Citroen e-C4 vs Volkswagen ID.3: which affordable EV is best for the family?
There's a new buzzword in the world of electric vehicles – affordability. It seems that with each new model that's launched, prices become cheaper, while those EVs that have been around for a bit longer have seen a steady fall in their prices over time.
Take the Citroen e-C4 as an example. This electric crossover hatchback has been on the market since 2020, and during its time on sale it has gone through a number of revisions to keep it competitive. Most recently, the e-C4 benefited from a facelift to incorporate Citroen's latest family look, but the French firm also took the opportunity to knock around £4,000 off its list price, too. Advertisement - Article continues below
Volkswagen is another company that has constantly tinkered with its model line-up, and the ID.3 hatchback has been updated with the arrival of a new entry-level variant. Called Essential, it does exactly what it says by offering the smallest battery and lowest power output in the range, but still has enough kit to make it an attractive option.
So which model makes the best case for itself? Does the e-C4 offer great value? Or does the ID.3 deliver enough to justify its price tag? Model: Citroen e-C4 50kWh Plus Price: £27,650 Powertrain: 50kWh battery (50kWh usable), 1x e-motor, 134bhp 0-62mph: 10.0 seconds Test efficiency: 3.6 miles/kWh Official range: 219 miles Annual VED: £195
The Citroen e-C4 uses the same platform as cars such as the Peugeot 208 and Vauxhall Corsa superminis, but its dimensions are more like a compact hatchback's. As with those models, it also comes with petrol and hybrid powertrains, but here we're concentrating on the all-electric version. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below View 3 Series View Grandland X View Q4 e-tron
Prices start at £27,650, which is around £4,000 less than the pre-facelift model. This gets you a car with a 50kWh battery, while the top-spec Max model is the only one with the larger 54kWh pack.
Tester's notes
The e-C4's three drive modes are selected via a rocker switch next to the drive selector on the centre console, but as with other Stellantis models with this set-up, they seem a bit superfluous to me. The system defaults to Normal when you start the car, so you stick with that most of the time. Advertisement - Article continues below
Eco mode cuts the power, so it feels as if you need to work harder to maintain the same speed. Power adds a snappy throttle response that requires you to adjust your driving style to compensate. It feels at odds with the car's character.
One place where the e-C4's roots as a combustion-engined vehicle are most obvious is beneath the boot carpet. Lift it up and you'll find a circular recess for a spare wheel, but while the petrol C4 has a completely round indentation, the e-C4's is squared off to make space for the battery.
Ironically, not even the petrol version of the C4 has the option of a spare wheel – you'll just have to rely on the tyre pressure warning system and standard repair kit to keep you going if you suffer any damage. Model: Volkswagen ID.3 Essential Price: £30,860 Powertrain: 55kWh battery (52kWh usable), 1x e-motor, 168bhp 0-62mph: 8.2 seconds Test efficiency: 4.1 miles/kWh Official range: 241 miles Annual VED: £195
It's been five years since the Volkswagen ID.3 kicked off the electrification of VW's line-up, and since then it has been joined by a range of models that use largely the same running gear. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
The ID.3 itself was given a facelift in 2023, while the Essential model tested here has helped lower the overall starting price of the line-up. At £30,860, it falls between the 50kWh and 54kWh versions of the e-C4 on price, while the battery is rated with a usable capacity of 52kWh, which VW says is enough for a range of 241 miles. Advertisement - Article continues below
Tester's notes
I think Match trim adds enough extra to the ID.3 to justify its mark-up over the Essential version. Alloy wheels look smarter than the plastic trims on the base spec, while the reversing camera, navigation and main beam assist are all useful features to have.
Another handy addition is the two-zone climate control. All ID.3s have two bars beneath the main display that you slide your finger across to adjust the temperature. On Essential cars they keep the dash symmetry intact, because they have the same function.
Adding options involves paying for some pricey packs instead of individual items. VW's smart-looking head-up display comes with either the £1,175 Driver Assistance Pack or the Assistance Package Plus (£2,240), which also adds semi-autonomous driving tech that can change lanes. It also includes a memory function and a remote parking operation. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
If you want improved driving dynamics, the £955 Sports package adds Volkswagen's DCC Dynamic Chassis Control and progressive steering for sharper responses.
