
Digested week: cheap meat and Corfe Castle – a toast to Brexit five years on
Why all the long faces? Just a few days ago it was the fifth anniversary of the UK leaving the EU, so how come we didn't have a weekend of celebrations? The Labour government marked the occasion by choosing to ignore it entirely. As if it had never happened. The Tories were also rather muted, with Kemi Badenoch keeping a low profile. Even Nigel Farage was sotto voce. His statement merely noted that Brexit would have gone a great deal better if the Tories had managed it better. As usual, Nige was taking no personal responsibility for anything.
So it's left to me to toast the many successes of the Brexit project. To sound a note of triumphalism. Here's just a few. First, the trade deals. Why do people get so hung up about the 4% drop in GDP when we are now a member of the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership? Give it 10 years of so and we might increase our GDP by 0.01%. Surely that's something to get excited about.
Then there's the trade deal with Australia that allows Aussie farmers to dump cheap meat in the UK. Brexit wasn't all about improving our trade, it was about giving a boost to the Commonwealth as well. Job done. Nor must we forget the increased regulations. As Chris Philp recently pointed out, most British workers are terminally lazy. That's why we now make exporters fill in tens of millions of completely unnecessary forms each year. The EU had made us idle. Brexit has restored the work ethic.
And thank God we got rid of the youth mobility scheme. All those young people wandering around Europe, having a good time in Florence or Barcelona. Eating pasta and tapas. That had to stop. Fraternising with Europeans when they could have been looking at Corfe Castle in the rain. If God had wanted us to speak a foreign language, he would have made us foreign. What's the point of being an island nation if we're going to waste time on the European mainland? Finally, there are the lengthy queues at European airports. Queueing is uniquely British and it's good to show the French and Germans how to do it properly. Call it soft power. Chin up, everyone.
Even by his usual reality-bending, incoherent standards, the latest intervention from Donald Trump was spectacularly wild. For the US to own Gaza, to kick out the 1.8 million Palestinians and turn the territory into the Riviera of the Middle East. Golf courses and casinos wherever you look. Foreign policy reduced to a real estate deal. This didn't just take the rest of the world by surprise, it also caught his supporters off guard. Trump had campaigned on a ticket of non-intervention on the global stage.
There again, maybe The Donald is a mystery to himself. You often get the impression that the words tumble out of his mouth of their own accord and that he has no idea of what he is going to say until after he has said it. So he's constantly playing catchup with himself. Either way, the fallout was predictable, with every country in the Middle East bar Israel, along with many others around the world, insisting the US plan was never going to happen. It broke with the Geneva conventions and amounted to ethnic cleansing. Bizarrely, Trump then announced that everyone loved the plan and that it was definitely going to happen. Just with no US money or boots on the ground. We were now through the other side of the looking-glass.
Keir Starmer's response was instructive. He has clearly given a lot of thought to how to deal with the president and has decided to take the indulgent-parent approach. Shower him with praise and then suggest a few minor tweaks. So Keir declared The Donald was ahead of the game in realising Gaza was now rubble. He himself had never noticed that before. The Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, adopted a similar approach by saying he had never known Greenland existed before Trump brought it to his notice. Perhaps this is the way forward.
Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, has recently been complaining that the Chinese have been scraping his data to train their own AI engine DeepSeek. Copyright theft on an industrial scale. I guess Sam should know what he's talking about as OpenAI ransacked the internet to get its own engine up and running. Along the way, he powered his way through several hundred thousand books without asking the authors' permission or offering a payment. Instead, he just stole everyone's intellectual property. Including mine. A friend directed me to a website where you could find out whether your own books had been part of the grand larceny. And, sure enough, several of my books had been chosen to be immortalised on various giant servers somewhere out in the desert. Fame of sorts, I suppose.
More interesting is: what is my contribution to AI? What will future generations unknowingly learn from me? From Vertigo: One Football Fan's Fear of Success they will learn that being a Spurs fan is a life sentence in disappointment. And it is the hope that finishes you off. Give it a year or two and they could find that out for themselves. From Brideshead Abbreviated, OpenAI will have found out how to parody 100 of the best books of the 20th century. Slightly niche, I would have thought. That just leaves several collections of my political sketches over the last 10 years. I guess even AI needs to develop a sense of humour. Much like Westminster.
Sometimes the sketch is a straightforward transcription service. Another lobby friend recently tested DeepSeek by asking it to write a sketch about Chris Philp in the style of John Crace. It was disturbingly good. Apart from one thing. It thought the Tories were still in government and that Philp was still a minister. My job is safe for a little while yet, I hope.
