Trump considers taking over D.C. government, chides New York
Trump has made a similar threat regarding Washington before, but has not followed through even as he criticized crime rates and bashed other institutions there.
The president, speaking during a cabinet meeting at the White House, said his chief of staff, Susie Wiles, was in close touch with Mayor Muriel Bowser, who favors making the city a US state.
'We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to. We could run D.C. I mean, we're ... looking at D.C.,' Trump said. 'Susie Wiles is working very closely with the mayor.'
Bowser's office declined to comment.
The District of Columbia was established in 1790 with land from neighboring Virginia and Maryland. Congress has control of its budget, but voters elect a mayor and city council, thanks to a law known as the Home Rule Act. For Trump to take over the city, Congress likely would have to pass a law revoking that act, which Trump would have to sign.
Becoming the 51st state would give Washington's roughly 700,000 residents voting representation in Congress. Democrats support that plan, while Republicans, who are reluctant to hand Democrats any politically safe seats in the House of Representatives and Senate, oppose it.
Trump suggested his administration would run the city better with an appointed leader than the democratically elected government.
'We would run it so good, it would be run so proper. We'd get the best person to run it,' he said. 'The crime would be down to a minimum, would be much less. And you know we're thinking about doing it, to be honest with you.'
While Trump said his administration had a good relationship with Bowser, he had less complimentary words for Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist who won the race to be the Democratic Party's nominee in New York's November mayoral election.
Trump described Mamdani as a 'disaster.' A representative for Mamdani did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
'We're going to straighten out New York... Maybe we're going to have to straighten it out from Washington,' Trump said. 'We're going to do something for New York. I can't tell you what yet, but we're going to make New York great again also.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
New hampshire judge to hear arguments on class action against Trump's birthright citizenship order
A federal judge in New Hampshire will hear arguments Thursday on whether to certify a class-action lawsuit that would include every baby affected by President Donald Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of a pregnant woman, two parents, and their infants, is among numerous cases challenging Trump's January order denying citizenship to those born to parents living in the US illegally or temporarily. Represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and others, the plaintiffs are seeking to have their case certified as a class action and to block implementation of the order while litigation continues. Tens of thousands of babies and their parents may be exposed to the order's myriad harms in just weeks and need an injunction now, lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote in court documents filed Tuesday. At issue is the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which states: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.' The Trump administration says the phrase 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' means the US can deny citizenship to babies born to women in the country illegally, ending what has been seen as an intrinsic part of US law for more than a century. Prior misimpressions of the citizenship clause have created a perverse incentive for illegal immigration that has negatively impacted this country's sovereignty, national security, and economic stability, government lawyers wrote in the New Hampshire case. 'The Constitution does not harbor a windfall clause granting American citizenship to … the children of those who have circumvented (or outright defied) federal immigration laws.' Legal battles continue in multiple states. Several federal judges have issued nationwide injunctions stopping Trump's order from taking effect, but the US Supreme Court limited those injunctions in a June 27 ruling that gave lower courts 30 days to act. With that time frame in mind, opponents of the change quickly returned to court to try to block it. New Jersey and the more than a dozen states joining its case in Massachusetts federal court have asked the judge to determine if the nationwide injunction in their case could still apply under the high court's ruling. The judge has scheduled a hearing for July 18. 'Everybody knows there's a 30-day clock, so our hope is that we get an answer prior to the end of the 30-day clock,' New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin told The Associated Press in a recent interview. In a Washington state case before the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, the judges have asked the parties to write briefs explaining the effect of the Supreme Court's ruling. Washington and the other states in that lawsuit have asked the appeals court to return the case to the lower court judge. As in New Hampshire, the plaintiff in Maryland seeks to organize a class-action lawsuit that includes every person who would be affected by the order. The judge set a Wednesday deadline for written legal arguments as she considers the request for another nationwide injunction from CASA, a nonprofit immigrant rights organization. Ama Frimpong, legal director at CASA, said the group has been stressing to its members and clients that it is not time to panic. 'No one has to move states right this instant,' she said. 