
Iran's parliament backs blocking Strait of Hormuz. Its closure will alienate Tehran further
Iran may be threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz, but experts told CNBC that it's also the one with the most to lose.
In a major move after U.S. struck Iranian nuclear sites, the country's parliament on Sunday reportedly approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, risking alienating its neighbors and trade partners.
The decision to close the waterway now rests with the the country's national security council, and its possibility has raised the specter of higher energy prices and aggravated geopolitical tensions, with Washington calling upon Beijing to prevent the strait's closure.
Vandana Hari, founder of energy intelligence firm Vanda Insights, told CNBC's ' Squawk Box Asia ' that the possibility of closure remains 'absolutely minimalistic.'
If Iran blocks the strait, the country risks turning its neighboring oil-producing countries into enemies and risks hostilities with them, she said.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration revealed that Iran had shipped 1.5 million barrels per day via the Strait of Hormuz in the first quarter of 2025.
Furthermore, a closure would also provoke Iran's market in Asia, particularly China, which accounts for a majority of Iranian oil exports.
'So very, very little to be achieved, and a lot of self-inflicted harm that Iran could do,' Hari said.
Her view is supported by Andrew Bishop, senior partner and global head of policy research at advisory firm Signum Global Advisors.
Iran will not want to antagonize China, he said, adding that disrupting supplies will also 'put a target' on the country's own oil production, export infrastructure, and regime 'at a time when there is little reason to doubt U.S. and Israeli resolve in being 'trigger-happy.''
Clayton Seigle, senior fellow for Energy Security and Climate Change at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that as China is 'very dependent' on oil flows from the Gulf, not just Iran, 'its national security interest really would value stabilization of the situation and a de-escalation enabling safe flows of oil and gas through the strait.'
There are currently no indications of threats to commercial shipping passing through the waterway, according to the Joint Maritime Information Center. 'U.S. associated vessels have successfully transited the Strait of Hormuz without interruption, which is a positive sign for the immediate future.'
Impact of potential disruptions
The Strait of Hormuz is the only sea route from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean, and about 20% of the world's oil transits the waterway. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has described it as the 'world's most important oil transit chokepoint.'
'Iran's operations in and around Hormuz are unlikely to be 'all or nothing' — but instead move along a sliding scale from total disruption to none at all,' said Signum's Bishop.
'The best strategy [for Iran] would be to rattle Hormuz oil flows just enough to hurt the U.S. via moderate upward price movement, but not enough to provoke a major U.S. response against Iran's oil production and export capacity,' he added.
On Sunday, Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, said in a post on X that pump prices in the U.S. could climb to $3.35-$3.50 per gallon in the days ahead, compared with the national average of $3.139 for the week of June 16.
Should Iran decide to close the strait, it would most likely use small boats for a partial blockade, or for a more complete solution, mine the waterway, according to David Roche, strategist at Quantum Strategy.
In a Sunday note, S&P Global Commodity Insights wrote that any Iranian closure of the strait would affect not only Iran's own exports, but also those of nearby Gulf nations such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar.
That would potentially remove over 17 billion barrels of oil from global markets, and affect regional refineries by causing feedstock shortages, the research firm said. The disruption to supply would impact Asia and Europe as well as North America.
Besides oil, natural gas flows could also be 'severely impacted,' S&P said, with Qatar's gas exports of about 77 million metric tons per year potentially unable to reach key markets in Asia and Europe.
Qatar's LNG exports represent about 20% of global LNG supply.
'Alternative supply routes for Middle Eastern oil and gas are limited, with pipeline capacity insufficient to offset potential maritime disruptions through the Persian Gulf and Red Sea,' S&P added.
The Commonwealth Bank of Australia pointed out that 'there is limited scope to bypass the Strait of Hormuz.' Pipelines in Saudi Arabia and the UAE have only a spare capacity of 2.6 million barrels a day between them, while the strait oversees the transport of an estimated 20 million barrels of oil and oil products per day, the bank said in a note.
All these present upside risk to energy prices, with Goldman Sachs estimating that the market is pricing in a geopolitical risk premium of $12.
