Orissa High Court Affirms Maternity Leave Rights for Contractual Employees, ETHRWorld
Advt
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox.
All about ETHRWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHRWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles.
Cuttack, Rejecting a writ appeal of the state government, a Division Bench of Orissa High Court here has recently upheld a three-year-old judgment passed by a single-judge Bench stating that maternity leave and associated benefits cannot be denied to a woman employed by the state on contractual basis.In a recent ruling, the Division Bench of Justices Dixit Krishna Shripad and Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo affirmed the August 2022 decision of a single-judge Bench, which had ruled in favour of a contractual employee of the Health and Family Welfare Department whose maternity leave application from August 17, 2016, to February 12, 2017 had been rejected by her department.Challenging the earlier decision, the state government had argued that the employee, being governed by the terms of a contract, was not entitled to maternity benefits.However, the Division Bench declined to accept this position and upheld the reasoning of the single-judge ruling."Maternity leave with pay or comparable social benefits are to be assured by the state through its policies and programmes, as India is a signatory to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)," the court observed.The Bench emphasised the social significance of maternity and the fundamental role of both parents in child-rearing."It is said that God could not be everywhere and therefore, he created mothers. The idea of maternity leave is structured on 'zero separation' between a lactating mother and a breastfeeding baby," the judgment stated.The court cited the views of child psychiatrists and obstetricians, noting that physical companionship between mother and child is mutually beneficial and promotes healthy bonding, which is essential for their wellbeing."A lactating mother has a fundamental right to breastfeed her baby during its formative years. Similarly, the baby has a fundamental right to be breastfed and brought up in a reasonably good condition. These two important rights form an amalgam from which the state's obligation to provide maternity benefits, such as paid leave, arises-within permissible resources," the court held.The Bench also referenced previous judgments of the Supreme Court and other High Courts, which have affirmed that contractual employees are entitled to maternity leave under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.Rejecting the state government's contention that only regular women civil servants qualify for maternity leave, the court observed: "Women employees for the purpose of availing such benefit do constitute one homogenous class and their artificial bifurcation founded on status of appointment falls foul of Article 14 of the Constitution."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Reimagining Workplace Inclusion: Lessons from the Mahabharat, ETHRWorld
Advt Advt By , ETHRWorld Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETHRWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHRWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles. What a labyrinth of dichotomies society is—and what narrative captures this more compellingly than the epic of the? This revered tale, which resonates differently across India's diverse cultural fabric, is a sprawling tapestry of 'what-if' if Drona's school hadn't been exclusive to royal princes? Would embracing a talented student like Eklavya, regardless of caste, have altered the war's outcome? What if the Pandava princes had looked beyond Karna's birth as a charioteer's son? Could they have gained an unmatched ally? On the other hand, what if there had been bias against Shikhandi—would Bhishma have remained undefeated? Theis a mosaic of such conjectures, each with the potential to redefine its is a potpourri of ethnicities, languages, and cultures—and takes great pride in its philosophy of 'Unity in Diversity.' But our multicultural richness often coexists with striking contrasts. We are simultaneously a land of technological ambition and deep-rooted inequality. Our culture is centuries deep in assimilation, and yet certain communities remain excluded from the mainstream. Tradition and long-held beliefs can sometimes harden into biases that obstruct empathy and decades of reform and awareness, many women across India still face hurdles to personal and professional growth due to entrenched orthodoxy. Legal rights exist for the LGBTQIA+ community, but social acceptance continues to lag. Persons with disabilities often remain unseen—not due to their lack of ability, but due to others' lack of awareness. Traditional social hierarchies continue to push marginalised groups to the echo chambers, once-unheard voices are becoming louder—and many of us are starting to is where the ideas of 'corporate' and 'citizenship' intersect. Organisations have a unique role to play in shaping a more equitable society. They are not just economic engines, but melting pots of identities, cultures, and perspectives. By bringing diverse voices to the same table, businesses can become platforms for transformative inclusion cannot stop at hiring. It must extend to the lived experience of every employee. Creating meaningful change means building a workplace culture rooted in respect, equity, and of the most urgent tasks for any forward-thinking organisation is to help marginalised groups break through long-standing stereotypes. That requires more than tokenism—it means offering genuine support, safe spaces, structural accommodations, visibility, and most importantly, celebrating the contributions of those who have historically been Tata Steel, we launched, our flagship Diversity & Inclusion initiative, over a decade ago. It focuses on gender diversity, persons with disabilities, the LGBTQIA+ community, and affirmative action groups. Today, we are proud to have surpassed 20% workforce diversity in is an industry where entry barriers—both social and physical—are often high. Women account for just about 20% of the manufacturing workforce in India, and predominantly in the electronics segment. Heavy manufacturing infrastructure is often not accessible to persons with disabilities, and LGBTQIA+ representation remains the momentum is building. As demographics shift and workplace expectations evolve, companies across sectors are recognising the need for a dynamic, future-ready workforce. Diversity is not a checkbox—it is a strategic imperative. The workforce of tomorrow will be more disruptive, more agile, and above all, more diverse. Organisations must transform not only to remain relevant but to lead in this new perhaps, as we revisit the stories of the, we can draw lessons for today's workplace—that for every Arjun, there must also be space for the, andof the world. Because greatness knows no single form.
