Iran and Russia Launch Naval Drills in Challenge to US
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Iran and Russia have launched a joint naval drill in the Caspian Sea, which borders both countries and lies between Eastern Europe and Central Asia, according to Iranian media.
Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. State Department and the Iranian and Russian foreign ministries for comment.
Why It Matters
The naval drills send a message on cooperation between Iranian and Russian armed forces to the United States weeks after it joined Israel in attacking Iranian nuclear sites.
Iran has sought to bolster its military capabilities following the 12-day conflict with Israel during which the U.S. launched strikes on key nuclear sites. Stalled diplomacy has increased the risks for a renewed conflict, as Tehran sought backing from Russia and China to counter U.S. military and economic pressure.
This handout photo made available by the Iranian Army Office on March 12, 2025 shows navy personnel saluting aboard a Chinese military ship during a joint Iranian-Russian-Chinese drill in the Gulf of Oman. The navies...
This handout photo made available by the Iranian Army Office on March 12, 2025 shows navy personnel saluting aboard a Chinese military ship during a joint Iranian-Russian-Chinese drill in the Gulf of Oman. The navies of Iran, Russia and China are holding military drills off the coast of Iran this week in a bid to boost cooperation, according to Iranian media. More
Iranian Army Office/AFP/Getty Images
What To Know
The joint maritime rescue and security drill, codenamed CASAREX 2025, includes the participation of the Iranian Navy, Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Navy, the Law Enforcement Command of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Navy of the Russian Federation, according to the semi-official Tasnim news agency.
On Monday, Mehr news agency published photos of what it said was the Russian Navy's SB738 vessel entering the Caspian Sea 2025 to join the exercise hosted by Iran's Navy.
Last week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met with Russian and Chinese officials at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization security forum (SCO), where he called for united opposition to U.S. military actions and urged deeper strategic coordination.
Earlier this year, U.S.-sanctioned Iran and Russia deepened ties with a defense pact covering joint drills, tech sharing, and coordination against common threats—but without a mutual defense clause. China is also emerging as top candidate to provide advanced weaponry that could help Tehran reestablish deterrence
In June, seven U.S. B-2 stealth bombers dropped GBU‑57 bunker-busters on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites. Iran's army commanders have warned both Israel and the U.S. of a "crushing" response against renewed attacks.
Iran has agreed to hold talks in the coming week with Germany, France, and Britain to discuss its nuclear program, a German diplomat told Newsweek.
What People Are Saying
Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA): "The event will be held under the slogan "Together for a Safe and Secure Caspian Sea." The primary goal of the operation is to reinforce maritime safety and security while fostering greater cooperation among the naval forces of these countries."
Department of Defense Chief Spokesman Sean Parnell in statement Saturday: "On July 18, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth hosted Israel Minister of Defense Israel Katz to congratulate the Minister on Israel's remarkable performance in the 12-Day War that paved the way for the resounding success of Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER."
What Happens Next
The exercise kicks off Monday and will take place for three days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Iranian foreign minister confirms nuclear sites ‘seriously damaged' by US strikes but vows to continue uranium enrichment: ‘We can never give it up'
Iran's nuclear facilities were 'seriously damaged' by US missile strikes last month but the regime intends to continue uranium enrichment efforts once they are rebuilt, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed Monday. 'Our facilities have been damaged, seriously damaged, the extent of which is now under evaluation,' Araghchi told Fox News 'Special Report' host Bret Baier. 'The facilities have been destroyed,' he later acknowledged, noting that Iran hasn't been able to refine nuclear fuel since President Trump ordered military strikes on three uranium enrichment sites on June 22. 3 Araghchi indicated that Iran would not agree to any nuclear deal with the US that would bar it from enriching uranium — a critical component for a nuclear warhead. Fox After the interview aired, Trump took to Truth Social and demanded an apology from CNN, whom he claims doubted the effectiveness of the airstrikes. 'Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, on the Iran Nuclear Sites: 'Damages are very severe, they are destroyed.' Of course they are, just like I said, and we will do it again, if necessary! As interviewed by Bret Baier,' Trump wrote. 'Fake News CNN should immediately fire their phony 'reporter' and apologize to me and the great pilots who 'OBLITERATED' Iran's nuclear sites. CNN is a major ratings loser, as is MSDNC!' the president added. Araghchi insisted, however, that the sites would be rebuilt and the enrichment of nuclear material would continue for 'peaceful purposes.' 'It is now stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe, but obviously we cannot give up our enrichment, because it is an achievement of our own scientists,' the foreign minister said. 'And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride,' Araghchi added. The regime official signaled that Tehran would not agree to any nuclear deal with the Trump administration that would outlaw domestic uranium enrichment, calling it 'a matter of dignity for the Iranian people.' 'If the goal is to make sure that Iran will never have nuclear weapons, that is achievable,' Araghchi said. 'But if the goal is to deprive Iran from its rights, including the right of enrichment, I think we have, we have difficulty.' 