Prove that Forest Rights Act is responsible for ‘negative' change to forest cover, Tribal Affairs Ministry tells Environment Ministry
The Tribal Affairs Ministry, which is the nodal Ministry for the implementation of FRA, further said that making such claims without 'adequate scientific evidence' may reinforce stereotypes among State, District, and Forest administrations 'that could undermine the rights vested under the Act, as well as the effectiveness of the implementation'.
The Ministry has requested a 'detailed scientific analysis' for the claim 'with valid instances through ground truthing as the report mentions'. A senior government official told The Hindu, 'The ISFR is meant to be a very detailed and scientific study of forests. If such claims are made, the purpose is to find out what evidence supports it. That is why this communication has been issued.'
After letter from activists
The Ministry of Tribal Affairs' communication, dated July 2, comes days after over 150 forest rights and civil society groups wrote to the Union government, taking issue with the ISFR's attribution of 'negative' change in forest cover partly to the implementation of FRA. They had also pointed out that this claim had been repeated by Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav in a media interview in June this year.
Former Environment Minister and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, who had amplified the civil society groups' letter, shared the Tribal Affairs Ministry's communication on social media on Saturday (July 5, 2025) as well.
The Tribal Affairs Ministry, in its communication, said that the FRA 'does not deal with regularisation of encroachments'. 'Instead, it acknowledges pre-existing rights that are already being exercised by eligible individuals and communities dwelling in forest areas. Beyond securing the tenure of the existing forest dwellers, FRA does not create any new rights that could potentially affect the ecological balance within protected areas,' it said.
In the communication, which has been marked to the Environment Ministry's Secretary, the Tribal Affairs Ministry's FRA Division has also referred to the media interview that was flagged by the civil society groups. It noted that the ISFR 2023, in the chapter on Change in Forest and Tree Cover, has two sections — one on 'positive' changes and another on 'negative' changes.
In the report, under the possible reasons for 'negative' changes, the Environment Ministry lists 'titles given to beneficiaries under the Forest Rights Act (2006)' as one of them. According to a review of the last five ISFRs published by the Forest Survey of India (FSI) in the last decade, this is the first time, titles under FRA have been included in this list explicitly. The point on FRA as one of the reasons for 'negative' change to forest cover was reiterated by Mr. Yadav in an email interview with a daily newspaper.
Notably, the Environment Ministry had denied allegations made against it by the civil society groups in a detailed statement posted on social media on Thursday (July 3, 2025). The statement had come after Mr. Ramesh had posted the civil society groups' letter on social media.
In the statement, the Environment Ministry had claimed that the Minister's interview remarks were taken out of context. It had gone on to assert that that ISFR 2023 had recorded a 'substantial increase in forest and tree cover', which it said was 'suggestive' of community involvement in forest management. 'The inference drawn is contrary to the factual position and totally devoid of merit,' it had said.
However, in the interview of Mr. Yadav, he was quoted as saying: 'Although there is a net increase in dense forests in the country, there are areas where the dense prime forests have been affected with degradation.' Mr. Yadav, in the interview, goes on to list possible reasons for this, including 'titles given under Forest Rights Act (2006)'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
State to file review petition against SC verdict on Zudpi land
MUMBAI: Maharashtra forest minister Ganesh Naik said the state government will file a review petition against the Supreme Court's verdict on the conservation of zudpi forest land. He made the announcement in the state assembly on Friday. Maharashtra forest minister Ganesh Naik (Bachchan Kumar) The review petition will be filed against an apex court's verdict, which directed that zudpi jungle land (shrub forest) in Vidarbha, in eastern Maharashtra, shall be considered forest land in line with an order of the court dated December 12, 1996. The current order was delivered on May 22. In its 1996 order, the court had held that forest land as defined under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980, would include not only forests as understood in the dictionary sense but any area recorded as forest in government records. Raising the issue, Congress legislator Nana Patole said this would pose a major problem as it would create hurdles in implementing development projects. 'No such land can be redeveloped after this verdict. The state government has failed to explain it to the Supreme Court, because of which this verdict was delivered,' Patole noted, demanding that the state file a review petition. Naik appeared to agree with him and said in the lower house, 'The apex court issued the verdict despite the central government taking a different stand. The state government will file a review petition to resolve the matter.' Interestingly, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis had welcomed the verdict, calling it a 'big relief for the Vidarbha region' that has been lagging in terms of development due to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. 'All the land parcels granted before 1996 were given a kind of exemption by the SC. A process has also been formulated for lands that were granted post-1996, following which the state can get the land from the central government,' Fadnavis said in a statement on May 22.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ministry vs ministry on forest tribes claim
