Germany to follow Austria and deport convicted Syrians - International
The ministry had instructed the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) to take action against "dangerous Syrian individuals and delinquents", a spokesman told AFP, confirming a report appearing in the Sunday edition of Welt newspaper.
The spokesman stressed that committing serious crimes meant one was excluded from the protection afforded by asylum and could lead to the revocation of any such status already granted.
An agreement reached by the coalition made up of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservatives and the Social Democrats provided for deportations to Afghanistan and Syria "starting with delinquents and people considered a threat," the spokesman added.
To that end the ministry was in contact with the relevant Syrian authorities, he said.
Between January and May, the BAMF has opened more than 3,500 procedures that could lead to the revocation of asylum rights granted to Syrian nationals, the ministry said in an answer to a question in parliament.
Refugee status had been withdrawn in 57 cases and lower-level protection in 22 other cases, said the ministry.
During the same period, around 800 Syrians have returned home as part of a voluntary repatriation programme funded by Germany, to which 2,000 have so far signed up.
Around a million Syrians live in Germany, most of whom arrived during the major exodus between 2015 and 2016.
But since the December 2024 fall of president Bashar al-Assad, several European countries, including Austria and Germany, have suspended asylum procedures as far-right parties have campaigned on the issue.
Austria's interior ministry on Thursday deported a Syrian criminal convict back to Syria, saying it was the first EU country to do so officially "in recent years".
Germany has in recent months suffered several deadly attacks by jihadists using bladed weapons as well as far-right violence, which has pushed the issue of security up the political agenda.
Follow us on:
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mada
an hour ago
- Mada
Another crash on Monufiya ring road kills 10, Sisi orders govt to ‘study' road closure
A crash on the Regional Ring Road in Monufiya killed 10 people on Saturday, marking the second incident of its kind in under 10 days. The traffic collision has driven another wave of public anger over the government's management of road maintenance and development works. The victims, most of whom were from the Ashmon area of Monufiya and heading to Sadat City, were killed after two microbuses collided near the Manshiyet al-Qanater area in Giza Governorate. The part of the road passing through the governorate was the site of another deadly collision on June 27 that killed 19 people, including minors. According to initial media reports, Saturday's crash occurred when two microbuses collided after one driver lost control of his vehicle at high speed in the absence of road signs and traffic control. Nine of the victims were killed immediately, while 11 others were injured and transferred to Bagour General Hospital, according to the Health Ministry. One of the injured died on Sunday. In response, President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi ordered the government to consider 'taking the necessary measures to close the road in areas undergoing renovation and maintenance work,' and develop safe alternatives. He also instructed the Interior Ministry to intensify law enforcement against traffic violations. A Cabinet statement later announced LE300,000 in compensation per victim's family from the labor and social solidarity ministries. Labor Minister Mohamed Gobran directed the Central Administration for Irregular Employment Affairs and the Monufiya Labor Directorate to investigate whether the victims are eligible to receive compensation offered to irregular workers. Among those decrying the lack of official action to ensure the road's safety was Egyptian Social Democratic Party MP Freddy al-Bayady, who spoke out against the 'constant and frivolous bleeding out of Egyptian lives.' In a request published in domestic news outlets for the transport and interior ministers to appear before the House of Representatives for questioning, Bayady asked, 'When will the road be closed?' and pressed for the resignation of responsible officials. 'Are you waiting for the road to become an open grave?' Last week's incident on the same road prompted heavy criticism in the media, civil society and the House, with calls for Transport Minister Kamel al-Wazir to resign and condemnation of the neglect of major highway projects constructed during his long tenure. Wazir lashed out at critics, rejecting any comments against himself or his ministry's performance, and placed the blame entirely on one of the drivers implicated in last week's crash. Critics also decried the government's initial half-hearted response to the incident at the time, as well as the absence of labor regulations to protect workers and provide them with safe transportation.
