Tariff? Long arm of Trump law may not pluck Apple off India
Apple shares plunged more than 4% to a low of $193.46 on the Nasdaq after Trump's statement.
'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social.The move, if implemented, would hit the Cupertino-based firm, which has been seeking to diversify its production base beyond China, as well as India's electronics manufacturing services ecosystem, which has been supporting not only phone manufacturers but also hundreds of ancillary and downstream component makers beginning to set up shop in the country, according to experts.
Shifting Apple's manufacturing to the US would not be a feasible solution, though, they said, since that would increase the cost of the iPhone to $3,000 on average from the current price of around $1000 owing to the high cost of labour in the US.
Most of the iPhones sold in the US currently are made in India. Apple's assembly lines in India churned out smartphones worth $22 billion in 2024-25, with a 60% year-on-year increase in output.
Some experts also said that Trump's statement appeared to be a negotiation tactic to secure a more favourable trade deal with India.'Trump's posturing of a potential 25% tariff on 'Made in India' Apple phones will certainly be a dampener on Apple's India plans,' said Jaijit Bhattacharya, president, Centre for Digital Economy Policy Research. 'It brings in regulatory uncertainty for Apple, which in itself is extremely detrimental. Apple was signalled to move out of China into trusted supply chain locations such as India. As it started ramping up in India, conflicting signals have emerged from the US administration.'He said the outcome would be significant uncertainty for Apple, impacting the company's ability to build a resilient supply chain and serve the market.Anurag Agrawal, founder of Techaisle, said, 'Trump's past actions indicate a willingness to impose tariffs to push for domestic production, and his recent comments suggest he is not pleased with Apple's move to diversify manufacturing to India. Therefore, some form of targeted tariffs remains a possibility. While Trump can impose tariffs, previous threats have often been used as negotiating tactics, and exemptions for electronics (including iPhones) have been granted before.'A section of industry executives, however, said the US administration's move to slap tariffs on Apple would not halt India's strides in electronics manufacturing services."India is primarily involved in assembly and even within that India's piece of the pie is under $40,' said Raja Manickam, founder of the fabless chip startup iVP Semiconductor and the former CEO of Tata Electronics. 'Finally, I do see that sense will prevail and that Apple will reason with the US government that at least 50% or more of their value addition comes in from chips, IP and software by American companies.'ET's queries sent to Apple remained unanswered till press time."The notion of Apple moving iPhone assembly to the US is less a concrete strategy and more of a negotiating tool, especially in the context of US-India trade dynamics," Sanyam Chaurasia, technology market analyst at Canalys Research said. "Realistically, even if Apple were to shift assembly stateside, it would take several years and involve significant cost implications." He said Trump appears to be using Apple as a 'bargaining chip' in tariff negotiations with India. "It's more a political gesture than a realistic plan. I expect to see more of this as pressure builds to secure favorable terms in the bilateral trade agreement," he said. Apple has increasingly chosen India as an alternative to China, where it has massive operations, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic, realising that over-reliance on a single production base could put its supply chain in jeopardy. In line with growing demand, the company's suppliers such as Foxconn and Tata Electronics have been expanding their India manufacturing footprint.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Exoticamp secures investment from KIMS Hospitals founder
Chennai-based travel-tech company Exoticamp has secured a fresh round of investment from Bhaskar Rao Bollineni, a cardiothoracic surgeon and Founder and Chairman of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS) Hospitals. 'This particular investment has been made in his independent capacity. And the funds would be deployed towards scaling its technology platform and accelerating brand-building initiatives,' said Swaminathan Subramanian, CEO and Co-founder of Exoticamp Adventures Pvt. Ltd. Exoticamp currently receives between 100,000 to 120,000 online visitors each month, with conversion rates fluctuating on a monthly basis. The average age of its consumers ranges from 22 to 25 years. 'During last financial year, our bookings stood at 25,000. And for this financial year, we have already touched over 7,000 bookings,' Mr. Subramanian said. He further said: 'People are bored with the regular way of holidaying and they are looking for nature-based experiences. Apart from families and Gen Z consumers, we are now receiving huge interest from schools, especially the International Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Our camps are helping them with outdoor learning experiences.' Citing examples, Mr. Subramanian said, 'We are organising aqua learning camps, astro experience and stargazing is another trend that is increasing. We have now created a separate vertical for schools and we already have five schools in our network.' With over 300 offbeat camping locations across 13 states and more than 40,000 campers hosted, Exoticamp offers curated, beginner-friendly outdoor getaways, ranging from forest glamps and tea estate stays to guided treks, kayaking, stargazing, and nature walks. India's outdoor and experiential travel market is projected to grow at over 17% CAGR, driven by a growing preference for immersive, short-haul trips.
Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
A poor, underdeveloped country with a population less than Dallas is giving Trump massive headache with illegal migrants
Synopsis Eswatini, a small African kingdom, has reversed its decision to accept five migrants deported by the United States. Initially agreeing to President Trump's conditions, Eswatini will now facilitate the return of migrants to their home countries, including Vietnam, Jamaica, and Cuba. This decision follows concerns about human rights and accusations of exploitation, sparking condemnation from opposition groups. AP FILE - Eswatini's King Mswati III addresses the Climate Action Summit in the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters, Sept. 23, 2019. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow, File) The tiny African kingdom of Eswatini announced Wednesday (July 16, 2025) that it would repatriate the five migrants who had been deported there by the United States. This development comes as a big issue for the Trump administration, as the African nation, which has a population less than many US cities, including Dallas, initially agreed to US President Donald Trump's conditions and was ready to accept the illegal immigrants, but now it is saying that these migrants will be sent back to their country of Africa's 39th largest economy, has a population less than that of Dallas. Its population size is 1.2 million people, while Dallas has a population of over 1.3 million. American officials said on Tuesday (July 15, 2025) that the migrants' home countries had refused to accept them. The migrants came from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Yemen, and Cuba and had been serving time in American prisons for serious offenses, according to the Department of Homeland government spokesperson Thabile Mdluli said in a statement Wednesday that the governments of her country and the United States, together with the International Organization for Migration, will "facilitate the transit of these inmates to their countries of origin."The International Organization for Migration said that it had no involvement in the removal of the migrants from the United States and had not been asked to provide any support with repatriation. The Trump administration has worked aggressively to broker deals with international partners willing to take deportees. Legal experts have challenged the deportations because the migrants could be subject to mistreatment and the Supreme Court decision, immigration officials acted quickly to implement new regulations that allow the government to carry out third-country deportations in as little as six hours, even without assurances that the migrants will be safe. Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, is tucked between South Africa and Mozambique and has one of Africa's last ruling monarchies. The kingdom is divided between those who praise its adherence to tradition and those who argue that the lavish lifestyle of King Mswati III stands in painful contrast to the poverty afflicting many of the country's 1.2 million to World Eswatini's GDP forecast is $5 billion in 2024 and $4.8 billion projected for 2025 (current market prices). This Eswatini GDP growth forecast for 2024 and 2025 reflects an estimated growth rate of 4.2%.The economy of Eswatini has grown at an average annual growth rate of 2.8% in the last four years and is ranked the 39th largest economy in Africa, ahead of Dallas, there are also several other US cities that have a population greater than Eswatini. These include New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, and Miami, among others. Eswatini's economy is driven mainly by the services sector, which makes up over half of the country's economic output. Manufacturing, especially sugar production, along with agriculture, mining, and construction, also plays big roles. Eswatini depends heavily on South Africa for both trade and imports, with about 65% of exports and 75% of imports linked to its citizens of Eswatini and foreign governments have also raised concerns about the country's human rights record, accusing the government of using excessive, sometimes lethal, force against people who oppose the king. Those opposed to the monarchy were quick to condemn the arrival of the deportees."This is appalling," said Lioness Sibande, the secretary-general of the Swaziland Peoples Liberation Movement, an opposition group. She described the move as an example of the West's long history of exploiting African nations. "The West is always disrespecting us as Africans and thinking we are their dumpsite," she her statement, Mdluli, the government spokesperson, sought to temper the concerns of Eswatini citizens. She said the deportees were being held in isolation units at correctional decision to take migrants from the United States came after months of talks that included "rigorous risk assessments and careful consideration for the safety and security of citizens," she said. "The nation is assured that these inmates pose no threat to the country or its citizens." Mdluli added that she could not reveal what Eswatini received in return for taking the migrants because the terms of the agreement with the United States remain classified.
