
Child care costs are ‘major problem' for most US adults, poll reveals
But they're divided over how to solve the problem and what role the government should have in that solution.
About three-quarters of U.S. adults see child care costs as a 'major problem,' but only about half say helping working families pay for child care should be a 'high priority' for the federal government, according to the June poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
5 Americans are divided over how to solve the problem involving child care costs and what role the government should have.
Srdjan – stock.adobe.com
5 About three-quarters of U.S. adults see child care costs as a 'major problem,' according to the June poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
The coronavirus pandemic was a tipping point, revealing the child care industry's vulnerabilities. The latest congressional package of tax cuts included tax credits and benefits for parents and businesses that assist employees with child care. Those changes have been praised by some, while others say millions of families at lower income levels wouldn't get the full credit and would be affected by cuts in Medicaid and food stamps.
The poll findings help explain the difficulty advocacy groups, elected officials and families navigate in trying to address the high costs of care: While most agree it's a problem, there isn't a simple fix. For instance, while government-funded child care is popular, that might not be everyone's first choice. Many U.S. adults also think it's better for children with two parents to be cared for full time by a parent.
'Everyone kind of agrees that it's a problem that we need to address,' said Sarah Rittling, executive director of the First Five Years Fund advocacy organization. 'By having this issue out there, it really is driving a lot of bipartisan conversations.'
Some consensus on free day care and paid family leave
Most Americans support initiatives to offer child care or additional time for working families to spend with babies. About two-thirds support providing free or low-cost day care for children too young to attend public school, and a similar share favor requiring employers to provide paid family leave for new parents.
Women are more likely than men to support the proposals, and Democrats are more likely than Republicans, but each is popular across the board.
5 Women are more likely than men to support the proposals that offer child care or additional time for working families to spend with babies.
Kawee – stock.adobe.com
Mary Banek, a nurse anesthetist of Midlothian, Texas, said she helps take care of her 1-year-old grandson so he doesn't need day care. When she had her kids, she left the workforce and got a license to start a day care from her home to watch 12 children, including her own, so she could generate income.
Banek said she's surprised at the high fees at day cares these days.
'I don't know what's happened and why it is so expensive,' Banek said, adding maybe there's a way to cap costs. She doesn't feel the government should foot the cost.
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
Many think parents should be caregivers
While many solutions focus on families with working parents, there isn't broad agreement this is the best arrangement for children. Just under half of U.S. adults, 45%, say children with two parents are better off when one parent doesn't have a job and raises the children. Only about 1 in 10 say children are better off when both parents work full time, and about 4 in 10 say it doesn't make a difference.
Vice President JD Vance has tried to push for ideas that would encourage Americans to have families but has opposed government spending on child care, saying children benefit from having a parent or family member at home as a caretaker.
5 Forty-five percent say children with two parents are better off when one parent doesn't have a job and raises the children.
NDABCREATIVITY – stock.adobe.com
About half of men say children with two parents are better off when one is the full-time caregiver, compared with about 4 in 10 women.
Stephen Yip-Wineman, 45, a high school teacher from Murrieta, California, who describes himself as a moderate, said he feels society doesn't see the value of parents choosing to be caretakers.
'A lot of people are pushed into the idea that everyone in their family is going to work and that's the way of being a productive member of society,' Yip-Wineman said. 'They think staying home and taking care of the kids is somehow not contributing.'
Yip-Wineman has two children ages 12 and 14, and their mother stays home, but he says his ideas of having a parent do the caretaking don't have to do with making the mother the primary caretaker.
'Having a parent raise the kids is not about pushing traditional Christian values and trying to keep women out of the workplace,' he said. 'It's about trying to be more personally engaged with each other.'
Are changes happening?
Many Democrats and Republicans have endorsed expansions to the child tax credit as a way to support families and lift children and young families out of poverty.
While campaigning as Donald Trump's running mate, Vance raised the possibility of increasing the child tax credit to $5,000, saying that would help more parents stay home with their children.
5 Democrats and Republicans have endorsed efforts to expand the child tax credit to support families and combat poverty.
AP
About 7 in 10 U.S. adults said they'd support increasing the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,500 for parents who are U.S. citizens, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll from June found. Republicans and Democrats were similarly likely to support this: About 8 in 10 of each were in favor.
In the final bill, however, the child tax credit increased to $2,200.
Beyond expanding the child tax credit, the package also increased a benefit allowing most working parents to claim a higher percentage of their child care expenses and get more tax credits.
