logo
Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes Senate: What's in it, who voted how?

Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes Senate: What's in it, who voted how?

Al Jazeeraa day ago
The United States Senate narrowly passed President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill on Tuesday, following intense negotiations and a marathon voting session on amendments.
The bill, which still faces a challenging path to final approval in the House of Representatives, would impose deep cuts to popular health and nutrition programmes, among other measures, while offering $4.5 trillion in tax reductions.
The measure was approved after almost 48 hours of debate and amendment battles.
Here is what you need to know:
What is Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'?
The bill is a piece of legislation that combines tax cuts, spending hikes on defence and border security, and cuts to social safety nets into one giant package.
The main goal of the bill is to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which are set to expire at the end of 2025. It would make most of these tax breaks permanent, while also boosting spending on border security, the military and energy projects.
The bill is partly funded by cutting healthcare and food programmes.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates Trump's measure will increase the US debt by $3.3 trillion over the next 10 years. The US government currently owes its lenders $36.2 trillion.
The key aspects of the bill include:
In 2017, Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered taxes and increased the standard deduction for all taxpayers, but it primarily benefitted higher-income earners.
Those tax breaks are set to expire this year, but the new bill would make them permanent. It also adds some more cuts he promised during his campaign.
There is a change to the US tax code called the SALT deduction (State and Local Taxes). This lets taxpayers deduct certain state and local taxes (like income or property taxes) on their federal tax return.
Currently, people can only deduct up to $10,000 of these taxes. The new bill would raise that cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for five years.
Taxpayers would also be allowed to deduct income earned from tips and overtime, as well as interest paid on loans for buying cars made in the US.
The legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts.
If the bill does not become law, the child tax credit – which is now $2,000 per child each year – will fall to $1,000, starting in 2026.
But if the Senate's current version of the bill is approved, the credit would rise to $2,200.
The bill sets aside about $350bn for Trump's border and national security plans. This includes:
$46bn for the US-Mexico border wall
$45bn to fund 100,000 beds in migrant detention centres
Billions more to hire an extra 10,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents by 2029 as part of Trump's plan to carry out the largest mass deportation effort in US history.
To help offset the cost of the tax cuts and new spending, Republicans plan to scale back Medicaid and food assistance programmes for low-income families.
They say their goal is to refocus these safety net programmes on the groups they were originally meant to help, primarily pregnant women, people with disabilities and children – while also reducing what they call waste and abuse.
Medicaid helps Americans who are poor and those with disabilities, while the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) helps people afford groceries.
Currently, more than 71 million people depend on Medicaid, and 40 million receive benefits through SNAP. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the bill would leave an additional 11.8 million Americans without health insurance by 2034 if it becomes law.
Republicans are pushing to significantly scale back tax incentives that support clean energy projects powered by renewables like solar and wind. These tax breaks were a key part of former President Joe Biden's landmark 2022 law, the Inflation Reduction Act, which aimed to tackle climate change and reduce healthcare costs.
A tax break for people who buy new or used electric vehicles would expire on September 30 this year if the bill passes in its current form, instead of at the end of 2032 under current law.
The legislation would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, going beyond the $4 trillion outlined in the version passed by the House in May.
According to Yale University's Budget Lab, wealthier taxpayers are likely to gain more from this bill than lower-income Americans.
They estimate that people in the lowest income bracket will see their incomes drop by 2.5 percent, mainly because of cuts to SNAP and Medicaid, while the highest earners will see their incomes rise by 2.2 percent.
Which senators voted against the bill?
Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine opposed due to deep Medicaid cuts affecting low-income families and rural healthcare.
I strongly support extending the tax relief for families and small businesses. My vote against this bill stems primarily from the harmful impact it will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural health care providers like our hospitals and nursing homes.
— Sen. Susan Collins (@SenatorCollins) July 1, 2025
Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina cited concerns over Medicaid reductions to his constituents. Tillis has announced that he will not seek re-election, amid threats from Trump that he would back a Republican challenger to Tillis.
The facts matter. The people matter. The Senate's Medicaid approach breaks promises and will kick people off of Medicaid who truly need it. The Senate can make one simple fix to make sure that won't happen. pic.twitter.com/zvW1AgCxBF
— Senator Thom Tillis (@SenThomTillis) June 30, 2025
Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky voted 'no' on fiscal grounds, warning that the bill would significantly worsen the national deficit.
Throughout the Vote-a-rama, I was working all night to stop Congress from adding to our debt.
I met with @VP and I reiterated my offer to vote for the bill—if it included a 90% reduction in the debt ceiling.
No earmarks. No handouts. Just real fiscal reform.
I wasn't looking…
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) July 1, 2025
Every member of the Democratic caucus, a total of 47 senators, also voted against the bill.
Who supported the bill in the Senate?
The remaining Republicans voted in favour, allowing the bill to pass 51–50, with the deciding vote cast by Vice President JD Vance.
Trump has set a July 4 deadline to pass the bill through Congress, but conceded on Tuesday that it would be 'very hard to do' by that date, since the House now needs to vote on it. The House had passed an earlier version of the bill in May, but needs to look at it again due to the amendments brought by the Senate.
Notable Senator supporters include:
Senator Lisa Murkowski (representative of Alaska): Her backing was secured after Republicans agreed to Alaska-specific provisions, including delayed nutrition cuts and a new rural health fund, making her vote pivotal.
'I have an obligation to the people of the state of Alaska, and I live up to that every single day,' she told a reporter for NBC News.
Senators Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming: These fiscally conservative senators shifted from hesitation to support following amendments to the bill.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune led the push to pass the legislation.
How have lawmakers and the public reacted?
Most Republican lawmakers celebrated it as a historic achievement.
Trump also expressed delight.
'Wow, music to my ears,' Trump said after a reporter told him the news. 'I was also wondering how we're doing, because I know this is primetime, it shows that I care about you,' he added.
Thune said after the vote: 'In the end, we got the job done, and we're delighted to be able to be partners with President Trump and his agenda.'
Democrats opposed it, calling it a giveaway to the wealthy at the expense of healthcare, food aid and climate policy.
'Today's vote will haunt our Republican colleagues for years to come,' Democrat Chuck Schumer said in a floor speech after the vote.
'Republicans covered this chamber in shame,' he added.
Today's vote will haunt Senate Republicans for years to come.
Americans will see the damage done as hospitals close, as people are laid off, as costs go up, and as the debt increases.
Democrats will make sure Americans remember the betrayal that took place today. pic.twitter.com/WmwnZa5n9k
— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) July 1, 2025
The US Chamber of Commerce led a coalition of more than 145 organisations supporting the bill, emphasising it would 'foster capital investment, job creation, and higher wages'.
They praised the permanent tax cuts and border security funding.
However, healthcare and hospital associations have warned that millions could lose coverage, driving up emergency and unpaid care costs. Environmental groups have also voiced strong opposition.
Public opinion on the bill is in decline, too.
'Initially, [Trump] had more than 50 percent of the support. Now, it is under 50 percent, and politicians know that,' Al Jazeera's Alan Fisher said, reporting from Washington, DC.
'They are aware that this could lead to a cut in Medicaid. They are aware, even though Donald Trump had promised to protect it, that this could cut nutritional programmes, particularly for poorer families in the United States.
'And although they will get tax cuts, they have managed a lot of the time to be convinced by the Democratic argument that, yes, there are tax cuts, but billionaires will do much better out of this than the ordinary American people, and that is what's changed the opinion polls,' he added.
What happens next?
The process begins with the House Rules Committee, which will meet to mark up the bill and decide how debate and consideration will proceed on the House floor.
After the bill passes through the Rules Committee, it will move to the House floor for debate and a vote on the rule, potentially as soon as Wednesday morning.
If the House of Representatives does not accept the Senate's version of the bill, it could make changes and send it back to the Senate for another vote.
Alternatively, both chambers could appoint members to a conference committee to work out a compromise.
Once both the House and Senate agree on the final text, and it is passed in both chambers of Congress, the bill would go to Trump to be signed into law.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' help grow the US economy?
Will Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' help grow the US economy?