Yet again I seem to find myself out of sync with the rest of the world. Research conducted by scientists at University College London and published in the British Medical Journal Mental Health has found that people are at their happiest when they wake up in the morning. Thereafter, the day seems to slip away from them and they feel progressively worse. By the time it gets to midnight, they are wondering why they even bothered to engage with the world. They would have been better off staying in bed all day watching TV on their laptops. There were some variations, as you might expect: people felt generally more chipper at weekends and on holiday, but the general principle applies: if you're feeling crap, try not to dwell on it. Just go to sleep and you will wake up in a better mood.
All of which is the precise opposite of my own biorhythms. I dread waking up each morning because that is when I am at my worst. When I am most in the grip of my anxiety. I often feel so anxious it is a struggle to get out of bed. The urge to hide under the duvet is almost irresistible.
Frequently I have to give myself a strong talking to. Reduce the morning to small increments. Minor achievements. Check phone. Get dressed. Go downstairs. Have breakfast. Answer texts and emails. Leave house. Once I've done all this, I find my anxiety is more or less manageable. I can get on with the day. Enjoy what I am doing at work. Have fun with friends and colleagues. Go to the gym. By the time I get home, I'm at my most relaxed. Ready even for something as brain dead as Silent Witness. Talking of which, the season finale was so bad it was a must-watch. Jack and Nikki's wedding was hysterical. Awkward dancing in Trafalgar Square. Two people with no obvious attraction to one another. Bring on season 29.
The older I get, the more I want to mark important milestones. Maybe I'm getting more sentimental, or maybe it's a realisation that I may not have so many of these occasions left as I would like and I want to make the best of them. So I should point out that we are very close to the anniversary of my heartache. My very own unwanted memento mori. Obviously some memories have faded in time. I can't remember the faces of those in the hospital beds next to me. But a lot is still vivid. The feelings of terror. Of being out of control. The consultant, doctors and nurses who looked after me and saved my life. The notion of time appearing to slow down.
To all intents and purposes, I am now a well man. My artery has been unblocked. My heart is functioning well in stress tests. My blood results are normal. I take all my meds with the devotion of a man who has been given a second chance. And yet … something important has changed. I feel more vulnerable than I ever did before. There is not a day goes by without me thinking of my heart attack. It's always just beneath the surface of my thoughts. Sometimes when I am heading off to work, I find myself wondering if I will make it back home. Whenever I am in the gym – the place where I had my heart attack – I am always on the lookout for chest pains. Most of all, I feel like I have been given a chronicle of a death foretold. As if I know how I am going to die. All that's left to be decided is when.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming Pip
Wes Streeting was interviewed on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme by Victoria Derbyshire, who was filling in for Kuenssberg, about the UK Government's proposed cuts to welfare, which have been described as a 'two-tier disability system' by campaigners. The UK government confirmed on Friday evening that it will make major changes to its planned welfare cuts, aiming to avoid a rebellion by more than 120 Labour backbenchers. Under the new plan, people already receiving Personal Independence Payments (Pip) or the health element of Universal Credit will keep getting them. However, the cuts will apply to future claimants. READ MORE: Police 'examining' Kneecap and Bob Vylan Glastonbury Festival performances When pressed by Derbyshire, Streeting was forced to admit that the Labour Government is planning on having fewer people able to claim disability benefits by reforming the welfare system. During the interview, Derbyshire said: 'Members of the cabinet, you on this program this morning, and the Prime Minister have said it previously, the current system is not sustainable. 'But even after your review, the bottom line is you want fewer people in receipt of Pip, fewer disabled people in receipt of Pip, don't you?' Streeting replied: 'Well, we want to make sure we're getting the line in the right place in terms of.' To which Derbyshire cut him off and asked: 'So, the answer is yes. You want fewer disabled people claiming Pip.' (Image: BBC) Streeting continued: 'I think 1000 more people, coming on every day, like it's not sustainable in its current form, it's just not. 'And unless we address that issue, we've got to do it in a fair way. 'We've got to do it in the right way.' Derbyshire interrupted Streeting again saying: 'But you won't say that out loud. Why not?' Streeting replied: 'Well I just did.' Derbyshire then asked for clarification that there will be fewer disabled people able to claim Pip. To which Streeting replied: 'I literally just said, we've got to make sure that in terms of where we are, where we draw the line, where we get it right, that it is sustainable for the longer term.' MPs are expected to vote on the welfare reform bill on Tuesday at Westminster which the UK Government will be hoping to pass after it offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Keir Starmer's first major Commons defeat since coming to power. The UK Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. Speaking on Times Radio earlier this week, campaigner at Disability Rights UK Mikey Erhardt said: 'The idea that you will be less in need, or less deserving of support, depending on the when of the condition that necessitates that support, is something you just have to reject out and out.' Meanwhile, Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, said Labour's 'very small' concessions on welfare reforms will still leave the system 'woefully inadequate'.


