Bad news for Deepinder Goyal as Maharashtra govt takes big decision on Blinkit, Zepto after..., says will continue to...
In more trouble for quick commerce majors Zepto and Blinkit amid the controversy surrounding their dark stores in Maharashtra, the state government has announced that it would continue regular inspections of these units to ensure cleanliness and other mandatory standards are being followed.
The development comes after the Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the closure of dark stores of both Zepto and Blinkit in early June for allegedly violating hygiene standards. The state suspended the food license of a Zepto dark store in Dharavi, while a similar facility of Blinkit was shuttered in Pune. Why FDA took action against Zepto and Blinkit?
Last month, based on a consumer complaint, the Maharashtra raided a Blinkit dark store, run by Darkstore Services near Mitcon College in Pune's Balewadi area, and found that the facility was operating without a food safety license, in violation of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
Apart from lack of a license, several other gross violations of hygiene standards were found during the FDA inspections, such as pieces of food items lying on the floor, workers handling consumables without headgear, etc.
Following the revelation, the Joint Commissioner (Food) ordered the store operator to immediately halt all food- related activities until it obtains a valid food license from authorities.
In Zepto's case, the FDA cancelled the license of its Dharavi facility for non-compliance with food standards. As per the FDA, Zepto's Dharavi dark store was shuttered for violating several regulations, including Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations, 2011, according to a report by NDTV Profit.
According to the agency, gross violations of food standards norms were found at Zepto's Dharavi facility, including fungal growth in certain food articles, and food products stores near stagnant water, which indicated poor hygiene as cold storage rules were flouted. The inspection also discovered the facility's floors were wet and filthy, and food items were stored in a disorganized and unsanitary manner, including directly on the floor.
The state FDA had also found norms violations during inspections at Zepto facilities in Bhiwandi, Bandra West and Borivali. What happened to these stores after FDA action?
According to Moneycontrol report, the Zepto and Blinkit have reopened their dark stores after acquiring the necessary permissions from authorities.
'Blinkit and Zepto have made the necessary changes. We had sent them a letter clearly stating that all their stores should follow the cleanliness and rules. They have assured us that these rules are now being followed completely. However, we are constantly checking whether everything is being implemented properly or not,' the report quoted Maharashtra's Minister of State for Food and Civil Supplies Yogesh Kadam as saying.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Gutkha Ban Vs Tasmac Sales: Contradiction in Tamil Nadu's Public Health Policy
Srimathi Venkatachari In Tamil Nadu, public health policy treads a morally ambiguous line between constitutional commitment and commercial convenience. The state, invoking Article 47 of the Constitution—mandating the govt to improve nutrition and public health and prohibit intoxicating substances — has banned gutka and pan masala citing cancer risks. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the same time, it operates and profits from the largest govt-run liquor retail monopoly in India: Tasmac. With more than `44,000 crore in annual revenue, the contradiction is not just glaring —it's institutional. This paradox reveals a deeper policy schizophrenia. On the one hand, the govt frames itself as a paternalistic guardian, shielding citizens from harmful substances. On the other, it plays bartender to the masses, peddling alcohol from every street corner, including those adjacent to schools, temples, and homes. The result is a public health framework that outlaws cancer but subsidizes cirrhosis. The 2013 ban on chewable tobacco was enforced under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, a legislative tool designed to protect citizens from hazardous food items. The move received judicial backing. In Godawat Pan Masala Products Co. vs Union of India, the Supreme Court recognised the States' autonomy under the Food Safety law to restrict or ban harmful substances. Madras High Court, in Rathinam Enterprises vs State of Tamil Nadu, (2025) went further, approving the selective ban on processed tobacco while permitting the sale of raw tobacco leaves. Contrast this with the legal regime for alcohol. Here, Tamil Nadu enjoys a golden goose thanks to Entry 8 of the state list in the Constitution. It grants states the sole authority to regulate alcohol production, distribution and sale. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now As a result, the same govt that brands gutka a public enemy becomes a benevolent supplier of alcohol. Public health, in this calculus, bends easily to revenue imperatives. Legally, the state walks a careful line, but the cracks are evident. In state of Tamil Nadu vs K Balu (2017) the Supreme Court upheld state-imposed curbs on liquor sales, especially near national highways, affirming the govt's power to regulate in the public interest. Yet, public interest becomes an elastic term when liquor shops mysteriously reappear just meters from their original locations after 'relocation'. Citizens see through this charade. A Tasmac outlet may comply with zoning laws on paper while operating adjacent to residential zones in practice. Alcoholism, domestic violence and road fatalities climb, but liquor counters stay open, often with police protection. The result is what might be termed 'constitutional tokenism': the use of selective bans to appear health-conscious while running a vast, state-sponsored liquor empire. This satisfies constitutional formalities under the doctrine of 'reasonable classification' but fails the test of equity, ethics and lived experience. The social cost of alcohol consumption in Tamil Nadu is immense. Studies link it to rising domestic violence, workplace absenteeism, school dropouts and road accidents. Women's groups routinely protest Tasmac shops that operate in close proximity to homes, citing increased insecurity and disruption of family life. Many of these protests are met with silence or police force. Meanwhile, the fiscal reliance on liquor revenue makes meaningful reform nearly impossible. In some districts, revenue from Tasmac outstrips allocations for education and public health. The irony is cruel: schools go underfunded while liquor outlets enjoy round-the-clock supply chains. What makes this even more concerning is the regressive nature of this taxation. The poorest — daily-wage workers and labourers — spend disproportionately more on alcohol, while the state grows dependent on their addiction to meet budgetary targets. The paradox sharpens further when one looks at class. Elite society indulges alcohol in private clubs and gated communities, often with imported spirits and minimal state scrutiny. For the working class, Tasmac is the only accessible vendor, public, noisy, often unsafe. The state's liquor policy therefore not only sustains addiction, it stratifies it. The poor buy what the state sells; the rich import what the state ignores. There is no easy solution. Prohibition is neither feasible nor desirable, as Gujarat's failed experiment shows. But surely there is a middle path, one that involves decentralising liquor retail, investing in de-addiction centres, raising awareness about substance abuse, and capping the density of outlets in urban and rural areas. Most importantly, the state must confront its moral conflict: it cannot pose as a public health crusader while acting as the chief purveyor of addiction. Tamil Nadu's policymakers must ask themselves a basic question. Should the health of its people depend on the sale of what ails them? (The writer is an advocate in the Madras high court) Email your feedback with name and address to
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
Blinkit, Zepto, Swiggy: A brief history of quick commerce, its rise, impact, and possible future in India
Blinkit, the quick commerce (q-commerce) arm of technology firm Eternal Ltd, outpaced its food delivery unit Zomato in net order value in the first quarter (April-June) of 2025-26, the company reported this week. Higher investments in the q-commerce segment, however, pulled down the company's consolidated net profit by 90% year-on-year to Rs 25 crore. Eternal's shares rose after the results were announced, The Financial Express reported. How do q-commerce platforms such as Blinkit, Zepto, Swiggy Instamart, and the recently-launched Amazon Now work, and what is their business model? What is q-commerce, and how does the company ensure that goods ordered on its platform reach customers quickly? Quick commerce (q-commerce) refers to the rapid delivery of goods ordered online, usually between 10 minutes and 30 minutes. For q-commerce to work effectively, firms must invest in opening and efficiently stocking so-called 'dark stores', which are stocked like standard retail stores but are used only as storage and are not open to the public. Dark stores are critical working infrastructure that make expedited fulfillment feasible in the area of operation of the q-commerce firm. Next, the firms must implement effective order management systems, and for the relevant information to be processed properly and directed to the closest dark store. At the store, the order details are automated using a dispatch software that swiftly redirects them to the warehouse staff and delivery personnel. Then, orders are delivered using transport vehicles (primarily two-wheelers such as motorcycles or electric e-scooters) to the customer's address using the most time-efficient routes. In 2013, grocery-delivery app Grofers was founded in Gurgaon by entrepreneurs Albinder Dhindsa and Saurabh Kumar. Soon afterward, Grofers announced 90-minute deliveries, rapidly connecting kirana stores to consumers. Towards the end of 2015, Grofers was getting almost 30,000 orders per day, and the company had received $120 million in funding from investors such as Softbank and Yuri Milner. In 2016, as competition emerged from other online grocers such as Dunzo, and having experienced a period of relative drought in sales, Grofers decided to adopt an inventory-led model. The company ended 2017 with an annual revenue run-rate of approximately Rs 1,000 crore, with sales having tripled from February to November of that year. In FY 2019, Grofers' revenue had skyrocketed to Rs 2,500 crore. Then, during the COVID-19 pandemic, an even quicker model for q-commerce emerged: under-30-minute deliveries. By the end of 2021, Grofers had changed its name to Blinkit and was fulfilling over 125,000 orders daily. Over the next couple of years, the Indian q-commerce business grew rapidly. In 2024, the q-commerce industry boasted a market size of approximately $6.1 billion, thanks in part to changes in consumer preferences and behaviour brought about by the pandemic, and the entry of other players such as Zepto, Swiggy Instamart, and Flipkart Minutes. More than 20 million people are currently estimated to be placing orders on q-commerce portals annually in India. Blinkit is the largest player, accounting for more than 40% of the q-commerce market share. On its website, Eternal says Blinkit