logo
Why nuclear energy is making a comeback across Europe

Why nuclear energy is making a comeback across Europe

Euronews27-05-2025
Several countries across Europe are pivoting or have made U-turns over the use of nuclear power, as governments seek greater energy security.
Belgium was in the spotlight earlier this month when its parliament voted to repeal a 2003 law that stipulated the gradual phaseout of nuclear energy.
The motion it adopted on 15 May allows for the possibility of reviving the country's atomic industry in the future, including building new power stations.
Belgium's original plan to phase out its seven nuclear reactors by 2025 was pushed back by a decade in 2022 due to energy uncertainty caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
The current conservative-led coalition government, led by Prime Minister Bart De Wever, came into power in February, and decided that the shift was necessary to meet its energy challenges.
"We know that it's a low-carbon energy source, which means we can meet our European climate targets, but it's also an abundant energy source," said Belgium's Energy Minister Mathieu Bihet.
"We have three objectives that are shared by our European partners. They are security of supply, a controlled price and low-carbon energy. And nuclear power meets all three criteria," he added.
Belgium is far from alone — other EU member states such as Germany, Denmark, and Italy are reconsidering their stances on nuclear power.
"I think it's obviously due to the current situation, with enormous geopolitical uncertainty and dependence on gas, which is still very strong," said Adel El Gammal, professor of energy geopolitics at the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB).
"So, quite naturally, anything we can do to make ourselves more independent of gas, we have to do. Nuclear power is one way," El Gammal, who is also secretary general of the European Energy Research Alliance (EERA), told Euronews in an interview.
The EU has around 100 nuclear reactors in 12 countries (Belgium, Bulgaria, Spain, Finland, France, Hungary, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden). Almost a quarter of the electricity produced in the EU comes from nuclear power, according to the latest data from Eurostat.
Nuclear plants release few pollutants into the air, which have made them an option as nations around the world seek clean energy to meet climate change targets. However, their construction and demolition produce large amounts of greenhouse gases.
Opponents have for decades cited the challenges involved with processing long-lived radioactive waste to lobby against new plants. Climate activists also say that relying on nuclear power risks slowing the rollout of renewable energy sources.
Germany in 2011 committed to phasing out nuclear power, thereby reinforcing its status as the leading voice of the anti-nuclear movement within the EU. This was achieved in April 2023 with the closure of the country's last three power stations.
During the German election campaign at the start of this year, then-candidate and now Chancellor Friedrich Merz, had promised to look into reviving the sector.
While Merz said in January that reopening the country's nuclear plants would "most likely not be feasible", his campaign vow marked a significant ideological shift in the German political landscape.
Just last week, Merz's government indicated it would stop blocking efforts to treat nuclear power on par with renewables in EU legislation, the Financial Times reported.
Italy is also considering reintroducing nuclear power.** At the end of the 1980s, Rome decided to put an end to nuclear power.
But Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government has set 2030 as the target date for returning to nuclear power, according to the country's energy security minister. The coalition government argues that this resource will help to ensure the country's energy security and achieve the environmental objectives of decarbonisation.
For similar reasons, coal-dependent Poland has embarked on a vast nuclear programme. Warsaw decided in 2022 to build its first power station, with the first reactor scheduled to be operational from 2033.
Earlier this month, EU renewables darling Denmark said it was considering lifting a 40-year-old ban on nuclear energy, and that it would analyse the potential benefits of a new generation of nuclear power technologies.
And just last week, Sweden passed a law to fund a new generation of nuclear reactors.
Meanwhile, in Spain, the government is under pressure to reconsider phasing out nuclear power following the giant blackout that hit the country at the end of April.
El Gammal of the EERA suggested two strategies for a return to nuclear power, which are not exclusive but very different in their development.
"The first is to extend existing facilities as far as possible. And here, I would say that if it can be done under well-established safety conditions, it should be done as far as possible. It's a no-brainer," he explained.
"On the other hand, relaunching a new nuclear industry or relaunching the construction of new reactors is much more complicated, because first of all, the budgets involved are extremely large," El Gammal added. "Then there's the time it takes to build a power station. It takes around ten years."
"Given the urgent need for strategic autonomy and climate change, this is a major problem", he said. All the more so as "renewable energies are coming on stream much more quickly".
Building an atomic energy industry means taking a long-term view, and anticipating the cost of different energy resources over an extended period of time.
However, as El Gammal pointed out, renewable energies are based on a logic of decreasing costs and increasing technology, "whereas in mature technologies, such as nuclear power, the costs are highly dependent on raw materials, i.e. cement, steel, in other words, raw materials whose cost is tending to increase."
But nuclear and renewables are not contradictory strategies; they can go hand-in-hand, he stressed.
To try and bring certainty to the industry, Belgium's energy minister Bihet suggested setting up joint projects and multi-state investments, which he said "will bring down costs and also stabilise investment to give companies confidence".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ryanair says dropping three French airports over 'harmful' tax
Ryanair says dropping three French airports over 'harmful' tax

