KY's Brett Guthrie holds plum chairmanship after raising big money for House GOP caucus
U.S. Rep. Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, talks with reporters after a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the U.S. Capitol Feb, 5. 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Among the powerful committee leaders of the U.S. House of Representatives, no one ships nearly as much campaign money to his party's political caucus as Kentucky's 2nd District Congressman Brett Guthrie.
That's a finding in a report released last week by the Washington-based political reform group Issue One. And, in the context of the report, it's not a flattering distinction.
The report is the latest of five that Issue One has released since 2017 that decry a system — employed by both parties — in which House members find themselves under 'relentless fundraising pressure' to raise money for their party caucus committee if they want to be appointed to powerful and prestigious committees.
'A little-known fact about members of Congress is that they must constantly raise money not just for their own reelection bids but to help their respective political parties accumulate power,' the report says. 'Both the Democratic and Republican parties lean on their most powerful legislators to boost their political war chests, under something called the 'party dues' system.'
This forces members to devote vast amounts of time to fundraising — time sometimes spent pleading for money from wealthy interests that lobby Congress and appear before congressional committees, the report says.
The pressure comes from the Republican and Democratic leaders who control committee assignments of their members.
Last December Republican leaders of the U.S. House picked Guthrie to chair the important Committee on Energy and Commerce, the oldest continuous standing committee in the House and one with broad jurisdiction over the country's health care, energy and environmental policies, telecommunications and technology innovation, and consumer safety.
GOP leaders have handed Guthrie and his committee a big assignment: cut $880 billion in spending, much of which will have to come from Medicaid, the federal-state program that pays for about 72 million Americans' health care, including almost 1 in 3 Kentuckians. The savings are needed to reduce the federal budget by $2 trillion as Republicans seek to renew and make permanent $4.5 trillion in tax cuts from the first Trump administration.
Issue One examined the contributions of top Republicans and Democrats on four powerful committees of the House since Jan. 1, 2023. The report found that about $1 of every $6 spent by the campaign committees of these 11 key committee leaders (seven Republicans, four Democrats) was in contributions to the party caucus' political fund. (For Democrats, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee or DCCC; for Republicans, the National Republican Congressional Committee, or NRCC.)
Among the 11 committee leaders, the report shows Guthrie gave by far the most, transferring $2.5 million from his campaign committee to the NRCC during the period. That amounted to a bit more than half of all of the spending by Guthrie's committee during the period. (None of the other 10 committee leaders whose campaign finances were examined transferred more than $1.5 million or more than 39% of their total spending during the period to their caucus political fund.)
Guthrie's Washington office referred questions from Kentucky Lantern last week to a Guthrie campaign spokeswoman who did not reply to an email from Kentucky Lantern.
Issue One reported that in his recent bid for chairmanship of Energy and Commerce, Guthrie was opposed by U.S. Rep. Bob Latta, an Ohio Republican. Online records of the Federal Election Commission show Latta's campaign committee transferred nearly $1.3 million to the NRCC in 2023-24. That's a large amount, but still far less than the $2.5 million transferred by Guthrie's campaign committee during the same period.
'Fundraising prowess is one criteria that party leaders consider when deciding whom to elevate into important leadership roles … ,' said Michael Beckel, one of the authors of the Issue One report. 'Rep. Guthrie's massive fundraising for the NRCC ahead of the 2024 election certainly didn't hurt him as he made a bid to become the next chairman of the coveted House Energy and Commerce Committee.'
Punchbowl News reported soon after last November's elections that Guthrie appeared to be the favorite over Latta. While Latta had an advantage in experience, Punchbowl News reported Guthrie 'leads the fundraising race this year by leaps and bounds.'
In 2016 USA Today reported that the process involves legislative leaders setting quotas for members. 'Lawmakers are supposed to dip into their own reelection accounts to meet these fundraising quotas,' USA Today reported. 'Those who make — or exceed — their dues are considered 'team players,' a label that lifts their chances of landing plum committee assignments.'