On the road
As with other Citroens, the e-C4 is geared towards comfort over sporty handling. Grip is good and the electric powertrain is responsive to a point, but the soft ride encourages you to take things easy and revel in the cosseting feel. The ID.3's rear-wheel-drive set-up and responsive electric motor sound like a recipe for fun, and it's certainly more engaging than the Citroen, but the ride is fidgety at lower speeds. Advertisement - Article continues below
Tech highlights
All versions of the e-C4 come with a 10-inch touchscreen. Plus and Max trims feature navigation and voice control, but all variants include wireless smartphone connectivity. The ID.3 also features this tech, while adaptive cruise control is included as standard too. Neither car comes with a heat pump as standard, but it's a more affordable extra on the Citroen at £450; it costs £1,150 to add to the VW.
Price and running
There's an overlap in prices between the highest-spec versions of the e-C4 and the entry point to the ID.3 line-up, but both models feature a similar amount of kit. The VW proved to be more efficient on test, with a return of 4.1 miles per kWh compared with 3.6mi/kWh for the Citroen. Combine this with the bigger battery, and the ID.3 can travel more than 210 miles between charges. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Practicality
The Citroen looks rakish next to the upright VW, but these two cars offer a similar amount of space inside. The ID.3 has more headroom and legroom, but both cars are equally wide, and boot space is pretty much comparable between them, too. The VW's bay is longer and wider, but there's a high load floor because of the rear-mounted electric motor that takes up space beneath the boot. Advertisement - Article continues below
Charging
Volkswagen offers a faster DC charging rate than Citroen. A 10-80 per cent top-up can take as little as 25 minutes from a 145kW source, but the e-C4 maxes out at 100kW, and Citroen quotes a 20-80 per cent charge time of half an hour. If you can take advantage of 11kW three-phase charging, you'll need to pay £300 to upgrade the e-C4 to use it – it's a standard feature on the ID.3.
Ownership
Both models come with a three-year/60,000-mile warranty, while VW includes three years of roadside assistance to Citroen's one. Servicing costs are very similar between these two models, with the annual price of Citroen's £508 four-year package working out nearly the same as VW's £384 three-year deal. Citroen was fifth out of 32 in the last Driver Power brands' survey, well ahead of VW in 29th.
While the Volkswagen Golf set a benchmark in the compact hatch class, the Volkswagen ID.3 hasn't quite had the same impact in the EV sector. Updates have improved the car, though, while the latest Pure-battery variant delivers good value for money while still offering a decent range. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
We'd go as far to say that this model in Match trim is the sweet spot in the range. It offers all the kit you could possibly want at a price that makes higher-spec variants look expensive. The roomy cabin and decent driving manners help it to slot easily into family life. Advertisement - Article continues below
Latest Volkswagen ID.3 deals
Picking between these two cars is difficult because they both have key strengths. There's lots to like about the Citroen e-C4, especially its comfortable ride and plush seats, while the reduced list prices make it even more tempting.
As a family car, the C4 ticks the right boxes for space and practicality, while the choice of petrol, hybrid or EV powertrains means there should be a model for most buyers. As an EV, it's a refined machine, but the range and slow charging capability mean it's a little behind the curve when compared with the ID.3.
