Britain and France try again to tackle English Channel migrant crossings
At a U.K.- France summit on Thursday that caps Macron's three-day stay, senior officials from the two countries will try to seal deals on economic growth, defense cooperation and – perhaps trickiest of all – unauthorized migration.
Macron and Starmer also will visit a military base and dial in to a planning meeting of the ' coalition of the willing, ' a U.K.- and France-backed plan for an international force to guarantee a future ceasefire in Ukraine.
During a meeting inside 10 Downing St. on Wednesday, the two leaders agreed that tackling small boat crossings "is a shared priority that requires shared solutions, including a new deterrent to break the business model" of people-smuggling gangs, Starmer's office said.
It said they would aim for 'concrete progress' on Thursday.
Channel crossings are a longstanding challenge
Britain receives fewer asylum-seekers than Mediterranean European countries, but sees thousands of very visible arrivals each year as migrants cross the 20-mile (32 kilometer) channel from northern France in small, overcrowded boats.
About 37,000 people were detected crossing the channel in 2024, and more than 20,000 made the crossing in the first six months of 2025, up by about 50% from the same period last year. Dozens of people have died trying to reach the English coast.
Britain and France agree the dangerous and unregulated crossings are a problem, but have long differed on how to address it.
The U.K. wants France to do more to stop boats leaving the beaches, and has paid the Paris government hundreds of millions of pounds (dollars, euros) to increase patrols and share intelligence in an attempt to disrupt the smuggling gangs.
'We share information to a much greater extent than was the case before,' Starmer told lawmakers in the House of Commons on Wednesday. 'We've got a new specialist intelligence unit in Dunkirk and we're the first government to persuade the French to review their laws and tactics on the north coast to take more effective action.'
Macron says Britain must address 'pull factors' like the perception it is easy for unauthorized migrants to find work in the U.K. Many migrants also want to reach Britain because they have friends or family there, or because they speak English.
Solutions have proved elusive
As far back as 2001, the two countries were discussing ways to stop migrants stowing away on trains and trucks using the tunnel under the channel.
Over the following years, French authorities cleared out camps near Calais where thousands of migrants gathered before trying to reach Britain. Beefed up security sharply reduced the number of vehicle stowaways, but from about 2018 people-smugglers offered migrants a new route by sea.
'You see that pattern again and again, where smuggling gangs and migrants try to find new ways to cross from France to the U.K.,' said Mihnea Cuibus, a researcher at the University of Oxford's Migration Observatory. 'The authorities crack down on that, and then gradually you see migrants and gangs try to adapt to that. And it becomes a bit of a game of cat and mouse.'
Cooperation on stopping the boats stalled after Britain's acrimonious split from the European Union in 2020, but in the past few years the countries have struck several agreements that saw the U.K. pay France to increase police and drone patrols of the coast.
Britain's previous Conservative government came up with a contentious plan in 2022 to deport asylum-seekers arriving by boat to Rwanda. Critics called it unworkable and unethical, and it was scrapped by Starmer soon after he took office in July 2024.
Britain hopes for a returns deal with France
Starmer is staking success on closer cooperation with France and with countries further up the migrants' routes from Africa and the Middle East.
British officials have been pushing for French police to intervene more forcefully to stop boats once they have left the shore, and welcomed the sight of officers slashing rubber dinghies with knives in recent days.
France is also considering a U.K. proposal for a 'one-in, one-out' deal that would see France take back some migrants who reached Britain, in return for the U.K. accepting migrants seeking to join relatives in Britain.
Macron said the leaders would aim for 'tangible results' on an issue that's 'a burden for our two countries.'
Cuibus said irregular cross-channel migration would likely always be a challenge, but that the measures being discussed by Britain and France could make an impact, 'if they're implemented in the right way.
