logo
The Mattiacio Group Becomes Largest Franchisee in Ziebart's System with 17-Store Acquisition

The Mattiacio Group Becomes Largest Franchisee in Ziebart's System with 17-Store Acquisition

Yahoo3 days ago
The Mattiacio Group will own and operate 26 Ziebart stores across New York, Florida, Indiana, and Ohio
The strategic sale underscores the strength of the automotive aftermarket brand and its franchise network
No changes are expected in daily operations as The Mattiacio Group remains committed to providing the same best-in-class services to its new markets
TROY, Mich., July 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Ziebart, the global leader in vehicle appearance and protection services, proudly announces a major milestone in its franchise history: The Mattiacio Group, a longtime and highly respected operator group, has acquired 17 additional Ziebart stores from The Harris Group. With this strategic acquisition, The Mattiacio Group becomes the largest ownership team within Ziebart's U.S. franchise system, now operating 26 locations across New York, Indiana, Ohio, and Florida.
"This is a defining moment for the Ziebart family," said Thomas A. Wolfe, President & Chief Executive Officer of Ziebart. "The Mattiacio Group has long been a pillar of exceptional leadership, operational excellence, and brand advocacy within our system. We also extend our deep appreciation to The Harris Group's unwavering dedication to Ziebart over the last four decades. This transition honors both legacies while positioning Ziebart for an even stronger future."
A New Chapter for a Family-Led PowerhouseThe Mattiacio Group's roots in the Ziebart brand date back to 1989, when family patriarch Tony Mattiacio opened his first location. Since then, the group has grown to successfully operate nine high-performing Ziebart locations primarily in Buffalo and Rochester, New York as well as Fort Myers, Florida. The Mattiacio Group evolved into a family business throughout the years, with Tony Mattiacio's children – Mark, Zach, Ryan, and Meghan – all playing a role on the leadership team. Earlier this year, Tony Mattiacio transitioned ownership of the group to the next generation, while retaining his role as CEO.
"We have always believed in the power of the Ziebart brand," said Tony Mattiacio, Chief Executive Officer of The Mattiacio Group. "This acquisition is about building on the foundation established by Jim Harris and his team, while continuing to invest in the people and processes that make Ziebart an industry leader. We're excited to bring our family values and growth mindset to even more communities."
Honoring a Legacy of Franchise ExcellenceThe Harris Group, led by franchise veteran Jim Harris since 2015, has built a strong reputation for operational excellence and community service across 17 locations, primarily in the Indianapolis and Dayton markets. The acquisition comes following Harris' decision to enter retirement. As part of the transition, the team is proud to announce the promotion of Brandi Gehring to the position of President, where she'll oversee daily operations and report directly to the Board of Directors. Gehring has worked with The Harris Group's Ziebart stores for over 20 years, working her way up from Customer Service Representative to most recently Chief Financial Officer. There will be no changes to day-to-day operations across The Harris Group as a result of the acquisition.
"The Harris Group's contributions to the brand are immeasurable, and we thank them for their decades of dedication," said Wolfe. "As The Mattiacio Group integrates these new stores, their leadership is committed to supporting staff, maintaining high service standards, and creating new opportunities for growth. Ziebart customers will continue to receive the same trusted services, backed by Ziebart's industry-leading expertise."
This milestone merger was made possible through a unique partnership between The Mattiacio Group and five outstanding members from The Harris Group: Gehring, Tim LeMasters, Darron Woodward, Ron Derksen, and John Mongaraz. As each of these individuals have each been instrumental in building and leading The Harris Group over the years, they'll enter this next chapter as equity partners.
"At The Mattiacio Group, we believe in building strong companies by building strong teams," said Zach Mattiacio, Chief Financial Officer of The Mattiacio Group. "This transition not only honors Jim Harris' legacy, but also ensures the business remains in the hands of the talented leaders who helped make it great."
For more information on franchise opportunities with Ziebart, please visit www.ziebart.com/franchise-opportunities. To find a Ziebart near you, visit www.ziebart.com.
About ZiebartFounded in 1959, Ziebart International Corporation is the worldwide leader in premium automotive appearance and protection services that extend the life of vehicles. All Ziebart products and services are made and sourced in the United States. Ziebart operates over 400 locations, with more than 1,000 car dealer partners, in 37 countries. Ziebart continues to grow and offers domestic and international franchising opportunities, a best-in-class investment for qualified prospects. For more information about Ziebart including franchise opportunities, please visit www.ziebart.com.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-mattiacio-group-becomes-largest-franchisee-in-ziebarts-system-with-17-store-acquisition-302517485.html
SOURCE Ziebart
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amazon Online Retail Sales Surged 11% In Second Quarter, Ahead Of Amazon Prime Day
Amazon Online Retail Sales Surged 11% In Second Quarter, Ahead Of Amazon Prime Day

Forbes

time42 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Amazon Online Retail Sales Surged 11% In Second Quarter, Ahead Of Amazon Prime Day

