logo
Prioritise people over militarisation

Prioritise people over militarisation

The Sun04-06-2025
THE Association for Welfare, Community and Dialogue (Acid) strongly denounces the recent warning by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who claimed that the threat from China is 'real and potentially imminent'.
Hegseth also urged Indo-Pacific allies to increase defence spending, citing the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation commitment to
5% of gross domestic product (GDP) as a benchmark.
Hegseth made these remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier defence forum.
He emphasised the Indo-Pacific as a top priority for the administration of US President Donald Trump, cautioning that any attempt
by China to take control of Taiwan would have 'devastating consequences' for the region and the world.
In response, Acid would like to highlight several reasons that challenge Hegseth's portrayal of China.
China endeavour since 1978
Since opening its economy in 1978, China has largely focused on national economic development through partnerships and collaboration with other countries, rather than engaging in war-mongering. This approach has lifted millions of its citizens out of poverty.
In 2013, it launched The Belt and Road Initiative – sometimes referred to as the New Silk Road – a global infrastructure development strategy aimed at investing in over 150 countries and international organisations.How can a nation be regarded as an imminent military threat when its primary focus has
been on economic development and shared prosperity?
Unlike the US, which has repeatedly used military force to assert dominance in the Middle East and other regions, China has not relied on military aggression to compel submission.
Portraying China as an imminent threat serves to justify and perpetuate US strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific.
While it is true that there are legitimate concerns surrounding territorial claims in the South China Sea and sovereignty issues related to Taiwan, such disputes should be addressed through dialogue and diplomacy – not through rearmament or an escalating arms race.
America's exceptionalism
It is important to consider the ideological stance of the current Trump administration, which
is heavily driven by the mantra of 'making America great again'.
Within this paradigm, other nations are merely regarded as conduits or pawns to serve US interests, with the ultimate goal of maintaining American global dominance by curbing the rise of China, which is seen as a credible strategic rival.
Encouraging Indo-Pacific nations to ramp up military spending supports this broader agenda, reinforcing a geopolitical strategy
that prioritises US supremacy over regional cooperation. This binary, black-and-white ideological leaning is inimical to common and collective prosperity that is vital for lasting peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.
Enriching the American arms industry
It doesn't take a genius to see that increased military spending by Indo-Pacific nations – including those in South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands – would primarily benefit the American arms industry.
The ongoing genocide in Gaza and the persistent destabilisation of West Asia are stark consequences of the proliferation of US weapons in the region – facilitating the enforcement of American-Israeli hegemony and suppressing resistance.
Indo-pacific nations should not place themselves in a situation where they are beholden to America for their protection. Instead, they should pursue independent, cooperative security arrangements rooted in mutual respect, dialogue and regional solidarity.
Social justice for Indo-Pacific people
It would be far wiser for Indo-Pacific nations to invest their resources in uplifting impoverished communities rather than diverting funds towards militarisation.
According to a 2024 United Nations report, over 260 million people in the Asia-Pacific region could be pushed into poverty over the next decade unless governments implement robust social protection schemes.
The report, Protecting Our Future Today: Social Protection in Asia and the Pacific, highlights a troubling rise in both monetary and non-monetary poverty, alongside
growing income and wealth inequalities across the region.
The number of people living in vulnerable conditions is expected to increase as the region continues to experience economic shocks
amid prevailing inequalities. Access to essential services and basic opportunities remains out of reach for many.
In light of this, Acid urges Indo-Pacific governments to prioritise social investment and poverty eradication, rather than aligning
with a US-driven rearmament agenda that ultimately serves American strategic and economic interests.
Ronald Benjamin is the secretary of Acid. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"We continue to encourage our NATO allies...weapons to Ukraine": US State Secy Rubio on defence cooperation
"We continue to encourage our NATO allies...weapons to Ukraine": US State Secy Rubio on defence cooperation

Malaysia Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Malaysia Sun

"We continue to encourage our NATO allies...weapons to Ukraine": US State Secy Rubio on defence cooperation

