SARS auto assessment is a system where SARS pre-fills tax returns using third-party data, such as salary, medical aid, and retirement contributions. For most taxpayers, no action is required, unless they need to add missing information via eFiling or the SARS MobiApp. The auto assessment period ran from 7 to 20 July 2025, ahead of the manual filing season opening on 21 July. SARS also reported a dramatic increase in the use of digital platforms: 10.2 million unique logins to SARS platforms since 4 July 2.1 million digital queries processed 1.1 million handled via the SARS Online Query System (SOQS) 707 000 via WhatsApp 290 000 through the Lwazi Chat Bot 'Ultimately, our aim is to make the best service to be no service at all,' Kieswetter said, reiterating SARS's vision to make tax compliance seamless and digital-first. Auto-assessments : 7–20 July 2025 : 7–20 July 2025 Individual Taxpayers : 21 July – 20 October 2025 : 21 July – 20 October 2025 Provisional Taxpayers and Trusts: 21 July 2025 – 19 January 2026 Most online submissions now receive an assessment outcome in under 5 seconds, supported by AI-driven risk detection tools that help block fraudulent or impermissible refunds. With the growing use of online services, SARS is also warning taxpayers to remain alert for scams. They stressed that SARS will never send clickable links via email or SMS. Phishing attempts should be reported to phishing@ SARS reminded those who owe tax to make payment arrangements promptly to avoid penalties and interest. Only refunds over R100 will be automatically paid into taxpayer accounts. As the 2025 filing season officially begins, SARS is encouraging all taxpayers to use digital channels rather than visiting physical service centres. 'There is no need to queue. Use our digital tools to get assessed and stay compliant,' Kieswetter concluded. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Fingers pointed at eThekwini Municipality over alleged wasteful expenditure on overpriced smart meters
Fingers pointed at eThekwini Municipality over alleged wasteful expenditure on overpriced smart meters

IOL News

time10 hours ago

  • IOL News

Fingers pointed at eThekwini Municipality over alleged wasteful expenditure on overpriced smart meters

The eThekwini Municipality's procurement of water meters has come under scrutiny Image: Supplied The eThekwini Municipality finds itself under scrutiny once more, amidst concerning allegations of wasteful expenditure following a recent procurement of electricity smart meters. Officials opted to purchase these devices from the highest bidders rather than the lowest quote suppliers, triggering concern among residents and stakeholders alike regarding potential misconduct and improper financial practices. Sources indicate that this decision suggests an attempt to bypass a qualified supplier that provided the lowest bid — a move that raises various questions. In what many perceive to be an alarming indicator of corruption, it has been alleged that officials may seek kickbacks from these more expensive suppliers. In May 2024, the National Treasury approved the RT29 national transversal contract for smart metering, identifying seven companies for the municipality to choose from for their needs. However, documents acquired by Independent Media reveal a shocking deviation from standard procurement practices. The eThekwini Municipality ordered 2,000 smart meters priced at R2,591 per unit from one supplier, while another supplier quoted a mere R1,645 per unit. The total cost indicated that the city spent R5.9 million for these overpriced devices. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading This instance of poor financial decision-making apparently didn't stop there. The municipality additionally procured non-smart meters at R1,996 per unit, accumulating a further cost of R4.5 million. With the distinction between smart and non-smart meters being that the former can be remotely disconnected by officials, while the latter necessitates physical travel for disconnection, questions loom large over why non-smart versions were even necessary. A source privy to the procurement process has expressed concern, stating, 'This is another instance of wasteful expenditure incurred by the city. There was no valid reason why the officials chose to purchase the same product with the same quality from different suppliers with varying prices. Surely, there is something fishy.' Attempts to obtain clarity from the municipality's communications team went unanswered as of Wednesday, leaving many to speculate on the motivations behind these decisions. This incident comes in the wake of previous controversies linked to the municipality's financial management. Just recently, the city faced a harsh financial penalty, having to pay over R20 million to a supplier, an amount accumulated from interest on a court appeal that the municipality lost. While the initial amount claimed was R30 million, the city disputed the claims but ultimately lost their case. DAILY NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store