Ministry vs ministry on forest tribes claim
In an office memorandum issued on July 2, the tribal affairs ministry questioned the environment ministry's assertion in the India State of Forest Report 2023 that 'titles given to beneficiaries under the Forest Rights Act (2006) (FRA)' contribute to negative changes in forest cover.
The State of Forest Report noted that 'forest cover changes observed during the two-year interval reflect actual changes on the ground,' encompassing conversions between forest and non-forest areas and shifts among different canopy density classes. However, it lists FRA titles alongside factors such as harvesting of short rotation plantations, logging, shifting cultivation practices, human encroachment, and natural calamities like storms and floods.
The intervention comes amid mounting criticism from forest rights activists who accuse the environment ministry of systematically undermining the 2006 law designed to recognise the rights of forest-dwelling tribal communities.
The tribal affairs ministry's memorandum specifically references volume 1 of the State of Forest Report. 'Therefore, the MoEFCC is requested to provide a detailed scientific analysis to support this claim with valid instances through field verification as the report mentions,' the memorandum states.
It warns that 'without adequate scientific evidence, reporting the vesting of FRA rights to tribal communities is causing degradation of forests may reinforce stereotypes amongst governments including district administrations and forest administration, that could undermine the rights vested under the Act, as well as effectiveness of the implementation Act.'
The ministry emphasised that the Forest Rights Act was enacted to recognise legitimate claimants present in forest areas before December 13, 2005, and does not regularise encroachments but acknowledges pre-existing rights already being exercised by eligible individuals and communities dwelling in forest areas, including national parks and sanctuaries.
'Beyond securing the tenure of existing forest dwellers, FRA does not create any new rights that could potentially affect the ecological balance within protected areas,' it added.
The dispute highlights deeper tensions over the FRA's implementation since its enactment in 2006. The legislation was designed to correct historical injustices faced by forest-dwelling tribal communities who had been denied formal recognition of their traditional rights. The law acknowledges that these communities have been 'integral to the very survival and sustainability of the forest ecosystem' and seeks to strengthen conservation efforts through their involvement.
The legislation was intended to address decades of displacement and marginalisation of tribal populations in the name of forest conservation, recognising both individual and community forest rights including the crucial right to protect, regenerate and manage community forest resources.
HT sought a response from the ministry of environment, forest and climate change on the office memorandum by the ministry of tribal affairs, but did not receive a response immediately. HT also reached out to tribal affairs minister Jual Oram and the spokesperson for tribal affairs but did not get any response.
The development follows a submission to the Prime Minister by nearly 150 organisations last week against alleged subversion of the FRA. The coalition of forest rights groups accused the environment ministry and forest bureaucracy of systematically resisting FRA implementation for the past 16 years.
Their submission highlighted multiple developments, including a National Tiger Conservation Authority order dated June 19, 2024, directing eviction of 64,801 families from tiger reserves across India. The activists argued this contradicts the FRA's provisions recognising traditional rights in protected areas.
The groups also criticised comments by environment minister Bhupender Yadav in a June 5 interview with HT, where he attributed primary forest degradation partly to 'titles given under Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006.'
In that interview, Yadav had said: 'Although there is a net increase in dense forests in the country, there are areas where the dense prime forests have been affected with degradation. This may be due to encroachment, illicit felling and in the northeast region, due to shifting cultivation. And to a lesser degree, due to unregulated grazing, natural causes like storms and landslides, and also titles given under Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006.'
The minister had suggested addressing degradation through 'stringent protection measures added with effective community involvement, and also by regulating shifting cultivation in the northeastern region.'
Responding to that submission on Thursday, the environment ministry said the government remains committed to tribal welfare and active involvement in forest management through traditional knowledge whilst enhancing livelihood opportunities.
The ministry also defended recent amendments to the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam against allegations that changes were made 'without an in-depth knowledge and understanding of its various provisions, the factual position and its implementation.' Critics have argued these amendments undermine institutional authorities established under the Forest Rights Act.
The ministry insisted that amendments were carried out through proper constitutional processes and parliamentary procedures. It highlighted Rule 11(7) of the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Rules 2023, which requires state governments to settle all forest rights claims under the 2006 Act before allowing any forest land to be diverted for non-forest purposes.