'There's different avenues through which we are all fighting again to make sure that this executive order never actually sees the light of day.' The New Hampshire plaintiffs, referred to only by pseudonyms, include a woman from Honduras who has a pending asylum application and is due to give birth to her fourth child in October. She told the court the family came to the US after being targeted by gangs. 'I do not want my child to live in fear and hiding. I do not want my child to be a target for immigration enforcement,' she wrote. 'I fear our family could be at risk of separation.' Another plaintiff, a man from Brazil, has lived with his wife in Florida for five years. Their first child was born in March, and they are in the process of applying for lawful permanent status based on family ties – his wife's father is a US citizen. 'My baby has the right to citizenship and a future in the United States,' he wrote.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Former DOGE official rushed grant to Trump-backed Gaza aid group over staff objections
A top US State Department official waived nine mandatory counterterrorism and anti-fraud safeguards to rush a $30 million award last month to a Gaza aid group backed by the Trump administration and Israel, according to an internal memorandum seen by Reuters. Jeremy Lewin, a former Department of Government Efficiency associate, approved the funds despite an assessment stating that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's (GHF) proposal failed to meet 'minimum technical or budgetary standards.' The June 24 action memorandum was sent to Lewin by Kenneth Jackson, another former DOGE official now serving as acting deputy administrator of the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The two have overseen the agency's dismantling and the merger of its functions into the State Department. Lewin also overrode 58 objections from USAID staff who wanted GHF to resolve numerous issues in its application before the funds were approved, two sources told Reuters. The $30 million was cleared just five days after GHF submitted its proposal on June 19. In a June 25 email to USAID leadership, Lewin cited 'strong Admin support for this one' and urged that the money be disbursed 'ASAP.' The documents highlight how the Trump administration prioritized GHF despite its lack of experience and the deaths of more than 500 Palestinians near the group's Gaza distribution sites. GHF, which coordinates closely with the Israeli military, has acknowledged reports of violence but said they occurred outside its operational areas. Lewin noted in his email that he had discussed the award with aides to Trump's Gaza negotiator, Steve Witkoff, and with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's office. He admitted the move would be controversial, writing: 'I'm taking the bullet on this one.' The White House referred Reuters to a State Department statement, which defended the approval under emergency provisions to 'meet humanitarian needs as expeditiously as possible.' It added the award would remain under 'rigorous oversight,' with new reporting and control requirements. – Raising the risk – A GHF spokesperson said the group's model 'is specifically designed to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse,' adding that such government inquiries were routine. Addressing the waived safeguards, the spokesperson said GHF was 'addressing each question as per regulations and normal procedure.' GHF claims its operations prevent ISIS from hijacking food aid and using it to exert control over Gaza's population — an accusation denied by the group. In the action memo, Jackson called GHF 'uniquely positioned to operate in areas with restricted access' and credited it with delivering millions of meals and weakening Hamas's influence. Jackson also acknowledged GHF had not met USAID's formal eligibility criteria and listed the nine waived requirements, which are normally mandatory. These included legal vetting for ties to extremist organizations and assessments of internal controls to prevent misuse of funds. Waiving the vetting 'could increase the risk' that GHF or its subcontractors might be linked to terrorist activity, the document said. GHF's required risk management plan was also incomplete. Jackson wrote that approving the award without it 'could risk programmatic diversion, reputational harm, and potential violations of US counterterrorism laws.' Nonetheless, Jackson recommended the waivers based on the 'humanitarian and political urgency' of GHF's mission. Lewin approved each item. Two former senior USAID officials said they had never seen such a move over professional staff objections. 'I oversaw something like 1,500 grants. I never saw it happen,' said Sarah Charles, who led USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance from 2021 to 2024. 'Very occasionally, we would do the vetting after an award in a sudden-onset emergency — think earthquake — but that was at the recommendation of staff.' USAID staff had questioned whether GHF could ensure safety for Palestinians collecting food packages, whether its team had adequate humanitarian training, and its plan to distribute powdered infant formula in an area with limited access to clean water.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump sets 50 percent US tariffs on copper, Brazilian imports starting in August
