
Afghans seeking German visas in Pakistan fear deportation – DW – 07/29/2025
In a small, rented room in Pakistan's capital Islamabad, ZK (not her real name), a 40-year-old Afghan woman, lives her days like a prisoner.
She spends most of her time cooking, singing, dancing and watching the news.
ZK, an Afghan journalist from Badakhshan province, was one of the first women to work as a news anchor in Afghanistan. In doing so, she broke barriers in the war-ravaged country's archconservative Islamic society.
After the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan in August 2021, they began rolling back progress achieved in the previous two decades when it came to women's rights.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
ZK fled to Pakistan in 2023 after she was accepted into a German humanitarian admission program designed for Afghans at risk under the Islamic fundamentalist group's regime.
It was originally meant to be a short stay before she and her children were relocated to Germany, but has now stretched to over two years.
This has left her uncertain about when they will be able to finally make the move to the European country.
ZK said she had faced repeated harassment by Pakistani authorities, as well as detention and deportation back to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan in February.
"I have been living in Pakistan for two years, waiting for my German visa, but delays in the process have hindered my journey. In February, I was arrested by Islamabad police and deported back to Afghanistan with my two sons," ZK told DW.
"Thanks to my journalist friends, I managed to obtain a visa and return to Pakistan. At the time of my arrest, my daughter was hiding in fear of the police and was left alone in Pakistan," she added.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Following the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, the German government promised to make it possible for people whose safety was in danger to come to Germany with their families.
These humanitarian admission programs primarily intended to help Afghans who had worked for the German military, as well as people actively involved in cultural, economic, scientific and academic fields, and those who had worked for the former Afghan government.
According to figures from Germany's Foreign Ministry, some 36,300 Afghans have so far come to Germany under the relevant schemes, including almost 20,800 locally employed staff.
But around 2,400 people approved for admission are still waiting in Islamabad in Pakistan, as there is no longer a German diplomatic mission in Afghanistan itself.
In Pakistan, they are housed in guest apartments belonging to the German government while they undertake seemingly interminable visa applications and security checks.
Even though many of them have received firm promises from German authorities that they can come to Germany, they now face an uncertain future as the current German government, under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, has pledged a tougher stance on asylum and irregular migration.
As a part of that push, Berlin has vowed to halt refugee admission programs, and is reviewing whether existing commitments can be revoked.
The situation has left the Afghans in Pakistan awaiting resettlement in Germany in limbo.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Meanwhile, Pakistan, which for decades had served as refuge for Afghans fleeing from wars or oppressive regimes, has mounted a series of expulsion and deportation drives targeting Afghans since late 2023.
The deportation offensive has targeted not only undocumented Afghans but also those with valid papers or awaiting resettlement in third countries such as Germany and the US.
Aziz Gull, a 25-year-old Afghan rights activist in Islamabad, expressed her despair to DW, saying, "Our hopes are shattered, and we are homeless. No country is accepting us. My file has been sent to the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but I have not received any confirmation yet. My case at the German Foreign Office is currently on hold, leaving my fate uncertain."
Gull, originally from Maidan Wardak province in Afghanistan, arrived in Pakistan in July 2024 and applied for a humanitarian visa through a German NGO.
She added, "We face the threat of police harassment, forced deportation from Pakistan, and the Taliban will kill me because of my activism in Afghanistan."
Several Afghans DW spoke to said they had been harassed by Pakistani authorities, and expressed fears of being deported to Afghanistan as a result of delayed resettlement in Germany.
But a Pakistani Foreign Ministry official, who asked not to be named, denied allegations of harassment.
The official instead blamed Germany for "not acting quickly to address the situation" and process the visa applications of the stranded Afghans.
"The pressure should be on Germany, not us," the official said, adding: "The police are currently checking the status of undocumented Afghans and deporting those without visas or lacking legal documents to remain in Pakistan."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Umer Gilani, a lawyer in Islamabad providing legal services to Afghan refugees, described the situation of Afghans stranded in Pakistan as "dire."
"They have been repeatedly harassed by the police and seeking constant extensions of their Pakistan visas which means living in extreme anxiety," he added.
