J.P.Morgan wary of stablecoin's trillion-dollar growth bets, cuts them by half
(Reuters) -J.P.Morgan on Thursday forecast stablecoin growth will only reach $500 billion by 2028, calling trillion-dollar projections "far too optimistic", as there was little evidence of mainstream adoption of the dollar-pegged cryptocurrency token.
Stablecoins have moved beyond their crypto trading roots to attract interest from fintechs and banks aiming to speed up payments and settlements, drawing attention from U.S. lawmakers, who last month passed the GENIUS Act in the Senate - a step analysts said could bring long-awaited regulatory clarity.
Before the Senate passed the stablecoin bill, Standard Chartered projected the market could reach $2 trillion by 2028, while Bernstein forecast in a June 30 note that supply would grow to about $4 trillion over the next decade.
But J.P.Morgan said payments adoption of stablecoins remains minimal, accounting for just 6% of demand, or about $15 billion. It estimated the stablecoin market at $250 billion, with most usage concentrated in crypto trading, decentralized finance and collateral.
"The idea that stablecoins will replace traditional money for everyday use is still far from reality," the brokerage said.
Stablecoin adoption beyond crypto markets faces hurdles from limited use cases and fragmented regulation, while international uptake remains limited as most countries focus on their own digital currencies or strengthening existing payment systems.
In June, the head of China's central bank pledged to expand the international use of the digital yuan or e-CNY.
Ant Group, an affiliate of e-commerce giant Alibaba, said it plans to apply for a license to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong through its overseas arm Ant International, which operates mobile payment app Alipay.
"Neither the rapid expansion of e-CNY nor the success of Alipay and WeChat Pay represent templates for stablecoin expansion in the future," J.P.Morgan said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
17 minutes ago
House Republican hard-liners defy Trump, Speaker Johnson by crippling crypto measures
In a crippling setback for the Trump administration, House Republicans failed to advance a key procedural vote on a package of legislation including three crypto measures -- a top priority for President Donald Trump. A dozen House Republicans bucked Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson to prevent the legislation from advancing on the floor -- joining the entire Democratic caucus -- and, at least temporarily, freezing activity in the House. The final tally was 196-223. Johnson said that while he anticipated that there may be enough opposition to defeat the effort, he felt that it was "important" to try to advance the bills. Republicans have a narrow majority in the House -- with 220 Republicans compared to 212 Democrats. Johnson said that he will attempt to work with Republican holdouts to answer questions -- though no more votes are planned in the House on Tuesday. The speaker explained that conservatives who voted against the rule want the crypto bills -- CLARITY, GENIUS and Anti CBDC Surveillance Act -- combined into one big package, rather than take separate standalone votes on each measure. "This is the legislative process. We have some members who really, really want to emphasize the House's product," Johnson said. "They want to, want to push that and merge them together. We're trying to work with the White House and with our Senate partners on this. I think everybody is insistent that we're going to do all three, but some of these guys insist that it needs to be all in one package." The intraparty rebellion comes after Trump strongly urged Republicans to vote in favor of advancing the crypto bills. "The GENIUS Act is going to put our Great Nation lightyears ahead of China, Europe, and all others, who are trying endlessly to catch up, but they just can't do it," Trump posted on Truth Social Tuesday. "Digital Assets are the FUTURE, and we are leading by a lot! Get the first Vote done this afternoon (ALL REPUBLICANS SHOULD VOTE YES!)." The no votes came from Reps. Andy Biggs, Tim Burchett, Michael Cloud, Andrew Clyde, Eli Crane, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Andy Harris, Anna Paulina Luna, Scott Perry, Chip Roy, Keith Self and Victoria Spartz. Majority Leader Steve Scalise also changed his vote to "no" to preserve the capability to call the measure back up for another attempted vote. Luna, a Florida Republican, told ABC News that she is "pro-crypto," but voted against the procedural vote because she continues to have concerns about creating a "backdoor" to a Central Bank Digital Currency -- a worry echoed by Greene. "I just voted NO on the Rule for the GENIUS Act because it does not include a ban on Central Bank Digital Currency and because Speaker Johnson did not allow us to submit amendments to the GENIUS Act," Greene, R-Ga., posted on X. "Americans do not want a government-controlled Central Bank Digital Currency. Republicans have a duty to ban CBDC. President Trump included a ban on CBDC in his January 23rd executive order and Congress must also include the ban on CBDC in the GENIUS Act." The vote came during what the White House is calling 'Crypto Week' and marks a rare instance when House Republicans have defied Trump's direction. Trump, who launched his own crypto meme coin earlier this year, recently said he is a "fan of crypto" and called it a "very powerful industry" that the U.S. has "dominated." "I'm president. And what I did do there is build an industry that's very important," Trump said last month. "If we didn't have it, China would." Once a crypto skeptic, , developing not only the $TRUMP meme coin, but also a bitcoin mining firm, a stablecoin firm and a crypto reserve.
USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Elmo and AIDS prevention: What is Congress targeting in their spending cuts?
Senate Republicans are weighing billions of dollars in spending cuts, targeting programs from PBS to global health initiatives, in response to a request from President Donald Trump. The proposal to claw back about $9 billion in federal funding reflects a portion of the cuts pursued by the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly spearheaded by billionaire and ex-adviser Elon Musk. The bill currently under consideration would impact the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS, and foreign aid agencies including the World Health Organization and U.S. Agency for International Development. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he expects the voting process to kick off in the evening of July 15, though a final decision would likely come late July 16 or even early the next day. Lawmakers have until July 18 before Trump's request officially expires and current funding remains in place. "I'm hopeful we'll have the opportunity to get on that bill and to do something meaningful when it comes to reducing the size and scope of the federal government, particularly in areas of our government where we know there is waste, fraud and abuse," Thune said in a press conference July 15. This new push for spending reductions comes on the heels of Congress' "big, beautiful bill" saga. Trump's sweeping tax, spending and policy package squeaked through the legislature just ahead of his self-imposed July 4 deadline. Broadcasting services squeezed Republican lawmakers are looking at codifying a sliver of the almost $200 billion DOGE claims to have saved the federal government. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought said the amounts being slashed represent "wasteful and unnecessary spending," in the White House's formal request to Congress. That includes stripping a little more than $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Trump has set his sights on their recipient outlets NPR and PBS, accusing both of unfair news coverage. If Congress moves ahead on these cuts, local stations are expected to bear the brunt of lost funding. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-South Dakota, had originally withheld support for the bill over the impact on public broadcasting, but he announced his change of mind July 15, after he said an agreement was reached to protect tribal broadcast services in his home state. Bulk of cuts hit foreign aid The legislation predominantly proposes cuts to foreign aid, including international peacekeeping efforts and certain global health initiatives. The Senate is set to remove one of the most controversial targets, though. Republicans including Sen. Susan Collins of Maine had criticized proposed rescissions for global AIDS prevention programs. Thune said Tuesday they plan to remove that $400 million cut, bringing the bill's total savings from $9.4 billion down to $9 billion and likely clearing one of the biggest hurdles for the upper chamber. "We hope that if we can get this across the finish line in the Senate that the House would accept that one small modification," Thune said. When will Congress move on the cuts? Some lower chamber lawmakers are already grumbling about the possibility of receiving a diluted version of the bill. Rep. Ralph Norman, R-South Carolina, told Politico he will not agree to "a penny less" than what the House originally approved back in June. Meanwhile, some Republican senators began the week saying they were still in search of details from the White House regarding exactly which programs and accounts would be touched before they could confidently back the bill. "It's important that we succeed on this package, because I hope this is just a warm up for what should be tens of billions of dollars worth of rescissions," Thom Tillis said July 15. "I think we need to get it right." Vought joined Senate Republicans for lunch later that day, and during that meeting Sen. John Hoeven R-North Dakota, said the OMB director provided more information about where cuts would be made. "Now, whether that meets the specificity that some members have asked for, I'm not sure," Hoeven told reporters. Vought, coming out of his lunch with lawmakers, said besides the AIDS prevention program exception, the bill is continuing on intact. "I think everyone involved wants a successful result," Vought said, adding. "We'll focus on the Senate right now, then we'll focus on it going back to the House."
Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Johnson breaks with Trump, calls for DOJ to release Epstein files
Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will bring the first procedural vote to the floor Tuesday on the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in spending. It's not clear he has even the 51 votes necessary to start debate on the package. Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon. 'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.' The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program. It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.' Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP. Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act. 'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.' It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version. MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week. But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland. Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair. What else we're watching: — Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case. — Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess. — Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning. Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.