Online shoppers came out in full force to power 11% growth in Amazon online store sales, its largest reporting segment, and its second-largest, third-party seller services, advanced 11% in the second quarter ended June 30, all before the big Amazon Prime Day four-day sales event. Amazon Prime delivery person in van sorting packages, Queens, New York. (Photo by: Lindsey Nicholson/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Amazon total net revenues blew past estimates to reach $167.7 billion, up 13%, and net income rose 35% to $18.2 billion, yet investors were spooked by modest third-quarter earnings guidance and increased cloud and AI competition from Microsoft and Google, causing Amazon shares to slide 8% by week's end, according to CNBC. Amazon Web Services, its business-facing cloud segment, was the fastest-growing unit, up 17% to $30.9 billion, though growth slowed from 19% second quarter 2024 and lagged behind Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud, both of which reported growth over 30% this year. On the consumer side of business, Amazon's online store exceeded Wall Street's $59 billion estimates to reach $61.5 billion and grew more than twice as fast as last year's second quarter when online stores advanced by 5%. Services to its over two million third-party marketplace sellers bettered expectations to reach $40.3 billion, though it grew at about the same pace as last year's second quarter. Advertising services, an important profit driver, reached $15.7 billion, up 23% over previous year, and subscription services grew 12% to $12.2 billion. Third quarter 2025 guidance is for net sales to reach between $174.0 billion and $179.5 billion, a 10% to 13% increase, though operating income is expected to range between $15.5 billion and $20.5 billion, compared to $17.4 billion last year. 'There continues to be a lot of noise about the impact that tariffs will have on retail prices and consumption. Much of it thus far has been wrong and misreported,' CEO Andy Jassy said during the earnings call. He added, 'Through the first half of the year, we haven't yet seen diminishing demand nor prices meaningfully appreciating.' Key Background Amazon's online retail sales increase bettered the industry's 6% non-store sales growth in the second quarter. Second-quarter performance is particularly noteworthy because it doesn't include revenues generated during this year's Prime Day event held July 8-11, 2025. By comparison, second- quarter online revenues this year came in a shade higher than the $61.4 billion generated during last year's third quarter when Prime Day was held. Amazon also reported that Prime membership signups during the three weeks before this year's Prime Day broke records, as did the number of items sold in advance. All of which bodes well for a significant increase over last year's third quarter online store revenues. The long-awaited return of Nike products to Amazon gave this quarter's online sales a boost. Also generating greater customer engagement was the launch of new luxury brands on the platform, including Aveda, Marc Jacobs fragrances, Aveda, Origins and Milk Makeup. In addition, the Saks on Amazon platform added Dolce & Gabbana, Etro, Stella McCartney, Rosetta Getty, and La Prairie this quarter. The Amazon Essentials product line offering everyday low prices continues to gain new adherents and now represents one out of every three units sold. Amazon Pharmacy has advanced 50% year over year. In a new pilot Perishables service for customers ordering other items for same day delivery, it reported 'strong customer adoption' with 20% of customers returning multiple times in their first month. It is also leaning into faster delivery by expanding same-day and next-day delivery to millions of U.S. customers in 4,000 smaller cities, towns and rural communities by the end of 2025. What To Watch For Tariff's impact on Amazon retail prices remain to be seen, as Jassy said, 'It's impossible to know what will happen.' He gave no hint about how prices might be affected once Amazon's advanced inventory is depleted, nor did he reveal how the company or its third-party sellers would deal with prices as costs go up. However, he did state that no matter what happens, Amazon's prices are likely to be lower to consumers 'on the items they care about.' Further Reading Amazon's Gloomy Earnings Forecast Overshadows Better-Than-Expected Results (CNBC, 7/31/2025) Amazon Shares Fall Because Cloud Unit's Growth Wasn't Enough for Wall Street (WSJ, 7/31/2025) Forbes What Amazon Prime Day Sales Say About Upcoming Holiday Shopping Trends By Pamela N. Danziger Forbes Why Amazon's Move Into Rural America Won't Cut Walmart's Retail Lead By Pamela N. Danziger

Your next direct report might not be human. Are you ready to lead it?
Your next direct report might not be human. Are you ready to lead it?

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

Your next direct report might not be human. Are you ready to lead it?

