logo
Issue ‘no caste no religion' certificates to those who ask: Madras High Court

Issue ‘no caste no religion' certificates to those who ask: Madras High Court

India Today12-06-2025
The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to issue orders enabling Revenue officials to grant 'no caste, no religion' certificates to individuals who do not wish to be identified by any particular caste or religion.The directive follows a petition filed by H Santhosh from Tirupattur district, who had appealed against a single judge's order that refused to direct the local Tahsildar to issue such certificates to his family.advertisementSanthosh, who has two children, declared in his affidavit before the court that he has never availed of any government benefits based on caste or religion and does not intend to do so in future. He expressed a desire to raise his children in a society free from caste and religious identity.
A division bench of Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar, setting aside the earlier order, directed the Tirupattur District Collector and the concerned Tahsildar to issue the certificate to the petitioner within a month. The court also called upon the Tamil Nadu government to pass a Government Order (GO) enabling the issuance of such certificates to all eligible applicants who approach the Revenue Department.In its observations, the bench said, 'While the Constitution of India prohibits caste-based discrimination, caste and religion still play a significant role in social life, politics, education and employment through reservation policies.' The judges described the petitioner's decision to renounce caste and religious identity as 'laudable' and stated that such efforts could help promote the prohibition of caste-based discrimination and act as an 'eye-opener' for like-minded citizens.advertisementThe court also dismissed the Revenue Department's argument that Tahsildars lack the power to issue such certificates due to the absence of a Government Order, calling the stance 'paradoxical'. The bench noted that certificates had been issued by Tahsildars in Tirupattur, Coimbatore and Ambattur in the past. It held that constitutional mandates, particularly under Article 25 of the Constitution of India, could not be overridden by administrative inaction.The court further observed that Article 25, while guaranteeing freedom of religion, also permits the state to legislate for social welfare and reform, even if such laws interfere with religious practices. In this context, the state has a constitutional obligation to respect the freedom of conscience of individuals who choose not to identify with any religion or caste.
IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If a Chief Secretary does not obey court orders, who else will, asks Madras High Court judge
If a Chief Secretary does not obey court orders, who else will, asks Madras High Court judge

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

If a Chief Secretary does not obey court orders, who else will, asks Madras High Court judge

If the Chief Secretary of a State does not comply with a judicial order within the time stipulated by a court of law, how will other officials serving under him obey judicial orders in letter and spirit, asked Justice Battu Devanand of the Madras High Court on Monday (July 21, 2025). He posed the question during the hearing of suo motu contempt of court proceedings initiated against Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary N. Muruganandam and his predecessor Shiv Das Meena, now serving as chairperson of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA). After both officers appeared before the court following the issuance of statutory notices, the judge observed that Mr. Muruganandam would not have needed to stand before the court if Mr. Meena had promptly complied with an order passed as early as September 19, 2023. Pointing out that Mr. Muruganandam had taken charge as Chief Secretary only on August 19, 2024, the judge said, he might not have come to know about the 2023 order until the present suo motu contempt proceedings were initiated against both officers in June 2025. The judge also expressed satisfication with the steps taken by Mr. Muruganandam to implement the court order pursuant to the contempt proceedings, but questioned as to why Mr. Meena had not taken steps to implement the order between September 2023 and August 2024. Justice Devanand recalled to have recorded his appreciation for Mr. Meena two years ago, in another case, for having issued a circular instructing all government officials to comply with court orders in true letter and spirit and also within the time stipulated by the court for their implementation. 'Now, the same officer is standing before the court for not implementing his own circular,' the judge remarked. Nevertheless, he closed the suo motu contempt proceedings after accepting the unconditional apology and being satisfied with steps taken by Mr. Muruganandam to implement the 2023 order. What is the contempt case about? Then, Justice Devanand had directed the Chief Secretary to constitute an expert committee for recommending necessary amendments to the Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 2023, since the existing provisions suffered from various infirmities. The judge had also ordered that the committee should consider fixing a time frame for providing compassionate employment to the dependants of government employees who died in service and consider the possibility of maintaining a district-wise list of dependants eligible for compassionate appointment. He had also called for an action-taken report from the Chief Secretary within three months. However, in June 2025, the judge learnt that his 2023 direction had not been complied with and therefore, he initiated suo motu contempt against all those who held the post of Chief Secretary since then. After Mr. Muruganandam reported that he had now constituted the committee and also submitted the minutes of its meetings, the judge recorded his submissions and closed the contempt proceedings with a direction to submit the amended statutory rules before the court after two weeks.

