Cong: Decision to impose Emergency in 1975 constitutional, undeclared Emergency now
Sapkal's remarks came on a day which marked 50 years of the Emergency Proclamation, as part of which the BJP held programmes and press conferences across the country targeting the Congress.
The state Congress president questioned whether the stand of former RSS chief Balasaheb Deoras, who supported the Emergency, is now unacceptable to BJP.
'The decision to impose Emergency in 1975 by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was constitutional. Certain forces were attempting to create chaos in the country. Later, the Emergency was lifted, elections were held, and democratic processes were restored,' Sapkal said.
'During the Emergency, Indira Gandhi didn't sell the country's assets or hand over public sector enterprises to industrialists. But for the past 11 years, there has been an undeclared Emergency in the country. Airports, ports, mines, banks, and government lands are being sold off to favoured industrialists. Even Dharavi's land has been sold. Today, dictatorship prevails, and the BJP's insatiable hunger for power is threatening democracy,' the Congress leader alleged.
Sapkal questioned how Sengol can replace the national emblem in government advertisements.
'The BJP government has splurged crores on advertisements around the Emergency. In these government ads, the national emblem is missing, replaced by the Sengol. The BJP wants to dismantle democracy and the Constitution and implement Golwalkar's 'Bunch of Thoughts',' alleged Sapkal.
Maharashtra Congress's official publication Janmanasachi Shidori released a special Emergency edition — featuring articles by Indira Gandhi, Pupul Jayakar, senior journalist and former RS MP Kumar Ketkar, Sena UBT MP Sanjay Raut, among others — to counter the 'BJP's false narrative' about the Emergency, Sapkal said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
Bihar businessman Gopal Khemka murder accused killed in police encounter
Gopal Khemka murder case: An accused in the murder of businessman Gopal Khemka has reportedly been killed in a police encounter, though official confirmation is still awaited. On 7 July, two persons had been arrested in connection with the murder of Patna-based industrialist Gopal Khemka, including the man who had pulled the trigger, a senior police officer said on Monday. The officer who did not wish to be identified said the shooter named Umesh Rai has been arrested while the other person who was suspected of having hired the contract killer has been detained. "Both persons have been held in Patna by a joint team of Special Task Force and Patna Police. The investigation is in progress. We will be able to divulge more details in due course," said the officer. Gopal Khemka was shot dead outside his residence in Patna by a bike-borne assailant at 11.40 pm on Friday, seven years after miscreants had gunned down his son in Hajipur. The incident had taken place near the gate of Khemka's house in the Gandhi Maidan locality. Following the incident, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar held a meeting to review the law and order situation in the state on Saturday during which he instructed officials to complete the investigation at the earliest, officials said. Khemka was reportedly associated with the BJP.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Panel of legal experts being consulted for law against sacrilege: Punjab FM
Punjab government is consulting legal experts to draft a stringent law against sacrilege of religious scriptures, aiming for harsher punishments. The government is proceeding cautiously to avoid future amendments, carefully reviewing the draft with legal advisors. While a special assembly session is scheduled, the bill's readiness remains uncertain, with potential for extension or another session. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Chandigarh: A panel of legal experts are being consulted for a law under which harsher punishment would be given for acts of "sacrilege" against religious scriptures, Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema said government is not in a hurry and will not bring such a law which will require subsequent amendments, the minister whether the legislation will be brought in the two-day special session of the Punjab Assembly starting July 10, Cheema said, "A panel of legal experts are being consulted over framing the law. We will take the opinion of LR (legal remembrancer) and the AG (Advocate General) office."Cheema said Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann is serious about the sacrilege issue."The law will ensure that no person dares to indulge in sacrilege. Our work (on framing the legislation) is not finished yet. When the draft is completely ready, we will share," he said while speaking to reporters after a cabinet meeting council of ministers, led by Chief Minister Mann, held a meeting whether the Bill is not ready yet, Cheema said, "If need be, we will extend it (session) or convene another one after 10 days. We are not in a hurry." He added that the Bill was under works."Earlier, SAD-BJP government framed a wrong bill and then the Congress regime framed the wrong one. We will not bring a law that requires repeated amendments," he minister said there are several other Bills, including concerning goods and services tax, that will be tabled in the upcoming