BY We've spent decades building frameworks to help people lead teams: courses, certifications, coaching, culture decks. All aimed at shaping better managers of humans. But that's no longer enough. Because for many workers, their first report won't be a person. It'll be an agent. In June BNY Mellon onboarded 1,000 digital workers while JPMorgan Chase is building AI teams at scale. This isn't theoretical. The new direct reports are already clocked in and they don't need coffee, feedback, or PTO. The problem? Most organizations are still running on legacy management models built for human hierarchies and not set up to manage machines. Leading humans versus governing agents When you manage people, you guide behavior. You motivate, delegate, coach, and course correct. It's a loop built on trust and conversation. When you manage an AI, none of that applies. You don't coach a model. You govern it. You define inputs, monitor outputs, escalate issues, and answer for the consequences. And you do that in real time. In AI-led teams, leadership is less about motivation and more about judgment. The ability to assess, adjust, and act across decision chains is what separates performance from liability. It's knowing what good looks like. It's catching the drift, asking the right question before the system generates the wrong answer, and being accountable for outcomes, even when you didn't directly produce them. The HR model is out of sync HR isn't ready for this shift. Most performance frameworks still assume linear paths, human reports, and long-term role tenure. But digital agents break that logic. They don't climb ladders. They execute tasks. They can outperform junior staff one day and be outpaced by a new model the next. You don't manage their growth. You manage the conditions in which they operate. That shift puts pressure on organizational design itself. Hierarchies built for human oversight don't hold when decision loops involve systems acting faster than approvals can be processed. That means rethinking how we define productivity, collaboration, and leadership. It means building new metrics for how human employees interact with agents, not just what they produce on their own. Are they designing good prompts? Are they escalating ethical concerns? Are they reviewing outputs critically or rubber-stamping them? These are the new leadership signals. Most performance reviews aren't built to detect them. Prompting is a leadership act Prompting isn't a technical skill; it's a management one. The way you frame a prompt shapes what an agent does. Vague prompts lead to vague results. Biased prompts produce biased outcomes. And poor prompting isn't just inefficient. It can become a legal or reputational risk. Yet most companies treat prompting like its keyboard wizardry. Something for the engineers or the 'AI power users.' That's a mistake. Everyone managing agents, from interns to executives, needs to learn how to design clear, intentional instructions. Because prompts are decisions in disguise, shaped by where they sit in the organizational context and why they're being made. The ethics chain is breaking In traditional teams, ethics and escalation follow a chain of command. Something goes wrong, someone flags it, and a manager gets involved. But with agents acting independently and often invisibly, the chain breaks. You can't escalate what you don't notice. And too often, companies haven't defined what ethical escalation looks like when the actor is synthetic. Who's accountable when an AI produces a discriminatory recommendation? Or leaks sensitive information? Or makes a decision a human wouldn't? If your answer is 'the tech team,' you're not ready. Governance can't sit in the back office. It needs to be built into team workflows. The best companies are training their people to pause, question and report, not just accept what the system spits out. Chain of thought and chain of reasoning aren't just cognitive tricks. They're how human teams will spot drift, bias, and breakpoints in the AI value chain. And that skillset is only going to grow in importance. The bottom line AI won't replace all managers, but it will redefine what management means. Leading agents demands flexing a different muscle and most organizations haven't trained for it. This isn't about replacing soft skills with hard skills, but rather it's replacing passive management with active stewardship: less people-pleasing and more decision accountability, fewer status meetings and more escalation pathways. Managing machines still means leading people. But the people you lead need new tools, new rules, and a different playbook. The companies that get this right won't be the ones with the flashiest tech. They'll be the ones that know how to change the game by managing what they've built. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Brudenell (DCB) is the executive director of Decidr, Australia's only publicly listed AI company. With 25+ years of experience working across AI infrastructure, model development, and business transformation, David has held senior leadership positions in public, large private and startup companies from Sydney to San Francisco, including Appen (ASX:APX), Pureprofile (ASX:PPL), Eclipx (ASX:FPR), Flare (purchased by MYOB in 2023) and more. More

Columbia Sportswear sues Columbia University, alleging merchandise too similar and causes confusion
Columbia Sportswear sues Columbia University, alleging merchandise too similar and causes confusion

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Columbia Sportswear sues Columbia University, alleging merchandise too similar and causes confusion

For decades, T-shirts, sweatshirts and other clothing under the Columbia Sportswear brand and clothing emblazoned with the Columbia University name coexisted more or less peacefully without confusion. But now, the Portland-based outdoor retailer has sued the New York-based university over alleged trademark infringement and a breach of contract, among other charges. It claims that the university's merchandise looks too similar to what's being sold at more than 800 retail locations including more than 150 of its branded stores as well as its website and third-party marketplaces. In a lawsuit filed July 23 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Columbia Sportswear, whose roots date back to 1938, alleges that the university intentionally violated an agreement the parties signed on June 13, 2023. That agreement dictated how the university could use the word 'Columbia' on its own apparel. As part of the pact, the university could feature 'Columbia' on its merchandise provided that the name included a recognizable school insignia or its mascot, the word 'university,' the name of the academic department or the founding year of the university — 1754 — or a combination. But Columbia Sportswear alleges the university breached the agreement a little more than a year later, with the company noticing several garments without any of the school logos being sold at the Columbia University online store. Many of the garments feature a bright blue color that is 'confusingly similar' to the blue color that has long been associated with Columbia Sportswear, the suit alleged. The lawsuit offered photos of some of the Columbia University items that say only Columbia. 'The likelihood of deception, confusion, and mistake engendered by the university's misappropriation and misuse of the Columbia name is causing irreparable harm to the brand and goodwill symbolized by Columbia Sportswear's registered mark Columbia and the reputation for quality it embodies,' the lawsuit alleged. The lawsuit comes at a time when Columbia University has been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support. Last week, Columbia University reached a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. Under the agreement, the Ivy League school will pay a $200 million settlement over three years, the university said. Columbia Sportswear aims to stop all sales of clothing that violate the agreement, recall any products already sold and donate any remaining merchandise to charity. Columbia Sportswear is also seeking three times the amount of actual damages determined by a jury.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store