'Enrichment is now stopped because our facilities have been under attack, but any settlement for Iran's nuclear program should include enrichment in the future, because that is our right,' he continued. 'We can never give it up.' 3 The foreign minister claims Iran has not been able to enrich uranium since the US strikes on three of its nuclear facilities. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images 3 Araghchi vowed that Iran would rebuild the sites and restart its nuclear program. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images Araghchi was adamant that despite the devastation to the regime's nuclear facilities, Iran still has the resources and expertise necessary for carrying out the highly technical process – which experts and world leaders have warned Iran has been undertaking in hopes of developing a nuclear weapon. 'It is developed by ourselves. It is an achievement by ourselves. The technology is there. The scientists are there, the people who have run these facilities are there,' Araghchi said. 'Buildings can be rebuilt. Facilities can be rebuilt. Machines can be replaced.' 'I think the recent attack proved that there is no military option for our nuclear program.' When asked about the condition of Iran's stockpile of already enriched uranium, Araghchi insisted that he had 'no detailed information' about whether it was destroyed during the US airstrikes. The Iranian official also indicated that the regime would be unwilling to accept terms for the Trump administration that would direct Tehran to reduce its production of ballistic missiles or stop funding terror groups Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. 'They are fighting for a just cause, and we have always supported them,' he said of the Iranian proxies. 'On our missiles, as I said, that is our most reliable means of defense,' Araghchi told Baier. 'How we can disarm ourselves? Who can [Iran] accept anything like that?' 'So, we will never disarm ourselves.' Trump has been adamant that any nuclear deal with Iran would need to include a mechanism that prevents the regime from ever engaging in uranium enrichment activities again. 'We are open to talks [but] not direct for the time being,' Araghchi said of the state of negotiations. 'If they are coming for a win-win solution, I am ready to engage with them.'
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Nvidia's China return buys time for Beijing to boost its chip drive
As semiconductors have become a geopolitical hot potato over the past few years, it's no surprise that Nvidia , the leader in artificial intelligence-related chips, has been caught up in escalating tensions between the U.S. and China. When Nvidia returned to the China market last week , seemingly with the blessing of Washington, it sparked debate over the strategic implications for the U.S.' dominance in AI and China's own focus on boosting its domestic chip and tech industry. For the U.S., Nvidia's return could help cement American strength in AI globally, experts told CNBC. For China, it could buy the country time as it continues on its own path to build Nvidia rivals and keep pace with AI software development. It's a tricky relationship, underscoring the strategic importance of the graphics processing units (GPUs) that Nvidia designs and that currently underpin the world's AI. "The relationship is symbiotic but I do believe China needs the U.S. technology more at this moment in time," Daniel Newman, CEO of Futurum, told CNBC's "The China Connection" last week. Nvidia's warnings Earlier this year, the U.S. government restricted exports of Nvidia's H20 chip to China. The product, a less-advanced version of Nvidia's leading hardware, had been created to comply with previous U.S. export restrictions. Washington has expressed concerned that these chips could be used in areas such as advancing the Chinese military and China's own AI industry. Nvidia took a $4.5 billion writedown on the unsold inventory and warned the China restrictions could impact billions of dollars of potential sales. Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia, has been critical of export curbs . He has said it would be a "tremendous loss" for Nvidia not to participate in China and that rival Huawei would be able to fulfil the needs of the country in its absence. Huang has argued that the restrictions could boost China's domestic semiconductor industry and that it risks eroding America's technological edge. That message appears to have got through to the White House. Nvidia said last week that it received backing from the U.S. government to resume sales of H20 in China. How the move will benefit the U.S. From a business perspective, Nvidia is expected to gain. But for Washington, the move is more strategic. "We want to keep having the Chinese use the American technology stack, because they still rely upon it," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC last week. Nvidia has managed to gain a formidable position in the market for semiconductors required to train and run AI applications, not just because of its hardware but also because of the popularity of its software platform known as CUDA, that developers build on. This creates an "ecosystem" around Nvidia's products which has proven sticky for its users. The return of the H20 to the world's second-largest economy will "buy China time" to boost its domestic industry, according to Pranay Kotasthane, deputy director at the Takshashila Institution. "But it will also buy the U.S. companies some respite. China is Nvidia's largest market and is home to 50 per cent of AI developers according to Jensen Huang. If that path is completely closed, American firms like Nvidia will find it difficult to raise revenues and re-invest them in the next round of research and development," Kotasthane said. "It might be justifiable to restrain access to the most advanced chips but to expand the scope of the restrictions doesn't make strategic sense." China domestic chips in focus Huawei has been China's leading player in developing AI-focused chips. The country's technology companies are using some of Huawei's hardware but the firm has yet to overtake the dominance of Nvidia's latest chips. One