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

Will Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' help grow the US economy?

Donald Trump says his sweeping tax cuts will grow the economy. But, critics say the bill will increase national debt. Dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', President Donald Trump's signature policy bill would slash taxes, largely benefitting the wealthiest Americans. To pay for it, federal spending would be reduced, including on Medicaid, food stamps and student loans. Supporters say the bill could jumpstart economic growth and create jobs. Critics, including some Republicans, say millions of Americans would pay the price. And the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would actually add an estimated $3.3 trillion to debt over a decade. Why did Canada scrap its digital tax on US tech companies? Plus, Nigeria's tax reform.

US-Japan trade deal – will this one be too tricky for Trump?
US-Japan trade deal – will this one be too tricky for Trump?

Al Jazeera

time2 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US-Japan trade deal – will this one be too tricky for Trump?

US President Donald Trump said this week that he is not confident the United States will reach a trade deal with Japan ahead of next week's deadline to reinstate global tariffs he paused three months ago. Trump also threatened to impose tariffs of 30 percent to 35 percent on Japan if a trade deal is not achieved, particularly in relation to US sales of rice and cars. This has caused concern among automobile and electronic manufacturers in Japan, whose exports to the US fuel the Japanese economy. Here is what we know about the US-Japan trade talks. What did Trump say about a trade deal with Japan? Most of Washington's trading partners are seeking trade deals as the July 9 deadline for the end of a pause on reciprocal tariffs looms closer. Trade talks have continued between the US and Japan for some time. Japan's chief trade negotiator and economy minister, Ryosei Akazawa, is making arrangements for his eighth visit to the US as early as this weekend, Japanese broadcaster TV Asahi reported on Wednesday. The US had a $69.4bn trading deficit with Japan in 2024, according to US federal data. Trump is seeking to close this. But this week, he voiced doubts about whether Washington and Tokyo could reach a trade deal at all. 'We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure if we're gonna make a deal, I doubt it, with Japan,' Trump told reporters on board Air Force One on Tuesday. 'They and others are so spoiled from having ripped us off for 30, 40 years that it's really hard for them to make a deal.' Why has Trump threatened Japan with new tariffs? Trump threatened to impose a tariff of '30 percent or 35 percent' on Japan if a trade deal is not reached by the time the reciprocal tariff pause is lifted on July 9. A basic 10 percent tariff on goods imported to the US, including from Japan, has remained in place throughout this pause. On April 2, when Trump announced his 'Liberation Day' reciprocal tariffs, he unveiled a 24 percent tariff for Japan on most goods except cars, aluminium and steel. Trump says he does not plan to extend the pause for higher, reciprocal tariffs. Once they are back in place, vehicles and car parts from Japan, as well as from other countries, face a 25 percent tariff. Aluminium and steel imports from all countries, including Japan, face a 50 percent tariff based on an order Trump signed on June 4. Now, Trump is zeroing in on rice sales to Japan as well, alleging that Japan does not buy rice from the US. 'I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform on Monday. 'We'll just be sending them a letter, and we love having them as a Trading Partner for many years to come,' Trump added, without specifying any details about the letter. Trump also claimed that Japan does not buy cars from the US. 'We didn't give them one car in 10 years,' he told reporters on Air Force One this week. During a Fox News interview that aired on June 29, Trump also said that Japan does not buy American cars and added: 'It's not fair.' 'So what I'm going to do is I'll write them a letter, say, 'We thank you very much. We know you can't do the kind of things that we need, and therefore you'll pay a 30 percent, 35 percent or whatever the numbers that we determine,' Trump said this week. 'Because we also have a very big trade deficit with Japan, as you know, and it's very unfair to the American people.' Does Japan buy cars and rice from the US? Yes. Contrary to what Trump told reporters this week, Japan bought $354.7m of rice from the US between May 2024 and April 2025, according to the trade data research group, Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC). Japanese rice imports from the US have in fact increased since the price of locally grown rice has surged. An extreme heatwave in 2023 yielded a substandard rice crop, leading to producers and manufacturers stockpiling rice that was available by early 2024. Additionally, an earthquake hit southern Japan on August 8, 2024, which led to consumers stockpiling rice and triggering a rice shortage. The government has decided to release rice from its own emergency stockpile. Figures from the Japan Automobile Importers Association also show that Japan imported 14,724 US passenger vehicles worth $1.04bn in 2024. This is a far cry from sales of Japanese cars to the US, however. In 2023, for example, Japan exported cars worth $41bn to the US while importing cars worth just $1.25bn from the US, according to the OEC. Why else have trade talks between Japan and the US stalled? The Japanese government also faces domestic pressures with a national upper house election on June 20. The farm sector has traditionally been a significant voting bloc for Japanese PM Shigeru Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party. Trade negotiator Akazawa said on Tuesday that Japan would not sacrifice its agriculture sector during trade talks with the US. 'I have repeatedly stated that agriculture is the foundation of the nation. In negotiations with the United States, our stance remains unchanged: we will not engage in talks that would sacrifice the agricultural sector,' Akazawa told a media conference. Ishiba is also opposed to any trade deal with Trump which does not roll back tariffs on cars. 'Japan is different from other countries as we are the largest investor in the United States, creating jobs,' Ishiba said on Wednesday during a debate with opposition leaders. 'With our basic focus being on investment rather than tariffs, we'll continue to protect our national interest.' Furthermore, Japan is in a stronger position than many other countries as it is the largest foreign holder of US debt. According to recent reports, Japan holds more than $1 trillion in US Treasury securities, which may give it leverage in trade talks. Has Japan responded to Trump's threat of higher tariffs? Japan has so far declined to comment on this. During a news conference in Tokyo on Wednesday, Japan's Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki said: 'We are aware of what President Trump said, but we don't comment on every remark made by US government officials.' How much does Japan's economy depend on US exports? While Japan does hold large amounts of US debt, it is more reliant on the US for exports than the other way around. The US is Japan's largest export market, accounting for 19.1 percent of total Japanese exports in 2023, according to the OEC. Only 4.03 percent of US exports went to Japan in 2023. In that year, the US exported $7.7bn worth of petroleum gas to Japan.

