Federal budget bill threatens ‘The Stitch' plan to reconnect downtown Atlanta
'The Stitch' plan project, first proposed in 2019, is intended to reconnect communities in downtown Atlanta that were separated by the creation of the Downtown Connector.
As proposed, the project would build an urban park above the connector as a physical cap.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE:
Rep. Williams announces more federal funding to connect Atlanta downtown neighborhoods
The final plan would create approximately 17 acres of new space for developments and greenspace atop a new, 3⁄4-mile platform spanning the Downtown Connector between Ted Turner Drive and Piedmont Avenue.
Last year, the project announced it received a $157 million federal grant to help the project.
However, the federal funding needed for the project is now in jeopardy.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Channel 2's Michael Doudna talked to Rev. Winnie Varghese, with St Luke's Episcopal Church, about the project.
'So the Stitch project is so poetic, a real sense of the vision of what it means to bring back a certain kind of life to downtown,' Rev. Winnie Varghese, with St Luke's Episcopal Church, said.
The Stitch would reconnect two halves of the city that were divided when the interstates were built.
The end goal would be to create real estate and green space that could create a new vibrant neighborhood for the city.
'That's unfortunate that, you know, a signed grant agreement from your federal government doesn't mean as much as it used to,' Central Atlanta Progress AJ Robinson said.
See, as Congress looks to pass a new budget bill, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' by President Donald Trump, it includes cutting the $157 million promised to help the development.
'But now our construction dollars are in peril, and so we're working very hard to try to turn that situation around,' Robinson said.
Robinson said without the federal dollars, construction would likely be delayed at least a year, but the plans would not be stopped. He says they would look for funding elsewhere.
'We've been working on this for maybe 20 years. Hopefully, it doesn't take another 20 years, but I think the project speaks for itself,' Robinson said.
And during a political climate where almost every issue is divided by red and blue, many supporters say this infrastructure project is an investment that will pay dividends.
'The Stitch is a once-in-a-generational project. It's a big piece of infrastructure,' Robinson said.
'I hope the money comes through in the way that it was promised and committed. I would hope for that,' Varghese said.
The budget bill now sits before the Senate for approval.
Channel 2 Action News asked both senators their thoughts on the potential cut to the project.
In a statement, Sen. Rev. Raphael Warnock said: 'I'm proud to have secured federal funding for the Stitch and it's a shame Washington Republicans want to divert money away from this transformative economic development project to pay for a tax cut for billionaires. ... I will do everything in my power to protect this funding so Georgians can continue to reap the benefits of their tax dollars.'
Sen. Jon Ossoff is on paternity leave.
TRENDING STORIES:
9-year-old girl nearly loses hand to Florida shark attack
Former 'RHOA' star Kim Zolciak, ex-Atlanta Falcon Kroy Biermann removed from mansion, court docs say
Rick Ross Car Show causes traffic troubles at another event miles away
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
I'm a Democrat who left Texas. New GOP maps will silence Latino voters.
I joined my fellow Texas Democrats in leaving the state to deny Republicans the required quorum they need to pass manipulated congressional maps. This summer, Texas tragically lost more than 135 of our neighbors, many of them children, to the devastating July 4 floods. In the wake of that heartbreak, Texans deserved leadership, compassion and action. Instead, Texas Republicans are exploiting the tragedy to launch a blatant and calculated power grab. They've hijacked what should be a special legislative session focused on helping grieving survivors to instead do the bidding of President Donald Trump and push through new congressional maps − a process normally conducted every 10 years after the Census. This isn't just political opportunism. It's an insult to the people who lost their lives and the communities still suffering. This is also a test. In 2024, Democrats nationwide took the Latino vote for granted and paid for it. We can't afford to make that mistake again. We must be clear about what's really happening in Texas now. Republicans are using Latino voters as political pawns. Latino voices, electoral power and ability to fully participate in our democracy are under threat. Democrats must stand up and show that we will not allow them to be silenced without a fight. Texas and national Republicans know the math. They understand that Latinos are now the largest population in our state, and that Texas elections have national consequences for the balance of power in Washington. A redistricting primer: Texas Democrats face their Alamo with new GOP congressional map Rather than work to earn more Latino votes, Republicans, at the direction of President Donald Trump, are instead tactfully carving them out of districts, dividing up their communities and working to silence their influence. Let's be clear:These proposed maps are designed to entrench Republican power, pad the party's slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and rig future elections. They are not a reflection of the will of the people, nor based on any new census data. Republicans' hidden agenda isn't so hidden In Austin, for example, we're seeing the impact firsthand. The maps would eliminate the Latino opportunity district, robbing a diverse, civically