'But that's a big if,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Macron says UK and France ‘share same will' amid crunch talks over migrant deal
Sir Keir Starmer said the UK would tackle illegal migration with 'new tactics' and a 'new level of intent' before crunch talks to hammer out a deal with Emmanuel Macron. The French president said the UK and France 'share the same will' to address the issue at the start of a Franco-British summit at Downing Street. It came after the pair said a 'new deterrent' was needed to stop small boats crossing the English Channel. The Prime Minister hopes the French president will sign up to a 'one in, one out' deal on Thursday, the last day of Mr Macron's state visit to the UK. Under the terms of the deal, Britain would accept migrants with links to the country in exchange for sending others back across the Channel. Sir Keir said the meeting was about working together on shared priorities. He said: 'For us, it's about delivering the changes that the British people want to see, and we will agree the situation in the Channel cannot go on as it is. 'So we're bringing new tactics into play and a new level of intent to tackle illegal migration and break the business model of the criminal gangs.' Speaking in French, Mr Macron said: 'We share the same will to tackle networks of illegal immigration through great co-ordination with other European countries. 'We have often mentioned France is the last destination before Great Britain for these men and women who often journey through paths of misery and are exploited by traffickers. 'We will work with countries of first entry in Europe (as) our intention is also to engage all countries who share a responsibility alongside us.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband were also at the summit. Defence Secretary John Healey, who was also at the summit, told ITV's Good Morning Britain that footage of French authorities puncturing a migrant dinghy to stop it from setting off last week was a 'recognition' that France has agreed to change its rules to intervene in shallow waters. To reduce small boat crossings, he said those changes need to be 'fully implemented' alongside new legislation, building up the new border security command, and any steps to be announced by Sir Keir and Mr Macron after the summit. French newspaper Le Monde has reported that some 50 migrants a week would initially be returned to France under the terms of the proposed deal, which it described as largely symbolic. If such a deal were struck, it would only result in the return of a fraction of the 21,000 people who have made the Channel crossing so far in 2025, a record for this point in a year. But it would also represent a concession by the French that such returns are possible, after years of MPs on the right of British politics insisting France is a 'safe' country where migrants can be sent back to. The Times reported the scheme would be scaled up after an initial pilot had shown 'proof of concept', citing Government sources. In return, Mr Macron is said to be pushing for the UK to do more to address 'pull factors' which are attracting people to make the dangerous crossing to the English coast. When Mr Macron and Sir Keir met in Downing Street on Wednesday, the small boats crisis appeared to be the mainstay of their conversations. The pair agreed the crossings are a 'shared priority that requires shared solutions', a Downing Street spokesperson said. They also agreed on the need for a 'new deterrent to break the business model of these gangs' and are aiming for 'concrete progress' on the matter. Following the French-UK summit, the two leaders will host a call with coalition of the willing partners, the proposed peacekeeping mission to deter Russia from attacking Ukraine in future. In a sign of close alignment on defence, Britain and France have announced they will buy new supplies of Storm Shadow missiles, which both have loaned to Ukraine to strike targets deep inside Russia. The two nations will also work closely to develop a successor to the long-range missile, the Ministry of Defence said.
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Failure to tear down Belfast bonfire will be victory for mob rule, warns Sinn Féin
Police in Northern Ireland will be giving into 'mob rule' if they fail to assist with the dismantling of a loyalist bonfire that is believed to pose risks to public health and to energy supplies, Sinn Féin has said. Loyalist paramilitaries warned of disorder if authorities took down the towering pyre on Meridi Street off Donegall Road in Belfast, which is to be lit on Friday night as part of wider loyalist commemorations. On Wednesday a Belfast city council committee voted to send contractors to dismantle the bonfire, which is on a site that contains asbestos and is close to an electricity substation that powers two hospitals. The Police Service of Northern Ireland declared a 'major incident' over the bonfire site and is considering the council's request. A joint statement from south Belfast paramilitary groups warned of a backlash if the pyre was removed. 'PSNI have been advised of the risk of widespread disorder, with loyalists in other areas across NI staging interface riots to stretch the PSNI,' it said. The Sinn Féin assembly member Pat Sheehan urged the police on Thursday to take 'firm, immediate action' to protect public health and critical infrastructure. 'We can't allow mob rule to decide what happens to this bonfire,' he told BBC Radio Ulster. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Sheehan also urged unionist representatives to 'step up' and condemn the bonfire, which is one of about 300 that will be lit on Thursday and Friday as part of the annual celebration of the victory of King William III's Protestant forces over Catholics at the battle of the Boyne in 1690. Meanwhile, a senior cleric added his voice to condemnation of a separate bonfire, in the County Tyrone village of Moygashel, that features an effigy of a migrant vessel with a dozen mannequins in lifejackets and placards that say 'stop the boats' and 'veterans before refugees'. John McDowell, the Church of Ireland archbishop of Armagh and primate of all Ireland, called the effigy racist and threatening. 'It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity or with Protestant culture and is in fact inhuman and deeply sub-Christian. I hope that the many people from other countries, who live in that area … can be reassured that it does not in any way represent the feeling of the vast majority of their neighbours.' An Irish national flag is also on the Moygashel pyre, which is to be lit on Thursday night.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The little-known Pentagon official who blindsided Trump on Ukraine aid
