logo
Elmo and AIDS prevention: What is Congress targeting in their spending cuts?

Elmo and AIDS prevention: What is Congress targeting in their spending cuts?

USA Today2 days ago
Senate Republicans are weighing billions of dollars in spending cuts, targeting programs from PBS to global health initiatives, in response to a request from President Donald Trump.
The proposal to claw back about $9 billion in federal funding reflects a portion of the cuts pursued by the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly spearheaded by billionaire and ex-adviser Elon Musk.
The bill currently under consideration would impact the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS, and foreign aid agencies including the World Health Organization and U.S. Agency for International Development.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he expects the voting process to kick off in the evening of July 15, though a final decision would likely come late July 16 or even early the next day. Lawmakers have until July 18 before Trump's request officially expires and current funding remains in place.
"I'm hopeful we'll have the opportunity to get on that bill and to do something meaningful when it comes to reducing the size and scope of the federal government, particularly in areas of our government where we know there is waste, fraud and abuse," Thune said in a press conference July 15.
This new push for spending reductions comes on the heels of Congress' "big, beautiful bill" saga. Trump's sweeping tax, spending and policy package squeaked through the legislature just ahead of his self-imposed July 4 deadline.
Broadcasting services squeezed
Republican lawmakers are looking at codifying a sliver of the almost $200 billion DOGE claims to have saved the federal government.
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought said the amounts being slashed represent "wasteful and unnecessary spending," in the White House's formal request to Congress.
That includes stripping a little more than $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Trump has set his sights on their recipient outlets NPR and PBS, accusing both of unfair news coverage.
If Congress moves ahead on these cuts, local stations are expected to bear the brunt of lost funding.
Sen. Mike Rounds, R-South Dakota, had originally withheld support for the bill over the impact on public broadcasting, but he announced his change of mind July 15, after he said an agreement was reached to protect tribal broadcast services in his home state.
Bulk of cuts hit foreign aid
The legislation predominantly proposes cuts to foreign aid, including international peacekeeping efforts and certain global health initiatives.
The Senate is set to remove one of the most controversial targets, though.
Republicans including Sen. Susan Collins of Maine had criticized proposed rescissions for global AIDS prevention programs. Thune said Tuesday they plan to remove that $400 million cut, bringing the bill's total savings from $9.4 billion down to $9 billion and likely clearing one of the biggest hurdles for the upper chamber.
"We hope that if we can get this across the finish line in the Senate that the House would accept that one small modification," Thune said.
When will Congress move on the cuts?
Some lower chamber lawmakers are already grumbling about the possibility of receiving a diluted version of the bill.
Rep. Ralph Norman, R-South Carolina, told Politico he will not agree to "a penny less" than what the House originally approved back in June.
Meanwhile, some Republican senators began the week saying they were still in search of details from the White House regarding exactly which programs and accounts would be touched before they could confidently back the bill.
"It's important that we succeed on this package, because I hope this is just a warm up for what should be tens of billions of dollars worth of rescissions," Thom Tillis said July 15. "I think we need to get it right."
Vought joined Senate Republicans for lunch later that day, and during that meeting Sen. John Hoeven R-North Dakota, said the OMB director provided more information about where cuts would be made.
"Now, whether that meets the specificity that some members have asked for, I'm not sure," Hoeven told reporters.
Vought, coming out of his lunch with lawmakers, said besides the AIDS prevention program exception, the bill is continuing on intact.
"I think everyone involved wants a successful result," Vought said, adding. "We'll focus on the Senate right now, then we'll focus on it going back to the House."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The House is poised to OK Trump's $9 billion cut to public broadcasting and foreign aid
The House is poised to OK Trump's $9 billion cut to public broadcasting and foreign aid

Associated Press

timea few seconds ago

  • Associated Press

The House is poised to OK Trump's $9 billion cut to public broadcasting and foreign aid