engaged city of fair representation at a time when our population has soared. Austin would be forced into a newly drawn Republican district stretching hundreds of miles to east Texas. Similar scenarios would play out across south Texas, Houston and Dallas, where millions of Latinos live. These new Republican maps send a message to Latino voters − and voters in general − that their voices don't matter. As Democrats, we can't wait for an election cycle to speak out and act with conviction. It's not enough to oppose these maps. We must fight for a Texas, and a country, where every voter, in every neighborhood, has an equal voice. After all, a hallmark of a thriving American democracy is that voters choose their elected leaders − not the other way around. Opinion: Texas Democrats know they're fighting a losing cause. At least they're fighting. As chair of the Progressive Caucus' redistricting effort, I've led these fights before, and I'm prepared to do it again. As a Latina and proud daughter of the Rio Grande Valley, I refuse to sit back while Republican leaders silence our communities, try to erase Latino political power and rig our democracy behind closed doors. That's why I joined my fellow Texas Democrats, as I did in 2021, in leaving the state, denying Republicans the required quorum they need to pass these manipulated maps. They've left us no choice. I must do everything in my power to stand up for my constituents and all Texans. That includes not letting these maps get a vote on the floor to begin with. If it can happen in Texas, it can happen elsewhere I believe we have the power − and the people − on our side to stop this shameful scheme. Texans must be willing to show up at hearings, share their stories, and demand transparency and fairness in this process. We need Democrats nationwide to see this moment as a front-line voting rights battle. It's not just another local fight. Because if Republicans make Texas their blueprint, what's to stop them from doing this in other states? Latino voters have seen this play out before. Politicians come around every few years talking a big game about representation, then disappear until the next election cycle. It has to end. The way we fight now with these maps will determine whether we earn the right to ask for Latinos to vote for us later. This moment is how Democrats can start to regain trust with Latino voters, and all communities of color. That means the stakes are high, but so is the opportunity. This is not just a fight about maps. It's a fight about who counts, and who has power in our democracy. History has its eyes on us, and it will remember who met this moment with resolve to win. And who stayed silent. Democratic Rep. Gina Hinojosa chairs the Texas House Progressive Caucus' redistricting effort.
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Republicans fear Trump tariffs are cutting into economy
Republicans on Capitol Hill are feeling jittery about the economy after the latest jobs report showed the economy added far fewer jobs than previously estimated over the past three months. President Trump and his economic team insist that the economy is going strong and poised for significant growth, but their bullish projections are meeting skepticism from some in the GOP who worry Trump's trade regime is creating economic headwinds. 'It definitely is indicative of a weakened economy, an economy that's not acting in a robust fashion. I've all along felt like there's a lag between tariffs and actual economic downturn,' said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Trump announced a new round of tariffs, including steep tariff increases on Canada and Brazil, the same day the jobs report was released. Paul argued the impact of tariffs are often delayed because companies usually sign contracts to set the prices of imports months in advance. Once those contracts expire, the higher prices of imported raw materials or finished goods are then reflected in the next round of business agreements, he said. 'I've had retailers telling me that they think their prices will have to change in the fall. As their initial contracts change, their input price is higher [and] goods will go higher, too,' he said. 'I think it is worrisome and I do worry that the news has been relatively benign on tariffs so far,' Paul said. 'The proof is really in the next couple months. 'I think there's more to come. I don't think we've seen the full impact of tariffs,' he said. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) warned that Trump's fluctuating tariff rates are increasing costs for consumers and creating uncertainty among businesses and employers. 'My view is that there's no question that consumers, Americans, pay a price for tariffs. It increases the price of the goods coming into the United States. The question is, 'Is there a reason that tariffs in a temporary way can solve trade barriers that have been artificially created against our products going somewhere else?'' he said. The Kansas senator said Trump's tariffs could have 'a beneficial outcome' if they can get other countries to open their markets to U.S. goods but cautioned 'there's no question tariffs are a tax on the cost of a product, a good.' 'A tax raises the cost of living for everybody,' he said. Asked about the impact on job creators, Moran replied: 'I know enough to know that certainty matters and at the moment there's not very much certainty about what's happening next.' 'Therefore, businesses delay decisions to expand, to hire, to spend money. So uncertainty creates a challenge for a growing economy,' he warned. A third Republican senator who requested anonymity said Friday's weak jobs report creates a significant political problem for Trump and Republicans in Congress. 'I don't think that the administration can ignore them,' the senator said of the jobs report. 