Organizations want increased funding for federal early-learning and care programs, including a child care program for low-income families and an early-education program called Head Start. Trump's Republican administration backed away from a proposal this year to eliminate funding for Head Start.
Other groups, including Child Care Aware of America, have pointed out the new law's cuts in Medicaid would result in a loss of health coverage for many child care workers.
___
The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
19 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Cuomo stays in N.Y. mayor's race as an independent after losing Democratic primary to Mamdani
NEW YORK — Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday he will campaign for mayor of New York City as an independent candidate, staying in a crowded field running against left-wing Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani. In a video, Cuomo, who last month suffered a bruising loss to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, announced he was making another run to combat the progressive Mamdani, who he said 'offers slick slogans but no real solutions.' 'The fight to save our city isn't over,' Cuomo said. 'Only 13% of New Yorkers voted in the June primary. The general election is in November and I am in it to win it.' Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams also is running as an independent in the general election, and Curtis Sliwa — founder of the 1970s-era Guardian Angels anti-crime patrol — is again on the Republican line. People opposed to Mamdani's agenda, which includes higher taxes on the wealthy, have called on donors and voters to unite behind a single candidate for the November election. They fear multiple candidates will splinter the anti-Mamdani vote, increasing the Democrat's chances to win. Mamdani's campaign responded to Cuomo's announcement by saying the ex-governor and mayor are cozying up to 'billionaires and Republicans' while the Democratic nominee remains focused on affordability issues. 'That's the choice this November,' campaign spokesperson Jeffrey Lerner said in a statement. Cuomo's decision to continue on in the race is the latest chapter in his comeback attempt, launched almost four years after he resigned as governor in 2021 following a barrage of sexual harassment allegations. He denied wrongdoing during the campaign, maintaining that the scandal was driven by politics. Cuomo was treated as the presumed front-runner for much of the Democratic primary, with the former governor boasting deep political experience, universal name recognition and a juggernaut fundraising operation. He limited media interviews, held few unscripted events and avoided mingling with voters. That strategy contrasted with Mamdani's energetic street-level campaign centered around affordability issues. The 33-year-old amassed a legion of young volunteers who blanketed the city to build support, while the candidate's savvy social media persona won him national acclaim. Lagging behind Mamdani in the vote count, Cuomo conceded the race last month on primary night. Final results released after the city ran through its ranked choice voting calculations showed Mamdani besting the former governor by 12 percentage points. Despite the Democratic primary loss, Cuomo had also qualified to run on an independent ballot line in November under a party he created called 'Fight and Deliver.' As he weighed whether to stay on as an independent, Cuomo began losing support from traditional allies. Key labor unions backed Mamdani, and the Rev. Al Sharpton, an influential Black leader, urged Cuomo to step aside. Some deep-pocketed contributors have meanwhile aligned behind Adams, who is running as an independent. Although he's still a Democrat, Adams pulled out of the primary shortly after a federal judge dismissed a corruption case against him at the request of President Trump's Justice Department, arguing that the case had sidelined him from campaigning. Cuomo, 67, served as governor for over a decade and modeled himself as a socially progressive Democrat who got things done. He pushed through legislation that legalized gay marriage and tackled massive infrastructure projects, such as a three-mile bridge over the Hudson River that he named after his father. Cuomo's national profile peaked in the early days of the nation's COVID-19 outbreak during his televised daily briefings. The governor leavened stern warnings for people to wear masks with heartfelt expressions of concern for his elderly mother or brotherly banter with Chris Cuomo, a TV journalist. His reputation was soon tainted when it emerged that the state's official count of nursing home deaths had excluded many victims who had been transferred to hospitals before they succumbed. Cuomo resigned shortly after New York's attorney general released the results of an investigation that found he had sexually harassed at least 11 women.


