Commentary: Gaza ceasefire talks collapse – what does that mean for the humanitarian catastrophe?
Both the United States and Israel have withdrawn their negotiating teams, accusing Hamas of a 'lack of desire to reach a ceasefire'.
US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff says it would appear Hamas never wanted a deal: 'While the mediators have made a great effort, Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith. We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people in Gaza.'
The disappointing development coincides with mounting fears of a widespread famine in Gaza and a historic decision by France to formally recognise a Palestinian state.
French President Emmanuel Macron says there is no alternative for the sake of security of the Middle East: 'True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine.'
What will these developments mean for the conflict in Gaza and the broader security of the Middle East?
HUMANITARIAN CATASTROPHE
The failure to reach a truce means there is no end in sight to the Israeli siege of Gaza which has devastated the territory for more than 21 months.
Amid mounting fears of mass starvation, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Gaza is in the grip of a 'humanitarian catastrophe'. He is urging Israel to comply immediately with its obligations under international law: 'Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food cannot be defended or ignored.'
According to the United Nations Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA, more than 100 people – most of them children – have died of hunger. One in five children in Gaza City is malnourished, with the number of cases rising every day.
Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini says with little food aid entering Gaza, people are 'neither dead nor alive, they are walking corpses … most children our teams are seeing are emaciated, weak and at high risk of dying if they don't get the treatment they urgently need'.
The UN and more than 100 aid groups blame Israel's blockade of almost all aid into the territory for the lack of food.
Lazzarini says UNRWA has 6,000 trucks of emergency supplies waiting in Jordan and Egypt. He is urging Israel – which continues to blame Hamas for cases of malnutrition – to allow the humanitarian assistance into Gaza.
PROPOSED CEASEFIRE DEAL
The latest ceasefire proposal was reportedly close to being agreed by both parties.
It included a 60-day truce, during which time Hamas would release 10 living Israeli hostages and the remains of 18 others. In exchange, Israel would release a number of Palestinian prisoners, and humanitarian aid to Gaza would be significantly increased.
During the ceasefire, both sides would engage in negotiations toward a lasting truce.
While specific details of the current sticking points remain unclear, previous statements from both parties suggest the disagreement centres on what would follow any temporary ceasefire.
Israel is reportedly seeking to maintain a permanent military presence in Gaza to allow for a rapid resumption of operations if needed. In contrast, Hamas is demanding a pathway toward a complete end to hostilities.
A lack of mutual trust has dramatically clouded the negotiations.
From Israel's perspective, any ceasefire must not result in Hamas regaining control of Gaza, as this would allow the group to rebuild its power and potentially launch another cross-border attack.
However, Hamas has repeatedly said it is willing to hand over power to any other Palestinian group in pursuit of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders. This could include the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), which governs the West Bank and has long recognised Israel.
SUPPORT FOR A PALESTINIAN STATE
Israeli leaders have occasionally paid lip service to a Palestinian state. But they have described such an entity as 'less than a state' or a 'state-minus' – a formulation that falls short of both Palestinian aspirations and international legal standards.
In response to the worsening humanitarian situation, some Western countries have moved to fully recognise a Palestinian state, viewing it as a step toward a permanent resolution of one of the longest-running conflicts in the Middle East.
Macron's announcement France will officially recognise a full Palestinian state in September is a major development.
France is now the most prominent Western power to take this position. It follows more than 140 countries – including more than a dozen in Europe – that have already recognised statehood.
While largely symbolic, the move adds diplomatic pressure on Israel amid the ongoing war and aid crisis in Gaza.
However, the announcement was immediately condemned by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who claimed recognition 'rewards terror' and 'risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became. A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel – not to live in peace beside it.'
ANNEXING GAZA?
A Palestinian state is unacceptable to Israel.
Further evidence was recently presented in a revealing TV interview by former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak who stated Netanyahu had deliberately empowered Hamas in order to block a two-state solution.
Instead there is mounting evidence Israel is seeking to annex the entirety of Palestinian land and relocate Palestinians to neighbouring countries.