'You have to see that connection, that link' between the disappointing jobs report and Trump's tariff policies, the senator said. 'I don't think spinning it is good enough,' the source added. The president responded to the negative jobs report by firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Erika McEntarfer. The report revised down the number of jobs gained in May and June by 258,000. But that move is also getting a skeptical response form some Republicans. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) warned that the shake-up at the data-reporting agency could undermine confidence in future economic data. 'The numbers are what the numbers are,' Tillis said. 'If we get to a point to where BLS [and] all these organizations that are considered to be the gold standard for data, if we start undermining them or people start losing their jobs because we don't like the result, that's a big boo-boo.' 'There are a lot of government-reporting agencies that are like the gold standard for financial markets,' he said, warning 'there better just be very clear evidence' of misconduct to support McEntarfer's termination. 'If they don't' provide that evidence, 'I think they're making a huge mistake,' he said. Several major U.S. employers have reported substantial business losses in recent weeks. Ford Motor reported last week a net loss of $36 million from April through June, compared with a profit of $1.8 billion a year ago. The automotive giant projects tariffs will cost it $2 billion this year alone. Omaha-based Berkshire Hathaway on Saturday reported that its earnings dropped by 4 percent compared with a year ago, in part because of tariffs. The company warned in its second-quarter earnings report that the 'adverse consequences' of international trade policies and tariffs 'could significantly affect our future results.' United Parcel Services's stock dropped last week after it reported weaker-than-expected earnings. The company said it would no longer provide forward guidance on revenues and profits, citing the lack of certainty in the economic outlook for the rest of this year. Appliance maker Whirlpool also announced disappointing second-quarter earnings and said it would lower its quarterly dividend payout. Some Republicans on Capitol Hill have said for months that they could support tariffs for a short period of time to put pressure on foreign trading partners to negotiate better deals for U.S. exporters but warned against putting long-term tariffs in place. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) warned in April that 'high tariffs in perpetuity' would be bad for the economy. 'I am not a fan of tariffs,' Cruz told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow at the time. 'My hope is these tariffs are short-lived and they serve as leverage to lower tariffs across the globe,' he said. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett dampened Republican hopes that high tariff rates would be transient when he told NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that many rates are already locked in Asked by NBC's Kristen Welker if Trump would change tariff rates if the financial markets dive, Hassett said: 'I would rule it out because these are final deals.'
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Early GOP rift emerges as Congress braces for shutdown fight
Rifts are emerging between Republicans over how to approach next month's government funding fight, with some pushing for leaders to try to pass new full-year spending plans and others already expressing openness to another funding patch if it means less spending. When lawmakers return from their monthlong recess in September, they'll have just weeks before an end-of-month deadline to keep the government funded or risk a shutdown. Lawmakers acknowledge they'll likely need a stopgap funding bill, also known as a continuing resolution (CR), to keep the government open come October and buy time for Congress to strike an overall fiscal 2026 spending deal. But some conservatives have already expressed backing for a full-year CR that would mostly lock in for another year funding levels set in March 2024. 'Number one, here's my order, pass the budget,' Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said last week. 'Number two, no government shutdown.' 'Number three is, if we're gonna have a CR, let's do a full year,' he told The Hill, adding, 'If we can't get it done by now, we're not gonna get done anytime soon.' It's become typical for Congress to pass short-term funding patches in September that temporarily keep spending at current levels into November or December as they work out a larger bipartisan deal to fund the government. That deal, which has often led to a massive spending bill known as an omnibus negotiated by House and Senate leaders, enrages conservatives who complain most lawmakers are left out of the process. Scott pushed back against that path, which he argued could lead to a 'busted up, blown-out spending bill.' His comments come after House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.), who is also a GOP spending cardinal, floated another 'yearlong CR' as an option when pressed about the fiscal 2026 process, arguing Democrats are 'not going to negotiate in good faith' when it comes time to hash out a bipartisan spending deal. 'I have no problem with yearlong CR, it keeps spending at current levels, it doesn't increase spending,' he said before the House recessed in late July. 'Just get it all over with. Just do a full-year CR, and I personally think that you could put the community project funded projects in it. We could do that if we had to,' he said. Lawmakers on both sides have been hopeful of striking a deal to include funding for projects back home, also known as earmarks, that didn't make it into the March full-year CR. But lawmakers on both sides are wincing at the thought of a full-year funding patch, particularly as the government operates under its third continuous stopgap. The last stopgap was passed in March, to extend funding for six months until the end of the fiscal year. 