Barroso: EU shouldn't be a ‘geopolitical teenager' faced with China
'Europe should not be a kind of geopolitical teenager. We have to become adults responsible for our own future,' Barroso, who helmed the EU executive between 2004 and 2014, said in an interview ahead of the EU-China summit taking place on Thursday in Beijing.
'Instead of criticising others, what we have to do is our own homework,' he went on, adding that 'it's not because of China or the US' that the EU doesn't yet have a fully-integrated single market for services or capital, or a joint European defence.
'I insist, this should be a wake-up call for Europe to do its own homework, instead of putting blame on others.'
Thursday's EU-China summit had promised to be an opportunity to reinvigorate EU-China ties: it falls on the fiftieth anniversary of bilateral relations between Brussels and Beijing and comes as Trump's unpredictable trade policies throw world trading relations into disarray.
But hopes of a reset have been dashed by simmering tensions over a range of issues, chief among them China's state-subsidised overproduction, which risks inflating an already-devastating EU trade deficit of €305.8 billion per year with China.
Trade disputes have also escalated after the EU imposed tariffs on China-made electric vehicles (EVs) last year, citing Beijing's unfair use of subsidies that push EU competitors out of the market. It triggered a tit-for-tat trade conflict, with Beijing launching anti-subsidy probes into EU-made brandy, pork and dairy products.
Asked whether there was still hope of the summit yielding a breakthrough, Barroso was clear: 'Frankly, I don't see that happening. I see a lot of tension.'
'I don't expect this summit to be the forward-looking, commemorative moment that in principle we would like to see.'
During the decade Barroso was head of the EU executive, China consolidated its position as the world's second-largest economy. His Commission refrained from granting China so-called "market economy status" in a bid to shield the 27-country bloc from dumping.
Talks for an investment deal known as the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) were also launched under Barroso, but the ratification of the deal later stalled in the European Parliament.
Asked whether he felt more could have been done then to foresee how China could balloon its trade surplus with global partners and develop a near-monopoly on critical supply chains, Barroso defended his Commission: 'I don't think it's very useful to judge the political decisions of a certain moment in the light of what happened afterwards. Because a political leader decides on the basis of the information he has at that moment.'
'The question is, were those the right decisions according to the information available at that moment? And yes, I believe they were.'
Also stalling any prospects of a detente between both sides is China's position on Russia's war in Ukraine. Brussels accuses Beijing of being a 'key enabler' of the war through its 'no-limits' trade and economic partnership with Moscow.
The EU executive estimates that China supplies 80% of the dual-used goods that end up in Russian weapons.
'Traditionally, China has been always saying they are for multilateral order, that they are for the respect of international law,' Barroso explained.
'But now, in a case that is the most evident case of the last decades, of a clear violation of international law (..) Russia, invading its neighbour Ukraine, taking parts of its territory, China is not able to say just a single word of criticism to Russia.'
'This is, of course, very difficult for the Europeans to accept.'
Watch the full interview live on Europe Today at 8.00 CET on July 24.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
'The slide into climate despair occurs when the conviction sets in that... no, we won't make it'
The summer of 2025 has already broken temperature records in many European countries. Heatwaves, megafires, floods, and other extreme weather events have followed one another, each setting new records in their respective categories. With each passing year, it has become increasingly tangible what climate disruption means. This reality should naturally push politicians and citizens to action. Yet, it is rarely the case. For the "why-bother-about-climate" crowd – citizens, decision-makers, and politicians alike – it is, instead, yet another excuse for inaction: "It's too late, everything is already lost, so if it's lost, why deprive yourself or change your habits?" In a global domino effect, these battalions of resignation have grown, acting as de facto allies of climate skeptics and swelling the ranks of the pro-inaction lobby. It is therefore crucial to understand the roots of this way of thinking and to show that it is misguided. Every gain is worth pursuing Eco-anxiety is based on a combination of specific factors: awareness of the importance of the ecological problem, coupled with a sense of personal powerlessness, which the multiplication of crises and the inadequate political and civic response can sometimes turn into pathological anxiety. The question that obsesses those with climate anxiety is whether we can make it. Will we meet the targets? Targets for emissions reduction, for levels of warming, for developing solutions...? The slide into climate despair happens quickly once the conviction sets in that "no, we won't make it." At that point, lacking an alternative perspective, it is tempting to turn despair into a kind of blasé resignation, which is easier to live with. This whole line of reasoning needs to be challenged. If the answer is hopelessness, it is because the question is wrong. Why should the fight against climate change be the only public policy whose value is measured solely by its ability to meet its targets? Do we stop working as soon as it is clear that economic targets will not be met? Do we stop obeying traffic laws when we realize that road safety targets will not be achieved? For the vast majority of citizens, the answer is obviously no. Everyone understands that what matters is a progressive and collective approach, and that targets, even if only partially reached, already constitute progress.