assembly AAP government was expected to table the law on "sacrilege" against religious scriptures in the two-day special session of the Punjab Vidhan June 28, CM Mann had said that his government will bring a law for stricter punishment for sacrilege acts. He had announced the move after holding a meeting with representatives of the 'Sarb Dharam Beadbi Rokko Kanoon Morcha'.Mann had expressed concern over existing legal loopholes that allow individuals guilty of such unpardonable acts to walk free, calling it completely unwarranted and CM had highlighted that while the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) provides clear provisions regarding religious places, it remains silent on holy 'granths'.Capital punishment could also be part of the is not the first time that a law was being brought for stricter punishment for 2016, the then SAD-BJP government brought in the IPC (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016 and CrPC (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016 recommending life sentence for sacrilege against Guru Granth Sahib. The Centre later returned the 2018, the then Amarinder Singh government had passed two Bills -- the Indian Penal Code (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2018, and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2018, which stipulated a punishment of up to life imprisonment for injury, damage or sacrilege to Guru Granth Sahib, Bhagavad Gita, Quran and the the president did not give assent to these two Bills.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Former CJI DY Chandrachud supports ‘one nation, one election', says it doesn't violate the Constitution
Former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud has supported the constitutional validity of the 'one nation, one election' ( ONOP ) proposal ahead of his scheduled appearance before the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on Friday. He is expected to appear along with another former CJI, JS Khehar, a TOI report stated. As per the TOI report, the former CJI, in his written opinion, has said that the Constitution does not mandate separate timings for Lok Sabha and state assembly elections. 'The Constitution never mandated holding national and state elections separately,' Chandrachud stated in his submission to the JPC, which is headed by BJP MP PP Chaudhary. The ONOP proposal aims to synchronise elections for Parliament and state assemblies. It has faced criticism from opposition parties, who argue it violates the Constitution's basic structure. Chandrachud responded to this, saying staggered elections are not part of the original Constitution and do not form an unchangeable feature. Concerns over Election Commission's powers While supporting the idea, Chandrachud flagged concerns over the extensive powers proposed for the Election Commission of India (ECI) under the ONOP bill. He noted that such powers could allow the ECI to extend or shorten the tenure of a state assembly, which would go beyond the Constitutionally set five-year term. 'Such unbounded authority could enable the poll body to curtail or extend the tenure of a state assembly beyond the constitutionally mandated five years, under the pretext that simultaneous elections with the Lok Sabha are not feasible. The Constitution must define, delineate and structure the circumstances under which the ECI may invoke this power,' he said. Live Events This concern was also raised earlier by former CJI Ranjan Gogoi. Chandrachud served as India's 50th Chief Justice from November 2022 to 2024. Voter rights and representation Chandrachud said that holding simultaneous elections would not affect the voters' rights. He argued that the bill provides for continued representation of electors through elected members in both Parliament and legislative assemblies. 'Arguments opposing simultaneous elections are based on the premise that the Indian electorate is naive and can be easily manipulated. The argument that staggered elections are a part of the Constitution's basic structure (or form part of the principles of federalism or democracy) does not hold. Staggered timing of elections cannot be considered as a feature of the original Constitution, let alone an immutable feature,' he said. Smaller parties may be marginalised Chandrachud also pointed out that simultaneous elections could benefit national parties over smaller or regional ones. He said this concern must be addressed through legislative policy. He highlighted that while the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 set spending limits for candidates, there is no limit on what political parties themselves can spend. This gap, he noted, gives an advantage to parties with higher financial resources. Midterm polls and government stability The bill proposes that any House elected through midterm polls will serve only the remainder of the original five-year term. Chandrachud said this could weaken a government's ability to carry out significant policy actions if it is elected for a short term. He said the Model Code of Conduct would kick in about six months before the next scheduled election, limiting government actions during that time. Several JPC members have also raised similar concerns. Former CJIs UU Lalit and Ranjan Gogoi have earlier presented their views before the JPC. Lalit has also supported the constitutional validity of the ONOP proposal.