Latest Citroen e-C4 deals Citroen e-C4 Volkswagen ID.3 Our choice e-C4 50kWh Plus ID.3 Pure Essential Price from/price of our choice £27,650/£29,310 £30,860/£33,135 Powertrain and performance Powertrain 1x electric motor 1x electric motor Power 134bhp 168bhp Torque 260Nm 310Nm Transmission Single-speed auto/FWD Single-speed auto/RWD 0-62mph/top speed 10.0 seconds/93mph 8.2 seconds/99mph Battery capacity/usable 50/50kWh 55/52kWh Official range 219 miles 241 miles Test efficiency/range 3.6mi/kWh/180 miles 4.1mi/kWh/213 miles Charging 100kW (20-80% in 30 mins) 145kW (10-80% in 25 mins) Dimensions Length/wheelbase 4,355/2,670mm 4,264/2,770mm Width/height 1,800/1,520mm 1,809/1,564mm Rear kneeroom 585-830mm 637-869mm Rear headroom/elbow room 910/1,445mm 956/1,444mm Boot space (front/seats up/down) 380/1,250 litres 385/1,267 litres Boot length/width 800/1,005mm 852/1,013mm Boot lip height 725mm 774mm Kerbweight/towing weight 1,571/454kg 1,712/548kg Turning circle 10.9 metres 11.5 metres Costs/ownership Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000 miles) £9,899/35.8% £15,708/50.9% Depreciation £17,751 £15,152 Insurance group/quote/VED 22/£757/£195 20/£601/£195 Three-year service cost £508 (4yrs) £384 Annual tax liability std/higher rate £166/£331 £185/£370 Annual fuel cost (12,000 miles) £832 £732 Basic warranty (miles)/recovery 3yrs (60,000)/1yr 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs Driver Power manufacturer position 5th 29th NCAP Adult/child/ped./assist/stars 80/83/57/63/4(2021) 87/89/71/88/5(2020) Equipment Metallic paint/wheel size £595-£720/18 inches £810-£965/18 inches Parking sensors/camera Rear/yes Front & rear/no Spare wheel/Isofix points Repair kit/two Repair kit/three Keyless entry & go/powered tailgate No/no Yes/no Leather/heated seats No/no/£450 No/no/£1,150 Screen size/digital dashboard 10.0 inches/yes 12.9 inches/yes Climate control/panoramic sunroof Two-zone/no Two-zone/£795 USBs/wireless charging Three/no/£400 Four/no/yes Wireless CarPlay/Android Auto Yes/yes Yes/yes Blind-spot warning/head-up display No/yes No/no Adaptive cruise/steering assist No/yes Yes/yes
Citroen
Most extras are reserved for the top-spec Max model. This includes the Techno Pack, which adds 360-degree cameras, adaptive cruise control and a wireless phone charger for £500. A sunroof costs £790 on Max trim.
Volkswagen
As well as having more kit, the ID.3 has more options, too. Alloys (£1,310) can replace the standard wheel trims, there are trick LED lights (£1,725) and a tow hitch (£1,105), but this is just for mounting a cycle carrier.
Looking for your next car? You can now search our nationwide dealer network for a choice of great cars on offer right now with new, used and leasing deals to choose from... New BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort review: the best BYD yet
New BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort review: the best BYD yet
The new BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort is arguably the Chinese brand's most convincing model in its range Best cars to own: Driver Power 2025 results
Best cars to own: Driver Power 2025 results
The best new cars to own in the UK right now according to the people who already do. It's the 2025 Driver Power results! New entry-level Renault Symbioz is £3k cheaper than a Nissan Qashqai
New entry-level Renault Symbioz is £3k cheaper than a Nissan Qashqai
The Renault Captur has also been fitted the new full-hybrid powertrain, which gets a bigger battery for more pure-electric driving
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
VinFast opens second domestic EV factory amid global expansion
HANOI, June 29 (Reuters) - Vietnamese electric vehicle manufacturer VinFast began production on Sunday at its second domestic factory, aiming to ramp up output of affordable mini urban models as its global expansion plans face delays. The new facility, located in the central province of Ha Tinh, has an initial annual capacity of 200,000 units and spans 36 hectares (90 acres), the company said in a statement. By comparison, VinFast's flagship factory in northern Haiphong is designed to reach a capacity of 950,000 units by next year. VinFast, backed by Vietnam's largest conglomerate Vingroup ( opens new tab, has set ambitious goals to establish production plants in international markets, including the United States, India, and Indonesia. However, it has faced hurdles in its global expansion, including weaker demand and stiff competition. The company announced last year that operations at its U.S. factory would be delayed until 2028. Its India assembly plant is expected to become operational next month. "Once operational, the VinFast Ha Tinh factory will contribute to VinFast's goal of producing 1 million vehicles per year to meet the increasing demand of domestic and foreign markets," said Nguyen Viet Quang, Vingroup's CEO. The EV maker has set a delivery target of 200,000 cars for 2025, having sold approximately 56,000 units in the first five months, primarily in its domestic market. It reported a net loss of $712.4 million for the first quarter, less than the $1.3 billion loss in the previous quarter but 20% more than a year earlier. Revenue jumped 150% to $656.5 million over the same period.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer faces fresh MP rebellion over farmers' inheritance tax
