
Benefits of HF Drug May Weaken Soon After Withdrawal
Finerenone, a third-generation nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, showed promise in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure (HF). However, its abrupt withdrawal after long-term use was associated with an increased incidence of serious adverse events (related to the heart, leading to death approximately 30 days after withdrawal of treatment.
METHODOLOGY:
Guidelines recommend lifelong use of therapies for HF due to their presumed lasting benefits; however, clinicians and patients frequently question whether such treatments can be safely stopped once the disease becomes stable.
Researchers conducted a secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial to assess the cardiovascular effects of discontinuing finerenone after long-term use of the drug.
The FINEARTS-HF trial included 6001 patients with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 40% who were randomly assigned to receive either finerenone (mean age, 71.9 years; 45.1% women) or placebo (mean age, 72 years; 45.9% women) for a median duration of 2.6 years.
After the treatment phase ended, 3742 surviving patients (1852 on placebo and 1890 on finerenone) were withdrawn from the interventions; the patients remained blinded to the treatment and withdrawal.
Adverse events were assessed approximately 30 days after the withdrawal, focusing on serious cardiovascular episodes or any event resulting in death.
TAKEAWAY:
Before the withdrawal, patients receiving finerenone vs placebo experienced fewer serious cardiovascular adverse events or adverse events leading to death (6.0 vs 9.2 per 100 patient-years).
The withdrawal of finerenone was associated with a 2.8-fold increase in the incidence of cardiovascular events or adverse leading to death, a pattern not observed after the withdrawal of placebo (time period-treatment P for interaction = .006).
Most of the cardiovascular events in the withdrawal period were related to HF; withdrawal of finerenone vs placebo was associated with more HF-specific serious events or adverse events leading to death (time period-treatment P for interaction = .012).
IN PRACTICE:
'Global implementation efforts are needed to promote long-term MRA [mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist] therapy persistence to maximize treatment potential. Minimal changes in serum potassium or kidney function during MRA therapy should not automatically lead to treatment interruption,' the researchers wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Muthiah Vaduganathan, MD, MPH, of Harvard Medical School in Boston. It was published online on July 28, 2025, in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
LIMITATIONS:
Patients assigned to receive finerenone or placebo may no longer have been directly comparable years after randomization. Clinical events during the withdrawal period relied on reporting of adverse events without adjudication. Fewer than 50 clinical events were recorded during the short withdrawal period, reducing the precision of the estimates.
DISCLOSURES:
The FINEARTS-HF trial was funded by Bayer. Several authors reported serving on advisory boards, having speaker engagements, receiving research support, and having other financial ties with multiple pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and healthcare companies. Three authors reported being employees of Bayer.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mind-Blowing Discovery: Peacocks Have Lasers In Their Tails
Sharks with frickin' lasers are tired news. Peacocks, apparently, are where it's truly at. Famous for their dazzling iridescence, peacock feathers are known to contain nanostructures that scatter light in ways that make their plumage shimmer in hues of blue and green. Applying a special dye to multiple areas on a peacock's tail, researchers from Florida Polytechnic University and Youngstown State University in the US went on the hunt for structures that may emit a very different signature glow. In a mind-blowing first for the animal kingdom, they discovered the eyespots on the fowl's fabulous feathers have unique properties that align light waves by bouncing them back and forth, effectively turning them into yellow-green lasers. Related: The word laser itself is an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Shine a light on atoms in certain materials, such as certain dyes or crystals, and they'll collectively excite one another into releasing a flood of photons. This kind of light amplification isn't rare in nature, attracting the attention of researchers who are interested in developing biological lasers. To become a bona fide laser beam, however, the buildup of stimulated waves must be neatly aligned so their phases march in step. One way to achieve this is to reflect the waves back and forth in a confined space known as an optical cavity. The researchers found evidence of optical cavities in the form of resonating nanostructures in different parts of the eyespot, all faintly emitting two different wavelengths: green and yellow/orange. Exactly what kind of structure is responsible for aligning the amplified light at these colors isn't clear. But the fact they are found across the feather, all emitting the same precise wavelengths in a signature fashion, is a sign that something strange is at work. Identifying the physical properties of these resonators could lead to advances in laser technology, or provide biologists with a new tool for analyzing living materials. As for the peacocks, we can only guess why evolution built lasers into their stunningly iridescent plumage. Given how biologists are quickly coming to terms with the way animals fluoresce and shine in patterns and colors beyond our perception, it may be for displays that other peacocks are well adapted to see. Perhaps sharks with lasers aren't such a terrible idea after all. This research was published in Scientific Reports. Related News World's Longest Lightning Strike Crossed 515 Miles From Texas to Kansas Stunning New Video Reveals Deepest-Known Undersea Life Forms How a Giant Earthquake Triggered a Surprisingly Small Tsunami Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
A black goo was oozing from a ship on the Great Lakes — and teeming with life