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US-Nato's threat to Russian oil buyers masks a bid to check China and corner the arms market
Play ball, our way Nato secretary general Mark Rutte may have thought he would cause jitters in India, China and Russia if he spoke the strident language of Donald Trump. That he caused no disquiet was evident in the stock markets in India, China and the Western 'ordered' India, Brazil and China - all BRICS members - to stop buying Russian oil after Trump threatened to punish them for non-compliance by imposing an additional 100% tariff. Curiously, he omitted mentioning Turkiye, a Nato member, being the third-biggest importer of Russian crude after India and China. It is amazing that some of the best strategists in the Western world would come up with a simplistic solution for resolving the Ukraine crisis: provide Ukraine with top-notch weapons and weaken Russia by blocking oil exports. Choking distribution of Russian oil, which accounts for 15% of global supply, would shoot up international crude prices, possibly by 20-30% from the present level of $68 a barrel. Markets were indifferent because they knew that European countries, and even the US, would not seriously commit themselves to such self-harm. Though the EU has moved away from Russian oil, it still purchases 19% of its natural gas requirements from Russia. Trump, once wary of Ukraine aid and banking on Putin ties, flipped after Rutte dangled big US arms sales So, why should India, which saves more than $11 bn a year by buying discounted Russian oil, accept this 'diktat', which is equal to an additional tariff? Indian officials prefer to wait. An earlier statement by S Jaishankar after US senator Lindsey Graham proposed a 500% tariff on buyers of Russian oil is an indicator of New Delhi's thinking. 'So, we have been in touch with Senator Graham. Our concerns and our interests on energy security have been made conversant to him. So, we'll then have to cross that bridge when we come to it, if we come to it,' Jaishankar said earlier this has protested the move, while Russian leaders are literally joking about it. 'China believes dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solution to the Ukraine crisis. We categorically oppose all illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction,' Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Wednesday. 'Coercion and pressure cannot resolve fundamental issues.'Trump, who consistently opposed high-spend support for Ukraine, and relied on his 'friendship' with Vladimir Putin to resolve the crisis, made a volte-face, offering top-notch military equipment to Kyiv. Some commentators have credited Rutte for bringing about this change by enticing Trump with promises of higher sales of US-made military there is more to it. Trump, and a section of European leaders, have been looking for ways to keep Beijing under pressure as they find Chinese companies surging ahead of Western businesses in sales and innovation. Cutting off Russian oil supplies could be a good way to force China, the biggest oil buyer, to pay more while weakening a supposed India-Russia-China 'alliance'.They are also hassled by the expansion and rising clout of BRICS, which Trump recently described as an 'anti-American' group. He takes the de-dollarisation threat more seriously than some BRICS members like India. The fact that the Russian economy has survived nearly four years of, in Putin's words, a 'special military operation' is seen by many as a direct affront to the supposed power of economic sanctions and Western plans to weaken the nation. India and China are blamed in some quarters for Russia's is the second-biggest arms buyer in the world after Ukraine. Russia remains the largest arms supplier, meeting 36% of India's arms requirements - though the number has declined from 72% during 2010-14, suggesting major changes in GoI's approach on the issue. According to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri), 'India is shifting its arms supply relations towards Western suppliers, most notably France, Israel and the US.'A key element in the growth of the defence industry is the existence of enemies and threat perception. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and, to a smaller extent, India help to meet this requirement for Western defence manufacturers. Qatar and Saudi Arabia are the third- and fourth-biggest buyers, mainly because of the threat perception from recently said that his success in persuading European countries to spend 5% of their GDP on defence has thrown up a potential market of $1 tn for the sector. It is obvious that American defence companies and politicians do not want China to start bidding for a piece of the new market by offering discounted rates. They don't want to share the fate of US construction and railroad companies, which failed to stop Chinese players from penetrating parts of Europe over the past also want a share of the Indian defence market, even if it's necessary to ensure continued discord between Asian neighbours, India, Pakistan and China. Trump's repeated claims about ending the recent India-Pakistan conflict should be seen in this the goals set out by the Trump-Nato combine cover several aspects other than oil. They include countering China's influence, weakening BRICS and enlarging the market potential of Western arms producers. The question is whether it will succeed in bringing India closer to the West (read: the US). Or, make New Delhi and Beijing strange tactical bedfellows. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. As deposit ground slips under PSU banks' feet, they chase the wealthy If data is the new oil, are data centres the smokestacks of the digital age? Can Grasim's anti-competition charge against Asian Paints stand amid intense war Can Indian IT's 'pyramid' survive the GenAI shake-up? Stock Radar: Igarashi Motors showing signs of momentum after 30% drop from highs; time to buy? These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts Multibagger or IBC - Part 15: Strong margins & no loans. Is this the auto sector's dark horse? Get ready for volatility with the big, better & experienced. 7 large-caps from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 39%
