Zelenskiyy praises killing of top Russian military figures
The Kremlin has blamed Ukraine for last Friday's car bomb outside Moscow that killed Yaroslav Moskalik, 59, deputy head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces.
Authorities in Kyiv have made no direct comment on the attack on Moskalik, the latest in a series of Russian military officers and pro-war figures killed since the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Zelenskiyy's remarks, on the Telegram messaging app, made no reference to any specific instance of Russian military officers being killed.
'The head of Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence reported on the liquidation of persons from the top command of the Russian armed forces. Justice inevitably is done,' Zelenskiyy said, referring to the agency's head, Oleg Ivashchenko.
'The head reported on further measures to counter Russian agent networks in Ukraine and saboteurs. Good results.
Thank you for your work,' the president said.
Ukraine's SBU intelligence service said it killed Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, a top Russian general accused by Ukraine of being responsible for the use of chemical weapons against Ukrainian troops, last December in Moscow.
Trump and Ukraine's Zelenskiy have 'very productive' meeting in Rome, says US official
A Moscow court at the weekend ordered a Ukrainian national facing terrorism charges in connection with the attack on Moskalik to be remanded in custody.
A Moskalik obituary published on Tuesday in the Russian defence ministry's official newspaper, Krasnaya Zvezda and signed by Russian Defence Minister Andrei Belousov, his deputies and top army commanders, described Moskalik as a 'loyal son' of Russia.
It said that since the start of the war, which the obituary in line with the Kremlin's stance called 'a special military operation', Moskalik supervised the works of the General Staff's combat control group. It did not provide details on what that position involved.
According to the obituary, from 2015 to 2021 Moskalik was involved in Russian defence ministry's international delegations working on issues relating to southeastern Ukraine.
He was 'responsible for preparing materials for the Russian president on the situation in southeastern Ukraine', the obituary said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Trump announces trade deal, oil partnership with Pakistan
US President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Filipino President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on July 22, 2025. Photo: AFP US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a new deal between the United States and Pakistan for the joint development of Pakistan's oil reserves — a development likely to factor into ongoing trade discussions between the two countries. In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, President Trump stated: 'We have just concluded a deal with the country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves.' He added that the US is in the process of selecting a company to lead the initiative. 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India someday!' he remarked. The announcement comes as part of a broader push by the US administration to secure new trade partnerships. 'We are very busy in the White House today working on trade deals,' Trump wrote. 'I have spoken to the leaders of many countries, all of whom want to make the United States 'extremely happy'.' He said several countries were now proposing tariff reductions. 'All of this will help reduce our trade deficit in a very major way,' he claimed, promising that a full report would be released 'at the appropriate time'. The development follows Pakistan's recent move to exempt foreign technology companies from a five per cent tax on digitally supplied goods and services — a measure widely viewed as a goodwill gesture toward Washington. The Federal Board of Revenue formally notified the exemption on Wednesday, coinciding with Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb's visit to Washington, where he is engaged in talks to resolve outstanding issues hindering a broader trade agreement. Earlier, Trump had announced that imports from India would now face a 25 per cent tariff. He also hinted at an unspecified 'penalty' in response to India's ongoing purchases of Russian arms and energy. The new rate is slightly lower than the one proposed in April but is still higher than tariffs imposed on other Asian nations that have signed preliminary agreements with Washington.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
US imposes sanctions on shipping empire tied to Iranian leaders