If oil flows through the strait were to drop by 50% for one month and then were to remain down by 10% for another 11 months, Brent is forecast to 'briefly jump' to a peak of around $110, Goldman said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Protesters target Wimbledon over Barclays sponsorship links to arms firms
Around two dozen demonstrators from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) gathered outside the main gates of the All England Club on Monday morning, just yards away from Centre Court. They chanted: 'Barclays bank, you can't hide, we charge you with genocide,' and held banners criticising the bank's alleged investments in defence companies linked to the Israeli military. Damian McCarthy, 53, a lawyer and organiser with the PSC, told the PA news agency: 'I'm a local resident – and a lot of people in Wimbledon think the genocide in Gaza is appalling. 'We want to raise awareness. Barclays' investment in genocide is wrong. 'It's not about Wimbledon, it's not about tennis, it's about the investment in genocide, and we've got to stop it.' An artist taking part in the protest unveiled an installation in memory of Hind Rajab, a five-year-old girl killed in Gaza in January 2024 after her family's car was hit by an Israeli tank shell. Barclays has been contacted for comment.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
As dust settles on Iran, Israel focuses on diplomacy with Mideast neighbors
TEL AVIV — As the dust settles on Iran after unprecedented Israeli and American attack s, the U.S. and Israel have shifted their focus toward an ambitious diplomatic push they hope will translate into the kind of enduring political stability that has evaded the region for decades. Despite apparent Iranian unwillingness, President Donald Trump is pushing for more talks with Tehran about its nuclear program. But Israel appears more interested in formalizing diplomatic relations with some of its long-standing adversaries, as well as ending the 18-month conflict in Gaza — which Trump has repeatedly pleaded for. 'This victory presents an opportunity for a dramatic widening of peace agreements,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement Thursday. 'We are working on this with enthusiasm.' The previous Trump administration brokered what it called the Abraham Accords, in which Israel established diplomatic relations with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain and later normalized its relations with Morocco in 2024 and Sudan, though that deal has yet to be ratified. Having devastated the powerful, Iran-backed Hezbollah militant group in Lebanon, its northern neighbor, and seen a Tehran-friendly regime toppled in Syria to the east, Israel is now interested in establishing formal diplomatic relations with both countries, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Monday The shift represents a broader change in Israeli policy toward its neighbors. Until around two weeks ago, Israel's modus operandi was to assert military dominance as a political strategy, according to Michael Oren, who served as the country's ambassador to the U.S. from 2009 to 2013. 'Now it's the first time that I've seen in history when we have the opportunity to make the strategy the strategy. It's not a tactic,' Oren, a former member of Israel's Knesset, or parliament, who served as deputy minister in the prime minister's office, told NBC News in a phone call on Friday. Before the Hamas-led terror attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel relied on a method known in Hebrew as 'mowing the grass.' The term was used by strategists to describe the country's periodic attacks against Palestinian militants and their supply of weapons in Gaza, attacks that faced widespread criticism from rights groups often because of the disproportionate number of deaths caused by Israeli forces. The phrase could also apply to Israel's behavior toward Iran and its proxies in taking out military commanders, nuclear scientists and senior advisers to the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, while attacking nuclear and military sites. In Lebanon, it has wiped out large swaths of Hezbollah's leadership. Today, Netanyahu's most formidable challenge will be finding a resolution to end the conflict in Gaza, where, despite nearly 20 months of war, Hamas remains nominally in control. Under pressure from Trump, who on Truth Social on Sunday again called for a 'deal in Gaza' and to 'get the hostages back,' the negotiations are also still captive to the same disagreements that have long delayed a deal. Hamas has refused to release its remaining hostages and surrender — key demands of far-right members of Netanyahu's government, including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir, his national security minister, both of whom have threatened to quit and bring down the fragile coalition if he does otherwise. Along with other lawmakers they have also called for the complete destruction of Hamas. Hamas, meanwhile, has demanded a permanent truce, a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza and guarantees about humanitarian aid. The decline of power in Iran, Hamas' primary patron, will likely sap the group's confidence and influence, according to Yohanan Plesner, the president of the Israel Democracy Institute, an independent research center. 'From an Israeli standpoint, this is a dramatic shift in the acceptance for the Jewish state in the region,' added Plesner, a former member of the Israeli parliament. But he cautioned that as long as Hamas is the governing body in Gaza, a deal to end the war there 'will be something that is possible but it will be very difficult for the Israeli government to swallow.' For now, Israel is in the ascendancy: Iran's nuclear program has been badly damaged, its 46-year-old Islamic regime is weakened and its proxy groups and allies throughout the region have been extensively damaged. Perhaps most important is that while the Israeli and U.S. attacks on Iran were publicly criticized, they were also quietly welcomed by its Arab neighbors, many of whom were quicker to condemn Iran's reprisal attack on the U.S. military base in Qatar than the American attack on Iran. For decades Iran has fostered allied regimes and proxy militia throughout the Middle East in order to fight Israel, its major ally in the region, the United States, and Shiite-majority Iran's adversaries among the Sunni-led Gulf kingdoms. Israel will now need those states to blaze a path toward an enduring peace, analysts said, or risk inflaming regional conflict even more. 'I think we see imperial Iran is in retreat,' Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, an associate professor of political science at the United Arab Emirates University in Al Ain, said in a phone interview last week. 'It probably means a more stable Middle East, a more stable region.' Israel and the United States would do better to cultivate what Abdullah described as an 'Axis of Moderation' of monied Gulf Arab kingdoms, many of whom have normalized relations with Israel — a play on the 'Axis of Resistance' used to describe Iran and its regional proxy groups that Israel has largely defeated. Israel has nonetheless made clear its intention to continue attacking Iran's nuclear program should a perceived need arise. And in Gaza and Lebanon, it has continued to launch regular strikes against what it says are militant targets long after ceasefires were put in place. But Trump, whose angry outburst appeared to rein in an Israeli strike on Iran after he declared a ceasefire in the region, has shown he is capable of halting Israel's responses. Oren said this could help pave the way toward lasting stability by restraining Israel's more militant instincts. 'The difference between tactics and strategy is in the hands of Donald Trump,' Oren said. 'To the greatest extent in Israel's history, our fate is in the hands of one person, and it's not the prime minister.'


South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Protesters target Wimbledon over Barclays sponsorship links to arms firms
Around two dozen demonstrators from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) gathered outside the main gates of the All England Club on Monday morning, just yards away from Centre Court. They chanted: 'Barclays bank, you can't hide, we charge you with genocide,' and held banners criticising the bank's alleged investments in defence companies linked to the Israeli military. Damian McCarthy, 53, a lawyer and organiser with the PSC, told the PA news agency: 'I'm a local resident – and a lot of people in Wimbledon think the genocide in Gaza is appalling. 'We want to raise awareness. Barclays' investment in genocide is wrong. 'It's not about Wimbledon, it's not about tennis, it's about the investment in genocide, and we've got to stop it.' An artist taking part in the protest unveiled an installation in memory of Hind Rajab, a five-year-old girl killed in Gaza in January 2024 after her family's car was hit by an Israeli tank shell. Barclays has been contacted for comment.