'It's terrible because conservatives should be fully against it, because it continues Biden spending,' Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) told The Hill last week. 'So there's no Republican that should want that.' 'It's important to have our priorities in there so I'm hopeful that we get it done,' he said, while noting the Senate Appropriations Committee's passage of eight funding bills out of committee so far, and plans to pass the final four after lawmakers return from recess. 'That sets us up either for passing all twelve, which would be phenomenal, or a temporary CR that would let us kind of finish the process,' he said. Some Republicans have already expressed concerns in recent months about defense programs being put on another CR past September. Defense hawks were already upset about the Pentagon being put on a full-year stopgap for the first time ever earlier this year. Asked about the prospect of defense programs running on another full-year CR, House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) didn't rule it out last month. 'We could stumble into that,' he told The Hill. 'It's not a good thing, but we could certainly do it. That's not a preferred objective. But if people aren't willing to come to a deal with the president, then that's better than a shutdown.' The top GOP appropriators in the Senate and House are both pushing to pass as many of the 12 individual fiscal year 2026 funding bills as they can, and Republican leaders in both chambers have backed those efforts. But it hasn't been easy. Last week, the Senate passed its first batch of three funding bills for fiscal 2026, approving more than $180 billion in discretionary funding for the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, military construction, legislative branch operations and rural development. But plans to pass the annual Commerce and Justice departments funding bills were scuttled over Democratic resistance to the Trump administration's relocation plans for the FBI's headquarters. The House, meanwhile, has passed two of its 12 spending bills. And negotiators will still need to iron out differences between the House bills, which skew far more conservative, and the Senate versions, which have to be written to get some Democratic support. At the same time, bipartisan government funding negotiations are being complicated by moves by the White House to claw back already allocated funds and White House budget chief Russell Vought's comments last month that the process should be 'less bipartisan.' Democrats have raised concerns about continuing to work through the regular appropriations process with their Republican counterparts in the face of an administration that has undertaken a sweeping operation to shrink parts of government without congressional approval. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-N.J.), a senior appropriator, told reporters last week that he doesn't 'understand how we can trust that any of the agreements we make are going to be adhered to by an administration that is acting illegally every single day.' 'I don't know that any guarantee that the President makes is something you can take to the bank, but the deal would have to be cut with the administration who's engaging with the illegality,' he said. At the same time, members on both sides see progress in the annual appropriations process as key to preventing a full-year stopgap in the coming months. 'Every bill we pass reduces the risk of having to have a shutdown or CR,' Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), a spending cardinal, said last week, adding that appropriators are 'trying to avoid' another full-year CR as they ramp up annual funding work. 'People have got to come to grips with the idea that the administration is going to do what they're going to do, and members of the Congress either engage in the appropriations process, do it through regular and get this done, or they have no say in how this goes,' he said. 'But the idea that there's never going to be another rescission or something else the Democrats don't like, that's how it goes. We have a Republican administration,' he said. 'But to sit out the process because of it is like taking your ball and going home because you don't like how the game's going.' The Senate Appropriations Committee last week also advanced legislation amounting to more than $1 trillion in government funding for fiscal 2026. That included about $852 billion in discretionary funding for defense programs and roughly $200 billion in discretionary funding for the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) said at the committee's final meeting before recess that the panel 'does plan to continue on a dual track, advancing bills on the floor and through this committee.' And some Senate appropriators are hopeful of a package encompassing the two bills ahead of next month's shutdown deadline. 'This is what was done in 2019,' Sen. Tammy Baldwin (Wisc.), top Democrat on the subcommittee that crafted the annual Labor-HHS funding bill, told reporters last week. The senator was referring to when lawmakers were able to pass the two bills major to both parties' priorities, along with a CR for other agencies to prevent a shutdown, for fiscal 2019 during Trump's first term. 'I know that's a high goal,' she said, but she added that she thinks there's 'high interest' on the House side in 'having appropriations and not continuing resolutions, particularly for the Defense Department.' 'And we could create a bipartisan momentum, if you will, getting those bills across the finish line,' she said.