Given the current uncertainty, it appears unlikely a new ceasefire will be reached in the near future, especially as it remains unclear whether the US withdrawal from the negotiations was a genuine policy shift or merely a strategic negotiating tactic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Ministers gather at UN for delayed meeting on Israel, Palestinians
FILE PHOTO: People rally in front of the United Nations headquarters during a \"Stop Starving Gaza Now\" protest amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in New York City, U.S., July 25, 2025. REUTERS/Christian Monterrosa/File Photo UNITED NATIONS - Dozens of ministers will gather at the United Nations on Monday for a delayed conference to work toward a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, but the U.S. and Israel are boycotting the event. The 193-member U.N. General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025. Hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, the conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran. The conference aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told newspaper La Tribune Dimanche in an interview published on Sunday that he will also use the conference this week to push other countries to join France in recognizing a Palestinian state. France intends to recognize a Palestinian state in September at the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, President Emmanuel Macron said last week. "We will launch an appeal in New York so that other countries join us to initiate an even more ambitious and demanding dynamic that will culminate on September 21," Barrot said, adding that he expected Arab countries by then to condemn Palestinian militants Hamas and call for their disarmament. The conference comes as a 22-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza still rages. The war was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas killed 1,200 people in southern Israel and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts Singapore Authorities say access to Changi intertidal areas unaffected by reclamation, in response to petition Singapore SIA flights between S'pore and Cambodia, S'pore and Thailand, operating normally amid border dispute Singapore Police statements by Jipson Quah in fake vaccine case involving Iris Koh allowed in court: Judge Singapore New Mandai North Crematorium, ash-scattering garden to open on Aug 15 Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng Singapore With regional interest in nuclear energy rising, S'pore must build capabilities too: Tan See Leng The U.S. will not attend the conference at the United Nations, said a State Department spokesperson, describing it as "a gift to Hamas, which continues to reject ceasefire proposals accepted by Israel that would lead to the release of hostages and bring calm in Gaza." The State Department spokesperson added that Washington voted against the General Assembly last year calling for the conference and would "not support actions that jeopardize the prospect for a long-term, peaceful resolution to the conflict." Israel is also not taking part in the conference, "which doesn't first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages," said Jonathan Harounoff, international spokesperson at Israel's U.N. mission. The U.N. has long endorsed a vision of two states living side by side within secure and recognized borders. Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, all territory captured by Israel in the 1967 war with neighboring Arab states. The U.N. General Assembly in May last year overwhelmingly backed a Palestinian bid to become a full U.N. member by recognizing it as qualified to join and recommending the U.N. Security Council "reconsider the matter favorably." The resolution garnered 143 votes in favor and nine against. The General Assembly vote was a global survey of support for the Palestinian bid to become a full U.N. member - a move that would effectively recognize a Palestinian state - after the U.S. vetoed it in the U.N. Security Council several weeks earlier. REUTERS
CNA
3 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Trump's call didn't stop the fighting in Thailand and Cambodia. Can Malaysia do better?