The ministry of tribal affairs has asked for scientific evidence from the environment ministry to substantiate claims that granting forest rights to tribal communities causes forest degradation, escalating a tussle over a landmark 2006 legislation that recognises traditional forest rights of tribal communities in protected areas. The intervention comes amid mounting criticism from forest rights activists who accuse the environment ministry of systematically undermining the 2006 law designed to recognise the rights of forest-dwelling tribal communities. (PTI) In an office memorandum issued on July 2, the tribal affairs ministry questioned the environment ministry's assertion in the India State of Forest Report 2023 that 'titles given to beneficiaries under the Forest Rights Act (2006) (FRA)' contribute to negative changes in forest cover. The State of Forest Report noted that 'forest cover changes observed during the two-year interval reflect actual changes on the ground,' encompassing conversions between forest and non-forest areas and shifts among different canopy density classes. However, it lists FRA titles alongside factors such as harvesting of short rotation plantations, logging, shifting cultivation practices, human encroachment, and natural calamities like storms and floods. The intervention comes amid mounting criticism from forest rights activists who accuse the environment ministry of systematically undermining the 2006 law designed to recognise the rights of forest-dwelling tribal communities. The tribal affairs ministry's memorandum specifically references volume 1 of the State of Forest Report. 'Therefore, the MoEFCC is requested to provide a detailed scientific analysis to support this claim with valid instances through field verification as the report mentions,' the memorandum states. It warns that 'without adequate scientific evidence, reporting the vesting of FRA rights to tribal communities is causing degradation of forests may reinforce stereotypes amongst governments including district administrations and forest administration, that could undermine the rights vested under the Act, as well as effectiveness of the implementation Act.' The ministry emphasised that the Forest Rights Act was enacted to recognise legitimate claimants present in forest areas before December 13, 2005, and does not regularise encroachments but acknowledges pre-existing rights already being exercised by eligible individuals and communities dwelling in forest areas, including national parks and sanctuaries. 'Beyond securing the tenure of existing forest dwellers, FRA does not create any new rights that could potentially affect the ecological balance within protected areas,' it added. The dispute highlights deeper tensions over the FRA's implementation since its enactment in 2006. The legislation was designed to correct historical injustices faced by forest-dwelling tribal communities who had been denied formal recognition of their traditional rights. The law acknowledges that these communities have been 'integral to the very survival and sustainability of the forest ecosystem' and seeks to strengthen conservation efforts through their involvement. The legislation was intended to address decades of displacement and marginalisation of tribal populations in the name of forest conservation, recognising both individual and community forest rights including the crucial right to protect, regenerate and manage community forest resources. HT sought a response from the ministry of environment, forest and climate change on the office memorandum by the ministry of tribal affairs, but did not receive a response immediately. HT also reached out to tribal affairs minister Jual Oram and the spokesperson for tribal affairs but did not get any response. The development follows a submission to the Prime Minister by nearly 150 organisations last week against alleged subversion of the FRA. The coalition of forest rights groups accused the environment ministry and forest bureaucracy of systematically resisting FRA implementation for the past 16 years. Their submission highlighted multiple developments, including a National Tiger Conservation Authority order dated June 19, 2024, directing eviction of 64,801 families from tiger reserves across India. The activists argued this contradicts the FRA's provisions recognising traditional rights in protected areas. The groups also criticised comments by environment minister Bhupender Yadav in a June 5 interview with HT, where he attributed primary forest degradation partly to 'titles given under Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006.' In that interview, Yadav had said: 'Although there is a net increase in dense forests in the country, there are areas where the dense prime forests have been affected with degradation. This may be due to encroachment, illicit felling and in the northeast region, due to shifting cultivation. And to a lesser degree, due to unregulated grazing, natural causes like storms and landslides, and also titles given under Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006.' The minister had suggested addressing degradation through 'stringent protection measures added with effective community involvement, and also by regulating shifting cultivation in the northeastern region.' Responding to that submission on Thursday, the environment ministry said the government remains committed to tribal welfare and active involvement in forest management through traditional knowledge whilst enhancing livelihood opportunities. The ministry also defended recent amendments to the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam against allegations that changes were made 'without an in-depth knowledge and understanding of its various provisions, the factual position and its implementation.' Critics have argued these amendments undermine institutional authorities established under the Forest Rights Act. The ministry insisted that amendments were carried out through proper constitutional processes and parliamentary procedures. It highlighted Rule 11(7) of the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Rules 2023, which requires state governments to settle all forest rights claims under the 2006 Act before allowing any forest land to be diverted for non-forest purposes. 