'This clause ensures that forest rights are indeed recognised,' the ministry said, arguing that proper legal safeguards remain in place despite activist concerns about implementation delays and bureaucratic resistance.
'The most effective way to understand this is by analyzing satellite imagery and corroborating it through on-ground verification—particularly using land titles granted under the Forest Rights Act. Comparing these data points with historical data from previous decades can provide a clear and objective picture of any changes in forest cover in those areas, including the extent of such changes,' said Debadityo Sinha, Lead- Climate & Ecosystems, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India-US interim trade deal: New Delhi draws red lines as Trump's deadline approaches, says ball in Washington's court
With India setting its red lines on key issues in sectors such as agriculture and dairy for the proposed interim trade agreement with the US, the ball is now in Washington's court to finalise the deal, sources said. They said if issues are settled, an interim trade pact could be announced before July 9, which marks the end of the 90-day suspension period of the Trump tariffs announced on April 2 on dozens of countries, including India. "India has drawn its red lines... now the ball is in the US court," a PTI report quoted sources as saying. The two countries announced in February that they will be starting negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by September-October this year. However, before that, India and US are locking to finalise the interim trade pact. On April 2, the US imposed an additional 26 per cent reciprocal tariff on Indian goods but suspended it for 90 days. However, the 10 per cent baseline tariff imposed by America remains in place. India is seeking full exemption from this 26 per cent tariff. "If the proposed trade talks fail, the 26 per cent tariffs will come into force again," one of the sources said. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal last week stated that India does not enter into any trade agreement based on deadlines and will accept the proposed trade deal with the US only when it is fully finalised, properly concluded and in the national interest. Free Trade Agreements (FTA) are possible only when both sides get benefitted and it should be a win-win agreement, he said. "National interest should always be supreme. Keeping that in mind, if a deal is made then India is always ready to deal with developed countries," Goyal said on July 4. The Indian team returned from Washington last week after holding talks with the US on an interim trade pact. Differences are also there on steel, aluminium (50 per cent) and auto (25 per cent) tariffs. India has hardened its position on giving duty concessions to the US on agriculture and dairy products as both are sensitive subjects. India has never opened the dairy sector in any of the previous trade pacts signed. US President Donald Trump last week said his administration is sending letters to the first batch of 10-12 countries, sharing details of reciprocal tariff rates and the entire process could be completed by July 9. His comments came amid increasing suspense in India on whether New Delhi and Washington would be able to firm up a much-anticipated trade deal before the US president's tariff deadline ends. He has, however, not named the countries. The president has stated that the reciprocal tariffs would come into effect from August 1. While the US is looking at duty concessions in sectors like certain industrial goods, automobiles (electric vehicles particularly), wines, petrochemical products, dairy, and agriculture items such as apples, tree nuts, and alfalfa hay; India may look at duty cuts for labour-intensive sectors like apparels, textiles, gems and jewellery, leather, plastics, chemicals, oil seeds, shrimp, and horticulture products. US tariffs will kick in on August 1 if trading partners from Taiwan to the European Union do not strike deals with Washington, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday. The rates will "boomerang back" to the sometimes very high levels which President Trump had announced on April 2 – before he suspended the levies to allow for trade talks and set a July 9 deadline for agreement, Bessent told CNN. According to an AFP report, Bessent confirmed comments by Trump to reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday in which he also cited a new deadline: "Well, I'll probably start them on August 1. Well, that's pretty early. Right?" The tariffs were part of a broader announcement in April where Trump imposed a 10 per cent duty on goods from almost all trading partners, with a plan to step up these rates for a select group within days. But he swiftly paused the hikes until July 9, allowing for trade talks to take place. Countries have been pushing to strike deals that would help them avoid these elevated duties. So far, the Trump administration has unveiled deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam, while Washington and Beijing agreed to temporarily lower staggeringly high levies on each other's products. Bessent said the administration was "close to several deals." "I would expect to see several big announcements over the next couple of days," he said. But he would not say which countries he was referring to, adding: "I don't want to let them off the hook." (With inputs from agencies)
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Karnataka BJP MLA Ramesh Jarkiholi's son fires gun in air during Lakshmi Devi temple festival, booked under arms act
Former Karnataka Minister and BJP MLA Ramesh Jarkiholi's son, Santosh Jarkiholi, has been booked by the police following a video emerged showing him allegedly firing a gun in the air during a temple fair in Gokak, reported PTI on Sunday. On Friday, during the annual fair of Laxmi temple festival in Gokak town in Belagavi district, the incident occurred. Santosh was seen celebrating amid a crowd by firing in the air. The video of the incident has gone viral on social media. The Gokak Town Police registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Santosh Jarkiholi on Saturday and booked him for the illegal use of a firearm in a public gathering. Police claimed that Santosh, who was covered in yellow powder, was among a large crowd when he was seen using a double-barrelled gun to fire shots into the air. His supporters were cheering as he fired shots. Santosh reportedly carried out the act in the presence of a significant police deployment at the venue. Speaking to reporters Belagavi District Superintendent of Police Dr Bhimashankar Guled confirmed the development. 'We have come across the video showing Ramesh Jarkiholi's son firing shots into the air in a public place. Displaying firearms and firing in public is an offence. Based on this, we have registered a suo motu case and further legal action will follow after a detailed investigation,' Hans India quoted the SP as saying to the reporters. Home Minister G Parameshwara stated that the state the matter was being taken seriously. "A formal complaint has been filed, and legal action will follow accordingly. The police will perform their duty without succumbing to any kind of pressure. No one is above the law," he said, assuring a transparent investigation into the case. Santosh may be summoned for questioning soon, officials have indicated.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
RTI reveals Kerala govt sponsoring visit of spy suspect Jyoti Malhotra
The Kerala government has come under heavy fire after it was revealed that Jyoti Malhotra, a social media influencer recently arrested on espionage charges, had visited the state as part of a government-sponsored tourism promotion campaign. Malhotra, a Haryana-based vlogger, is now accused of leaking sensitive information to Pakistan. Shockingly, her entire trip across Kerala was facilitated and funded by the state's Tourism Department under an official influencer outreach initiative. Documents obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act confirm that her travel, accommodation, food, and even filming arrangements were handled by a private agency contracted by the department. She was among 41 influencers selected to promote Kerala as a global tourist destination. During her multi-city visit, Malhotra toured Kochi, Kannur, Kozhikode, Alappuzha, Munnar, and Thiruvananthapuram. She arrived in Kerala via Kannur airport after travelling from Delhi to Bengaluru. Her vlogs included visuals of Theyyam performances and scenic locations, all of which were shared on her YouTube channel Travel with Jo and other social media platforms. She eventually returned to Delhi by train. At the time of her visit, no suspicions had been raised regarding her activities. However, her arrest in May 2025 under the Official Secrets Act has now cast a shadow over the episode. Central intelligence agencies are probing whether her video content may have served as a cover for intelligence-gathering. Investigators are also examining whether she accessed strategically sensitive locations or communicated with Pakistani handlers during her stay. Adding to the growing alarm, Haryana Police have confirmed that Malhotra had visited Pakistan shortly before the terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir - raising serious questions about her potential ties to ISI operatives. Amid the controversy, Kerala's Tourism Minister P.A. Mohammed Riyas defended the decision to bring Malhotra to the state. He insisted that the program was launched with good intentions and followed the precedents set by previous governments. 'This was part of a larger influencer campaign aimed at promoting Kerala. Everything was done transparently and in good faith,' Riyas said. 'This is not a government that facilitates espionage. The media must understand how government systems work. No one could have foreseen this.' However, opposition parties were quick to respond. Both the Congress and the BJP criticised the state's failure to conduct adequate background checks on the influencers invited under official programs. They demanded accountability for what they termed a 'serious lapse in judgment' that could have had national security implications. The ongoing investigation has triggered a wider debate on the intersection of tourism promotion and national security. Many are now calling for more rigorous vetting procedures for individuals participating in government-sponsored initiatives, especially those involving sensitive travel routes or infrastructure. With Malhotra still in custody and the probe expanding, the Kerala government finds itself on the defensive, scrambling to contain the fallout from what is now being called one of the most embarrassing intelligence lapses linked to a state-sponsored tourism effort.