Sir Keir Starmer is facing a fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his inheritance tax raid on farmers. The Telegraph understands that more than 40 MPs are considering mounting an attempt to water down the policy, which threatens to bankrupt family farms by landing them with large inheritance tax bills. Rebels have been emboldened after forcing the Prime Minister to climb down on welfare cuts this week, in the third about-turn for the Government in two months. The U-turns – on benefits, winter fuel payment cuts and a national inquiry into grooming gangs – have added to a £40 billion black hole Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, needs to fill at the next Budget. In a sign of fraying party discipline, MPs are plotting further rebellions on immigration and the two-child benefit cap, alongside the farming revolt. A senior rebel told The Telegraph: 'It's obviously a Government in crisis and the back benches are feeling ignored. The whole strategy is not working and we've got to change direction.' The fresh threats to Sir Keir's authority come after more than 100 MPs publicly broke with the Government over its disability benefit cuts, leading to a Number 10 climbdown this week. Backbenchers are considering using rebel amendments to exempt small family farms from changes to inheritance tax announced in the October Budget. Farmers have historically been able to pass down their land tax-free. But from April 2026, full tax relief will be capped for estates at £1 million, above which just 50 per cent tax relief will be available. A so-called 'rural growth group' has proposed that ministers consider the impacts of substantially raising the planned £1 million cut-off point at which estates lose valuable tax reliefs. The back-bench group has suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10 million, 50 per cent to £20 million, and nil thereafter. This higher threshold would probably exempt almost all small family farms from inheritance tax, with only the richest paying the levy. The changes will be enacted in a Bill due to be voted on by MPs later this year, when they could be challenged by rebels. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, said they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government, [but] I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' A handful of Labour parliamentarians have publicly criticised the so-called 'tractor tax' plans. Markus Campbell-Savours, Labour MP for Penrith and Solway in Cumbria, a rural seat, said in December that he would vote against the Treasury's plans, telling the House of Commons: 'Let me be clear, if today was the real vote, I would vote against the Government's plans.' Sir Keir is also facing opposition to some of his new immigration rules which are expected to be voted on after the summer break, The Telegraph understands. Many of the immigration changes announced by the Prime Minister last month, including changes to visa routes, can be brought into effect without a vote in the House of Commons. However key parts of the proposals, including a new levy on international student fees, will require the endorsement of Labour MPs. A leading rebel told The Telegraph that the Government should spend the summer recess 'reflecting on an evidence-based approach as to how to build effective policies on immigration'. Another said: 'The leadership have to seriously look at their actions on this policy regarding the lack of consultation with backbench MPs.' A number of refugee charities have been lobbying parliamentarians over the changes after their repeated requests for meetings with Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, were turned down. 'Biggest mistake to date' MPs opposed to the changes were encouraged this week by the Prime Minister's apology for using the term 'island of strangers' in his speech announcing the immigration changes. One rebel Labour MP said: 'Of course it was right for the Prime Minister to apologise for the language that he used and understand the distress that it caused, but similarly, if the Government listened more on policy, this would be stronger'. This week Sir Keir apologised for the language in the speech, saying he had not read it properly before delivery because he had been distressed by an arson attack on his family home. But he gave no indication that the Government would U-turn on any of its immigration reforms. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said the apology was Sir Keir's 'biggest mistake to date'. He said: 'This is absolute proof that Keir Starmer has no beliefs, no principles and just reads from a script. 'Only a year into his premiership and he has already made his most fatal error. He has no intention of clamping down on immigration, both legal and illegal. 'This is his biggest mistake to date and one he will not be able to recover from – the public voted for change, instead they're being given more mass immigration and a spiralling crisis at the border. 'We need a leader that has vision and unwavering principles, that man is clearly not Keir Starmer.' Some Labour MPs on the party's Right wing were bewildered by the Prime Minister's sudden apology. One told The Telegraph 'that row-back is the most staggering of all' and said it would further erode discipline. Labour MPs are also bracing for a fight with the Government in the autumn over the two child benefit cap, which many want to see scrapped. The Prime Minister has reportedly committed to scrapping the cap but no announcement has yet been made. In a speech next week, Kemi Badenoch is set to mock Sir Keir's growing roster of U-turns. 'Now that his backbenchers smell blood, there's almost certainly another climbdown on the two-child benefit cap in the offing,' she is expected to tell the Local Government Association on Wednesday. 'Labour told us 'the adults were back in charge', but this is actually amateur hour. The Prime Minister is incapable of sticking to a decision.' A senior Labour party figure said that Downing Street's loss of control over MPs constituted 'an absolute s--- show'. The source said: 'This is an outburst beyond the welfare bill that has broken out. It is from loyal, moderate people who have defended the winter fuel cut for months and then had the rug pulled from under them with the U-turn. 'These are moderate MPs getting constant lobbying from disabled groups and constituents and now they've been told there is money available after all. Those frustrations are largely with Rachel. But they're also with No 10.' 'Now they have lost their patience. It's an absolute s--- show.' Labour MPs have described the past week as a 'deep crisis' with senior government figures forming 'circular firing squads'. One Labour MP said of the Chancellor: 'It's already clear that Rachel Reeves has lost because her whole economic and fiscal strategy is failing on numerous counts. The PM is reversing everything that she wanted to do.' A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
How prepared is Ireland for the knock-on effects of a future war?