That same USA Today report said another Kentucky Republican, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, refused to pay his dues. 'They told us right off the bat as soon as we get here, 'These committees all have prices and don't pick an expensive one if you can't make the payments,' Massie said. 'That's part of orientation.'
On Monday, Massie, in response to questions emailed him by Kentucky Lantern, said, 'My opinion of the dues system is still the same: it's extortion and should be illegal.'
As for how his refusal to participate in the system has affected his committee assignments, Massie said, 'I've been able to maintain committee assignments to B and C committees without giving to the NRCC, but participation on an A committee is understood to be off the table, so I've never sought an A committee.'
Issue One CEO Nick Penniman said in last week's report, 'It's a betrayal of public trust for legislative leaders in Congress to be constantly worried about fundraising and regularly soliciting wealthy and well-connected donors who have business before their committees. These fundraising demands lead to profound conflicts of interest.'
Guthrie, of Bowling Green, is a former state senator who first won election to Congress in 2008 by beating Democrat David Boswell in a competitive election for the right to succeed retiring Republican Congressman Ron Lewis.
Since then Guthrie has never been seriously threatened in eight reelections. This gives him the luxury of being able to transfer his campaign funds to the NRCC. Last November he won reelection with 73.1% of the vote despite transferring more than half of his campaign war chest during the two-year election cycle to the NRCC.
Beckel of Issue One described the organization as bipartisan and called it 'the leading cross-partisan political reform group in Washington, D.C.'
'We unite Republicans, Democrats, and independents in the movement to fix our broken political system and build a democracy that works for everyone,' he said. 'We are fiercely bipartisan, working with current and former members of Congress from both sides of the aisle.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

15 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: Senate to begin 'One Big Beautiful Bill' vote-a-rama Monday
The Senate on Sunday afternoon began debate on President Donald Trump's megabill for his second term priorities after a dramatic procedural vote late Saturday night. There could be up to 20 hours of debate. While Democrats will use their allotted 10 hours, Republicans are expected not to. The Senate will begin its "vote-a-rama" at 9 a.m. Monday, during which time senators will offer amendments to the bill. Overnight Sunday, the Senate parliamentarian ruled more provisions out of order with the reconciliation process Republicans are using to pass the bill with a simple majority. If it passes in the Senate, the bill goes back to the House to consider changes the Senate made to the House's version of the bill, which passed by one vote.


Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
‘Nepo baby' Zohran Mamdani is still a breath of fresh air
If Zohran Mamdani's 'luxury beliefs' turn out to be even half as effective as those of fellow 'nepo baby' Franklin Delano Roosevelt's — social security, minimum wage, and that pie-in-the-sky idea of a 40-hour workweek — he will be a great mayor. Sandy Huckleberry Jamaica Plain Globe Opinion writer Carine Hajjar's analysis of Zohran Mamdani's victory in the New York mayoral primary fails on several counts. First of all, her accounts of being harassed on the New York City subway presumably happened under current or prior administrations. None of them are socialist. How Mamdani will handle subway crime is unknown at this point. Bernie Sanders, a strong supporter of Mamdani, is hardly a self-soothing progressive. He is a genuine populist, and presumably so is Mamdani, who cites Boston's Mayor Michelle Wu as a role model. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up As for calling him a nepo baby, where does that come from? His father is a professor and his mother is a film director. So what? Is no one with a college degree allowed to be a populist? Advertisement Michael Keating Cambridge In her recent column, columnist Carine Hajjar turns her sights on Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor. She paints a picture of a city beset by dangerous, mentally ill, unhoused people, and insinuates that 'nepo baby' Mamdani doesn't have the best interests of New York's most vulnerable, particularly women, at heart. She cynically pits various groups against each other to advocate for more policing. Advertisement Ironically, she fails to acknowledge that the aforesaid crimes and misdemeanors are happening on the