Metro
35 minutes ago
- Metro
Budapest holds biggest Pride parade ever despite government ban
Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban did his best to stop the annual Pride march going ahead in Budapest yesterday, but his efforts backfired. The march was widely reported to have seen its biggest ever turnout, becoming a rallying point for people concerned about freedom of assembly as well as LGBTQ+ rights. Estimates put turnout at between 100,000 and 200,000 people, with striking images showing crowds flow across the Danube over the Elisabeth Bridge with barely space to wave a flag. The controversy turned what was usually a more lowkey event with perhaps tens of thousands attending into a huge political rally, attracting attention across the EU. On Friday, Orban threatened 'clear legal consequences' for anyone joining the march, but police stayed on the sidelines after the liberal mayor of the city allowed the march to proceed. Pride marches have been banned in the country since early 2025, when Hungary passed a law restricting the freedom of assembly by connecting it to a previous law from 2021 prohibiting children seeing public portrayal of 'divergence from self-identity corresponding to sex at birth, sex change or homosexuality'. With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications! I call on the Hungarian authorities to allow the Budapest Pride to go fear of any criminal or administrative sanctions against the organisers or the LGBTIQ+ community in Hungary and beyond: I will always be your ally. — Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) June 25, 2025 The ban allows people organising or taking part to be fined, and allows police to use facial recognition software to identify them. To allow the march to go ahead, the city's mayor Gergely Karacsony renamed it as Bupadest Pride Freedom, casting it as celebrating the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Hungary in June 1991. More Trending More than 70 members of the European Parliament were expected at the 30th Pride march. Ursula von der Leyen, president of the EU Commission, urged beforehand: 'I call on the Hungarian authorities to allow the Budapest Pride to go ahead. Without fear of any criminal or administrative sanctions against the organisers or participants. To the LGBTIQ+ community in Hungary and beyond: I will always be your ally.' Pro-government media cast a negative light on the events, with daily newspaper Magyar Nemzert using the headline 'Chaos at Budapest Pride' focusing on traffic disruption, and accusing the organisers of being globalist puppets. Event organisers said: 'The main message of the jubilee Budapest Pride is: we are here! We are at home in Hungary, and we are at home in Europe. Solidarity across borders shows: Europe has not forgotten the Hungarians. There are a lot of people who care that Hungarians can once again live in a democracy and under the rule of law.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
A British Leyland of TV is the Government's worst idea yet
A show about a good-looking human rights lawyer who becomes a triumphant, reforming prime minister? Or a mini-series about a brilliant, glamorous economist who becomes Britain's first female chancellor? Perhaps a movie about a fiery red-head who works her way up from poverty to become the most powerful woman in the country? As the Government paves the way for a potential merger between ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 to create a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster, it is not hard to imagine the kind of shows it might commission. But hold on. A British Leyland of television is the Government's worst idea yet. What the industry actually needs is more competition – not less. It may still be a few years off. But Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Government is very clearly paving the way for a major consolidation of the British broadcasting industry. Last week, as part of its shiny new 'industrial strategy', it opened the door to removing the barriers that prevent a merger between the existing terrestrial broadcasters. Apparently, ministers will examine 'possible consolidation between broadcasters', along with 'closer strategic partnerships'. Meanwhile, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Ofcom will be asked to review their definitions of 'television advertising' to include YouTube and Netflix, which again will make mergers easier. Add it all up, and it is not hard to see where this is going. We will need a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster to cope with a changing market, stand up to the American streaming giants, and preserve what used to be one of the UK's strongest industries. Heck, they could even bring in the marketing whizzes who gave us Great British Energy and Great British Railways to come up with the branding for Great British Television. Of course, we all understand that something needs to be done. In a world where streaming dominates, and with most people under 30 barely even aware of what traditional broadcasting through signals and aerials was, the industry is in an increasingly dire position. ITV, the biggest of the three, has seen its share price slump from 265p 10 years ago to just 80p now, and the broadcaster is only worth £3bn. There has already been plenty of speculation about a break-up, perhaps with a sale of its production unit, or else a full-scale takeover of the company, probably by a foreign buyer. Channel 4 has been slashing jobs and cutting back on its programming budget as it grapples with a declining advertising market. Meanwhile, Channel 5, which has never been a huge success since it was launched in 1997, is also potentially in play as its American owner Paramount prepares for a takeover by media company Skydance. Why not put all three together and create a new British-owned powerhouse in commercial broadcasting?