Phoenix mobile home fire burns 5 units, leaving over 30 residents displaced
Around 4 p.m. June 22, Phoenix firefighters were sent to a residential area near 43rd Avenue and Van Buren Street where "multiple" mobile homes were on fire, according to Capt. Todd Keller, spokesperson for the Phoenix Fire Department.
Flames from the first alarm fire made its way outside the homes, spreading to other units, as crews maintained a position around the blaze, successfully containing it, Keller said.
Downed power lines were treated by firefighters, Keller said.
There was a power outage in the area, impacting about 60 Salt River Project customers near 41st Avenue and Van Buren Street, as of 6:20 p.m.
A total of 33 people across five mobile homes were displaced as a result of the fire, according to Keller.
No injuries to residents or firefighters were reported, Keller said.
The cause of the fire remained under investigation by the Phoenix Fire Investigations Task Force.
This is a developing story, check back to azcentral.com for more details.
Contact reporter Rey Covarrubias Jr. at rcovarrubias@gannett.com. Follow him on Instagram, X, Threads and Bluesky: @ReyCJrAZ.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: West Phoenix fire leaves 33 mobile home residents displaced
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
3 minutes ago
- CBS News
Top Justice Department official voices support for interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba ahead of crucial deadline
When Alina Habba was installed by President Trump as acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey on March 24, a 120-day stopwatch was immediately triggered. That's how long an interim U.S. attorney can serve without Senate confirmation, unless the state's district court judges vote in a rare meeting to extend that deadline, which expires Tuesday. Habba has not received Senate confirmation and faces an uphill battle in a state represented by two Democratic senators adamantly opposed to her holding the office. That leaves it up to the state's judges, who have a decision to make Monday about Habba. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche urged the judges to allow her to remain in the job in a pair of social media posts on Sunday evening and Monday morning. Habba "has brought steady leadership and sound judgment as interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey," wrote Blanche. "She has the full confidence of [the president] and DOJ. District judges should use their authority to keep her in place." Habba did not immediately reply to questions from CBS News. She was nominated by Mr. Trump on July 1 for a full term as U.S. attorney. Blanche led Mr. Trump's personal criminal defense team, and Habba led his personal civil defense team in multiple major cases during the years between his terms in office. Habba had never worked in law enforcement prior to her appointment to the U.S. attorney's office. Blanche wrote that "Habba has the full confidence of DOJ leadership because she's doing the job—aggressively, independently, and by the book. The district judges should not be swayed by political noise. Keep her in place." Habba's brief tenure as the top federal law enforcer in her home state has been tumultuous. But she has received permission to hire 20 new prosecutors, according to the New Jersey Globe, a major achievement amid drastic workforce cuts across the federal government. She has also repeatedly clashed with the state's top Democrats. The role of a U.S. attorney is traditionally viewed as nonpartisan, but Habba told an interviewer early in her time in office that she aimed to help "turn New Jersey red," referring to the color associated with Republicans. "I think New Jersey is absolutely close to getting there," she told right-wing outlet Real America's Voice. "So, hopefully while I'm there, I can help that cause." She also announced investigations into New Jersey's Democratic governor and attorney general, who oppose the president's immigration measures. In May, Habba's office charged Newark Mayor Ras Baraka with criminal trespassing and U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver with assault after a protest at an immigration facility. The charges against Baraka were dropped, and McIver entered a not guilty plea.
Fox News
3 minutes ago
- Fox News
Teen lifeguard impaled by beach umbrella returns to work after freak accident: ‘I'm pretty good'
The New Jersey lifeguard impaled by a beach umbrella while working a summer job on the sand is speaking out about the ordeal that almost ended her life. Alex Kaus, 18, was working as a lifeguard on Asbury Park's 3rd Avenue Beach last month when the incident occurred. "Physically, I'm pretty good," Kaus told Kaus was setting up the umbrella when a gust of wind blew her off a lifeguard stand, dropping her on the point end of the 1-inch metal pole, reported. Fellow lifeguards found Kaus lying on the ground with the stake through her left shoulder and sticking out the back of her arm, Asbury Park Fire Chief Kevin Keddy previously told Fox News Digital. First responders cut the umbrella stake off Kaus, making it easier to transport her to the hospital. Three weeks after the incident, Kaus is reportedly back at work, according to the local outlet. While she is not yet guarding beachgoers, the college student is reportedly checking for beach badges as she prepares to head back to school at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. "I hope to have at least like two-ish weeks on the stand before I have to go back to school," Kaus said. Kaus has no exact return date for when she will return to guarding, as she reportedly is waiting to be medically cleared before taking to the water. This summer marks the New Jersey native's second year on the Asbury Park beach, which she chose to apply to after spending time visiting as a child, according to "I knew I liked it here and I knew it was a busy beach and wanted some, like action," Kaus said. With the news of her accident making national headlines, Kaus looked to downplay the attention as she focused on her recovery. "I'm definitely one of those people who's just like, 'It's all good,'" she said. "I'm still processing everything." Kaus is especially thankful for her fellow lifeguards and those who rushed to her rescue. "I'm really grateful to the people that were there with me," Kaus told "My coworkers, Liz and Noah and Patty and Colin, they were all there." Kaus did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. While Kaus is still recovering from her accident, she hopes the level of attention her story created shines some light on the role of lifeguards protecting local beaches up and down the country's coasts. "We appreciate it when people appreciate us as lifeguards," she said. "Because we're out here every day, keeping everybody safe."
Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Kiss Cam Moment And Our Rush To Moral Superiority
FOXBOROUGH, MA - JULY 30: Coldplay frontman Chris Martin performs at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, ... More Mass., July 30, 2016. The band stopped in Boston as part of their international "A Head Full of Dreams" tour. (Photo by Timothy Tai for The Boston Globe via Getty Images) If you were judged solely by your worst moment, how would you fare? Like millions around the world, I watched the now-viral "kiss cam" incident that captured Andy Byron, CEO of Astronomer, embracing someone who was clearly not his wife at a Coldplay concert. The backlash was immediate and merciless. The shame was public and punishing. The judgment, swift and hours, the digital dogpile was mounting along with speculation swirled about his marriage, his leadership, and his character. The court of public opinion had rendered its verdict: guilty as charged, sentenced to eternal public shame. Admittedly, my initial reaction was to laugh, then to cast judgment, and then to marvel at the stupidity of a clearly intelligent corporate leader ever thinking such blatantly morally wrong behavior would not catch up with him. Yet as I watched the feeding frenzy unfold, I couldn't help but wonder: What if this moment reveals something deeper than two people's poor judgment? What does our collective response say about us? There's no question that trust was betrayed and integrity was compromised. The consequences—for his marriage, his family, his company, and his own sense of self—will be profound. Public figures, especially leaders, are rightly held to higher standards. When you occupy positions of influence and responsibility, your actions carry weight far beyond your personal sphere. But the speed and apparent glee with which the internet cast its collective stone should give us pause. Because while most of us will never be publicly exposed in such a dramatic fashion, we've all had moments we wouldn't want replayed on the world stage. Words spoken in anger that we immediately regretted. Corners cut when no one was watching. Promises broken quietly. Trust betrayed in small but meaningful ways. Moments of weakness when our ego overrode our values. Instances of unkindness we'd rather forget. This isn't about excusing infidelity or minimizing its devastating impact on families and relationships. Rather, it's about resisting our human tendency to rush toward moral superiority when someone else is caught in their fallibility. The Pharisee in all of us wants to condemn the sinner in others. It feels good to point fingers at someone else's moral failure because it temporarily elevates our own sense of righteousness. Social media amplifies this instinct, creating digital mobs that descend with righteous fury on anyone who stumbles publicly. Shame declares: "He is bad." Humility acknowledges: 'I, too, have fallen short and still have work to do on myself.' As leaders, we face a choice in moments like these. We can join the chorus of condemnation, positioning ourselves as morally superior. Or we can use these moments as mirrors, examining our own integrity gaps with honest self-reflection. The most effective leaders I've worked with share a common trait: they're ruthlessly honest about their own shortcomings. They understand that leadership isn't about perfection—it's about authenticity, accountability, and the courage to keep growing even when (especially when) it's uncomfortable. How many of us have made decisions that compromised our values when we thought no one was watching? How many times have we rationalized small betrayals or convinced ourselves that "just this once" wouldn't matter? The only difference between us and someone caught on camera might be the size of the stage and the number of witnesses. So yes, make your judgment if you must. Public figures should be held accountable for their actions, especially when those actions violate the trust placed in them. But don't miss the deeper invitation this viral moment offers: to conduct an audit on any infractions of your own integrity, including examining the part of you that needs to judge others and to honestly assess where you too might be falling short of the values you claim to live by. We don't become better leaders or better humans by standing in judgment of others' failures. We become better by standing in the humble truth of our own fallibility. By owning our mistakes, acknowledging our blind spots, and committing anew to bridge the gap between the values we espouse and the actions we actually the CEO at the center of this storm, the path forward is clear but steep. Genuine accountability requires more than damage control or public relations spin. It demands honest self-examination, authentic apology to those harmed, and the hard work of rebuilding trust through consistent action over time. But for the rest of us watching from the sidelines, the invitation is equally profound: to lead ourselves with the character and moral courage we want to see more of in others. Integrity is the only path upon which we can never get lost. It's not about perfection—it's about alignment between our values and our actions, even when (especially when) no one is watching. In a world quick to shame and slow to forgive, perhaps the most radical leadership act is to model a different way: one that acknowledges our shared humanity, holds space for growth and redemption, and focuses more energy on our own character development than on judging others' character deficits. The kiss cam captured a moment of moral lapse and lousy judgment. But our response to it reveals something far more telling about who we are—and who we're choosing to become. What moment of your own would you least want to see go viral? And what does your answer reveal about the distance between who you pretend to be and who you actually are? Perhaps the most uncomfortable truth is this: we shame others not despite our own failings, but because of them. The fiercer our judgment, the deeper our fear of being exposed. The louder our condemnation, the more desperately we need to believe we're far better. But are we really? In a world where everyone has a camera on hand, we're all just one viral clip of a bad moment away from being the person everyone else gets to judge. The question isn't whether you'll sometimes fall short of showing up with integrity. The question is whether you'll have the courage to face your failures with the same mercy you hope others might show you—if your worst moment ever goes Warrell is a leadership expert, keynote speaker and bestselling author of "The Courage Gap". More at