watch of 'tough on crime' Mayor Eric Adams. Similarly, while bemoaning the experiences of harassment faced by women, she makes no mention of Andrew Cuomo's well-known history of harassing his female staffers and employees. Cuomo, a former New York governor, conceded New York City's Democratic mayoral primary to Mamdani on Wednesday. Hajjar suggests that Mamdani's ideas for advances in mental health care and community violence prevention are pointless — dangerous, even. Yet we know from our experience here in Boston that these types of innovative community violence prevention efforts do, in fact, work. It is just such initiatives, put in place by Mayor Michelle Wu, that have helped crime rates in our city Katie Sutton Hingham New Yorkers rejected the Democratic status quo While no one can predict how successful Zohran Mamdani will eventually be, there is little doubt that his victory was due to an overwhelming desire on the part of New Yorkers to believe in, to quote from his victory speech, 'the power of the politics of the future: one of partnership and sincerity.' Bruce Goldberg Newburyport Mamdani only promises more chaos Carine Hajjar states that the current NYC policies — such as neglect of the mentally ill and the homeless, and the deliberate nonenforcement of misdemeanor crimes, have made everyday life more miserable and dysfunctional in the city. Mamdani promises more of the same, only less law enforcement in the interest of public safety and even more neglect. How would that lead to better personal security, cleaner neighborhoods, and an improved quality of life? Advertisement J Q Public
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The rise and fall of the 30-year friendship between Bill Gates and Warren Buffett
Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have been friends for over 30 years. After hitting it off in their first meeting, they worked together on philanthropy for decades. But their relationship appears to have cooled in recent years. Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, who both rank high among the richest men in the world, have been friends for decades. It began in the 1990s and led to joint ventures and world-changing philanthropy. But in recent years, both their business and personal relationships have cooled. Here's what happened. A decades-long friendship. Gates and Buffett's friendship can be traced back to a single day: July 5, 1991. Gates' mother, Mary, invited the late Meg Greenfield, a Washington Post editor, to her home. Greenfield planned to bring her friend Buffett, Business Insider previously reported. Gates didn't want to take the day off work. Mary Gates pressed her son to join them, but he didn't want to take the day off work, Business Insider reported. "What were he and I supposed to talk about, P/E ratios?" Gates later wrote in a column for Fortune. But he chose to show up because Greenfield was also planning to bring legendary Post publisher Katharine Graham, with whom Gates wanted to speak. Buffett made similar comments at the time. Buffett didn't particularly want to meet Gates, either. "While we're driving down there, I said, 'What the hell are we going to spend all day doing with these people? How long do we have to stay to be polite?" Buffett recalled years later to Fortune. But the pair hit it off immediately. To the surprise of both men, they hit it off, Fortune reported. Gates recalled being impressed by Buffett's questions, such as, "If you were building IBM from scratch, how would it look different?" Gates told Buffett to buy stock in Intel and Microsoft. It was the beginning of a deep friendship and a mutual mentorship. Friendship and mentorship alike. Buffett has attended multiple Microsoft events, but he's never served on the company's board or invested in the tech company, Business Insider previously reported. In 2018, he said it would be a conflict of interest due to their close friendship. But Gates didn't have the same concern. Gates didn't seem to worry as much about a conflict of interest. He joined Berkshire Hathaway's board in 2004 after the passing of Buffett's first wife, who was a board member, Market Watch reported. Both say they have a laser focus. Both credit their tremendous success to a laser focus, Alice Schroeder wrote in a biography of Buffett. Gates has written that he's learned from Buffett how to manage his time by prioritizing certain people and tasks. Shortly after they first met, Gates said he asked Buffett for his favorite business book recommendation, and Buffett lent Gates his copy of "Business Adventures" by John Brooks. It's now Gates' favorite business book, too, and he still has Buffett's copy. Joining together on causes. They've often joined forces for political and philanthropic causes. In 2010, Gates