WASHINGTON: The United States on Wednesday slapped sanctions on a shipping empire controlled by the son of a top political advisor to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Treasury Department said sanctions were being imposed on companies and vessels operated by Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, who has been subject to US sanctions since 2020. It said Hossein operates a fleet of more than 50 tankers and container ships that transport Iranian and Russian oil and petroleum products, generating tens of billions of dollars in profit. 'The Shamkhani family's shipping empire highlights how the Iranian regime elites leverage their positions to accrue massive wealth and fund the regime's dangerous behavior,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. The Treasury Department and State Department said more than 115 individuals, corporate entities and vessels were being sanctioned including companies based in Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and other countries. US imposes sanctions on Iranian oil minister, shadow fleet 'The over 115 sanctions issued today are the largest to-date since the Trump Administration implemented our campaign of maximum pressure on Iran,' Bessent said. The sanctions are being imposed over a month after the United States attacked Iran's nuclear program, hitting a uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the sanctions are intended to 'disrupt the Iranian regime's ability to fund its destabilizing activities, including its nuclear program, support for terrorist groups, and oppression of its own people.' 'As President (Donald) Trump has said, any country or person who chooses to purchase Iranian oil or petrochemicals exposes themselves to the risk of US sanctions and will not be allowed to conduct business with the United States,' Bruce said. Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender told reporters he did not expect the sanctions to result in 'sustained disruption to global oil markets.' 'This is a targeted action against Iran's illicit oil smuggling, a significant majority of which goes to China,' Faulkender said. 'By exposing this activity we're helping legitimate firms avoid this trade,' he said. Faulkender said Iran was exporting about 1.8 million barrels of crude oil per day at the beginning of the year and the current figure is around 1.2 million barrels per day. 'We're still engaging in further action to bring that number down even more,' he said.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
India reacts to Trump's 25% tariff on exports to US
U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday a 25% tariff on goods imported from India starting August 1 and an unspecified penalty for buying Russian weapons and oil. Trump's decision dashes hopes of a limited trade agreement between the two countries, which had been under negotiation for several months. Here are some reactions: Madhavi arora, economist, emkay global 'While the negotiations seem to have broken down, we don't think the trade deal haggling between the two nations is over yet. We see it more from the lens of geopolitics than purely economics and see both sides striving to get the deal done, even as the power equations may change a bit in U.S. favour.' Ranen banerjee, partner of economic advisory, pwc India 'Higher tariffs for India compared to countries it competes with, for exports to the U.S., are going to be challenging. However, the expectation is that the trade deal is likely to be finalised shortly and hence the period of applicability of these higher tariffs could be short.' Nilesh shah, md kotak mahindra amc 'Despite the unpredictable policy making of the U.S., the market was expecting a tariff deal to work out as longer-term U.S.-India strategic interests are aligned. Markets will hope for a 'TACO' trade if better senses prevail. India, US trade talks face roadblocks ahead of tariff deadline, Indian sources say China is defying U.S./UN sanctions on Iran oil, Myanmar and Russia trade and North Korea support. Size and the competitiveness of the economy has its advantages. I hope and pray that this unilateral imposition should accelerate Indian policy making to be growth supportive. Our biggest deterrence continues to remain GDP size and competitiveness.' Agneshwar sen, trade policy leader, ey India 'The decision to raise the U.S. tariff to 25% on Indian exports is an unfortunate development, particularly given the strong strategic partnership that has been steadily built between India and the USA in recent years. However, it's important to note that both countries remain positively engaged in active negotiations with the U.S. team expected in India later in August to finalize a comprehensive trade agreement.' Kirit bhansali, chairman, gem and jewellery export promotion council India 'This is a deeply concerning development. The Indian gem and jewellery sector, in particular, stands to be severely impacted. The United States is our single largest market, accounting for over $10 billion in exports - nearly 30% of our industry's total global trade. A blanket tariff of this magnitude will place immense pressure on every part of the value chain. We recognise the need to address trade imbalances, but such extreme measures undermine decades of economic cooperation. We urge the U.S. administration to reconsider, and call on both governments to engage in constructive dialogue that safeguards