US secures trade deal with Vietnam as negotiations continue with S Korea
US secures trade deal with Vietnam as negotiations continue with S Korea

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US secures trade deal with Vietnam as negotiations continue with S Korea

A trade deal between the United States and Vietnam has marked the first full pact President Donald Trump has sealed with an Asian nation, but has also raised fears that it could provoke a new standoff between the US and China. South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, who came to power last month on a platform of pursuing pragmatic diplomacy with both the US and China, indicated on Thursday that it remained unclear whether tariff negotiations between Washington and Seoul would be concluded by next week's deadline. Vietnam has the third-biggest trade surplus with the US of any country after China and Mexico, and was targeted with a 46 percent rate, one of the highest in Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff blitz on April 2. Analysts say the US-Vietnam trade deal may give a glimpse of the template Washington will use with other Asian countries still scrambling for accords, including South Korea, Japan and Thailand. Speaking at his first news conference on Thursday since taking office on June 4, Lee said the tariff negotiations with the US have been 'clearly not easy' and stressed that the countries must reach mutually beneficial outcomes. 'It's difficult to say with certainty whether we will be able to reach a conclusion by July 8. We are now doing our best,' Lee said. 'What we need is a truly reciprocal outcome that benefits both sides and works for everyone, but so far, both sides are still trying to define exactly what they want.' Lee, a liberal, came to power after winning a snap presidential election caused by the removal of conservative President Yoon Suk-yeol over his ill-fated imposition of martial law in December. Trump's 90-day pause in global reciprocal tariffs is set to expire on July 9, potentially exposing South Korean products to 25% tax rates. The US has separately been seeking higher duties on specific products such as automobiles and semiconductors, which are key exports for South Korea's trade-dependent economy. There are growing concerns in Seoul that Trump may also demand a broader deal, requiring South Korea to pay significantly more for the 28,000 US soldiers stationed in the country to deter threats from North Korea. Lee has consistently urged patience on tariffs, arguing that rushing to secure an early deal would not serve the national interest. Provoking China? South Korea's struggle to reach a trade deal with the US comes as the US-Vietnam trade deal was secured late on Wednesday, meaning that the 46 percent rate due to take effect next week has been averted. Vietnam is now set to face a minimum 20 percent tariff in return for opening its market to US products, including cars. But a 40 percent tariff will hit goods passing through the country to circumvent steeper trade barriers – a practice called 'transhipping' – and has raised concerns about how Beijing will react. Washington has accused Hanoi of relabelling Chinese goods to skirt its tariffs, but raw materials from the world's number-two economy are the lifeblood of Vietnam's manufacturing industries. 'From a global perspective, perhaps the most interesting point is that this deal again seems in large part to be about China,' said Capital Economics. The terms on transhipment 'will be seen as a provocation in Beijing, particularly if similar conditions are included in any other deals agreed over coming days', it added. Shares in clothing companies and sport equipment manufacturers – which have a large footprint in Vietnam – rose on news of the deal in New York. But they later declined sharply as details were released. Vietnam's government said in a statement late on Wednesday that under the deal, the country had promised 'preferential market access for US goods, including large-engine cars'. But the statement gave scant detail about the transhipment arrangements in the deal, which Trump announced on his Truth Social platform. Uncertainty over how transshipping will be 'defined or enforced' is likely to have diplomatic repercussions, said Bloomberg Economics expert Rana Sajedi. 'The looming question now is how China will respond,' she said. 'Beijing has made clear that it would respond to deals that came at the expense of Chinese interests.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store