logo
F1 Goes Hollywood. But Is The Movie For Real Fans?

F1 Goes Hollywood. But Is The Movie For Real Fans?

Forbes15 hours ago

Brad Pitt and Damson Idris
A star-studded cast, high-octane racing, and the weight of Formula 1's logo behind it. On paper, the new F1 movie has everything—an A-list lineup, jaw-dropping cinematography, and a reported $200 million budget to bring it to life. With real circuits, real teams, and a real racing icon like Lewis Hamilton involved behind the scenes, it presents itself as a film deeply rooted in the sport. But with all that behind it, the question remains: is this really for F1 fans or just made to look the part?
*Spoilers ahead*
Between Realism And Hollywood
Racing is notoriously difficult to get right on screen. As an intensely technical sport, it risks dragging the movie's pace down if overexplained. But swing too far in the other direction and oversimplify it, ignore realism…then the result can feel hollow and even cartoonish. Motorsport movies often struggle to strike that balance, and so for the purists, it can be even more difficult to impress.
The F1 movie clearly sets out to ground itself in realism. Director Joseph Kosinski, alongside Oscar-winning cinematographer Claudio Miranda, designed custom camera rigs that could not only mount directly onto the cars but also be operated remotely. Much effort was made to ensure they could capture the thrill of the racing scenes.
However, the movie often teeters awkwardly between authenticity and spectacle. Some scenes depict Sonny Hayes using tactics that would never fly under FIA regulations: excessively slowing on the formation lap to gain an advantage, intentionally causing a crash to trigger a safety car, and holding up rivals under blue flags.
This is cinema. It's meant to thrill, not replicate a steward's report. But it raises a valid question: for new viewers unfamiliar with the sport's rules and culture, will this version of Formula 1 shape their understanding of what racing actually is?
Representation In The Paddock
The movie centers around APX GP, a team that's desperately trying to climb its way from the back of the grid, and leading the technical direction of the car is Kate McKenna (played by Kerry Condon). It's a welcome image, especially since there aren't many women in top positions in the sport, but even that progressive moment comes with a catch. Her car is underperforming badly, and she changes the entire concept mid-season for Sonny Hayes, a driver who hasn't raced in F1 in thirty years. For all the film's gestures toward inclusion, it falls flat, leaning on the tired trope of leaning on a man whose instincts override the data, the engineers, and the woman in charge.
McKenna's character is also written into a romantic subplot with Hayes, an arc that adds limited depth to the story and potentially undercuts her authority as a team leader. Though her presence is important, the execution may leave viewers questioning how much weight the character really carries.
Another female character appears as a pit crew member, but she goes unnamed. She works the wheel gun during pit stops and is often shown in the background of the garage, dropping tools and mishandling equipment, and ruining pit stops. While she eventually learns from her mistakes, the framing leans more toward running gag than meaningful development.
Actress Simone Ashley was listed in the cast and featured in the pre-release buzz. But her role was cut to a cameo, which can happen in the edit.
It simply calls into question the inclusion and representation of female characters in sports narratives on a larger scale.
Designed For Newcomers
From the get-go, it was clear the F1 movie wasn't targeting seasoned fans. Like Drive To Survive, F1 is an onboarding ramp to bring in those who know little about the sport but like fast cars, big names, and cool racing scenes and underdog arcs.
And in that way, it works. The film is slick, digestible, and visually gripping. But for those who follow the sport closely, it feels like Formula 1 has been filtered through a Hollywood lens, more to entertain than to inform. After all, it's not a documentary. It never claimed to be.
But for fans used to the sport's detail, tension, and constant evolution, this version might feel like it leaves something behind in the rearview mirror.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

F1 reveals plan for private first preseason test in 2026
F1 reveals plan for private first preseason test in 2026

