Analyst Questions Commanders Defense Ahead of 2025
After a season of shock and awe and surprising many opponents early, the Washington Commanders made their first NFC championship game appearance since 1991 last year.
That's thanks in large part to a rebuilt coaching staff, a rookie quarterback phenom and a new ownership group.
In 2025, the Commanders won't surprise anyone, and opponents will be better prepared for the Jayden Daniels-led offense.
Knowing that, can the defense keep up and make sure the team is competitive?
Bleacher Report's Alex Ballentine believes the defense still needs some work heading into training camp.
'It's not hard to love the offense. Jayden Daniels is a transformational talent. They added Laremy Tunsil and Deebo Samuel to give them a legitimate franchise left tackle and sidekick to Terry McLaurin," Ballentine wrote. "The defense is another story. The Commanders' moves on that side of the ball were less splashy. They added Jonathan Jones and Deatrich Wise, but both are on the wrong side of 30. Will Harris is coming off his best season in New Orleans, but he isn't a needle-mover. Javon Kinlaw and Eddie Goldman should help with interior line depth, but neither is going to take the group to the next level.
'The good news for Washington is that Dan Quinn has a great track record of getting the most out of his defenses. But if the Commanders don't live up to the hype in Daniels' second season, it's most likely because the defense just didn't materialize.'
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 17, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Louisville football could be sleeper in ACC race: Transfer QB Miller Moss holds key
CHARLOTTE, NC — This episode of The C.L. Brown Show was taped live on location at the ACC Kickoff and features college football reporter David Ubben of The Athletic, Fiesta Bowl CEO Erik Moses and California head coach Justin Wilcox. Ubben tells why, even though Clemson is the favorite, he wouldn't be surprised if Louisville finds itself competing in the ACC championship game. Moses explains why even if the College Football Playoff expands, first-round games belong on campus. As Wilcox brings Cal to its first game at Louisville, he tells why he always expects a quarterback under U of L coach Jeff Brohm to play well. A new episode of this podcast, hosted by Courier Journal sports columnist C.L. Brown, posts each Wednesday. You can listen to The C.L. Brown Show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcast, Audible, CastBox and iHeartRadio, among others. More from C.L. Brown Louisville football doesn't need to top Clemson. Being second in ACC should rate CFP bid Pat Kelsey has Louisville basketball recruiting at all-time high Kentucky basketball's Mark Pope has landed homegrown stars. Tyran Stokes would be big win Fear shouldn't derail Run 4 Roses basketball tournament or city of Louisville Kentucky football's Mark Stoops is on ropes. But don't count him out in SEC Reach sports columnist C.L. Brown at clbrown1@ follow him on X at @CLBrownHoops and subscribe to his newsletter at to make sure you never miss one of his columns. This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Louisville football: Jeff Brohm team will be factor in ACC race


New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
ESPN and NFL closing in on ‘Next Era'-defining media deal
In 1987, an eight-year-old cable network in just 41 million homes acquired the rights to eight NFL regular season Sunday night games and the Pro Bowl. The then-up-and-coming ESPN paid a now-quaint $51 million per season to the NFL for the three-year package, and it changed the trajectory of what became arguably the most powerful sports media company of all time. ESPN was built on a lot of things, but the most notable was its nearly four-decade relationship with the league. Advertisement Now, according to sources briefed on negotiations, ESPN and the NFL are inside the five-yard line on another ground-breaking deal that may not have the impact of 1987 but could be historic, as the all-sports network makes its programming available in a direct-to-consumer product this fall that will cost $29.99 per month. ESPN is hyping this upcoming iteration as 'The Next Era.' While a contract between ESPN and the NFL is not signed, the two sides have been closing in on talks that first began four years ago, heated up a little more than a year and half ago and now are the closest they have ever been, with the league even informing its owners they may be needed for a vote on it early next month, as first reported by Sports Business Journal. Until a deal is across the goal line, it is not done – and the minute details, which the sides are said to be working around the clock on, matter. All that said, it's a big deal. The NFL and ESPN declined to comment for this column. In 1987, ESPN used NFL games as a battering ram to increase the fees it charged cable subscribers. By 2011, that once-little network was in 100 million homes, it called itself, 'The Worldwide Leader in Sports,' and it wasn't wrong. Today, still strong, but diminished, ESPN charges more than $10 per month for its services, but with the digital revolution, the rise of Netflix and other streaming options has resulted in just 65.3 million homes receiving ESPN through cable, satellite and services like YouTube TV and Fubo, according to Nielsen. ESPN wants to maintain as many of those viewers as it can. Those subscribers will be able to have access to ESPN in its traditional format, while adding the ability to log on to the new and improved direct-to-consumer app, launching soon. The same way a generation first turned to ESPN on cable, the Disney-owned network hopes the ESPN app becomes the ultimate go-to for sports fans. That leads back to the NFL. Advertisement The NFL has tried for years to unload many of its media assets, including NFL Media (which operates NFL Network and Red Zone Channel, among other entities), and there is optimism that it will finally happen. The league has had some