E&E News
20 minutes ago
- E&E News
House Republicans buck Trump on NOAA cuts
House Republican appropriators would cut NOAA by nearly $400 million for fiscal 2026, but they're rejecting deeper reductions proposed by the White House. The Commerce-Justice-Science bill — released Monday and up for subcommittee markup Tuesday — represents a blowback to the administration's efforts to dismantle the science agency, including dissolving the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research. The legislation would still amount to a 6 percent cut from current levels, and Republicans focused more on its law enforcement portions than science provisions. Advertisement 'This bill importantly balances federal funding to support American values and the priorities of the Trump Administration by investing in programs that strengthen our economy and policies that protect our constitutional rights,' said Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), chair of the Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations Subcommittee. 'This bill also ensures that America remains the global leader in space exploration as adversaries like China ramp up global aggression,' he said. Republicans say the bill includes 'reducing spending on reckless climate change efforts' and 'right-size the bureaucracy of the federal government by reducing salaries and expenses where appropriate.' Committee Democrats said the bill 'continues Republicans' attacks on America's scientific and economic competitiveness by cutting billions from science, technology development, STEM education, and aeronautics research of NASA and the National Science Foundation.' The legislation would slash funding for independent ocean species research, with a 78 percent cut for the Marine Mammal Commission, established in 1972 under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The National Science Foundation would see a 23 percent cut of $2 billion. That's significantly less than the 57 percent proposed drop included in the Trump administration budget request. The Republican bill would hold funding levels steady for NASA, at roughly $24.8 billion, compared to a 25 percent cut under the White House budget proposal of $18.8 billion. The House bill would codify President Donald Trump's executive orders to end diversity, equity and inclusion programs and prohibit federal funding 'for DEI efforts and critical race theory.' The Senate Appropriations Committee planned to release its own Commerce-Justice-Science bill last week but a dispute over FBI headquarters thwarted that effort. But lawmakers discussing the bill said it would include full funding for the National Weather Service. Senators are working on their spending bills on a bipartisan basis.


New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democratic city officers flocking to cop-friendly red states, police leader claims: ‘Why would anyone stay?'
Law enforcement officers in areas primarily run by Democrats continue to flock to red states for job security, better pay and bosses who will back them up, according to one police leader. Joe Gamaldi is the national vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP). He is an active lieutenant with the Houston Police Department, and he said police in blue cities are tired of facing hostility from local leaders. Advertisement 'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' he told Fox News Digital. 'Because, ultimately, people want to feel appreciated for what they do, and when you have a boss — in this case, mayors or city councils, who regularly call you a piece of crap to the public — why would anyone stay?' Florida is one example of a Republican-led state that has benefited from the mass departures. 5 'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' Joe Gamaldi said. AP Advertisement According to a 2024 statement from former Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, the state welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state. 'Florida is the most pro-law enforcement state in the nation because we back our blue,' Moody said at the time. 'We've been spreading the word about all the great incentives to join our ranks, and individuals like the new Sarasota recruits have answered the call, leaving behind places where their service was not as appreciated as it is here.' She said she was 'as inspired as ever to continue doing all we can to show our support to those who bravely protect and serve' after seeing the influx of police officers into the state. 5 Florida welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state. Fox News Digital Advertisement Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community, adding officers are 'voting with their feet.' 'We're also seeing it [in] Texas in Houston, which is a city that leans a little blue, but they have been supportive of police officers,' he said. 'The mayor there has given a massive raise to police officers. You're seeing officers go there. You're seeing officers go to Dallas. So, you're seeing all these communities, and there's one common thread. It's 'We support police officers.'' Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement and said, in many cities, law enforcement officers are afraid to do their jobs in 'critical incident' situations, even when they do them by the book. 5 Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community. LightRocket via Getty Images Advertisement 'I think you can look no further than Seattle, Portland, Chicago [and] New York,' he said. 'All of these cities have basically told their police officers, 'We don't support you. We're not gonna be there for you when you need us. We're gonna try to defund you when given the opportunity.' 'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said, referring to socialist Zohran Mamdani, who has been open with his anti-police rhetoric. 5 'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said Zohran Mamdani /X Blue cities, Gamaldi said, are worse off for driving out their police forces. 'Look at the mass exodus of experience in solving cases and experience of just mentoring the next generation of police officers,' he said. 'I mean, the damage that was done in 2020 with the defund the police movement, rhat's going to reverberate for decades. You don't just recover from something like that when you have all of that experience walking out the door.' 5 Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement. Christopher Sadowski He also pointed to better pay and other financial perks, like cities covering moving expenses, as reasons law enforcement officers are moving away from far-left areas. Ultimately, he posed a question to those who patrol the streets where they are unappreciated, saying, 'Why not leave?' Advertisement 'To anyone watching this right now,' Gamaldi said, 'if your boss was constantly telling you [that] you're doing a horrible job, and, in addition, if you were following the exact policies, training and the law of your job, and yet they are still demonizing you, still throwing you under the bus, still trying to indict you, why the hell would you stay?'