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Ryanair says dropping three French airports over 'harmful' tax

"This astronomical tax makes France less competitive compared to other EU countries such as Ireland, Spain and Poland, which do not impose any air taxes," the airline said in a statement. Ryanair said it was dropping airports in Brive and Bergerac in southwestern France as well as the eastern city of Strasbourg, from where it served Portugal and Scotland. Ryanair had already dropped Vatry airport in northeastern France in the spring. Ryanair urged the French government to abolish the "harmful" air tax in order to make French aviation more competitive. Ryanair said its decision follows "the French government's failure to cancel an excessive increase in air tax, which was raised by 180 percent in March 2025". The Solidarity Tax on Airline Tickets rose to 7.40 euros ($8.55) per passenger for domestic and European flights from 2.63 euros previously. "At a time when France should be focusing on recovery and growth, Ryanair has no choice but to reduce its capacity for winter 2025 by 13 percent due to the French government's failure to act against this harmful air tax," said Jason McGuinness, Ryanair's chief commercial officer. The airline said its decision followed numerous warnings from airlines and French airports that the tax hike would make many routes to France unprofitable, particularly at regional airports and during the winter season. Ryanair said its decision will mean the loss of 25 routes and 750,000 seats in France this winter. "This completely avoidable loss will have a severe impact on regional connectivity, tourism and local employment," it said. The airline said it would redirect capacity and investment to more competitive European markets such as Sweden, Hungary and Italy if the French government does not change course. In contrast, if the government decides to drop the tax, Ryanair said it would respond with an investment of $2.5 billion, 25 new aircraft, a doubling of traffic to over 30 million passengers per year, and the creation of 750 additional jobs in French regions. © 2025 AFP

The battle over the EU's €2 trillion budget has begun
The battle over the EU's €2 trillion budget has begun