Kuala Lumpur [Malaysia], July 11 (ANI): US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, during a press briefing in Kuala Lumpur, addressed questions regarding President Trump's remarks on a new deal between the United States and NATO to supply weapons to Ukraine and elaborated on America's broader regional priorities. Further elaborating on NATO's potential contributions, Rubio highlighted that many member nations already possess the kinds of defensive systems Ukraine urgently needs. 'In addition to that, I would point to the fact that a number of the defensive weapons that Ukraine seeks are in our Allies in NATO have them. So, as an example, Germany, I believe, has 13 or 14 Patriot batteries. Other countries do as well, some others, and some have placed orders for that. And so we continue to encourage our NATO Allies to provide those weapons, those systems, those defensive systems that Ukraine seeks - that they should provide those weapons to Ukraine since they have them in their stocks, and then we can enter into financial agreements with us where they can purchase the replacements,' Rubio said. When asked to clarify President Trump's statement that NATO would fully pay for US weaponry being supplied to Ukraine, Rubio explained the arrangement, pointing to existing frameworks already being pursued by Ukraine and European allies. 'Well, I think what you're referring to is something that Ukraine has already offered, and so has Europe, and that is to buy weapons from the United States and then provide them to Ukraine. At the end of the day, some of the systems that Ukraine requires are systems that Europe doesn't make. They would have to purchase them from the United States,' he said. Shifting the focus to America's engagement in the Indo-Pacific, Rubio responded to concerns about the US's regional commitment. 'No, I'm just saying that it was a very friendly environment, and I think the reiteration to the point we made, and that is, look, I read these things about how the US is not focused on the Indo-Pacific. But it's funny - everywhere I travel in the world, the headline is: The U.S. is not paying enough attention, whether it's the Western Hemisphere or NATO or even in the Middle East,' he said. Rubio reaffirmed that the US remains firmly engaged with Southeast Asia through economic and defence ties. 'I think sometimes there's a media dynamic that covers certain parts of the world more than others, but the relationships we have here have existed for a long time - a long time. When you talk about 6,000 American companies that are directly invested in the economies of Southeast Asia, we're not walking away from that. We're not walking away from that; we're not walking away from our defence ties that we have in the region; we're not walking away from the strong economic ties we have in the region. On the contrary, we want to build on it,' Rubio noted. Rubio also pointed to recent agreements with regional partners as proof of ongoing cooperation. 'Just yesterday we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Malaysia on civil nuclear cooperation. The - I believe as early - either last night or early this morning, our arrangement with - on another civil nuclear program with Thailand came into effect. So we have a lot of positive things going on and we're going to continue to build on those. We're excited about them and we're not going to walk away from them,' Rubio said. (ANI)

Pope Leo XIV's childhood home in Illinois to open as tourist attraction
Pope Leo XIV's childhood home in Illinois to open as tourist attraction

The Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Sun

Pope Leo XIV's childhood home in Illinois to open as tourist attraction

DOlTON: Pope Leo XIV's childhood home has been sold to the village where he grew up, which intends to make it a historical site, local media reported Friday. The modest brick home in the Chicago suburb of Dolton, population 21,000, was sold by its current owner for $375,000, WGN television said. It said the owner had bought the house for $66,000 last year -- prior to Pope Leo's election as the first American pontiff -- and done extensive renovations. The Dolton village board of trustees voted earlier this month to purchase the three-bedroom house and turn it into an attraction open to the public. According to WBEZ Chicago radio, the parents of Pope Leo -- born Robert Prevost -- bought the house in 1949 and sold it in 1996 AFP

Divided US appeals court rejects plea deal for accused September 11 attacks mastermind
Divided US appeals court rejects plea deal for accused September 11 attacks mastermind

The Star

time9 hours ago

  • The Star

Divided US appeals court rejects plea deal for accused September 11 attacks mastermind

FILE PHOTO: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused mastermind of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, is shown in this file photograph during his arrest on March 1, 2003. REUTERS/Courtesy & World Report (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Friday refused to allow Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused mastermind of the September 11, 2001, attacks, and two of his co-defendants to plead guilty under agreements that would have spared them the death penalty. The ruling by a 2-1 panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upended an attempt to bring an end to a military prosecution of the three detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that has been beset by two decades of legal gridlock. Those plea agreements had been offered last year and accepted by the official who oversees the Pentagon's Guantanamo war court, only to be revoked in August by then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin after Republican lawmakers attacked the agreements. A military judge, though, ruled that Austin lacked authority to revoke the plea deals in a decision that was upheld in December by U.S. Court of Military Commission Review. The judge then scheduled prompt plea hearings. The D.C. Circuit at the behest of former Democratic President Joe Biden's administration agreed to pause those proceedings while it heard the government's legal challenge, which Republican President Donald Trump's administration continued. U.S. Circuit Judges Patricia Millett and Neomi Rao, writing for the majority, in Friday's ruling said Austin "indisputably had legal authority to withdraw from the agreements." "Having properly assumed the convening authority, the Secretary determined that the 'families and the American public deserve the opportunity to see military commission trials carried out," the judges wrote. "The secretary acted within the bounds of his legal authority, and we decline to second-guess his judgment." Millett was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, while Rao is a Trump appointee. U.S. Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins, an Obama appointee, dissented from what he called a "stunning" ruling, saying his colleagues should have deferred to the decisions of military courts interpreting military rules. A lawyer for Mohammed and one of his co-defendants, Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi, did not respond to requests for comment, nor did the Pentagon. Matthew Engle, an attorney for the third defendant, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak bin 'Atash, said he was considering a potential further appeal, including to the U.S. Supreme Court. Mohammed is the most well-known inmate at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, which was set up in 2002 by then-U.S. President George W. Bush to house foreign militant suspects following the September 11, 2001, attacks. Mohammed is accused of masterminding the plot to fly hijacked commercial passenger aircraft into the World Trade Center in New York City and into the Pentagon. The 9/11 attacks killed nearly 3,000 people. (Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; additional reporting by Idrees Ali in Washington, editing by Deepa Babington)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store