Will act as per law on Cauvery aarti petition: Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister Shivakumar
'We will respond as per law, whatever it may be. Nobody is stopping people from praying and worshipping,' Shivakumar told reporters, after the Karnataka High Court sought a formal response from the state on the matter.
On May 24 addressing a press conference, Shivakumar stated that decisions to organise the Cauvery Aarti on a grand scale have allocated funds to support the initiative.
Shivakumar announced that the government will launch a grand Cauvery Aarti program within 100 days. 'This is a matter of pride for us,' he said, adding that Rs 90 crore has been earmarked for the initiative.
The Cauvery Aarti to be conducted every week on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays, with participation from religious mutts across the state. Artists have been approached to compose a unity-themed devotional song for the occasion, and Shivakumar confirmed he has written to renowned music composers for their collaboration.
On Cauvery aarti during Dasara Shivakumar said, 'The state government is preparing to do the Cauvery aarti programme along with the Dasara this time. Cauvery aarti will include programmes to represent the cultures of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The modalities are being worked out.
'We have formed a committee under the leadership of BWSSB Chief Ram Prasath. The DC of Mandya will also be part of this committee. Various departments such as Muzrai, Kannada and Culture, Irrigation, and Tourism departments will be involved in various aspects of Cauvery aarti,' he added.
When asked about the Finance department's recommendation that it would be difficult to finance Cauvery aarti, he said, 'The final decision lies with the government, no matter what the recommendations are. The government is committed to starting the Cauvery aarti.'
On the location of the Cauvery aarti venue, he said, 'This event would be held a little far from the dam keeping in mind security considerations. The Committee will take a final call on the location.' (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
28 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Trump says he will ‘substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases
United States President Donald Trump on Monday said that Washington will substantially increase the tariffs imposed on goods imported from India over New Delhi's purchase and sale of Russian oil in the 'open market for big profit'. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits,' Trump said on social media. He said: 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA.' Trump has been threatening to impose a so-called penalty on New Delhi for buying a large portion of its military equipment and fuel from Russia amid the war on Ukraine. The penalty would be in addition to the 25% levy Washington announced on goods imported from India, as part of the so-called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries that have not finalised separate trade agreements with the US. The US president's comment on Monday came after Trump on Friday said that he had heard that India was ' no longer going to be buying oil' from Russia. 'I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step,' ANI had quoted Trump as saying. 'We will see what happens.' On Thursday, Reuters had reported that Indian state-owned refiners had halted oil purchases from Russia over the previous week. However, on Saturday, ANI quoted unidentified Indian officials as saying that the state-owned refiners are continuing to source oil from Russian suppliers. The US president's remarks on Friday had also come just hours after India's Ministry of External Affairs responded to the Reuters report, stating that decisions on sourcing fuel are guided by market dynamics. Ministry Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal had said that India and Russia share a 'steady, time-tested ' partnership. 'Our ties with any country stand on their merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country,' Jaiswal had said. New Delhi's clarification came two days after Trump on Wednesday threatened to impose the ' penalty ' on India for military and energy purchases from Russia. While the 25% reciprocal tariff was to take effect on August 7, the executive order signed by Trump on Thursday had made no mention of the 'penalty'. On Thursday, Trump said that he does not care about 'what India does with Russia' and that 'they can take their dead economies down together, for all I care'. 'We have done very little business with India, their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world,' Trump had said on social media. 'Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together.' On Wednesday evening, India's commerce ministry said that New Delhi was studying the implications of the US' decision, and that it would take all steps necessary to secure national interests.
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
Malegaon Blast: Maharashtra Must Challenge Acquittal Verdict, Says Congress MLA Arif Masood
New Delhi: Congress MLA from Madhya Pradesh, Arif Masood, urged the Maharashtra government to file an appeal against the acquittal of all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit. Masood emphasized that terrorism has no religion and should not be associated with any faith. He cited the state government's recent decision to challenge the Bombay High Court's acquittal of 12 accused in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case, stating that similar action should be taken in the Malegaon case. "Terrorism has no religion, nor is it related to any Maharashtra government, which has announced that it would file an appeal against the acquittal of the 12 accused in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case by the Bombay High Court, should do the same thing in the Malegaon case too," said Arif Masood. Meanwhile, families of the Malegaon blast victims have expressed their intent to challenge the verdict of the special NIA court, which acquitted all the accused on July 31. Their lawyer, Shahid Nadeem, confirmed that some of the families will independently file appeals. He also criticized the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for not taking action against witnesses who turned hostile during the trial. The Maharashtra government had earlier approached the Supreme Court to challenge the Bombay High Court's acquittal in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. In the Malegaon investigation, after the NIA took over from the ATS, it dropped charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), citing issues with how the provisions were applied. The 2008 Malegaon blast occurred on September 29 in the Nashik district, killing six people and injuring over 100. In its judgment, the special court not only acquitted all seven accused but also directed the government to pay compensation, Rs 2 lakh to the families of those killed and Rs 50,000 to the injured. The court found insufficient evidence to prove that Pragya Thakur owned the motorcycle allegedly used in the blast, noting that its chassis number had been erased. It also observed that Thakur had renounced worldly possessions two years before the incident.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Speaking for Jharkhand
Not always do people who emerge as leaders from the grassroots successfully translate their popularity into electoral success. This is especially the case when the leaders belong to marginalised communities that lack the economic resources and legacy advantage to build and sustain a political party. Shibu Soren was an exception. His public life, which spanned over six decades, saw many ups and downs, but it stands for his remarkable endurance as a politician who straddled the complex worlds of Adivasi identity in Jharkhand and coalition politics at the Centre. He was thrice the chief minister of Jharkhand and multiple times a Union minister. But his political legacy extends beyond the short tenures he had in office: In fact, his political biography is synonymous with the history of the rise of the Jharkhandi identity and the Jharkhand state. Shibu Soren's political biography is synonymous with the history of the rise of the Jharkhandi identity and the Jharkhand state. (ANI Photo) The movement for a separate state for the native residents of the Chhotta Nagpur plateau, divided into many tribes and speaking numerous tongues, goes back to the 1950s. But the early decades after Independence, a period that marked the consolidation of an umbrella Indian identity, sought to delegitimise the identity concerns of marginalised communities. Leaders such as Soren challenged this narrative and fearlessly organised at the grassroots on social and economic agendas. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM), established in the 1970s with Soren as one of the founders, brought together identity concerns and working-class agendas, which enabled the movement to build solidarities beyond Adivasis. It fought the liquor mafia, instituted direct action to end land alienation among locals, ran literacy campaigns and advocated the establishment of schools, and worked to create parallel credit networks. The statehood demand was revived in the 1980s, which culminated in the formation of a separate state in 2000. The JMM in office embraced the vices of the establishment and abandoned the lofty ideals of the movement. This is perhaps the fate of all movement-centric outfits — the Congress, CPI and CPI-M, the Dravidian parties, Bahujan Samaj Party, among others — as they transition to parties of office. That said, Soren will be remembered as a leader from an underprivileged community who fought for his people, established their political agency, and enabled the founding of a state centred on the Jharkhandi identity. The allegations that continued to dog Soren through the course of his political career — they ranged from murder to corruption — are a reflection of the political economy of the resource-rich region he emerged from. His party may have failed in transforming how politics is played, but the very fact that it was a player made it, and him, unique among tribal mobilisations.