'This clause ensures that forest rights are indeed recognised,' the ministry said, arguing that proper legal safeguards remain in place despite activist concerns about implementation delays and bureaucratic resistance. 'The most effective way to understand this is by analyzing satellite imagery and corroborating it through on-ground verification—particularly using land titles granted under the Forest Rights Act. Comparing these data points with historical data from previous decades can provide a clear and objective picture of any changes in forest cover in those areas, including the extent of such changes,' said Debadityo Sinha, Lead- Climate & Ecosystems, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Safety of children online paramount: T'gana CM
Telangana chief minister A Revanth Reddy on Saturday emphasized the importance of protecting children from all kinds of abuse— including sexual abuse and abuse over social media. Gutha Sukender Reddy, Chairman Telangana legislative council welcomes state Chief Minister Revanth Reddy before addressing the council meeting at state Legislative Assembly, in Hyderabad on Saturday. State Congress President Bomma Mahesh Kumar Goud and party council members also present. (Mohammed Aleemuddin) Speaking at the inaugural session of the state-level-meet 2025 on the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act at Dr Marri Chenna Reddy Human Resource Development Institute in Hyderabad, the chief minister said that child survivors must be made central to the legal and moral framework addressing sexual offences perpetrated against them. 'We have to protect our children from sexual abuse, at any cost and with all means,' said Revanth Reddy. He added that his government was giving top priority to the protection of children and women, saying that Telangana had pioneered child-friendly courts, run by Hyderabad Bharosa Centre. The goal was not just faster case disposal, but total child protection and development, said the chief minister. 'Telangana Bharosa Project has 29 centres. It provides police support, legal aid, medical assistance and counselling in a friendly environment,' he said. Telangana Bharosa centers set up in all the districts of the state are aimed at centralising help and support measures for women and children affected by violence and sexual abuse in order to reduce the risk of re-victimization. Survivors are provided with psychological, legal, medical and rehabilitation support, besides police help and prosecution of the accused. Stating that the Pocso Act and Juvenile Justice Act were highly progressive instruments in the country's legal framework, the chief minister, however, said they had their own problems in implementation. 'We must ensure procedures help child victims, not hurt them. We must also end child pornography, and impose strict punishments,' he said. He called for curbing social media abuse of children and said the perpetrators must be treated without mercy. 'We must ensure justice and compassion for children not only in courts but also at police stations, child centres and in every step of this process,' he said, adding that justice was not just about conviction, but about restoration, about dignity, and reclaiming childhood. Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant, who is also executive chairman of National Legal Services Authority (NLSA), said the child protection framework in the country remained disjointed and under-equipped and there was a need for a fundamental shift in the system that treated the child not as a passive witness in a criminal trial, but as a person in urgent need of sustained and holistic care. 'The abused children must experience meaningful restorative justice—where the systems meant to protect them do not re-traumatise them. The system should prioritise the healing of children both within and outside the four walls of the courtroom, alongside ensuring accountability,' he said. 'Consider the case of a 10-year-old child made to recount trauma repeatedly—before a teacher, a police officer, a medical examiner, a lawyer, and then a judge. With each retelling, her voice grows fainter until it vanishes altogether,' added justice Kant. Justice Kant observed that the distress of the victim was often compounded by the legal process. 'When the system forgets the child in its pursuit of the accused, it fails them both. He noted that this imbalance was not incidental, but structural,' he said, adding that the healing of an abused child was not just a legal requirement, but also a moral obligation and a Constitutional commitment. He stressed that the task of protecting and supporting child victims was too important to be left to the legal system alone. It was not only the responsibility of the judiciary, police, and social workers—but a collective national duty. Telangana high court acting chief justice Sujoy Paul, senior police officials of the women and child welfare department, legal services experts from UNICEF and other civil society organisations also attended the session.