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

The battle over the EU's €2 trillion budget has begun

Negotiations over the long-term budget — in Brussels speak, the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) — are now underway following the European Commission's presentation of its initial proposal. This has fired the starting gun on a protracted negotiation that is typically among the most heated in Brussels. The new budget, which covers the period from 2028 to 2034, would represent a 67% increase compared to the previous budget from 2020 to 2027, reaching a total of €2 trillion. This would raise EU spending from 1.13% to 1.26% of the bloc's gross national income. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the objective is to achieve a simpler, more effective budget that is better aligned with European priorities. According to Euronews journalist Gerardo Fortuna, who has reported on the topic, in her previous term von der Leyen 'faced unprecedented challenges such as the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the COVID pandemic, and the rise in energy prices.' These challenges demonstrated the EU's need for more agility — and that is the main feature of the proposed budget: the ability to move money from one area to another when needed. "And the other is, of course, simplification. We used to have over 50 funds, now there are fewer,' Fortuna explained. Controversy over fund simplification To achieve this simplification, the Commission is reorganising the budget structure around three main pillars: competitiveness, research and innovation — including war-related defence infrastructure; external action, which will receive around €200 billion, including support for Ukraine; and the merging of traditional funds for agriculture, fisheries, cohesion and social policy. The fact that the Common Agricultural Policy and the Cohesion Policy — traditionally the largest components of the budget — are now being grouped together and face significant cuts has stirred controversy among farmers and MEPs. 'The Parliament does not support this approach for the next MFF. We believe agriculture and cohesion should remain separate. If they are combined in the same package, they will end up competing with each other for funding. And we don't think that's a good idea. It's not the right path for the future,' Socialist MEP Carla Tavares told Euronews. Due to this opposition, it is highly unlikely that the Commission's proposal will be approved in its current form. Some of the EU's financial heavyweights — such as Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden — have already rejected the budget, arguing that it is too costly. A long and difficult road now begins to gain approval for the proposal. Budget negotiations are expected to start in December, when the Danish Presidency of the EU Council will prepare a base document at the next summit. The European Parliament will also be involved, but only to give its final approval once the agreement has been negotiated by the leaders. This process could take up to two years, meaning that citizens will have to wait to find out which areas of their lives will be most affected by changes in EU funding. Watch the video here! Journalist: Stefan Grobe Content production: Pilar Montero López Video production: Zacharia Vigneron Graphism: Damaso Jaivenois Editorial coordination: Ana Lázaro Bosch and Jeremy Fleming-Jones

EU fails to agree Israeli suspension from research fund over Gaza
EU fails to agree Israeli suspension from research fund over Gaza

Euronews

time6 hours ago

  • Euronews

EU fails to agree Israeli suspension from research fund over Gaza

A European Commission proposal to deny Israel partial access to the EU's €95 billion Horizon Europe research fund failed to garner the necessary qualified majority support when EU ambassadors met in Brussels on Tuesday to discuss the issue. If agreed, Israel would lose access to €200 millions' worth of future grants and investments in Horizon's European Investment Council (EIC) which specialises in so-called disruptive technologies. But representatives from Berlin and Rome said they need to examine Commission's proposition further. For a qualified majority vote to pass the population weight of either Italy or Germany is required. "Germany wanted to continue dialogue with Israel as opposed to taking action – but we all know the dialogue is not working," a source at the meeting told Euronews. Another diplomat said Germany, which has opposed any sanction against Israel, was now "holding the cards' in relation to the decision. Both Germany and Italy said they needed more time and would let the EU know if they come to a different position in the coming weeks, according to two sources familiar. Hungary, Bulgaria and Czechia were opposed to taking any action, according to the sources. The Netherlands, Ireland, France, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Portugal, Malta and Spain all supported the Commission's plan with several saying they would also push the EU for stronger sanctions, potentially in trade, the sources said. The Commission's motion to suspend Israel's participation in Horizon is in response to an EU report finding the country had breached human rights obligations in the EU-Israel Association Agreement. After this finding the two sides came to an agreement that Israel would "substantially" increase access to civilians for food and medicine within the enclave to prevent the EU taking action for the breach. However, the EU says there has been no material improvement for Palestinians, and according to EU sources, the EU has not been able to independently verify the claims from Israel that it is allowing more trucks of aid to reach the starving population. EU officials have so far been prevented from going into Gaza to make their own assessment of the situation. "I didn't receive any convincing explanation as to why I couldn't go into Gaza," a senior official said. Meanwhile, the UN and other agencies say humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza worsens by the day, and over 130 people have died from hunger alone; 88 of them children and infants. On Monday, two prominent Israeli NGO's B'Tselem, and Physicians for Human Rights, Israel, issued a report claiming Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. As ambassadors met on Tuesday, the death toll for the entire war hit over 60,000 people according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health ministry. 81 people were killed by Israel on Tuesday alone; 32 while seeking aid, the ministry said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store