bilateral trade and protects the millions of jobs that depend on it on both sides.' N. Thirukkumaran, general secretary of tiruppur exporters' association 'It is just a negotiation tactic. Trade negotiations are ongoing. The Indian government is tough on certain terms like agriculture and dairy — India isn't opening up. If it goes through, U.S. exports from the association will be affected, because Vietnam has lower tariffs. We will be losing our competitive edge. India prioritises national interest in US trade talks, trade ministry source says We are optimistic that an imminent trade agreement will be on the lines of the one with the UK. We have to wait and watch, and not panic. There is no reason to panic.' Garima kapoor, economist, institutional equities, elara securities, mumbai 'Overall, we continue to see a deal by end Q3 but, a kneejerk reaction in Indian asset classes is likely in the near term.' S.C. ralhan, president of the federation of Indian export organisations 'This is a major setback for Indian exporters, especially in sectors like textiles, footwear, and furniture, as the 25% tariff will render them uncompetitive in the US market against rivals from Vietnam, China, and elsewhere. However, we remain hopeful that both countries will work towards a bilateral trade agreement.' Avinash gorakshakar, director of research at profitmart securities 'Until the final document is released, it's all speculation. India is a large, attractive market that the U.S. cannot afford to ignore, so any move will ultimately be weighed against long-term interests. My sense is that the August 1 deadline may itself be flexible and India is unlikely to budge easily. In the short term, the announcement could trigger some selling pressure, but in the longer term, I expect the impact to neutralize. India's market attractiveness remains intact.' Colin shah, md, kama jewelry 'With U.S. being one of the key export destinations, this will severely impact the sectors like gems and jewellery that are heavily dependent on exports. Going ahead, we expect trade activities to remain muted with U.S. However, we also need to wait and watch how the situation unfolds.' Rahul mehta, chief mentor, clothing manufacturers association of India 'Having seen the several about turns on the tariff front in the case of other countries, I would not press panic buttons right now. But, if the proposed terms do come into effect, it will make our products 7% to 10% more expensive than some of our competitors, and it will certainly hurt our apparel exports to the U.S. India and US advance toward interim trade deal after four-day talks Fortunately, this set-back has come at the time when we have just signed an FTA with UK, and are proceeding rapidly with an FTA with EU.' Sakshi gupta, principal economist, hdfc bank, gurugram 'For now, the announcement of 25% tariffs is likely to cause volatility in the FX market with mounting depreciation pressure on the rupee. Although the RBI is likely to intervene tomorrow to tamp down the depreciation pressure.' Aditi nayar, chief economist, icra 'When the U.S. had initially imposed tariffs, we had lowered our forecast of India's GDP expansion to 6.2% for FY2026, presuming a tepid rise in exports and a delay in private capex. The tariff (and penalty) now proposed by the U.S. is higher than what we had anticipated, and is therefore likely to pose a headwind to India's GDP growth. The extent of the downside will depend on the size of the penalties imposed.' Ashok chandak, president, india electronics & semiconductor association 'The imposition of a 25% tariff by the U.S. on Indian goods will be short term. Indian electronics exports is a short-term challenge that could disrupt supply chains and dent price competitiveness. India does not have any major advantage compared to other Asian countries anymore if 25% tariff above baseline 10% is continued. However, it also underlines the urgency for India's electronics sector to diversify export markets, deepen domestic markets, develop Indian brands and products, and move up the value chain to reduce dependency on price-sensitive, tariff-exposed exports.' Rishi shah, partner and economic advisory services leader, grant thornton bharat 'Given the escalating rhetoric around Russia-Ukraine negotiations, some form of adverse development was anticipated… the specifics of the additional 'penalty' beyond the 25% tariff may determine the actual economic impact.' Harsha vardhan agarwal, president, federation of indian chambers of commerce and industry 'We hope that this imposition of higher tariffs will be a short-term phenomenon and that a permanent trade deal between the two sides will be finalised soon. The aim is to secure a beneficial pact rather than a hurried deal that gives short term benefit but may result in adverse outcomes in the long term. It is also important to note that India offers a large market for U.S. businesses and many of the large companies from the U.S. benefit from leveraging the demand as well as the skills and talent pool that we have to offer.'