Research vessel Blue Heron trawls the Great Lakes, gathering data from the water. The floating laboratory's most recent discovery, however, came from an unexpected location: its own rudder. While docked after a long cruise to study algae blooms in lakes Erie and Superior in September, the crew noticed a black, tar-like substance oozing from the rudder shaft, the mechanism that allows the 87-foot-long (nearly 27-meter-long) boat to change directions. Unsure of what the odd goo was, Doug Ricketts, marine superintendent and senior research associate at the University of Minnesota Duluth's Large Lakes Observatory, brought a cup of the substance to the observatory's scientists for testing. The scientists were surprised to find that the material was teeming with life-forms, some of which were unknown microorganisms. The mysterious substance, now informally named 'ShipGoo001,' had seemingly been thriving in the oxygen-free environment of the rudder shaft, according to a June 27 university announcement. 'There's no reason to expect any living organisms to be in this part of the ship,' Ricketts said, referring to the closed-off rudder shaft housing. 'This particular piece of a ship doesn't really move a lot. It's not exposed to the rest of the world.' If more goo is found, the goal will be to collect it without disturbing its oxygen-free environment, said lead researcher Cody Sheik, a microbial ecologist at Large Lakes Observatory. More careful study could lead to further discovery of new species of microbes, he added. 'One of the things that's fun about this, is that it was very unexpected. … All of these different things that we make become new habitats that (could be) right for microorganisms,' Sheik said. 'It makes me wonder: What else are we missing by not going out and just looking at something?' Studying the mysterious goo While some of the DNA extracted from the black goo was found to be from previously unknown microorganisms, other genetic material in the sample has been observed across the world. When researchers searched global databases, they discovered some DNA was related to microbes from a tarball-type substance in the Mediterranean, a hydrocarbon-contaminated sediment in Calgary, Alberta, and other samples from the coast of California to Germany. 'It's kind of all over the board in terms of what sort of environments these things are being found in,' Sheik said. 'I think we'll get a better idea of what these organisms are capable of by thinking more broadly about the other environments that they're found in.' The researchers still have many unanswered questions about the odd material, including how it came to be on the ship and whether it is capable of biocorrosion — eating or degrading the ship's steel. Since the substance was in its own sealed environment, it would need a complex food web to be able to thrive and sustain itself. '(Biocorrosion) is one of the things we have to worry about in oil pipelines and all these other really key infrastructure places. And so, you know, for some of these ships, especially the ones that are really long-lived here on the Great Lakes, because they're in fresh water, is this something where they could be corroding this area? It may be something to think about for future iterations of shipbuilding and things like that,' Sheik said. Researchers hope to answer these questions in a forthcoming research paper, which will also include the full genomes of the goo's microorganisms so other scientists can build on their work, Sheik added. Depending on what the researchers find, the material could have practical applications; methane-producing organisms in the substance could have potential use in biofuel production, according to the university's announcement. For now, researchers are keeping an eye out for more of the substance in the ship, and on other vessels, so they can gather additional samples and run further tests. The origin of the goo Because there are so many microbial species in the world — potentially up to 1 trillion — finding a new one isn't particularly surprising, said Jeffrey Marlow, an assistant professor of biology at Boston University. 'It's all about where they're found and what their genomic history or metabolic capacity is — that's what often makes a new species particularly exciting,' he added in an email. To ascertain the origin of the substance, Sheik and his team are putting together a history of the ship, as the former fishing boat was purchased pre-owned nearly three decades ago by the University of Minnesota Duluth. While the ship's rudder is not meant to be lubricated with anything other than water, it's possible that the previous owners oiled that area and those organisms laid dormant for years. What's more, the goo was not present during the ship's last inspection in November 2021. Marlow, who was not involved in the discovery, hypothesized that the ooze could have wound up in the rudder shaft by catching a ride on marine snow — clumps of dead organic matter that sink through the water column and contain oxygen-free pockets, he explained. Sheik plans to explore the goo's origin, noting that there are many scenarios to consider, including whether the substance grew in the rudder shaft in the first place or somehow hitched a ride on the boat. 'One of the coolest parts of this story is the fact that the sample made it to the microbiologists in the first place — it speaks to a 'microbiologically literate' culture where several people had the awareness and curiosity to ask what might be living in an otherwise inconvenient ooze,' Marlow said. 'It makes you wonder what other fascinating microbes could be living around us in the most unexpected places.' Taylor Nicioli is a freelance journalist based in New York. Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun says Elon Musk risks 'killing breakthrough innovation' at xAI. Here's why.
Meta's Yann LeCun disagrees with Elon Musk about the role of researchers at AI companies. Musk earlier said xAI is ditching the "researcher" job title in favor of "engineers." LeCun said ignoring the distinction between them could risk "killing breakthrough innovation." Meta's chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun, doesn't agree with Elon Musk's latest take on AI development. Like, at all. Musk sparked a conversation about the roles of researchers and engineers at tech companies on Tuesday in an X post. Musk said his AI startup, xAI, would ditch the "researcher" job title in favor of "engineer." "This false nomenclature of 'researcher' and 'engineer', which is a thinly-masked way of describing a two-tier engineering system, is being deleted from @xAI today," Musk said. "There are only engineers. Researcher is a relic term from academia." Two days later, LeCun shared a screenshot of Musk's X post on LinkedIn with a multi-paragraph response. "If you make no distinction between the two activities, if you don't evaluate researchers and engineers with different criteria, you run the risk of killing breakthrough innovation," LeCun said. "True breakthroughs require teams with a long horizon and minimal constraints from product development and management." Musk isn't the first person to question the distinction between AI researchers and engineers. Other leading AI companies have, too. In a 2023 X post, OpenAI President Greg Brockman said that the company didn't want to put its workers into such defined buckets. Instead, the ChatGPT-maker settled on the phrase "Member of Technical Staff." Anthropic, which makes Claude, also uses "Member of Technical Staff" as a job title. "While there's historically been a division between engineering and research in machine learning, we think that boundary has dissolved with the advent of large models," Anthropic says on its careers page. LeCun, however, says the research labs that shaped what the science and tech industries have become were all separate from engineering divisions. "The industry research labs of yore that have left an indelible mark on scientific and technological progress (Bell Labs Area 11, IBM Research, Xerox PARC, etc) were all research divisions that were clearly separate from engineering divisions," LeCun said. Read the original article on Business Insider