New York Times

time41 minutes ago

  • New York Times

F1 reveals plan for private first preseason test in 2026

Formula One has revealed its plan to holds its first preseason test in 2026 behind closed doors, giving teams a first chance to sample their overhauled car designs in private. As reported by The Athletic earlier this month, the first outing of the all-new cars for 2026 — featuring new power units and active aerodynamics — is scheduled to take place across five days at the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya in Spain at the end of January. Advertisement Teams will be able to take part on three of the five days of the shakedown, which both F1 and the FIA confirmed on Monday would be held from Jan. 26-30 next year. But the shakedown is going to be held entirely behind closed doors, with no plans for the running to be broadcast, or for fans or the media to be allowed to attend, meaning it can take place in private. Teams have struck their own agreements with the track on the outskirts of Barcelona to complete the test running, meaning F1 will only be responsible for the timing data. The move will maintain a degree of intrigue over the new car designs, and the pecking order among the teams which is set to be considerably shaken up in what is the greatest technical change in F1 for a generation. The test will also be where the new Cadillac team can make its official on-track debut with its car after getting the green light to join the grid for 2026. A better idea of the competitive picture will come with the first public outings of the new F1 cars will come with the official test running in Bahrain a couple of weeks later in February. The first three-day test is scheduled for Feb. 11-13, while the second test will be held from Feb. 18-20 at the Bahrain International Circuit. The change in the technical regulations for this year has resulted in teams getting increased preseason running. In each of the past three seasons, preseason testing has only run for three days, which teams typically split by giving each of its drivers one-and-a-half days each of running. Following the final test in Bahrain, which starts following the commencement of Ramadan, teams will then make the trip to Australia for the opening round of the 24-race season on March 8. Another update from F1 and the FIA confirmed the Azerbaijan Grand Prix will take place on Saturday next year, moving a day forward from its originally-planned date of Sept. 27, which is the nation's Remembrance Day. A statement read: 'Following a request from the Azerbaijan promoter and relevant government stakeholders, FIA and Formula 1 have agreed to move the 2026 Azerbaijan Grand Prix from Sunday 27th September to Saturday 26th to accommodate a national day. Advertisement 'All the F1 teams have been informed of this change, which will mean each day of the event will move one day earlier.' F1 has recent history in moving races to a Saturday, having shifted both Bahrain and Saudi Arabia from their usual Sunday slot in 2024 in order to create an extra one-day buffer before the start of Ramadan. The Las Vegas Grand Prix has also been kept on a Saturday night slot since joining the calendar in 2023. (Fadel Senna/AFP via Getty Images)

Is this Hollywood's moment of AI reckoning?
Is this Hollywood's moment of AI reckoning?

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

Is this Hollywood's moment of AI reckoning?

For some in Hollywood, as Silicon Valley's AI models have become impossible to ignore, it's better to have a seat at the table as these new technologies emerge, rather than sitting back and letting the tech titans take full control. This, at least, is the impetus behind Asteria, the generative AI studio cofounded by the filmmaking couple of Bryn Mooser and Natasha Lyonne, who promote their company as using 'ethical' AI. Lyonne has justified her embrace of the technology by explaining: 'It's better to get your hands dirty than pretend it's not happening.' The company has faced some backlash, both because Lyonne (tastelessly, her detractors would argue) claimed the late David Lynch had endorsed AI, and because its flagship model is proprietary—meaning we have no way to verify that it is indeed trained only on licensed material (as Lyonne and co. say it is). Meanwhile, James Cameron is on Stability AI's board, and has expressed his hope for using AI to make blockbuster filmmaking cheaper. Jason Blum's Blumhouse Productions has partnered with Meta for AI testing and chatbots. Lionsgate signed a deal with Runway, an AI startup valued at $3 billion, to let the company train its model on the studio's 20,000+ films and TV series; Runway also signed a deal with AMC. This embrace of AI, though, puts the James Camerons and Natasha Lyonnes of the world at odds with industry peers who are opting to push back on these would-be robot overlords before they take over.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store