possible outcome is that U.S. export curbs will accelerate China's domestic efforts. China has been looking to boost its domestic semiconductor industry with a particular focus on AI chips. There are a whole host of startups working on new products in the country. Nvidia's return to China could slowdown that progress. "If Nvidia's chips are made available to Chinese firms, it could weaken momentum behind domestic chip projects, cut off capital, and delay progress in domestic Chinese hardware. This retains U.S. tech influence over global AI rails," Tejas Dessai, director of research at Global X ETFs, told CNBC by email. Ultimately, it all goes back to Nvidia's software which keeps developers locked into its hardware. "Chinese model developers still prefer to use Nvidia hardware, because the domestic alternative AI stack, particularly the software development environment from Huawei is still difficult to use and lacks the depth and flexibility of Nvidia's offering," Paul Triolo, a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, told CNBC by email. Can China catch up to Nvidia? Still, China's direction of travel and its quest for domestic providers of AI chips is unlikely to change. "Eventually Chinese AI model developers will have to transitions to a domestic AI stack," Triolo said. Nvidia's chips have proved very effective at training huge AI models that require massive amounts of data to be processed. The actual running of those AI model in products like chatbots is known as inferencing. This process may require a different type of chip, which Chinese tech giants as well as startups are working on. "In chips, China's opportunity could come when the focus shifts to inference. That's when demand for lower cost, efficient processors could scale, and we believe custom chip programs from big Chinese tech companies could ultimately serve that demand," Dessai of Global X ETFs said.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Democrats Steamrolling Toward 'Civilized Civil War,' James Carville Warns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. James Carville, veteran Democratic strategist, warned that the party is "steamrolling toward a civilized civil war," saying that it is also necessary on the heels of the 2024 election loss. Newsweek reached out to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) via email Monday for comment. Why It Matters Carville, in an op-ed in The New York Times on Monday, referencing internal divisions and the aftermath of President Donald Trump's election win, echoed criticisms he said were common among fellow Democrats, saying the party is "constipated, leaderless, confused, and divided." Carville's comments followed a string of defeats for Democrats in the 2024 election cycle, with the party's struggles for a clear message and effective leadership intensifying as the 2026 midterm elections approach. With the party still seeking a direction and a leader capable of rallying its broad coalition, Carville's warnings hold particular resonance as Democrats prepare for upcoming electoral battles. What To Know In the op-ed, Carville said, "The Democratic Party is steamrolling toward a civilized civil war. It's necessary to have it. It's even more necessary to delay it." Carville noted a fissure within the party along both generational and ideological lines and highlighted Zohran Mamdani's win in the New York City Democratic primary as an example. "Candidates like Mr. Mamdani are impatient for an economic future that folks my age are skeptical can be delivered," Carville said. The strategist said that a leader will emerge the day after the 2026 midterm elections, adding, "No new party or candidate has a chance for a breakthrough until that day." As Democrats and Republicans alike ramp up midterm efforts, Carville suggests the Democratic Party run on the phrase "We demand a repeal." Carville said the phrase can be used to emphasize the Democrats' desire to repeal President Trump's spending law, a repeal to protest Medicaid, a repeal to save the deficit, and a repeal "to end the endless wars." "We've never had a simpler, more unifying oppositional message," Carville concluded. "Soon it will no longer be possible to avoid a brawl between the factions ignited back in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. But for now, whether you're the progressive Mr. Mamdani, the centrist former Representative Abigail Spanberger running for the Virginia governorship or even Elon Musk, we can all agree on one thing: We demand a repeal. Onward to the midterms." According to recent polling, potential contenders for the Democratic 2028 presidential primary ticket include former Vice President Kamala Harris, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. James Carville can be seen posing for a portrait at the 27th SCAD Savannah Film Festival on October 31, 2024, in Savannah, Georgia. (Photo byfor SCAD) James Carville can be seen posing for a portrait at the 27th SCAD Savannah Film Festival on October 31, 2024, in Savannah, Georgia. (Photo byfor SCAD) What People Are Saying Former George W. Bush adviser Scott Jennings on X in June: "Dems have blown their credibility with the working class on illegal immigration, insane cultural issues, and identity politics. And now they expect people to believe their attacks on Trump's economic policies?" Carville, in part, in the op-ed: "Our midterm march starts with a simple phrase every candidate can blast on every screen and stage: We demand a repeal. A repeal of Mr. Trump's spending law is the one word that should define the midterms. It is clear, forceful and full-throated. It must be slathered across every poster, every ad, every social media post from now until November 2026. That single word is our core message. Every Democrat can run on it, with outrage directed not at the president or a person but at this disastrous bill. And the reasons are countless, each one a venom-tipped political dagger." Brendan Buck, MSNBC political analyst, on X on Monday: "Oh dear. A midterm pledge to repeal a major law you have almost no chance of repealing. What could possibly go wrong..." What Happens Next Democrats and Republicans are expected to ramp up campaigning ahead of the 2026 midterms.
