美成功打擊伊朗核設施？衛星圖見6巨坑 專家一看皺眉了
前聯合國核檢查員、現美國科學暨國際安全研究所（Institute for Science and International Security）所長歐布萊特（David Albright）指出，美軍出動B-2轟炸機投下14枚重達3萬磅的GBU-57鑽地炸彈成功打穿核設施，「該設施應該已經報銷」。
不過，CNA Corporation衛星圖像專家艾弗列斯（Decker Eveleth）提醒，由於設施埋藏極深，光靠衛星影像難以評估下方破壞情況。根據Maxar Technologies拍攝的影像顯示，福爾多核設施山脊上有六個整齊排列的彈坑，推測為兩波鑽地炸彈「雙重打擊」所致，周遭地表有大量翻動痕跡與塵土覆蓋。
Comparison of imagery before and after the strikes reveal changes to the terrain above the Fordow Nuclear Facility. Including subsidence, or the collapse of earth, along the ridgeline above the site and possible missile entry points on the side of the mountain. pic.twitter.com/0LY4ebsjNm
— Open Source Centre (@osc_london) June 22, 2025
但讓專家更擔憂的是，伊朗可能早在美軍攻擊前，已將大量高達60%、接近武器級的高濃縮鈾轉移至秘密地點，根據《路透社》（Reuters）報導，一名伊朗高層人士透露，大量高濃縮鈾已於空襲前撤離福爾多，Maxar衛星圖像也顯示，19日至20日福爾多出現「異常活動」，設施入口外排起長龍車輛，疑似為緊急轉移核材料。
核專家路易斯（Jeffrey Lewis）指出，美軍此番行動最多只能將伊朗核計畫「延後數年」，而非徹底摧毀，「我們幾乎可以確定，伊朗還有我們尚未知曉的秘密核設施。」
除福爾多外，美軍空襲也波及納坦茲（Natanz）與伊斯法罕（Isfahan）核設施，根據衛星資料，伊斯法罕設施遭美國戰斧巡弋飛彈重創，納坦茲則被疑似鑽地彈擊中地底濃縮廳上方，可能造成嚴重損害。不過，歐布萊特質疑，針對伊斯法罕使用巡弋飛彈的破壞力不足，難以穿透比福爾多更深的地下隧道系統。
伊朗近日曾通報國際原子能總署（IAEA），將於伊斯法罕設立新濃縮設施，計劃安裝多達2000~3000座離心機，外界憂心相關設施是否已轉移至其他未被掌握的秘密地點。
目前，伊朗國會已威脅退出《核武禁擴條約》（NPT），結束與IAEA的合作，專家憂心，國際社會恐將「對伊朗正在做什麼一無所知」，中東局勢恐再次升高，美國與以色列雖表明將阻止伊朗發展核武，但若未能徹底摧毀其關鍵設施，伊朗未來恐得以快速重啟核計畫。
（封面圖／取自Unsplash）
更多東森財經新聞報導為何不能政權更迭？ 川普喊：讓伊朗再次偉大投資專家放話！ 川普打伊朗「我直播切GG」泌尿醫送暖：準備救援美參戰以伊衝突！台積電摔3% 台股嚇崩463點
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
25-06-2025
- Wall Street Journal
Attacks ‘Effectively Destroyed' Iran's Program
This is an excerpt from 'Post-Attack Assessment of the First 12 Days of Israeli Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Facilities' published June 24 by David Albright and Spencer Faragasso of the Institute for Science and International Security. After 12 days of military operations, a survey of the resulting damage is appropriate. . . . Overall, Israel's and U.S. attacks have effectively destroyed Iran's centrifuge enrichment program. It will be a long time before Iran comes anywhere near the capability it had before the attack. That being said, there are residuals such as stocks of 60%, 20%, and 3-5% enriched uranium and the centrifuges manufactured but not yet installed at Natanz or Fordow. These non-destroyed parts pose a threat as they can be used in the future to produce weapon-grade uranium.
Scientific American
24-06-2025
- Scientific American
Did the U.S. Really Destroy Iran's Nuclear Program?