SINGAPORE: In a few hours, Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet will sit down for peace talks in Malaysia, amid an escalating border conflict that has killed at least 30 people and displaced thousands more. The visit to Kuala Lumpur on Monday (Jul 28) by the leaders will offer the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) a chance to preserve its treasured centrality and demonstrate a capacity to solve its problems on its own rather than under external intervention or pressure. It also offers current ASEAN chair, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, an opportunity to create a legacy. This is something that has thus far eluded him, and ASEAN in the other major crisis it faces – Myanmar's seemingly intractable and ongoing civil war. The scheduled talks follow a characteristically unilateral announcement on Saturday by United States President Donald Trump claiming both countries had agreed to work out a ceasefire after he threatened to cease trade talks if the fighting did not stop soon. Cambodia had already proposed a ceasefire, but Thailand – after the call from Mr Trump – said while it agreed in principle with a ceasefire, the onus was on Cambodia to stand down. Mr Trump's announcement did not seem to have any effect. There was no sign of de-escalation. Within hours of a brief pause, Thailand and Cambodia were exchanging rocket and gun fire again, possibly with each intent on gaining advantage on the ground ahead of a truce so that a clear win could be presented domestically. A WINDOW FOR ASEAN Speculation on the origins of the conflict ranges from bad blood over business and economic interests – from casinos to scam centres – to personal falling out between the Hun and Shinawatra families; to domestic agendas to prop up wobbly political parties and mandates; and even superpower rivalry between the US, an ally of Thailand, and China which has significant economic interests in Cambodia. Premier Hun Manet's father Hun Sen – now President of the country's Senate and viewed as the de facto leader of Cambodia – may indeed feel he has greater strategic space with China's backing, given China's interests in Cambodia. But while there may be some element of truth in that, it risks falling into the trap of seeing the conflict through an American, China-centric prism. China took pains last week to say the weaponry Cambodia was using was old stock supplied not recently but previously by Beijing. In fact, any definitive explanation without real evidence is suspect; the origins of the conflict remain opaque and likely only really known to a relatively small circle of power elites in both capitals. Regardless, neither country wants to be seen domestically to bending to external pressure. This offers a thus far ineffective ASEAN response new traction. Conversely, the opportunity puts pressure on Mr Anwar, who may be seen as somewhat compromised by his decision earlier this year to appoint former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra as an adviser – even if one of several – to the ASEAN chair he holds. Thus while the meeting offers hope, underlying complexities should not be underestimated. The proximate and historical causes of the conflict may be many, and significantly intertwined, but what is evident and indisputable is that what tipped a volatile situation over the edge was a falling out between old friends Mr Hun Sen and Mr Thaksin. The latter's daughter, Paetongtarn Shinawatra – who became prime minister only last August – has been suspended pending an ethics investigation over her leaked phone call with Mr Hun Sen, throwing Thailand's civilian coalition government into some disarray and giving its military an opportunity to wave its nationalist credentials. 'Failure to secure a meaningful and lasting ceasefire could severely damage ASEAN's credibility as a regional problem-solver, especially given past criticisms of its effectiveness in other regional crises,' Professor Pavin Chachavalpongpun of Kyoto University's Centre for Southeast Asian Studies told me. THE LIMITS OF MEDIATION The meeting signals a step towards de-escalation, but it doesn't magically resolve the deep-seated territorial disputes, nationalistic sentiments and historical grievances that fuelled this conflict, Professor Pavin added. 'The true test will be whether it leads to genuine, sustained efforts to address the root causes, or merely provides a temporary pause in hostilities.' That the conflict so easily ignited historical grievances underscores its unfinished nature. A particularly disturbing aspect – mirroring the India-Pakistan crisis in May – is the jingoism that has reached such levels, even in the local media, that it has prompted some civil society organisations to speak out. Thailand's Assembly of the Poor for instance, last week said: 'We resist the ultra-patriotism and militarism that makes states turn their back on people, while manipulating fear, hatred and loss as their political instruments.' Securing a ceasefire may be the easiest part of Monday's meeting. The more difficult aspects will however have to be addressed by political-military elites in Cambodia and Thailand, to avoid a repetition of a cycle that, with tourism and investor confidence plunging, both countries can ill afford.