is present in 100+ cities, and more than 16 million customers use the app every month. The three largest q-commerce companies in India — Blinkit, Zepto, and Swiggy Instamart — together receive approximately 4.3 million orders every day. The industry has been disruptive, most notably in decreasing the dependence of customers on the estimated 13 million kirana stores across the country. According to a survey by Datum Intelligence, q-commerce has reduced consumers' spending on kirana stores by around $1.28 billion, with 46% of respondents expressing a partial or major shift in expenditure. Approximately 200,000 kirana stores have been forced to shut down due to pressure on their businesses from q-commerce, according to the trade body All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation (AICPDF). In towns and cities across India, these local stores with their smaller budgets and tight margins find it difficult to compete with well-funded q-commerce companies that offer rapid home deliveries at competitive prices and over long hours of the day. The shrinking of traditional kirana stores and the disappearance of jobs in that sector present a difficult policy challenge. And are the quick commerce companies themselves doing well? Despite the boom, no major q-commerce player has truly reached profitability – even though most remain optimistic of being able to do so in the near future. The challenges to the model arise due to a few reasons: q-commerce companies have high operational costs that consist of maintaining and managing a large number of dark stores, thousands of delivery personnel and staff, and large-scale, functional software. These costs have continued to increase as q-commerce companies have rapidly expanded their footprint. A large number of customers buy only a few items at a time – usually essentials such as milk and bread, chips, cold drinks, instant noodles, party supplies, etc. – and low average order values (AOVs), ranging from Rs 500-600, make profiting from most deliveries a challenge. There is also fierce competition in the market among a handful of q-commerce companies that are constantly trying to one-up one another, which makes it difficult for them to make decisions based solely on profits. Concerns have been raised over the safety and security of the gig workers who often work without adequate legal protection and social security, and face risks of accidents and injury trying to deliver orders within short times. In the end, despite the popularity of q-commerce and the great convenience that it offers to customers, it faces a range of stresses and challenges, and the profitability and sustainability of this model over the longer term remains an open question. The writer is a student and a summer intern at The Indian Express
India.com
a day ago
- India.com
Bad news for Deepinder Goyal as Maharashtra govt takes big decision on Blinkit, Zepto after..., says will continue to...
(File) In more trouble for quick commerce majors Zepto and Blinkit amid the controversy surrounding their dark stores in Maharashtra, the state government has announced that it would continue regular inspections of these units to ensure cleanliness and other mandatory standards are being followed. The development comes after the Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the closure of dark stores of both Zepto and Blinkit in early June for allegedly violating hygiene standards. The state suspended the food license of a Zepto dark store in Dharavi, while a similar facility of Blinkit was shuttered in Pune. Why FDA took action against Zepto and Blinkit? Last month, based on a consumer complaint, the Maharashtra raided a Blinkit dark store, run by Darkstore Services near Mitcon College in Pune's Balewadi area, and found that the facility was operating without a food safety license, in violation of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Apart from lack of a license, several other gross violations of hygiene standards were found during the FDA inspections, such as pieces of food items lying on the floor, workers handling consumables without headgear, etc. Following the revelation, the Joint Commissioner (Food) ordered the store operator to immediately halt all food- related activities until it obtains a valid food license from authorities. In Zepto's case, the FDA cancelled the license of its Dharavi facility for non-compliance with food standards. As per the FDA, Zepto's Dharavi dark store was shuttered for violating several regulations, including Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations, 2011, according to a report by NDTV Profit. According to the agency, gross violations of food standards norms were found at Zepto's Dharavi facility, including fungal growth in certain food articles, and food products stores near stagnant water, which indicated poor hygiene as cold storage rules were flouted. The inspection also discovered the facility's floors were wet and filthy, and food items were stored in a disorganized and unsanitary manner, including directly on the floor. The state FDA had also found norms violations during inspections at Zepto facilities in Bhiwandi, Bandra West and Borivali. What happened to these stores after FDA action? According to Moneycontrol report, the Zepto and Blinkit have reopened their dark stores after acquiring the necessary permissions from authorities. 'Blinkit and Zepto have made the necessary changes. We had sent them a letter clearly stating that all their stores should follow the cleanliness and rules. They have assured us that these rules are now being followed completely. However, we are constantly checking whether everything is being implemented properly or not,' the report quoted Maharashtra's Minister of State for Food and Civil Supplies Yogesh Kadam as saying.