success with its in-house creations, but in a media ecosystem that is more scattered, it may finally be ready to let someone else manage them – for a pretty penny, of course. The exact amount of money or equity that Disney/ESPN would pay is not yet known, but it will be enormous. There is expected to be a regulatory period that will need approval before everything goes into effect. The process may take nine months, give or take. What could be in the deal is the Red Zone Channel, NFL Network, seven regular-season games that appear on NFL Network, enhanced betting and fantasy league possibilities. There may be more. Red Zone is the Sunday afternoon show that takes viewers inside all the stadiums when teams are threatening to score. This could be a boon for ESPN's app, as well as in its future negotiations with cable and operators for its slew of networks. It could upsell Red Zone in the app, as well as demand more from operators (like YouTube TV, Fubo or cable systems) to continue to offer the service on its platform every Sunday in the fall. The NFL Network, under ESPN, would likely be enhanced. ESPN's main channels would still feature the NFL a lot of the time, but the devoted network would be on 24/7. NFL Network has seen years of layoffs and downsizing, and while ESPN will likely take advantage of overlapping jobs to cut costs, it will also want to make NFL Network even more of a must-watch. With sports betting and fantasy becoming an increasing part of the fan experience, ESPN can be expected to use its potentially enlarged user base integration into its new direct-to-consumer app for what it will likely hope is a transformative experience and increased subscriber growth. Advertisement In 2024, of the 100 highest-rated programs on television, 72 were NFL games. This does not appear to be changing anytime soon. With increased NFL competition from Amazon Prime Video on Thursday nights, Netflix on Christmas and now, for the first time, YouTube, for the second game of the 2025 season from Brazil, to go along with fellow traditional players such as Fox, NBC and CBS, a closer relationship for ESPN with the league would seem to make sense. ESPN already pays $2.7 billion per season for 25 games a year, mostly on Monday Nights. It will have ESPN's first Super Bowl on its platforms, including its sister network, ABC, in February 2027. This potential new agreement is probably not as transformative as 1987, but the sports streaming battle is about to have a historic marker in the fall when ESPN's direct-to-consumer launches, with possibly even more NFL in its portfolio. When 'The next era begins,' ESPN's first big move may be using its old playbook. (Top photo of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell: Stacy Revere / Getty Images)
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
West Ham United Secure Signing For This Versatile Player: A Good Signing For The Hammers?
West Ham United have been floating between inconsistency and ups and downs for several seasons now. Despite some moments of brilliance in European competition, their performance in the Premier League has shown constant cracks in their system. The arrival of Graham Potter marked the start of a rebuilding process, and the team is now looking for players with elite experience but without inflating the budget. The losses in defence have left a gaping hole that is more noticeable with each passing week, and while signings are arriving in dribs and drabs, the need to reinforce the defensive flanks is becoming urgent. In that scenario, it is not surprising that the club has kept the radar active even on players who are not necessarily big headline signings. One of them has been Kyle Walker-Peters. With Southampton relegated and the player out of contract, several teams were on the lookout for him. There were contacts with clubs in Turkey, and his name was linked with Besiktas, but that move fell through. It was then that the Londoners sniffed out the opportunity and made a move fast. An opportunity that fell from the sky for West Ham United West Ham have now signed the English full-back. Kyle Walker-Peters, 28 years old, will arrive on a free after finishing his contract with Southampton. The club will offer him a deal until 2028, completing his signing after he passed his medical in London. The defender has the advantage of being able to play on both the right and left, something that appealed to the board. The collapse of his move to Turkey opened the door for this unexpected move. With the departure of Coufal, Cresswell and the imminent departure of Emerson Palmieri, Potter needed to find quick solutions. Walker-Peters fits right in where it is most needed. He has Premier League experience, possesses pace at his disposal and a good tactical reading of the game. His profile fits the style of play the manager wants to implement. The Englishman is not a full-back who shines with his stats, but he delivers consistently, and that is worth a lot in a squad that is looking for balance and depth. Opinion: A sober and necessary move The arrival of Walker-Peters seems a smart response to the team's urgency. He is not a media figure, but he is someone who knows what it takes to compete every week in the Premier League. His no-cost signing allows the club to avoid committing valuable resources. That financial flexibility may prove key to closing in on other reinforcements further up the pitch. In addition, the Englishman's experience may make it easier to adapt to a system that will demand intensity and order. On a tactical level, he brings an obvious advantage. Not many defenders offer guarantees on either flank, and with a coach like Potter, who values versatility, the English full-back could play an important role from day one. That said, how well he performs will depend on how well he gets to grips with the new coaching staff. If Kyle can adapt quickly, he could be a starter for much of the season. He won't solve all of West Ham's problems, but he does plug a gaping hole that needed to be filled.