Business Times
29 minutes ago
- Business Times
Trade talks with US in trouble as Thai-Cambodia conflict escalates
[BANGKOK] After months of uncertainty over the tariff fate imposed on its exports to the US, a deadly border clash between Thailand and Cambodia has now added fresh geopolitical risk to an already tense trade standoff as Bangkok scrambles to avoid punishing new duties. Fighting broke out on Jul 24 along the Thai-Cambodian border, killing at least 32 people and displacing over 200,000 civilians. The violence comes as Thailand struggles to finalise a trade agreement with Washington, even as regional peers like Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines have secured deals that cap US tariffs at 19 to 20 per cent. Both Thailand and Cambodia, which run sizeable trade surpluses with the US, face tariffs of 36 per cent on their exports to the American market starting Aug 1 if no deal is struck. For Thailand, one of the most export-reliant economies in the region, such a steep rate – among the highest globally – would deal a heavy blow to its already faltering economy. US President Donald Trump on Saturday said both sides had agreed to a ceasefire, following calls with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai. He added on Truth Social: 'They are also looking to get back to the 'Trading Table' with the United States, which we think is inappropriate to do until such time as the fighting STOPS.' Although fighting continued, both sides reportedly agreed to let Malaysia, Asean's current chair, mediate the conflict. According to reports, the two prime ministers are expected to travel to Malaysia on Monday for initial talks. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Growth on the line Economists had already projected GDP growth of less than 2 per cent this year under a best-case scenario of 10 to 20 per cent US tariffs. That forecast is now expected to be downgraded to below 1 per cent if the full 36 per cent rate takes effect. Thailand's economy remains heavily export-driven, recording around US$300 billion in exports last year. The US accounted for 18 per cent of those shipments – one of the highest shares in Asean, behind only Vietnam and Malaysia. During the first six months of 2025, Thailand's exports grew 15 per cent year-on-year, with much of that attributed to front-loading by US clients. Exports to the US were up 41.9 per cent in June. Thailand's second main engine of economic growth is tourism, a sector now facing fresh headwinds as a sharp drop in Chinese visitors, spooked by security concerns, has been further compounded by the border conflict. The kingdom's tourism arrivals in the second quarter fell 12 per cent year on year, after falling 5 per cent in Q1 of FY2025, driven by weakness from North Asia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East and China (down 40 per cent), according to government figures. Arrivals are expected to reach 32-33 million, compared with 35 million in 2024. Sluggish domestic factors And unlike many neighouring countries, Thailand's domestic consumption remains sluggish, crippled by high household debt (88 per cent of GDP), which cuts into spending. 'If you cannot improve your competitiveness in the export sector, and you have high household debt, it constrains your ability to build your economy through domestic channels because already people have to pay a lot of their incomes to service their debt,' said Kim Eng Tan, Senior Director for Asia Pacific sovereign ratings at S&P Global Ratings, at a recent Bangkok conference. While Thailand has a well-diversified range of export items, including automobiles and auto parts, agricultural commodities, processed foods, electrical appliances and electronics, it has lagged in moving up the value-added ladder in electronics, nowadays the main driver of export success. In this sector Thailand already faces stiff competition from Asean neighbours, which now look like they will face lower tariff rates in the important US market. 'The impact of tariffs on Thailand will actually depend on the tariffs imposed on its competitors,' said Louis Kuijs, chief economist for Asia-Pacific at S&P Global Ratings, speaking at the same event. Most of the Asean economies are competitive in the US market, so it matters less how competitive Thailand is compared to US factories – which are unlikely to reopen – and more how it stacks up against other Asean exporters. Thailand is also competing with China in the US market. 'A lot depends on the tariff rate on China as it is Thailand's main competitor in the US market,' said Kirida Bhaopichitr, Research Director at the Thailand Development Research Institute. 'China is Thailand's main competitor in 18 of the top 20 Thai exports to the US,' she pointed out. The final tariff rate on China is expected to be announced on Aug 11. Political risks Thailand's future efforts secure a deal with the US are further complicated by its own political disarray, which the conflict with Cambodia has added to. Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended from her post by Thailand 's Constitutional Court on Jul 1, after a supposedly private conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen was leaked, in which she called him 'uncle' and criticised the Thai commander of the border region. Paetongtarn is the daughter of Thaksin Shinawatra, a former prime minister and billionaire businessman once known to have close personal ties with Hun Sen. Thailand's political scene has arguably been shaky for the past two decades, with much of the divisiveness centered around power struggles between powerful politicians, such as Thaksin, and the elites identified with royalists, the military and entrenched business groups. 'We have to wait for a government that is able to get its policy vision lengthened to the extent that it is able to implement polices to deal with some of the problems,' said S&P's Tan. He added, 'But this development (US tariffs) is not likely to change the metrics in such a way that we may have to change our outlook, because overall the Thai metrics are still quite resilient. But it is not helpful.'