Fashion Network
5 hours ago
- Fashion Network
France lashes out as EU agrees to tariff pact with Washington
France has denounced the new trade agreement between the European Union and the United States as a 'submission,' even as most EU members acknowledged the deal was unequal but necessary to avoid an economically damaging trade war with Washington. The framework agreement, announced Sunday between two economies representing nearly a third of global trade, allows the U.S. to impose a 15% import tariff on most EU goods starting next month. The deal offers limited protection for key sectors, including the automotive and pharmaceutical industries. While the 15% rate is half of what Washington initially threatened, it still exceeds European expectations significantly. U.S. President Donald Trump, who has sought to reshape global trade using tariff leverage since returning to the White House earlier this year, praised the accord during a visit to Scotland, calling it 'the biggest deal ever made.' But France, the EU's second-largest economy, was outspoken in its disapproval. 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission,' French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X (formerly Twitter). French President Emmanuel Macron has made no public statement on the matter. While the mood across Europe was subdued, most governments agreed that failing to reach an agreement would have triggered a far worse scenario. 'This agreement has succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard,' said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, whose country leads the EU bloc's economic rankings. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said during a press conference that allowing 30% tariffs to be imposed would have been 'much, much worse.' 'This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances,' he added. Some member states acknowledged the deal provides stability following months of trade tensions with the U.S. Sweden described it as the 'least bad alternative,' while Spain supported it 'without enthusiasm.' A final deal will likely require ratification from EU capitals. Still work to do Because trade policy falls under the European Commission's authority, French objections are unlikely to derail the framework agreement. However, the deal has not yet been finalised. Many of the agreement's specifics remain unknown. EU officials said they expect clarification in a joint statement to be released by August 1. Additional negotiations will follow to turn the agreement into a full-fledged deal. Germany also called for further negotiations, particularly regarding the steel sector. President Trump said the deal—alongside an investment package that exceeds the Japan agreement signed last week—would strengthen trans-Atlantic relations after years of what he described as unfair treatment of U.S. exporters. Japan's package will include up to $550 billion in equity, loans and guarantees from state-run agencies, to be invested at Trump's discretion, according to Tokyo. In contrast, EU officials stated that the EU's $600 billion investment figure is based on non-binding intentions from the private sector. The agreement is expected to bring regulatory clarity to European industries, including those in the automotive, aerospace, and chemical sectors. However, EU negotiators had originally pushed for a zero-for-zero tariff deal. A 15% tariff remains significantly higher than the U.S.'s average import tariff rate of 2.5% before Trump's return. More clarity, but a challenge European stocks opened higher on Monday, with the STOXX 600 reaching a four-month high. Tech and healthcare sectors led the gains. 'The 15% rate is better than the market was fearing,' said Jefferies economist Mohit Kumar. Still, many European businesses remain conflicted about the outcome. 'Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm,' said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association (VCI). 'Further escalation has been avoided. Nevertheless, the price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. U.S. customers are paying the tariffs.' A major concern remains how the EU's promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. and sharply increase energy imports can be realized. It remains unclear whether specific investment pledges have been made, or if the details are still being finalized. While the EU has committed to $750 billion in strategic purchases over the next three years—including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and nuclear fuel—the U.S. may struggle to meet the demand. Though U.S. LNG production capacity is expected to nearly double over the next four years, analysts say it still won't be enough to meet Europe's needs. Oil production forecasts have also been revised downward. Despite the uncertainties, analysts say the deal has reduced market instability. Oil prices edged up on Monday.