Outsourcing employees question govt's sincerity amid new appointments
Outsourcing employees question govt's sincerity amid new appointments

Hans India

time5 hours ago

  • Hans India

Outsourcing employees question govt's sincerity amid new appointments

Hyderabad: Outsourcing employees in various government departments are questioning the sincerity of the administration's stated aim to eliminate middlemen, as the recent appointment of thousands of new outsourcing staff has raised eyebrows. This comes even as many existing outsourcing employees face uncertain futures due to accumulating pending salaries and non-renewal of contracts. Employees are astonished by the government's dual approach of terminating some outsourcing services while simultaneously making new appointments in other departments. On 19 July, as part of the establishment of the Irrigation and Command Area Development Department, the government granted permission to engage 2,494 various categories of services on an outsourcing basis, along with 61 housekeeping and security services, all through a third-party service provider. These employees will operate under the administrative control of the Department's Engineer-in-chief. As per the Government Order (GO) issued by Sandeep Kumar Sultania, Principal Secretary, these employees will be engaged for a period of one year, or until regular posts are filled, or until the actual need ceases, whichever occurs earlier. This decision has surprised many, particularly amidst the ongoing impact of salary delays affecting several employees in different departments and hundreds losing their jobs due to non-renewal of contracts this year. Outsourcing employees have questioned the necessity of continuing to engage these agencies, especially since the government had promised to constitute a dedicated corporation. 'We are losing close to Rs 5,000 per month as commission to these agencies. This is a clear case of exploitation. We hope Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy understands the grievance of the outsourcing employee,' emphasised employees. A significant protest was recently organised by outsourcing employees near Indira Park in Hyderabad, led by a Telangana JAC committee of outsourcing employees, demanding that the government resolve their issues. Their key demands include regularisation of services, scrapping the contract/outsourced employment system, proper pay scales and benefits, ex gratia for families of deceased employees, addressing agency exploitation, and the formation of a dedicated recruitment corporation. Earlier, the state government had formed a committee to review staffing across government bodies and offered hope for outsourced employees. The government is reportedly drafting proposals for a dedicated recruitment corporation to manage this ad-hoc staff. A Cabinet Sub-Committee is also studying the concerns raised by outsourcing employees, and the government has assured safeguarding their rights.

Kula Nirmulana Porata Samithi holds state-level meeting
Kula Nirmulana Porata Samithi holds state-level meeting

Hans India

timea day ago

  • Hans India

Kula Nirmulana Porata Samithi holds state-level meeting

Ongole: Arrestingthe democrats and agitators who are voicing for the oppressed people is a clear violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India, observed Justice B Chandrakumar. The Kula Nirmulana Porata Samithi organised a state-level meeting with a demand for the release of its president Duddu Prabhakar, who has been in prison in Chhattisgarh for the last two years, at Ambedkar Bhavan in Ongole on Saturday. Attending as the chief guest to the meeting, Justice Chandrakumar said that no one has the right to suppress the constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights, including the right to speak, the right to question, and the right to live. He said that the public has the right to dissent from the government, and it is undemocratic to arrest the leaders and workers who are working for the rights and aspirations of the public. Another speaker, former Additional Advocate General of Andhra Pradesh, A Sathya Prasad, said that enforcing the laws made during the British Raj on the citizens of the country is nothing but cruel. The enforcement of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) like acts is strangling the voices of the public. He said that the government must protect the constitutional systems and not use force on the people questioning the systems. He stated that it is disheartening that the bail application of Duddu Prabhakar was rejected citing the sections of the UAPA. Veekshanam Editor N Venugopal said that the government is waging a war on its people and resorting to atrocities on them, the natives of Chhattisgarh, in the name of 'Operation Kagar', to hand over the forest, full of natural resources and assets, to corporate forces. The Communist Party of India AP Secretary K Ramakrishna said that after the Bharatiya Janata Party came into power, the opposition party leaders are branded as Urban Naxals, and are being silenced by force. He said that the BJP won't be in power for long in a democracy. The KNPS AP vice president, M Krishnaiah, and assistant secretary Duddu Venkatrao, presided over the meeting while ViRaSam leader G Kalyanarao, New Democracy leader Chittipati Venkateswarlu, Chenetha Karmika Samakhya leader Macharla Mohan Rao, Praja Kalamandali state secretary J Koti, and others participated in it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store