Voice of Belady
2 hours ago
- Voice of Belady
Israel Between the Jaws of a Mill
Written by Howayda Awad Ahmed Israel's deception of European countries and the lies it employs in the media it broadcasts to those countries, claiming that the land inhabited by the Jews is the Promised Land, and that the Palestinians are merely Arab inhabitants seeking to strip them of their Jewish identity. Because most of those countries have a mental makeup problem, namely the persecution of Jews since ancient all the crimes committed by the Zionist army against defenseless civilians and children are in defense of existence. Since Operation Flood of Al-Aqsa, European support has reached its peak at all levels. They support the Israeli existence and the defense of its land, as they claim. This support has not ceased to this day due to the Zionist media fabrications, lies, and various stories broadcast to delude the European continent into believing that they are in a state of defense of existence. Quite simply, Gaza was lost and reduced to rubble, with more than 25,000 martyrs and thousands more injured, hungry, and disabled. All this was applauded by Europe, which embraces all the ideas promoted by the Hebrew media in Europe day and night to gain positions and endless support. This was in the complete absence of international and humanitarian law, international conventions, and treaties. But a surprise recently occurred: the European conscience began to awaken slightly from its deep slumber and accepted the proposal of Spain and Ireland in 2024 and to consider the European partnership with Israel. This stems from the refutation of the position of the Israeli government and its far-right Prime Minister Netanyahu regarding US President Donald Trump's recent moves in the Middle East, the negotiations with Iran to halt its nuclear program, Trump's choice to play it alone, far from Israel, his agreement with the Houthis in Yemen, the cessation of airstrikes on Yemen, and the exclusion of Israeli ships from the agreement. Netanyahu felt anger and disappointment, and that Trump only cares about America's interests, even at Israel's expense. Matters worsened when Trump visited the Gulf last month, ignoring a visit to Israel. The situation then escalated with the establishment of mechanisms and a negotiating line directly with Hamas to secure the release of an American prisoner without any reference to Israel. Europe is following Trump's ideology directly, but this time it has adopted an independent approach, not subservient to the US position all along. It has a different stance on events in the Middle East and Ukraine, and is committed to European economic security. Europe's pent-up anger is searching for an outlet to explode from Israeli practices. We have seen France, Britain, and Canada in particular summon Israeli ambassadors, suspend talks on a free trade zone with Britain, and demand and condemn the cessation of displacement, genocide, and starvation in Gaza, and open the door to humanitarian aid. Israel's response, unfortunately, was the Gideon Armored Vehicles, an operation designed to end its plan to completely occupy Gaza, divide it, and tighten security control over it. It has thrown all European opinion, unable to ignore humanitarian and civil society organizations working in international relief, universities, and school students denouncing Israeli massacres, and bringing this matter to the International Court of Justice or the International Criminal Court. All of this has put pressure on Europe. Because the world is now governed by the logic of the jungle and double standards, Europe's position will become difficult if it does so, harming its position on the Russian-Ukrainian war. It has found it necessary to unify its position and change its direction. This has placed the entity under isolation and boycotts in various popular spheres, halting conferences and research activities, and closing some Israeli-affiliated companies. This clear and explicit threat from the European Union will have a profound impact due to Israel's violations of human rights. Israel may even lose trade relations with the European Union, which accounts for more than 30 percent of Israel's international trade. The situation is exacerbated in the practical field, including satellites and the requirements of scientific advancements in the field of computers and globalization. The issue of a European review and the suspension of the partnership between the 27 member states represented by the European Union and the practical suspension of their partnership with Israel seems a remote possibility, as it requires the unanimity of all member states. However, the good thing about what is happening is that there are more than 15 member states capable of halting trade with Israel, even if the decision is opposed by Germany and Hungary, with their significant influence. But in the end, it appears that all this opposition and skirmishes are nothing more than a purely political exercise to appease European public opinion, which has recently awakened and begun to grieve. Despite all this, the Jewish lobby abroad will not allow any resolution to emerge that opposes and undermines Israel's path of killing, destruction, and displacement. Therefore, Israel pretended to accept the pressure and allowed the entry of some food, relief supplies, and trucks, which do not meet the needs of Gaza, which is crying out for refuge. Unfortunately, this aid was used as a political bargaining chip and a weapon for Israel in a war that will only end by a miracle. Then the Zionist entity resumes broadcasting to the European media that they do not understand the gravity of the security situation and that the people of Israel are threatened by the Arabs, thus allowing its actions to go unpunished, dissolving partnerships, terminating trade agreements, and stripping it of its international immunity. Let us see what the outcome of the two-state solution conference this month at the United Nations, under French and Saudi sponsorship, will be, and what recommendations it may ultimately unravel. Then Israel resumes broadcasting to the European media to stop European decisions, using the old priesthood of anti-Semitism and its influence on European commercial, political, economic, social, and even humanitarian decision-makers. Israel will not abandon its old dream of extending the Nile to the Euphrates and its project of regional expansion in Lebanon, Syria, and all the countries of the Arab region. It will maintain a state of no war, no peace, and insecurity, which will make all the countries of the region aware that future expansionism will not stop as long as the United States and the European Union take a position of objection at times and rejection at other times, to silence the peoples of the world.