Ireland's decision to sign up to the European Union's €150 billion weapons fund was greeted with typical fanfare last Friday when it was announced by Simon Harris. The move, the tanaiste said, would allow Ireland and other countries to streamline the procurement of arms and defence systems. 'I am determined to provide for the development of a full spectrum of Defence Force capabilities that will bring Ireland in line with other similar-sized European countries,' Harris added. Europe is embarking on a mass rearmament because of the worsening security situation on its eastern borders and across the globe. The bloc announced the creation of a €150 billion fund called Security Action for Europe (Safe) in response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the fact that America is no longer a reliable guarantor of European security as it turns its focus instead towards China, where the communist regime is building one of the largest militaries in the world. Defence spending across the EU is surging, with Nato members last week pledging to allocate 5 per cent of their GDP to defence amid rising fears of a potential war on the continent. This marks a sharp increase from last year, when only 23 of the alliance's 32 members were meeting the existing 2 per cent target. For its part, Ireland will spend €1.35 billion on defence this year, up €100 million on 2024, but amounting to only about 0.2 per cent of GDP. Is this enough given Ireland's vulnerability and stated position of neutrality? And is the country prepared for a coming war? The answer to both, in short, is no. Friday's announcement came amid ongoing government efforts to formulate strategies to address a worsening security landscape, compounded by decades of underinvestment in defence. The coalition has also struggled to educate an electorate that often conflates neutrality with protection, overlooking the state's inability to defend itself. Few Irish people think about serving their country by joining the military. The government and the military have promised but failed to revitalise the reserve Defence Forces. It is difficult to exaggerate the scale of the polycrisis facing the tanaiste, who is also the defence minister. Harris faces inertia in both the Department of Defence and the military, which is struggling on almost every front. And like militaries across Europe, the Defence Forces struggle to recruit and keep staff and even to put patrol vessels out to sea. Some of these patrol vessels are confined to port for months. • Alex Massie: It's time Ireland started to pay for its defence As of May 31, there were 7,468 Irish military personnel compared with 9,480 in 2010. Numbers within the Defence Forces have fallen nearly every year between 2010 and 2024. The Air Corps has no combat jets but does have maritime patrol aircraft. The Naval Service has a fleet of vessels but does not have the staff to put all but a few to sea. Crucially, the government and the general staff of the Defence Forces are not battle-hardened. They have no real experience of dealing with a conventional or hybrid attack. There is no single scenario for the outbreak of war in Europe but it could begin with a Russian attack on the continent's eastern borders, though it is more likely to be hybrid in nature with the Kremlin using terrorist groups, cyberattacks and sabotage to try to upturn European society or provide an excuse to take action. However, it could also involve an attack on a weak state such as Ireland, whose isolated location on the EU's western border in the north Atlantic makes it vulnerable. Neutral countries have no protection in war. • 'Ireland must recruit tech workers to counter Russia cyber threat' 'The Atlantic was and will always be challenged by Russia's north Atlantic fleet. If the UK currently feels threatened by Russia, why should we think Ireland is not?' said Riho Terras, an Estonian member of the European parliament and a former military officer. 'If Russia keeps on rearming at its current pace, pretty soon Europe and Nato will not have the ability to handle it. The Kremlin looks for weak spots. It's hard to understand why Ireland thinks it won't be impacted. Europe really does need to stop figure-skating when Putin is playing ice hockey,' Terras added. If a conventional attack were to occur under a dubious pretext, Ireland would be forced to seek assistance from other EU states and Nato as it does not have any capability to defend itself. Before Friday's announcement, the government was already trying to rearm the Defence Forces but struggling to make progress. It has announced the acquisition of sonar and primary radar systems, but this is not new technology and will also take years to become operational. 'We are spending €60 million on new technology we should have bought decades ago. The new maritime patrol aircraft we bought for €250 million have no anti-submarine kits because the department didn't like the sound of anti- submarine warfare equipment,' one retired military officer said. 'The sonar system we have bought has to be towed on a ship but we cannot put naval vessels out to sea. 'It's akin to the gardai celebrating getting flashing blue lights and sirens attached to patrol cars when they have no drivers. Nothing makes any sense,' the source added. 