and Buffett, along with Gates' then-wife, Melinda French Gates, started The Giving Pledge, which encourages billionaires to donate most of their wealth to charitable causes in their lifetimes or in their wills. To date, about $600 billion has been pledged. Gates also credits Buffett with inspiring him to found the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000. Buffett contributed billions to Gates' foundation. Buffett has given part of his fortune, including Berkshire stocks, to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In 2006, he committed to giving 99% of his wealth to philanthropy and said the Gates Foundation would be the biggest recipient of his donations in his lifetime. Buffett's contributions to Gates' foundation from 2006 through 2023 total at least $39 billion, accounting for the appreciation of Berkshire stock over time, The New York Times reported. They've advocated for policy change, too. In 2014, Gates, Buffett, and Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson published a New York Times op-ed pushing for immigration reform. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Buffett called Gates his "science advisor." In February 2020, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged $100 million to fight the pandemic. During the pandemic, they spoke often. Pre-pandemic, they'd been seen trying out mattresses in Buffett's hometown, enjoying Dairy Queen, and playing ping pong. In July 2020, Yahoo's Andy Serwer wrote that during the pandemic Warren and Gates were "talking on a more regular basis." Buffett told Serwer that the two men scheduled a weekly hourlong call, but they usually exceeded the allotted time. That same year, Gates resigned from his roles at Berkshire Hathaway and Microsoft. The billionaire said he wanted "to dedicate more time to philanthropic priorities." But things have evolved amid Gates's life changes. Over the years, Buffett's feelings about Gates appeared to have cooled. The New York Times reported in August that Buffet began to believe the Gates Foundation had become bureaucratically bloated, hindering philanthropic productivity. He was disheartened to hear some people found Gates rude. Following the death of disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2019, news emerged that Gates met with Epstein repeatedly. Gates later said the meetings were for philanthropic purposes and were a "huge mistake." After that, things changed even more. In 2021, Gates and his wife announced their divorce after 27 years of marriage. Shortly after, Buffett resigned from the three-person board at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. "My goals are 100% in sync with those of the foundation, and my physical participation is in no way needed to achieve these goals," Buffett said at the time. Buffett said his gifts to the foundation won't continue after he dies. In a 2022 blog post, Gates said half of the Gates Foundation's resources had come from Buffett's gifts. However, Buffett, who is 93 years old, said recently that his 2006 commitment to the foundation would remain only while he lived. In 2023, he detailed plans for his wealth distribution after his death, leaving it to his three children to disseminate. Buffett made no mention of the Gates Foundation, and The New York Times reported his children have unanimously agreed that none of the remaining Berkshire shares will go to the foundation. Gates has stopped posting as much about Buffett. On his blog, Gates once wrote regularly about Buffett. In 2018, he wrote about how the two friends visited a "fantastic" candy store in Ohama, where Buffett lives and works. In 2019, Gates wrote a post titled "Grilling and chilling with Warren." In 2020, Gates wished Buffet a happy 90th birthday. It included a photo of him holding a cake with Buffett's face on it. But the few posts from 2021 and 2022 that mention Buffett are strictly business. Instead of writing about goofy guys' trips, Gates thanked Buffett for his generous contributions to the Gates Foundation. In 2023, Gates didn't mention Buffett in a single post. And in his 20-plus posts so far in 2024, Gates has only mentioned Buffett once, again focusing solely on philanthropy. Buffett continues to support Gates' charitable work Buffett, who announced in May that he would step down from Berkshire Hathaway at the end of the year, announced on June 27 that he would donate about 12.4 million Class B shares — common stock of a corporation — to five foundations. That's about $6 billion in total. Despite the cooled friendship, the biggest beneficiary of Buffett's donation will be the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, which will receive 9.4 million shares worth about $4.6 billion. Read the original article on Business Insider