Voice of Belady
2 hours ago
- Voice of Belady
Identity Amid the Rubble: Syria and Iraq Between Grand Narratives and Systematic Dismantling
By: Mohamed Saad Abdel Latif – Egypt In a moment many perceived as a turning point, Ahmad al-Sharaa appeared in civilian clothes, speaking in a pragmatic tone about Syria's future. For some, his appearance signaled the dawn of a post-Assad era—perhaps a new Syria, radically different. Yet the Iraqi experience had already taught those willing to learn: no statue falls without casting a longer shadow, and no regime collapses without leaving behind its ghosts—in the alleys of cities, at the borders of identity, and in the pulse of geography. When Saddam Hussein's statue fell in Baghdad, the scene resembled more the toppling of a tyrant than the birth of a nation. Years later, the destruction of the Assad family's monuments in Damascus echoed that image—yet with one key difference: the game's threads were far more entangled, and the geography more defiant. What has happened—and continues to happen—in Damascus and Baghdad cannot be viewed through a single lens. It's not just a tale of fallen despotism or crushed revolution; it is an entire structure that continues to reproduce itself through new tools. The killer and the victim have begun switching roles, the masks change, but the stage remains the same—operated by the same forces whose interests intersect above rivers of blood. Here, the specter of Gamal Hamdan looms—the geographer who did not read fortunes but rather the genius of place and time. When he spoke of Iraq and the Levant, he was not prophesying, but mapping out the latent fractures in the region's fabric—those inherited from geography, history, and politics. He saw signs of disintegration that needed no military coup or foreign intervention—just one tremor for the entire image to collapse. Amid sects and minorities, regions and rival powers, the internal fabric morphs into a perpetual battlefield. Sectarianism has not only been a domestic tool but has also become a foreign one. Iran, Turkey, and Israel each view Damascus as an extension of their national security—just as Baghdad was once a playground for redrawing influence maps. Sovereignty became a worn-out slogan, and the 'state' a fragile framework governed by unwritten agreements among power brokers who see human beings as mere numbers in the balance of power. In this context, the democratic slogans hoisted atop tanks—whether in Baghdad or Damascus—proved to be flimsy veils for a bitter truth: democracy cannot be crafted by armies, and freedom cannot be imposed from abroad. The fragile political entities protected by militias or regional deals possess no soul of statehood. They are mere protectorates—awaiting the next deal or war. Iraq never produced a true 'state' in the Green Zone, and post-2011 Syria only yielded new faces over the same corpse. Lebanon continues to breathe through the lungs of others, while the Golan Heights—an open wound—now witnesses wars fought in names not its own. The result? A complex scene of organized fragmentation, the collapse of statehood concepts, and a battle over identity. The 'partition of the already-partitioned,' as some have written, is no longer a deferred scenario—it is a reality administered drop by drop, under global watch and through the hands of blood-soaked proxies. The geopolitical landscape of the region—with all its historical, ethnic, and sectarian entanglements—cannot be understood through a Facebook post or a shallow reading in the cafés of the virtual world. This moment calls for a pen that grasps the depth of time and place, and eyes that see beyond the mirrors—not fleeting whims or temporary allegiances. Mohamed Saad Abdel Latif Writer and researcher in geopolitics and international conflicts Email: saadadham976@