'If war breaks out and Russian submarines are entering our waters to sabotage undersea cables or attack Britain, we are powerless to do anything. This is very similar to the years leading up to the Second World War. We are not at the back of the queue to acquire military equipment — we are not even in the queue.' Like many other announcements on defence, the decision potentially to use the EU Safe fund to acquire arms and military equipment may turn out to be unnecessary. Money is not the issue with increasing Ireland's preparedness; it is decision-making. Ireland's acquisition of new sonar and primary radar was made without EU funding. A decade ago, Ireland signed a similar memorandum of understanding to allow for joint procurement with Britain but did not use it. Terras warned that the Safe programme might not even work. 'No EU country has to use it. If large and important countries like Germany don't use it, Spain and the rest of them won't either. It's a loan facility for those who need it,' he said. The announcement by Harris came amid government moves to restructure oversight of defence. It has announced the formation of a ministerial group, a revamped national security committee and the rebranding of the National Security Analysis Centre (NSAC), set up six years ago to advise the taoiseach on national security. The new group is chaired by Micheál Martin, the taoiseach. Harris attends, as does Jim O'Callaghan, the minister for justice, along with the secretaries-general of the relevant departments, the garda commissioner and the chief of staff of the Defence Forces. It is scheduled to meet every quarter, while the national security committee can meet on a more frequent basis. But many familiar with these entities describe them as 'old wine in new bottles'. The NSAC is widely considered to have been an abject failure. Various iterations of the national security committee took no action to stop the expansion of the Russian embassy when it sought planning permission, essentially to build a spy base in Dublin. Others point out how no action was taken when Russia's intelligence services managed to recruit an agent, codenamed Cobalt, inside the Oireachtas, who still remains in place. Neither Martin, Harris nor O'Callaghan have any real understanding of Russia and its determination to undermine the EU for strategic purposes. Harris is also struggling to overhaul the Department of Defence, though he has been credited with making decisions and pushing ahead with investment projects, often in the face of bureaucratic inertia. 'Harris is making decisions and he's getting projects across the line but he's struggling with the department and the military. He's making the right decisions when something is put in front of him but he's one man trying to reform a dysfunctional system,' one insider said. There are other problems that illustrate Ireland's unreadiness for war in Europe, according to Eoin McNamara, a defence researcher at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. 'There are now long queues to buy military equipment around Europe, such is the demand because Russia is rearming at exponential speed,' he said. 'Time is not on Ireland's side. Decisions are not being made fast enough. Most countries, if they can't find an ideal defence system, are going for the second-best option, but Ireland isn't doing this.' Unlike other EU states, Ireland has failed to nurture a defence industry, though it urgently needs one. The government and the military have yet to demonstrate any novel thinking in terms of how to use new technologies to defend its citizens. 'Ireland is a small country that needs to think more about technological solutions to defend itself,' said McNamara who noted how Ukraine had shown the world how a country could defend itself through its own resources. Ukrainian-manufactured drones have inflicted the majority of casualties on the battlefield. 'Defence is a driver of innovation. Within Ireland, we could do something similar here and build a fantastic industry around defence technology. We need to recognise what's happening as an opportunity,' said Fintan Buckley of Ubotica Technologies, an Irish defence company specialising in artificial intelligence platforms for satellites. Ubotica's Space:AI system can detect, classify and track vessels, even those operating off the grid, to provide maritime situational awareness from space to seafloor. 'The initial response by the government to what's happening has been about getting more boots on the ground and more boats out to sea, but long term it needs to think about how we embrace technology to provide security to protect our critical infrastructure,' Buckley said. 'We need to foster a closer relationship between our Defence Forces and industry to help foster new technologies. We do this in other industries but we need to do the same with defence.' However, many experts believe that Ireland's greatest security vulnerability — one that arguably leaves it more exposed than its European neighbours — is that Russia, after years of intelligence-gathering in the state, already knows all of the above.