Even if you leave the costs aside, Gilani pointed out, "there is no shortage of people whose visas expired and got summarily deported back to Afghanistan, putting their lives and liberty at risk."
Gull, the Afghan rights activist in Islamabad, said she was "deeply concerned about the possibility of being forcibly returned to Afghanistan."
Over the past few years, the Taliban have banished women and girls from almost all areas of public life.
Girls have been barred from attending school beyond sixth grade, and women have been prohibited from local jobs and nongovernmental organizations.
The Taliban have ordered the closure of beauty salons and barred women from going to gyms and parks. Women also can't go out without a male guardian.
Outside the home, women and girls are required to hide not only their faces and bodies but also their voices.
"Going back would likely result in imprisonment or even execution for us," said Gull.
ZK, the female journalist, shares a similar view. "Returning to Afghanistan means death. The Taliban had already killed my husband."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
What next for US, China after talks end with no trade deal? – DW – 07/30/2025
Although no trade agreement has been reached, the US and China did agree to continue working towards extending the 90-day tariff truce, which is due to expire on August 12. Will the two rival superpowers strike a deal? The latest round of trade talks between the United States and China in Stockholm ended on July 29, with no deal in place. The 90-day truce announced in May after talks in Geneva paused an escalating trade war between the world's two largest economies, who had threatened to impose tariffs of over 100% on each other. After the Geneva meetings, US tariffs on Chinese goods were reduced from 145% to 30%, while China's retaliatory tariffs dropped from 125% to 10%. While the two rival powers have signaled that they are open to extending the negotiations beyond the August 12 deadline and avoid tariffs surging to pre-Geneva levels, key differences remain unresolved after the talks in the Swedish capital. This latest round of negotiations "showed no material difference from the previous two" and still reflected "a case of waiting things out in hopes of a shift," Claus Soong, an analyst at the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS) in Berlin, told DW. Whether the pause will be extended now depends on US President Donald Trump, who is expected to decide after a full briefing. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the US delegation in Stockholm, called the meetings "constructive," but he stressed that "nothing is agreed until we speak with President Trump." US officials warned that failure to reach a deal could see tariffs on Chinese goods surge back to triple-digit levels. China confirmed efforts to prolong the 90-day pause on most reciprocal tariffs. The US-China trade dispute as well as the US leader's trade policies with most of his country's partners has caused global uncertainty and impacted economic growth. And while the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said the recent easing of some tariffs has helped raise its global growth forecast to 3%, it warned that higher tariffs would create more uncertainty that could lead to slower economic activity. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Dr. Patricia M. Kim, a fellow at the Brookings Institution's John L. Thornton China Center, told DW that recent weeks have seen both sides look to moderate their rhetoric, "signaling a mutual interest in creating the conditions for a leader-level meeting." While no agreement was announced, both sides seem to have "achieved their immediate objective from this meeting — to extend the trade truce, buying time to work toward a broader deal that Presidents Trump and Xi [Jinping] could endorse when they meet later this year," she added. There have been reports that the two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea being held from October 30 to November 1. Trump this week denied that he was "seeking a summit," although did not rule out traveling to China to meet with Xi Jinping. The US delegation went into the talks in Stockholm just days after Trump secured a deal with the EU, which many in the bloc say favors the US. The US has also recently signed deals with Japan, the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, giving the trade delegation in Stockholm a boost as it renewed talks with China. But after a string of wins, Washington is finding out that striking a favorable deal with China might not be so easy. A core element of the standoff revolves around China's dominance over rare earth materials and US restrictions on AI chip exports. At trade talks in London in June, export controls were formally included in trade discussions, an unprecedented move that blurred the lines between trade and national security. After London, both countries signaled a potential easing of restrictions on rare earth and semiconductor exports. According to MERICS expert Soong, China has the upper hand in this area, as the "chip card" is less effective than rare earths. "China can leverage its control over the global market for rare earth materials and magnets," he said, which are crucial for the world's car, semiconductor and aerospace industries. "Rare earth control is the real pain point," Soong added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In February Trump imposed a 20% tariff, claiming China had failed to curb fentanyl precursor exports. While most of the Geneva-era tariffs were later scaled down, the 20% fentanyl-related tariffs remain in place. In what was widely seen as a gesture of goodwill and a bid to de-escalate trade tensions, in late June Beijing added two fentanyl precursors to its list of controlled substances. While that move raised hopes that the related duties might be lifted, Soong cautioned that "the fentanyl-related tariffs appear to serve primarily as a pretext." "Given that their removal would lower the overall tariff rate to just 10% — potentially below the levels applied to Japan and the EU — such a move seems improbable," he said. Soong added that even if the 20% fentanyl tariff is scrapped, "equivalent measures would likely be reintroduced under a different justification." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In an interview with Fox Business ahead of the Stockholm talks, Bessent pointed out that China accounts for 30% of global manufacturing exports. "It should not get any larger," Bessent said, adding that China's "is an unsustainable, historically the most imbalanced economy, thus a shift towards a domestic consumption-centered economy is necessary." Dr. Kim said that given Beijing's own recognition of those economic imbalances, US concerns about Chinese overcapacity or the need for consumer-driven growth may be manageable. She highlighted how some of their interests are aligned — namely Chinese purchases of non-strategic US goods, Chinese investment in non-sensitive US sectors, and cooperation on fentanyl. But when the negotiations go beyond trade and enter "the strategic realm, they will get more challenging," Kim said. "It's hard to imagine Beijing agreeing to side with the US against its strategic partners," she said, referring to the Trump administration pressing China on their purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. China, Dr Kim explained, will "certainly have demands" of their own, including pushing the Trump administration to adopt their preferred language and stance on Taiwan, and to commit to exempt export restrictions on high-tech goods. "Such issues that cut against the core strategic interests of both sides will prove more difficult to resolve," Kim said.


DW
an hour ago
- DW
Should India worry about China's massive dam? – DW – 07/30/2025
China's construction of a massive dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo has raised fears in India over water flows, agriculture and regional security. China began building a massive dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river near the disputed border with the northeastern Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh — which Beijing also claims — earlier this month at a ceremony attended by Chinese Premier Li Qiang. It has sparked alarm in India given both the environmental risks and the potential leverage it offers China over water flow into northeast India and Bangladesh. The estimated $170 billion (€147.4 billion) hydropower project aims to generate 300 billion kilowatt hours of electricity annually, supplying power primarily for transmission to other parts of China and meeting local demand in Tibet. It surpasses the giant Three Gorges Dam's capacity, currently the largest in the world. Some experts and former diplomats believe the dam is likely to renew tensions between India and China, despite recent signs of a cautious improvement in ties, such as addressing border concerns. The two nations have accused each other of trying to seize territory along their de facto border, known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which India claims is 3,488 kilometers (2,167 miles) long and China says is shorter. After years of tension, both countries have renewed efforts to normalize relations. In January, both sides agreed to resume flights after nearly five years. Three months later, India and China's special representatives decided to move forward by resuming pilgrimages and border trade. However, the dam project introduces a major new fault line, as the ecological changes to the landscape are expected to trigger a range of geopolitical and environmental issues related to habitats and demography across the lower Himalayas. India considers the Expert Level Mechanism (ELM) — a bilateral data-sharing framework — inadequate given the scale of dam project, as the ELM mainly provides information during the monsoon season, when flooding is a major risk. "In the long run, as India argues, it will not only trap nutrient-rich sediments vital for downstream soil fertility in Assam and Bangladesh, thereby affecting irrigation," Aravind Yelery, associate professor at the Centre for East Asian Studies in Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, told DW. The dam will "also impact crop yields and agricultural productivity, and compromise riverine ecosystems," Yelery added. In Yelery's estimate, the transboundary rivers and China's approach to unilaterally altering the riverine ecosystem is disastrous environmentally and diplomatically. "From a legal aspect, China is taking a felonious route to neglect its responsibility for preserving river flows due to geopolitical ambitions," said Yelery, adding that this has already had a profound impact on India's strategic approach to engaging in border talks. China took a similar stance on the Mekong River, asserting upstream control while constructing several dams. Since the mid-1980s, China has built 11 large dams on the Mekong (Lancang), with more underway. "China has not entered into riparian agreement with any of its neighbours even though it controls the headworks of most major rivers in Asia," Atul Kumar, a China expert and fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Beijing has adopted a similar stance in the Yarlung Tsangpo case and kept India and Bangladesh uninformed on these dam projects. Even the hydrological data sharing, a harmless technical detail, often depends on bilateral relationship and has often remained unavailable during tense periods," said Kumar. A statement by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun that the project "will not have any negative impact on the downstream regions" during a media briefing last week has been met with skepticism. Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu described the Chinese mega dam project as a ticking "water bomb" and an existential threat that is a far bigger issue than the military threat. "The issue is that China cannot be trusted. No one knows what they might do," Khandu told news agency PTI, stressing that China is not a signatory to the international water treaty that could have forced it to abide by global norms. Kumar also raised concerns over the dam's risk of failure, which "would always remain a ticking bomb for downstream areas in northeast India and Bangladesh." "In an unstable and earthquake-prone Himalayas, a natural disaster, conflict or even sabotage can bring destruction all over the downstream areas," said Kumar. Former diplomat Anil Wadhwa called for a consultative mechanism and said China should disclose details about the dam's capacity, water flows and alignments, once construction has been completed. "It is imperative that India takes all defensive measures in Arunachal Pradesh by constructing its own dam at the earliest," Wadhwa told DW. "The local opposition should be compensated and open communication with the affected community will help lest the issue spiral as we have seen with other mega projects in the country." That sentiment was echoed by former diplomat Ajay Bisaria, who told DW, "Given China's recent history of leveraging economic interdependence and trade as a geopolitical tool, India should assume China will weaponize the waters." "While China's willingness to do so is evident, its capacity and the technical feasibility are yet to be seen. To mitigate that risk, India must proactively assess and game the worst-case scenario," Bisaria concluded. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video


DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Middle East: Support grows for Palestinian statehood – DW – 07/30/2025
More than a dozen countries have joined France in calling on more countries to recognize a Palestinian state amid the crisis in Gaza. DW has United Kingdom will recognize Palestinian statehood in September unless the Israeli government takes significant steps to end the "appalling situation" in Gaza and meets other conditions, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday. Israel rejected Starmer's ultimatum, calling it a "reward for Hamas," comments that were repeated by US President Donald Trump. UK Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander responded to the Israeli claim, saying: "This is not a reward for Hamas. Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation that has committed appalling atrocities." "This is about the Palestinian people," she told LBC radio. "It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death." "We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza," she added. Alexander also spoke on the BBC's Today Program, rejecting accusations that the government had changed its position for political reasons. She stated that the Labor Party has a "longstanding commitment" to recognizing the State of Palestine as part of achieving a two-state solution, adding that support for Palestinian statehood had been part of the party's 2024 manifesto. The UK, along with the United States, the EU and others, designates Hamas as a terrorist organization. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The foreign ministers of 15 countries issued a joint statement following a UN conference in New York on Tuesday aimed at reviving a two-state solution between Israelis and the Palestinians. The conference was hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. It had been planned to take place earlier in the year but was postponed following Israel's strikes on Iran. "In New York, together with 14 other countries, France is issuing a collective appeal: we express our desire to recognize the State of Palestine and invite those who have not yet done so to join us," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot wrote on X. In the statement, 15 signatories affirmed their "unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution." Nine of the signatories have not yet recognized Palestinian statehood, including Australia, Canada and New Zealand. They expressed "the willingness or the positive consideration of their countries" to move toward recognition. The other signing countries were: Andorra, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Slovenia and Spain. President Emmanuel Macron announced plans last week to formally recognize Palestinian statehood in September, sparking strong opposition from Israel and the United States. This blog will cover the latest developments across the Middle East, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are at risk of death by starvation in Gaza. The humanitarian crisis has led to several Western countries saying that they will recognize a Palestinian state as a means to put pressure on Israel. France has said it will officially recognize Palestine in September, ahead of the 80th UN General Assembly. The UK also announced on Tuesday that it would recognize Palestinian statehood unless Israel commits to a ceasefire and long-term peace process. Israel rejected the British ultimatum. Follow along with this blog for up-to-date reports, correspondents' analyses, and explainers on the unfolding situation in Gaza.