US President Donald Trump launched his global tariff assault into overdrive on Wednesday, announcing a new 50 percent tariff on US copper imports and a 50 percent duty on goods from Brazil, both to start on August 1. 'I am announcing a 50 percent TARIFF on Copper, effective August 1, 2025, after receiving a robust NATIONAL SECURITY ASSESSMENT,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social media platform, referring to a 'Section 232' national security trade investigation into the red metal that has been underway. The announcement came hours after he also informed Brazil that its 'reciprocal' tariff on August 1 would rise to 50 percent from 10 percent — a shockingly high level for a country with a balanced US trade relationship. Trump first broached the copper tariff during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, setting off a scramble by companies to import as much copper as possible from Chile and other major suppliers. He blamed the decline of the US copper industry on past administrations, saying copper was needed for semiconductors, aircraft, electric vehicle batteries, and military hardware. 'America will, once again, build a DOMINANT Copper Industry,' Trump wrote. Trump's Brazil tariff order came in a letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva that vented anger over what he called the 'Witch Hunt' trial of Lula's right-wing predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro, adding to an increasingly bitter public feud with Lula. Trump also criticized what he said were Brazil's attacks on free elections, Americans' free speech, and 'SECRET and UNLAWFUL Censorship Orders to US Social Media platforms.' He ordered the US Trade Representative's office to launch a new 'Section 301' unfair trade practices investigation that could add even more tariffs, citing 'Brazil's continued attacks on the Digital Trade Activities of American companies.' Lula responded to Trump's letter by issuing a statement saying that any unilateral measure to increase tariffs would be met with a response in accordance with Brazilian law. Brad Setser, a former US trade official now with the Council on Foreign Relations, said Trump's action could easily spiral into a damaging trade war between the two democracies. 'This shows the danger of having tariffs that are under the unilateral control of one man,' Setser said. 'It's tied to the fact that Lula beat Trump's friend Bolsonaro in the election.' Brazil is the 15th largest US trading partner, with total two-way trade of $92 billion in 2024, and a rare $7.4 billion US trade surplus, according to US Census Bureau data. Top US exports to Brazil are commercial aircraft, petroleum products and crude oil, coal, and semiconductors, while Brazil's top exports to the US are crude oil, coffee, semi-finished steel, and pig iron. The South American country has held off on implementing a digital services tax but has sought to advance legislation with stronger competition regulations on digital platforms. Trump earlier on his Truth Social media platform issued August 1 tariff notices to seven minor trading partners that exported only $15 billion in goods to the US last year: a 20 percent tariff on goods from the Philippines, 30 percent on goods from Sri Lanka, Algeria, Iraq, and Libya, and 25 percent on Brunei and Moldova. The latest letters add to 14 others issued earlier in the week, including 25 percent tariffs for powerhouse US suppliers South Korea and Japan, which are also to take effect August 1 barring any trade deals reached before then. They were issued a day after Trump said he was broadening his trade war by imposing a 50 percent tariff on imported copper and would soon introduce long-threatened levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. Trump's rapid-fire tariff moves have cast a shadow over the global economic outlook, paralyzing business decision-making. As more tariff drama unfolded in Washington, US and European Union negotiators pushed closer to a trade deal to ease Trump's tariffs on the biggest bilateral US trading partner bloc. Trump said he would 'probably' tell the EU within two days what rate it could expect for its exports to the US, adding that the 27-nation bloc had become much more cooperative. EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said good progress had been made on a framework trade agreement and a deal may even be possible within days. Sefcovic told EU lawmakers he hoped that EU negotiators could finalize their work soon, with additional time now from the extension of a US deadline to August 1 from July 9. 'I hope to reach a satisfactory conclusion, potentially even in the coming days,' Sefcovic said. However, Italian Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti had earlier warned that talks between the two sides were 'very complicated' and could continue right up to the deadline. EU officials and auto industry sources said that US and EU negotiators were discussing a range of potential measures aimed at protecting the European Union's auto industry, including tariff cuts, import quotas, and credits against the value of EU automakers' US exports. Equity markets shrugged off the Republican president's latest tariff salvo on Wednesday, while the yen remained on the back foot after the levies imposed on Japan. Following Trump's announcement of higher tariffs for imports from the 14 countries, US research group Yale Budget Lab estimated consumers face an effective US tariff rate of 17.6 percent, up from 15.8 percent previously and the highest in nine decades. Trump's administration has been touting those tariffs as a significant revenue source. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington has taken in about $100 billion so far and could collect $300 billion by the end of the year. The United States has taken in about $80 billion annually in tariff revenue in recent years. The Trump administration promised '90 deals in 90 days' after he unveiled an array of country-specific duties in early April. So far, only two agreements have been reached, with Britain and Vietnam. Trump has said a deal with India was close.