Fashion Network
5 hours ago
- Fashion Network
France lashes out as EU agrees to tariff pact with Washington
France has denounced the new trade agreement between the European Union and the United States as a 'submission,' even as most EU members acknowledged the deal was unequal but necessary to avoid an economically damaging trade war with Washington. The framework agreement, announced Sunday between two economies representing nearly a third of global trade, allows the U.S. to impose a 15% import tariff on most EU goods starting next month. The deal offers limited protection for key sectors, including the automotive and pharmaceutical industries. While the 15% rate is half of what Washington initially threatened, it still exceeds European expectations significantly. U.S. President Donald Trump, who has sought to reshape global trade using tariff leverage since returning to the White House earlier this year, praised the accord during a visit to Scotland, calling it 'the biggest deal ever made.' But France, the EU's second-largest economy, was outspoken in its disapproval. 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission,' French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X (formerly Twitter). French President Emmanuel Macron has made no public statement on the matter. While the mood across Europe was subdued, most governments agreed that failing to reach an agreement would have triggered a far worse scenario. 'This agreement has succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard,' said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, whose country leads the EU bloc's economic rankings. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said during a press conference that allowing 30% tariffs to be imposed would have been 'much, much worse.' 'This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances,' he added. Some member states acknowledged the deal provides stability following months of trade tensions with the U.S. Sweden described it as the 'least bad alternative,' while Spain supported it 'without enthusiasm.' A final deal will likely require ratification from EU capitals. Still work to do Because trade policy falls under the European Commission's authority, French objections are unlikely to derail the framework agreement. However, the deal has not yet been finalised. Many of the agreement's specifics remain unknown. EU officials said they expect clarification in a joint statement to be released by August 1. Additional negotiations will follow to turn the agreement into a full-fledged deal. Germany also called for further negotiations, particularly regarding the steel sector. President Trump said the deal—alongside an investment package that exceeds the Japan agreement signed last week—would strengthen trans-Atlantic relations after years of what he described as unfair treatment of U.S. exporters. Japan's package will include up to $550 billion in equity, loans and guarantees from state-run agencies, to be invested at Trump's discretion, according to Tokyo. In contrast, EU officials stated that the EU's $600 billion investment figure is based on non-binding intentions from the private sector. The agreement is expected to bring regulatory clarity to European industries, including those in the automotive, aerospace, and chemical sectors. However, EU negotiators had originally pushed for a zero-for-zero tariff deal. A 15% tariff remains significantly higher than the U.S.'s average import tariff rate of 2.5% before Trump's return. More clarity, but a challenge European stocks opened higher on Monday, with the STOXX 600 reaching a four-month high. Tech and healthcare sectors led the gains. 'The 15% rate is better than the market was fearing,' said Jefferies economist Mohit Kumar. Still, many European businesses remain conflicted about the outcome. 'Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm,' said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association (VCI). 'Further escalation has been avoided. Nevertheless, the price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. U.S. customers are paying the tariffs.' A major concern remains how the EU's promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. and sharply increase energy imports can be realized. It remains unclear whether specific investment pledges have been made, or if the details are still being finalized. While the EU has committed to $750 billion in strategic purchases over the next three years—including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and nuclear fuel—the U.S. may struggle to meet the demand. Though U.S. LNG production capacity is expected to nearly double over the next four years, analysts say it still won't be enough to meet Europe's needs. Oil production forecasts have also been revised downward. Despite the uncertainties, analysts say the deal has reduced market instability. Oil prices edged up on Monday.