Many in the world woke to the news on 22 June that the United States had bombed nuclear sites in Iran, with the goal of destroying the nation's ability to produce nuclear weapons. The raids targeted Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities in Fordow and Natanz, and its nuclear research centre in Isfahan, using stealth bombers to drop massive 'bunker-busters', and cruise missiles. Although Iran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, experts have long assessed that Iran was close to having the capability of building nuclear weapons if it chose to do so. The US attacks followed a bombing campaign by Israel, which has since carried out further attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. On 23 June, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that "very significant damage is expected to have occurred" at the underground Fordow site. Researchers at academic institutions and think tanks are also assessing the potential impacts of the attacks on Iran's nuclear capabilities. Analysts have said that the attacks probably set the nuclear programme back substantially, but not permanently. In particular, Iran could have moved stockpiles of highly-enriched uranium, and perhaps some enrichment centrifuges, elsewhere. David Albright, a nuclear policy specialist and president of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington DC, spoke to Nature about what researchers know. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. How do you assess the impact of the bombings on Iran's nuclear capabilities? There aren't many researchers who are able to assess the impact of the bombings. We have decades of experience with the Iranian nuclear programme, so we know their facilities and activities very well. And we have great access to satellite imagery — which we have to buy. We try to buy some every day. And we utilize analysts who have decades of experience to analyze these images. We also have lots of contacts with governments, and we have colleagues who also have contacts with governments. A lot of the damage is on the surface, so it's a question of knowing what the building did [in terms of its role in the nuclear program]. We rely on our repository of information about the sites that are attacked. So it's pretty straightforward. Obviously, more problematic is the underground sites. When we initially assessed Israel's bombing of Natanz, three days later I saw a very small crater above the underground hall. I could work out and link it to a type of Earth-penetrator weapon that Israel is known to have. It would leave a really small crater when it went in, and the damage would be underground. The United States bombed it with a much more powerful Earth penetrator. So damage is probably more extensive. How and when will we know for sure the extent of the damage? As nuclear experts, we'd like to see this done with diplomatic agreements, where Iran would allow intrusive inspections into its programme. If that does not happen, then it's the job of US and Israeli intelligence to assess the damage. They're looking at communications intercepts, or trying to recruit people on the inside to reveal information. Would there be radioactive materials detected outside Natanz, Esfahan and Fordow if the attacks were successful? So far, the IAEA reports no such leaks. And it appears that Iran had moved the enriched uranium stockpiles in the days before the bombings. The United States has said that the target of its bombings was the facilities, so they understand they are not getting at the nuclear material. Can shockwaves damage enrichment facilities even without a direct hit? Shockwaves can cause a lot of damage. They will push against the centrifuges, and if they're spinning, it can cause the rotor inside to crash against the wall. It's anyone's guess how much is destroyed without additional information. But the idea of the US bombing was that Israel may not have done enough damage. Would it pose more serious environmental risks if Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant were bombed? Israel has said it will not attack nuclear reactors. And Israel negotiated with Russia not to attack the Russians who operate Bushehr. But yes, it really could be disastrous. The decay products of uranium fission that accumulate inside a reactor are much more dangerous than the uranium itself. That's why you don't want to have a nuclear reactor involved in a war.
Yahoo
23-06-2025
- Yahoo
美成功打擊伊朗核設施？衛星圖見6巨坑 專家一看皺眉了
美軍21日凌晨發動空襲，針對伊朗福爾多（Fordow）等三處核心核子設施展開「午夜鐵鎚行動」（Operation Midnight Hammer），根據商業衛星影像顯示，核設施遭美軍巨型鑽地炸彈（MOP）重擊，地底深處的濃縮鈾離心機可能已被摧毀，但目前仍無法完全確認實際破壞程度。 前聯合國核檢查員、現美國科學暨國際安全研究所（Institute for Science and International Security）所長歐布萊特（David Albright）指出，美軍出動B-2轟炸機投下14枚重達3萬磅的GBU-57鑽地炸彈成功打穿核設施，「該設施應該已經報銷」。 不過，CNA Corporation衛星圖像專家艾弗列斯（Decker Eveleth）提醒，由於設施埋藏極深，光靠衛星影像難以評估下方破壞情況。根據Maxar Technologies拍攝的影像顯示，福爾多核設施山脊上有六個整齊排列的彈坑，推測為兩波鑽地炸彈「雙重打擊」所致，周遭地表有大量翻動痕跡與塵土覆蓋。 Comparison of imagery before and after the strikes reveal changes to the terrain above the Fordow Nuclear Facility. Including subsidence, or the collapse of earth, along the ridgeline above the site and possible missile entry points on the side of the mountain. — Open Source Centre (@osc_london) June 22, 2025 但讓專家更擔憂的是，伊朗可能早在美軍攻擊前，已將大量高達60%、接近武器級的高濃縮鈾轉移至秘密地點，根據《路透社》（Reuters）報導，一名伊朗高層人士透露，大量高濃縮鈾已於空襲前撤離福爾多，Maxar衛星圖像也顯示，19日至20日福爾多出現「異常活動」，設施入口外排起長龍車輛，疑似為緊急轉移核材料。 核專家路易斯（Jeffrey Lewis）指出，美軍此番行動最多只能將伊朗核計畫「延後數年」，而非徹底摧毀，「我們幾乎可以確定，伊朗還有我們尚未知曉的秘密核設施。」 除福爾多外，美軍空襲也波及納坦茲（Natanz）與伊斯法罕（Isfahan）核設施，根據衛星資料，伊斯法罕設施遭美國戰斧巡弋飛彈重創，納坦茲則被疑似鑽地彈擊中地底濃縮廳上方，可能造成嚴重損害。不過，歐布萊特質疑，針對伊斯法罕使用巡弋飛彈的破壞力不足，難以穿透比福爾多更深的地下隧道系統。 伊朗近日曾通報國際原子能總署（IAEA），將於伊斯法罕設立新濃縮設施，計劃安裝多達2000~3000座離心機，外界憂心相關設施是否已轉移至其他未被掌握的秘密地點。 目前，伊朗國會已威脅退出《核武禁擴條約》（NPT），結束與IAEA的合作，專家憂心，國際社會恐將「對伊朗正在做什麼一無所知」，中東局勢恐再次升高，美國與以色列雖表明將阻止伊朗發展核武，但若未能徹底摧毀其關鍵設施，伊朗未來恐得以快速重啟核計畫。 （封面圖／取自Unsplash） 更多東森財經新聞報導為何不能政權更迭？ 川普喊：讓伊朗再次偉大投資專家放話！ 川普打伊朗「我直播切GG」泌尿醫送暖：準備救援美參戰以伊衝突！台積電摔3% 台股嚇崩463點