Time of India
04-07-2025
- Time of India
Orissa High Court Affirms Maternity Leave Rights for Contractual Employees, ETHRWorld
Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETHRWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHRWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles. Cuttack, Rejecting a writ appeal of the state government, a Division Bench of Orissa High Court here has recently upheld a three-year-old judgment passed by a single-judge Bench stating that maternity leave and associated benefits cannot be denied to a woman employed by the state on contractual a recent ruling, the Division Bench of Justices Dixit Krishna Shripad and Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo affirmed the August 2022 decision of a single-judge Bench, which had ruled in favour of a contractual employee of the Health and Family Welfare Department whose maternity leave application from August 17, 2016, to February 12, 2017 had been rejected by her the earlier decision, the state government had argued that the employee, being governed by the terms of a contract, was not entitled to maternity the Division Bench declined to accept this position and upheld the reasoning of the single-judge ruling."Maternity leave with pay or comparable social benefits are to be assured by the state through its policies and programmes, as India is a signatory to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)," the court Bench emphasised the social significance of maternity and the fundamental role of both parents in child-rearing."It is said that God could not be everywhere and therefore, he created mothers. The idea of maternity leave is structured on 'zero separation' between a lactating mother and a breastfeeding baby," the judgment court cited the views of child psychiatrists and obstetricians, noting that physical companionship between mother and child is mutually beneficial and promotes healthy bonding, which is essential for their wellbeing."A lactating mother has a fundamental right to breastfeed her baby during its formative years. Similarly, the baby has a fundamental right to be breastfed and brought up in a reasonably good condition. These two important rights form an amalgam from which the state's obligation to provide maternity benefits, such as paid leave, arises-within permissible resources," the court Bench also referenced previous judgments of the Supreme Court and other High Courts, which have affirmed that contractual employees are entitled to maternity leave under the Maternity Benefit Act, the state government's contention that only regular women civil servants qualify for maternity leave, the court observed: "Women employees for the purpose of availing such benefit do constitute one homogenous class and their artificial bifurcation founded on status of appointment falls foul of Article 14 of the Constitution."
News18
01-07-2025
- News18
Doctor's Maternity Leave Is Valid Bond Service, Says Madras High Court
Last Updated: The judgment further observed that rights under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 override any contrary conditions in employment contracts or bond agreements The Madras High Court recently held that maternity leave taken during the mandatory government bond service must be treated as valid service, directing the authorities to return the educational certificates of a postgraduate medical student who had been denied them for not completing the full tenure. A division bench comprising Justices GR Swaminathan and K Rajasekar delivered the verdict in an appeal filed by Dr. E. Krithikaa, who had completed her MS (General Surgery) from Thanjavur Medical College and served in a government hospital for a year before going on maternity leave. Dr Krithikaa had been appointed as an Assistant Surgeon following the completion of her postgraduation and served in Thittakudi Government Hospital for 12 months. However, as she did not complete the full two-year bond period — having gone on maternity leave — the state authorities refused to release her original certificates. Her initial writ petition seeking the return of documents was dismissed, prompting her to file a writ appeal. The division bench emphasised that maternity benefits are not merely welfare measures but a matter of constitutional right protected under Article 21. It relied heavily on the Supreme Court's decisions in Kavita Yadav v. State (2024) and Deepika Singh v. PGIMER (2023), which clarified that maternity leave must be recognised as part of employment service and that any attempt to deny this would violate both statutory protections and constitutional guarantees. Justice Swaminathan, writing for the bench, stated, 'Maternity leave is integral to maternity benefit and forms a facet of Article 21. The appellant, though not a regular government employee, is entitled to the same treatment under the law." Reinforcing the point with literary flair, the court quoted poet John Milton's famous line from Paradise Lost—'They also serve who only stand and wait"—to underscore that maternity is no less a form of national service than any physical presence at the workplace. Accordingly, the court set aside the single judge's earlier dismissal and directed the authorities to return Dr Krithikaa's certificates within four weeks. First Published:
