Test Driving The 2025 Toyota Sequoia 1794 Edition
Toyota has released a new trim for its largest SUV: the 2025 Toyota Sequoia 1794 Edition. The 1794 Edition trim has been available on the Tundra full-size truck for a couple years, but it was just introduced on the Toyota Sequoia. The 1794 Edition sits below the top-of-the-line Sequoia Capstone trim and above the Sequoia Platinum trim. It includes a lot of extra equipment that we'll dive into in a moment, but let's revisit what role the Toyota Sequoia serves first.
Toyota Sequoia: Does it Really Need a V8?
This is the biggest vehicle in Toyota's line up, acting as the brand's roomy, three-row, family-friendly, off-road capable SUV that utilizes on a body-on-frame chassis. It's got a 3.4-liter twin-turbo V6 combined with an electric motor, as reflected in the 'i-Force MAX' badging on the hood. This hybrid drivetrain delivers a total of 437 hp and an impressive 583 pound-feet torque. That peak torque number is quite a bump up from the peak horsepower number – thank you electric motor.
The i-Force MAX hybrid drivetrain benefits both power and fuel efficiency
The previous Sequoia featured a V8, and while it's easy to bemoan the loss of the V8 the reality is that the execution of this twin-turbo V6 + hybrid combination means the car accelerates with authority. It gets to 60 mph in about 5.5 seconds and through the quarter mile in around 14.4 seconds. The power is delivered through a 10-speed automatic transmission that picks gears quite well. The result: both solid power and solid throttle response, despite having only six cylinders.
The Toyota Sequoia 1794 Edition can be outfitted with the TRD Off-Road package
More impressive, and surprising, is that the hybrid drivetrain actually sounds pretty good, too, especially for not being a V8. I purposely avoided researching where the sound was coming from, though I have a strong suspicion it's coming from an amplifier and speaker as much or more than the exhaust system. But I'm going to embrace not knowing, and just say that between the drivetrain's power and torque, plus throttle response and deep exhaust note, the Toyota Sequoia's drivetrain is quite effective.
The Sequoia's interior features a digital gauge cluster and 14-inch touchscreen
Another Sequoia surprise-and-delight feature is a real-time oil pressure gauge. This is something I wasn't expecting in a three-row SUV in 2025, but I happen to be looking down at the gauge cluster while accelerating from a stop, and I saw the oil pressure gauge flare to life as the engine's RPM rose. Real-time oil pressure? That was common in older performance cars but is pretty much unheard of in modern family vehicles. Kudos to Toyota for serving drivers who still appreciate real time feedback.
Despite it's body-on-frame underpinnings the Sequoia offers a refine ride quality
Toyota Sequoia: Drives Smaller Than It Looks
While the 2025 Toyota Sequoia certainly isn't a small SUV (it's more than 17 feet long and 6 and a half feet wide), this is one of those vehicles that can have you forgetting how much SUV is behind you after a just few minutes of driving. It doesn't necessarily feel nimble or spritely, but if you're avoiding the Sequoia because you think it might feel unwieldy, don't. If you can handle a CR-V or RAV4, you can handle the Sequoia, though you'll likely want to leverage the 360-degree camera technology when it's time to park.
The 1794 Edition trim includes woodgrain accents with "1794" badging
This particular model is the Sequoia 1794 Edition. Just as Ford has the King Ranch and Dodge has the Big Horn, the 1794 Edition is named for a large ranch in Texas. And in the spirit of Texas, it's got a lot of features that proudly display its ties to the longhorn state. These include brown leather and wood interior accents, '1794' badging throughout the interior and exterior, a panoramic sunroof, second row captains chairs, massaging front seats that are also heated and cooled, and a tow package.
A wide range of off-road features and technology are available on the Sequoia
Because it's a large body on frame chassis, the Sequoia rides on Toyota's TNGA-F (Toyota New Global Architecture) platform. This platform serves many models, including the Land Cruiser, Tacoma, Tundra, and 4Runner. For the Sequoia application it offers standard rear wheel drive, with optional four-wheel-drive available on nearly every trim. Buyers can also get a two-speed transfer case and locking rear differential, plus crawl control (low-speed cruise control for off-roading) and hill-descent control. These features are part of the TRD Off-Road package.
The 20-inch wheels features off-road tires when the TRD Off Road package is ordered
For buyers needing to tow heavy trailers, the 2025 Toyota Sequoia can handle between 8,900 and 9,500 pounds, impressive numbers and yet another reflection of the extra torque emanating from its hybrid drivetrain. Fuel efficiency also benefits, with the i-Force MAX engine giving the Sequoia a 22 mpg rating for rear-wheel-drive models and 20 mpg for all-wheel-drive versions. Not bad for a 6,200-pound, three-row SUV with 157 cubic feet of passenger space.
A mere 12 cubic feet of cargo space behind the third row reduces the Sequoia's utility
Toyota Sequoia: A Long Lasting SUV
But perhaps the most impressive Toyota Sequoia figure is its expected lifespan. My company, iSeeCars.com, studies the predicted lifespan of every model sold in the U.S., and the Sequoia consistently lands near the top of that list. The list looks at models most likely to get to 250,000 or more miles, and the Sequoia, along with the Tundra, 4Runner, and Tacoma, often make up the top four spots. The latest list shows the Sequoia in slot number 2 (behind Tundra) with a 36.4 percent chance of getting to 250,000 miles, or 4.2 times more likely to get there than the average vehicle.
Straightforward controls make it easy to enjoy the Sequoia's many features
Sitting in the Toyota Sequoia's driver's seat presents a user-friendly set of controls, despite the SUV's wide spectrum of capabilities. The 14-inch touchscreen uses an intuitive interface, with dedicated climate controls beneath it. The Sequoia's off-road controls are in the center console, and include two- and four-wheel drive settings, high- and low-range gearing, a knob for drive mode settings, plus buttons for tow mode, crawl control, and multi-terrain select.
The surround-view camera eases the challenge of maneuvering the Sequoia
For storage space there's a relatively shallow bin on top of the center console, along with a much larger, deeper storage area under the console's hinged lid. There's also a USB-C and a standard USB plug in the big bin. The top of the console and upper dash area feature woodgrain with '1794' badging above the glovebox. The woodgrain is offset with brown leather panels featuring tan contrast stitching, all of which is unique to the Sequoia 1794 Edition trim that's new for 2025.
The Sequoia 1794 Edition includes standard second-row captain's chairs
Toyota Sequoia: Interior Space Reduced
Despite its body-on-frame underpinnings, the 2025 Toyota Sequoia delivers confident handling and a refined ride quality. However, while the advantage of using a body frame structure is increased chassis strength and durability, it comes at the cost of interior space. Specifically, having a live axle running between the two rear wheels impinges on the packaging in the third row and cargo area. It means a higher floor back there, which reduces third-row headroom and legroom.
Third-row space is compromised by the Sequoia's live-axle underpinnings
The only way to avoid this is to use a front-wheel-drive based, unibody structure that doesn't have a live rear axle, like the Toyota Grand Highlander. That model offers more third-row passenger space and better cargo space behind the third row. If you're buying a three-row SUV and you genuinely plan to use the third row for adults, as well as the cargo area for hauling things, you'll want to go with the Grand Highlander instead of the Sequoia. Of course the Sequoia is better off-road and it's got that ultra-durable body-on-frame design, but it is not as good for maximizing third-row space and cargo capacity.
The 2025 Toyota Sequoia has one of the longest predicted lifespans
Pricing for the Sequoia starts around $65,000 for the base SR5 trim and tops out around $87,000 for the Capstone version. This 1794 Edition costs $83,000, though adding the TRD Off Road package brings the price to just over $85,000. With that configuration you'll have an SUV loaded with both luxury and off-road features, and while those numbers may seem high, they represent pricing reality for large, luxurious SUVs in a post-Covid world. And in that world, the 2025 Toyota Sequoia brings not just luxury and off-road capability, but exceptional long-term reliability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oregon Legislature's last-ditch attempt for 3-cent gas tax increase fails
Oregon Department of Transportation workers fill a pothole on U.S. Highway 97 near Chemult in 2016 (Oregon Department of Transportation/Flickr) Oregon Democrats' last-ditch effort to stave off hundreds of layoffs at the Oregon Department of Transportation by passing a 3-cent gas tax increase failed late Friday night after House Republicans refused to allow a vote. House Speaker Julie Fahey, D-Eugene, introduced the last-minute amendment earlier Friday, pulling the plug on a transportation package more than a year in the making. Supporters and opponents alike described the proposed 3-cent gas tax increase and hike to vehicle registration and title fees as nothing more than a Band-Aid. But the Oregon Department of Transportation won't have even that Band-Aid to staunch the bleeding. The Legislature adjourned for the year shortly after 11 p.m. on Friday, after House Republicans refused to waive House rules to allow a vote. The bill would have raised about $2 billion over the next 10 years, a far cry from the $11.7 billion lawmakers aimed to raise earlier. House Majority Leader and committee chair Ben Bowman, D-Tigard, said he was 'extremely frustrated' at what the bill became and that it is 'not a transportation package.' 'I believe that people will die because we are not going to fund the broader transportation safety measures that our system needs,' he said. 'My 'yes' vote tonight is because a 'no' vote is a vote not to pay for paving, not to pay for fault line striping, not to pay for filling potholes, not to pay for snow plowing. We have to protect these services.' Testifying on the bill just after 6 p.m. on Friday, Gov. Tina Kotek said she understood how difficult it is to accept that a bill months in the making won't succeed. But right now, she said, the most important thing is to make sure the Oregon Department of Transportation has the money it needs to avoid 600 to 700 layoffs. If the Legislature fails to pass the amendment, Kotek said she will begin to let workers go by as soon as Monday. 'No one is arguing that this solution is sufficient,' Kotek said. 'It is a Band-Aid in every sense of the word.' The bill would increase the state's 40-cent gas tax by 3 cents, hike vehicle registration fees from $43 to $64 and increase vehicle title fees from $77 to $168. The roughly $2 billion estimated to result from those increases would go to the Oregon Department of Transportation, leaving cities and counties without additional funds. The measure also includes some accountability measures, such as requiring regular audits of the transportation department and shifting responsibility to hire and fire the department's director from the Oregon Transportation Commission to the governor. Still, opponents including Rep. Bobby Levy, R-Echo, said that wasn't enough to justify the higher costs to taxpayers, especially the rural residents she represents who must drive more than their urban counterparts. 'We can't just keep asking Oregonians — especially those who are already economically vulnerable — to pay more into a system that hasn't proven it can manage the resources it has,' Levy told the committee. Republicans issued their own proposals to raise money for roads and bridges that would not increase any taxes, but instead take and use millions of dollars meant for electric vehicle and bus programs, bike and pedestrian programs and climate programs. The death of the original transportation package, House Bill 2025, is a blow to a legislative effort months in the making. Lawmakers traveled the state last summer, seeking public input on plans to overhaul the state's transportation funding system. The latest measure eliminates proposed increases to the transit payroll tax, which would have gradually tripled from 0.1% to 0.3%. Without the payroll tax increase, officials at Portland's public transit agency TriMet said they'd have to cut 27% of their bus service, eliminating 45 of 79 bus lines. The tax increase would have cost an Oregonian making the state's median annual income about $10 per month, according to TriMet's analysis. Transit supporters and other Oregonians who waited hours for the hearing to begin lambasted lawmakers for not listening to them. Cassie Wilson, transportation policy manager for the nonprofit community planning group 1000 Friends of Oregon, said she opposed the amendment and wants lawmakers to vote on the $11.7 billion transportation tax-and-spending package instead. 'Transit keeps the 30% of Oregonians who can't or don't drive moving,' she said. Bill Bradley, executive board officer for ATU Local 757, a public transit workers union, said up to 500 members could lose their jobs in the coming year if the state does not pass a more robust funding package. Melissa Unger, executive director of the Service Employees International Union Local 503 that represents many transportation department employees, said her members supported everything advocates of the earlier bill wanted. With time running out before the Legislature must adjourn by Sunday, Unger said they needed some assurance that workers won't lose their jobs. 'We ask that you either pass this or do something so that people in the next two weeks across our state and in every county do not receive layoff notices,' she said. A proposal to mandate electric vehicle users pay a per-mile fee also didn't make the final bill. All tax increases in that bill are intended for the state transportation department, worrying cities and counties. Historically, transportation revenue has been split between the state, counties and cities, with the state taking 50%, 30% going to counties and 20% for cities. Portland Mayor Keith Wilson said the bill 'completely sidelines' local needs and means Oregon's largest city will lose about 60 employees. 'It jeopardizes dozens of essential city jobs and undermines our ability to perform basic safety functions like filling potholes and implementing traffic safety improvements,' Wilson said. 'In Portland, this means 300 streetlights that we won't be able to repair this year.' Benton County Commissioner Gabe Shepherd said he was one of about 20 county commissioners from around the state who waited hours to testify. 'Local governments cannot be left behind,' Shepherd said. 'We cannot be an afterthought. We cannot be a fix for later.' The long-awaited transportation package faced headwinds in recent days, as Republicans and moderate Democrats lined up against it. Rep. Kevin Mannix, R-Salem, was the only Republican to publicly support the larger measure, saying it wasn't perfect but was better than nothing, while Sen. Mark Meek, D-Gladstone, doubled down on his objection to it. 'From the correspondence I've received from around the state of Oregon and my community both in letters, emails, phone calls, social media posts, I'm doing the right thing for Oregonians,' he said on the Senate floor Friday morning. Following Kotek's Friday testimony, House Republicans welcomed the package's defeat in a press release, slamming Democrats for 'forcing families to pay one of the largest tax hikes in history.' They did not address the Kotek-backed proposed amendment. 'While our work represents a major victory for working-class, low-income, and rural communities, House Republicans will continue to listen to and fight on behalf of Oregonians against any future taxes that raise the cost of living,' said House Minority Leader Christine Drazan, R-Canby. 'We welcome House Democrats to join us.' Updated at 8:44 p.m. with comments and a vote from the House Rules meeting. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Do red cars really go faster? The answer is black and white for Australian drivers.
BRISBANE, Australia, July 8, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Are red cars really faster? Does silver speed off the line? Or does white win the race? While we can't say that colour makes any difference to the speed of the car on the road, we can say with certainty which cars are quickest out the showroom door. And it seems, Australians are a black and white bunch, with both colours accounting for nearly half (46%) of survey respondents' cars, according to a new Budget Direct Car Insurance Survey. The survey found white came out on top with 30%, followed by black at 16%, narrowly edging out silver (15%), blue (13%) and grey (12%). Red sputtered into sixth position (10%), with other colours making up the remaining 4%. Little wonder Aussies love to play 'Spotto' when they catch sight of an elusive yellow vehicle! Interestingly, despite white dominating current ownership, it's a much closer race for our favourite car colours. Black and white are neck and neck, splitting the honours with 21%. "It seems opposites really do attract," said a Budget Direct spokesperson. "Car colour is about so much more than aesthetics—white is considered the safest of all popular colours. Although yellow and orange are thought to stand out even more, which explains why they're often used for taxis. "Then there are the cars that look cleaner. Dark colours look fantastic when they're freshly washed, but it won't be long before you see dirt, dust and marks again. Silver and grey are the easiest to keep looking clean." Speaking of cleanliness, hats off to the 48-57-year-olds, who are most likely to wash their car every week (18%). Survey respondents aged 18-27 year olds came in second at 13%. Overall, 12% of survey respondents washed their car every week. 44% washed every month. Four out of every 100 respondents said they only cleaned the outside of their car once a year. If it was State of Origin, New South Wales and South Australian drivers (13%) were most likely to wash their car weekly, against Victorians (12%), Queenslanders (11%) and West Australians (10%). But back to the big question: are red cars really faster? More than 1 in 10 South Australians (11%) agreed the statement is true. As a nation, only 6% of Australians agreed. Scientifically, the colour makes no difference. One-third of us (34%) believe black cars are hotter. They're right. Scientists have found not only does a dark colour make your cabin hotter, it could affect your fuel economy, by putting extra demand on your air conditioner. Another 11% of us believe silver cars have better resale value. They are also right! More common colours like silver and white hold their value better than less popular colours. "At the end of the day, colour is entirely your decision. You may get a great deal on a car because it's not a popular colour. Or you may play it safe – literally," said a Budget Direct Spokesperson. "We'll insure your car whether it's black, white, yellow or pink with purple polka-dots!" To read the full survey breakdown, visit our Budget Direct Car Ownership Habits Survey. DISCLAIMER Insurance is issued by Auto & General Insurance Company Limited (ABN 42 111 586 353, AFSL 285571) (AGIC) and arranged by Auto & General Services Pty Ltd (ABN 61 003 617 909, AFSL 241411) (AGS). Registered Office: 13/9 Sherwood Road, Toowong 4066. All data in this article are from the sources referenced in this article, and was obtained in February 2025. While AGS has endeavoured to ensure the information we've relied on is accurate, current and complete, we do not guarantee it and accept no liability for the use or reliance upon this information. This information contains general information only about our products and has not taken into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination available at and consider whether the product is appropriate to you before deciding to buy our product/s. Subject to meeting underwriting criteria. View original content: SOURCE Budget Direct Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Car and Driver
2 hours ago
- Car and Driver
2026 Dodge Durango Review, Pricing, and Specs
Specs See all specs EPA MPG 17–20 Combined Seating 7 Seats Powertrain Gas Drivetrain Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive Limited Warranty 3 Years/36,000 Miles Overview Dodge has taken the 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' philosophy with the 2026 Durango, which is well into its second decade of production. While the automaker has freshened the interior over the years, giving the latest example a 10.1-inch touchscreen and optional amenities like ventilated front seats and fancy stereos, this three-row SUV is pretty old school. It rides on a rear-wheel-drive platform, and the smallest engine on offer is a naturally aspirated 3.6-liter V-6. If you need more than 295 ponies, a 360-hp V-8 is provided in Durango R/T models. Expert Tip: Given that the Durango is a Dodge, the lineup wouldn't truly be complete without an SRT Hellcat variant, but we review that 710-hp supercharged beast separately. What's New for 2026? For 2026, Dodge introduces a new Blacktop Redline package for the V-8-powered Durango R/T. It adds black 20-inch wheels and badges, plus SRT aerodynamic addenda at both ends. Pricing and Which One to Buy The GT Plus hits the sweet spot, blending the proven V-6 engine with all-wheel drive, a rear load-leveling suspension, 20-inch wheels, front-seat ventilation, heated second-row seats, and more. Engine, Transmission, and Performance Engines: 295-hp 3.6-liter V-6; 360-hp 5.7-liter V-8 295-hp 3.6-liter V-6; 360-hp 5.7-liter V-8 Transmission: 8-speed automatic 8-speed automatic Drivetrains: rear-wheel drive; all-wheel drive The entry-level Durango GT is the only rear-driver of the lot (though shoppers can option all-wheel drive for $2000 more). Its 295-hp V-6 engine and eight-speed automatic transmission make for a capable and efficient—if not thrilling—pairing that'll please most casual drivers. The R/T's V-8 provides a significant boost in power and towing capacity, but consumes more fuel. The Durango's rear-wheel-drive platform lends an athletic feel to the driving experience, and its muscle-car persona shines through in everyday use. But because it's not sprung too aggressively, it remains a family-friendly SUV that's both fun to drive and easy to live with. 0–60-MPH Times C/D 60-mph Tests: 6.2 seconds (V-8, AWD); 7.4 seconds (V-6, AWD) In Comparison: It's been nearly a decade since we tested the Durango, but it hasn't evolved much in that time. With all-wheel drive, the V-6-powered Durango managed to reach 60 mph in a reasonable 7.4 seconds. The V-8 model did it in 6.2 seconds, which is quick for the class. View Photos Dodge Towing and Payload Capacity Models with the 3.6-liter V-6 are rated to tow 6200 pounds, while those with the 5.7-liter V-8 are good for 7200 pounds or, if equipped with the Tow and Go package, 8700 pounds. Fuel Economy and Real-World MPG C/D 75-mph Highway Fuel-Economy Test s: 23 mpg (V-8 R/T); 22 mpg (V-6) 23 mpg (V-8 R/T); 22 mpg (V-6) EPA City Rating s: 14-18 mpg 14-18 mpg EPA Highway Ratings: 22-25 mpg The EPA hasn't released fuel-economy information for the 2026 Dodge Durango yet, but the SUV's numbers shouldn't change. According to the agency, the V-6 model earns ratings of up to 18 mpg city and 25 mpg highway, and the V-8 variant sees 14 mpg city and 22 mpg highway. In our highway fuel-economy test, the 2020 V-8-powered Durango R/T surprised us by returning 23 mpg, outperforming its EPA rating and the 22-mpg result posted by the V-6 Durango. For more information about the Durango's fuel economy, visit the EPA's website. Interior, Comfort, and Cargo First Row: Despite its age, the Durango feels contemporary inside (thanks to making the 10.1-inch touchscreen standard last year). The first row's ergonomics and overall comfort are good, and the design exudes the luxury-meets-muscle-car vibes that Dodge is known for. Second Row: Many SUV rivals offer more second-row passenger space, but the Durango's second row isn't unpleasant for adults. A three-seat bench for the second row is standard, but if you want, a pair of captain's chairs is available as an option. Third Row: Getting into the third row is complicated by the fact that the second-row bench doesn't slide, but we're fans of the elevated wayback, as it gives you at least a sense of space where there isn't much. Cargo Capacity: We were able to put 30 carry-on suitcases inside the Durango with all of its rear seats folded, but we could fit only four behind the third row. View Photos Dodge Infotainment and Connectivity Infotainment: 10.1-inch touchscreen 10.1-inch touchscreen Connectivity: Bluetooth, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility Bluetooth, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility Audio Systems: 6-speaker stereo (standard); 10-speaker Alpine stereo (optional); 20-speaker Harman/Kardon stereo (optional) The Durango features a 10.1-inch touchscreen, running the familiar and easy-to-use Uconnect infotainment system. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto functionality is included. We noted good audio quality for Bluetooth phone calls, and one caller who reached us during a drive even commented that she could hear the V-8 engine's sonorous rumble. Safety and Driver-Assistance Features If you want the full roster of Durango safety tech, you'll have to pony up; much of it is optional. Standard Safety Features: blind-spot monitoring, rear-cross-traffic alert blind-spot monitoring, rear-cross-traffic alert Optional Safety Features: automated emergency braking, adaptive cruise control For information about the Durango's crash-test results, visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) websites. Warranty and Maintenance Coverage The Dodge Durango offers the same coverage as many competitors but falls well shy of the Hyundai Palisade, which has a best-in-class 10-year, 100,000-mile powertrain warranty. Toyota provides two years of complimentary scheduled maintenance on its three-row SUVs, but Durango buyers have to pay separately for such services. Limited Warranty: three years or 36,000 miles three years or 36,000 miles Powertrain Warranty: five years or 60,000 miles five years or 60,000 miles Complimentary Maintenance: None C/D Test Results and Specs Whenever a model debuts or sees significant revisions, we test it and publish the results. While the chart below may list data for an earlier model year, the numbers still apply to the current model, as it hasn't seen meaningful changes and doesn't warrant a new test. Specifications VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-/4-wheel-drive, 6-passenger, 4-door hatchback PRICE AS TESTED: $48,480 (base price: $45,490) ENGINE TYPE: pushrod 16-valve V-8, iron block and aluminum heads, port fuel injection Displacement: 345 cu in, 5654 cc Power: 360 hp @ 5150 rpm Torque: 390 lb-ft @ 4250 rpm TRANSMISSION: 8-speed automatic with manual shifting mode DIMENSIONS: Wheelbase: 119.8 in Length: 201.2 in Width: 75.8 in Height: 71.9 in Passenger volume: 141 cu ft Cargo volume: 17 cu ft Curb weight: 5369 lb C/D TEST RESULTS: Zero to 60 mph: 6.2 sec Zero to 100 mph: 16.3 sec Zero to 110 mph: 20.6 sec Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.6 sec Top gear, 30-50 mph: 3.0 sec Top gear, 50-70 mph: 4.1 sec Standing ¼-mile: 14.7 sec @ 95 mph Top speed (governor limited): 120 mph Braking, 70-0 mph: 193 ft Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.78 g FUEL ECONOMY: EPA city/highway driving: 14/22 mpg C/D observed: 16 mpg C/D observed highway driving: 23 mpg C/D observed highway range: 560 mi More Features and Specs