Donald Trump's frustration was clear when he was asked who had approved a pause on sending weapons to Ukraine during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday. 'I don't know,' he snapped at the reporter. 'Why don't you tell me?' The freeze in military aid last week blindsided top national security figures, alarmed key allies and was rapidly reversed by the US president himself, but not before generating a rush of headlines about dysfunction and incoherence in the policy process. At the centre of it all is a little-known Pentagon official: Elbridge Colby, a national security policy chief, who reportedly halted supplies because US stockpiles were running low. Insiders say, at best, it illustrates confusion about how to put Mr Trump's 'America First' policies into practice and, at worst, it shows how the administration's decision-making process has broken down. A former member of the US national security council said Mr Colby had come unstuck because he was trying to put proverbial flesh on the bones of Mr Trump's vague platform of ending foreign wars and avoiding anything that looked like intervention. 'I don't think he's trying anything he didn't think is the position of the president or the defence secretary. He's not freelancing,' he said. 'He thinks this is the position of the people above him.' Others pushed back on the claim that Mr Colby was behind a freeze. 'There was no pause,' said a person familiar with the events. 'The review and the assessment may have slowed things down temporarily, but there was never a decision made to pause those shipments. Mr Colby served in the first Trump administration and was a lead author of the US 2018 national defence strategy. The report set out a shift from conflicts dominated by counterterrorism operations to great power competition between the US, Russia and China. But his return in the second Trump administration has proved controversial. He has argued consistently that America can no longer rely on massively outspending rivals. 'The fundamental reality is that there are structural limitations on what the United States can do – it cannot do everything at once,' he wrote in his 2021 book, The Strategy of Denial. 'Thus it must make hard choices.' His argument that defence resources should be reoriented away from Europe and the Middle East and towards China ignited a feud between Maga loyalists and hawkish conservative senators when his name was put forward earlier this year. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Senator, led opposition to his nomination and highlighted some of Mr Colby's past comments on Iran, including how he had played down the threat of Tehran obtaining nuclear weapons. A nuclear-armed Iran could be contained, he argued in 2012, angering Israel's allies who, much like Mr Trump, see it as an existential threat. Opponents scoured his background for ammunition to prevent him taking up the position. They pointed to a grandfather who ran the CIA and degrees from Harvard University and Yale Law School, as evidence that he was too 'establishment' for the Trump administration. He was eventually confirmed with a Senate vote of 54 to 45, thanks to the backing of some heavy hitters from Trump world. Arthur Schwartz, an adviser to Donald Trump Jr who is also close to JD Vance, the vice-president, had responsibility for steering his nomination through the Senate. Key Trump confidants, such as Charlie Kirk, head of the Turning Point USA youth movement, spoke up in his support. And Mr Vance delivered a telling line at his confirmation hearing, setting out an 'America First' approach to Pentagon policy. 'We cannot fight wars unless our troops have the ammunition we need; we cannot defend our own national security unless we have the tank shells, the artillery shells and increasingly the drones and other advanced weapons that are necessary to actually fight battles when - God forbid - those battles are necessary to fight,' he said. After Mr Colby concluded his review last month, the US halted supplies of Patriot air defence systems, Hellfire air-to-ground missiles, missiles used by Himars rocket artillery, Stinger portable air defence systems and 155mm artillery shells promised by the Biden administration. 'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a [US department of defence] review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' said Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman. Russia met the announcement with its biggest barrage of attacks on Ukraine in more than three years of war. One person was killed and 26 were wounded after waves of missiles and drones rained down on Thursday, prompting a phone call between Mr Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky. The US president reportedly told his Ukrainian counterpart that he did not know about the halt in supplies. By Monday the pause had been reversed. 'We're gonna send some more weapons. We have to,' Mr Trump told reporters. 'They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now.' The reversal won praise from friends of Ukraine, even as some worried about the message the U-turn sent to the rest of the world. Mitch McConnell, who was until recently the leader of Republicans in the Senate, said: 'Today, the strategic incoherence of underfunding our military and restricting lethal assistance to partners like Ukraine is measured in the avoidable erosion of American credibility with allies and the mounting deaths of innocents.' Some of that stems from the administration's mix of traditional conservatives and Maga World iconoclasts, according to John Herbst, former US ambassador to Ukraine. 'Even if the pause was approved at no higher level than the under secretary of defence for policy or even the secretary of defence, it is a reminder that administration policy on Russia and Ukraine is put together with the input of people with vastly different worldviews,' he wrote in a paper for the Atlantic Council. And Mr Colby has his supporters. Steve Bannon, former chief strategist to Mr Trump, said pivoting away from Ukraine to China made more sense from an 'America First' perspective. 'This is key to our hemispheric defence, and we're being sucked dry,' he said, before drawing an analogy with the strikes on Iran. 'Bridge knows the process, once you supply the weapons, next thing you know you're a combatant like the 12-day war.'