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House is expected late Thursday to approve President Donald Trump's request to claw back about $9 billion for public broadcasting and foreign aid as Republicans target institutions and programs they view as bloated or out of step with their agenda. The White House had described the package as a test case and said that if Congress went along, more would come. The House's approval would mark the first time in decades that a president has successfully submitted such a rescissions request to Congress, and even then the results were more mixed. Unlike other presidents, Trump is getting nearly all the cuts he requested. Opponents voiced concerns not only about the programs targeted, but about Congress ceding its spending powers to the executive branch as investments approved on a bipartisan basis are being subsequently canceled on party-line votes. No Democrats supported the measure when it passed the Senate, 51-48, in the early morning hours Thursday. Two Republicans also voted no. 'We need to get back to fiscal sanity and this is an important step,' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters. The package cancels about $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and nearly $8 billion for a variety of foreign aid programs, many designed to help countries where drought, disease and political unrest endure. The effort to claw back a sliver of federal spending comes just weeks after Republicans also muscled through Trump's tax and spending cut bill without any Democratic support. The Congressional Budget Office has projected that measure will increase the U.S. debt by about $3.3 trillion over the coming decade. A heavy blow to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting The cancellation of $1.1 billion for the CPR represents the full amount it is due to receive during the next two budget years. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service to support national programming. Democrats were unsuccessful in restoring in the Senate. Lawmakers with large rural constituencies have voiced particular concern about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in their state. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., said Tuesday that the stations are 'not just your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your volcano alert.' Less than a day later, as the Senate debated the bill, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck off the remote Alaska Peninsula, triggering tsunami warnings on local public broadcasting stations that advised people to get to higher ground. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he secured a deal from the White House that some money administered by the Interior Department would be repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in about a dozen states. But Kate Riley, president and CEO of America's Public Television Stations, a network of locally owned and operated stations, said that deal was 'at best a short-term, half-measure that will still result in cuts and reduced service at the stations it purports to save.' Inside the cuts to foreign aid Among the foreign aid cuts are $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and family reunification for refugees and $496 million to provide food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. There also is a $4.15 billion cut for programs that aim to boost economies and democratic institutions in developing nations. Democrats argued that the Republican administration's animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill. Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said the amount it takes to save a starving child or prevent the transmission of disease is minuscule, even as the investments secure cooperation with the U.S. on other issues. The cuts made to foreign aid programs through Trump's Department of Government Efficiency were having life-and-death consequences around the world, he said. 'People are dying right now, not in spite of us but because of us,' Schatz said. 'We are causing death.' After objections from several Republicans, GOP leaders took out a $400 million cut to PEPFAR, a politically popular program to combat HIV/AIDS that is credited with saving millions of lives since its creation under Republican President George W. Bush. Looking ahead to future spending fights Democrats say the bill upends a legislative process that typically requires lawmakers from both parties to work together to fund the nation's priorities. Triggered by the official rescissions request from the White House, the legislation only needs a simple majority vote to advance instead of the 60 votes usually required to break a filibuster. That meant Republicans could use their 53-47 majority to pass it along party lines. In the end, two Republican senators, Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, joined with Democrats in voting against the bill, though a few other Republicans also raised concerns about the process. 'Let's not make a habit of this,' said Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who voted for the bill but said he was wary that the White House wasn't providing enough information on what exactly will be cut. Russ Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, said the imminent successful passage of the rescissions shows 'enthusiasm' for getting the nation's fiscal situation under control. 'We're happy to go to great lengths to get this thing done,' he said during a breakfast with reporters hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. In response to questions about the relatively small size of the cuts -- $9 billion -- Vought said that was because 'I knew it would be hard' to pass in Congress. Vought said another rescissions package is 'likely to come soon.' 'But we're not there yet,' he said. ___ Associated Press writers Becky Bohrer in Juneau, Alaska, and Seung Min Kim contributed to this report.

Paxton Threatens to Arrest Democrats If They Flee Texas
Paxton Threatens to Arrest Democrats If They Flee Texas

Bloomberg

timea minute ago

  • Bloomberg

Paxton Threatens to Arrest Democrats If They Flee Texas

By Updated on Save Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton threatened to arrest state Democrats who obstruct plans to draw new congressional maps, raising the stakes for a controversial effort backed by President Donald Trump as a way of protecting the slim Republican majority in the US House of Representatives. Paxton, a firebrand Republican running for the US Senate, warned lawmakers not to leave Texas ahead of a special legislative session next week after national Democratic leaders encouraged state representatives to resist the plan. If enough Democrats flee, the legislature would be short of the minimum number of lawmakers required for a vote — a move that Democrats have unsuccessfully tried in recent years to block legislation.

PepsiCo Reaches for Protein and Fiber to Boost Sales
PepsiCo Reaches for Protein and Fiber to Boost Sales

New York Times

timea minute ago

  • New York Times

PepsiCo Reaches for Protein and Fiber to Boost Sales

High-protein Cheetos? Doritos with added fiber? The snack and beverage giant PepsiCo said it planned to offer healthier, or cleaner, versions of some of the company's popular chip and drink brands and add protein or fiber to them, which consumers are increasingly seeking, executives told Wall Street analysts and investors on an earnings call on Thursday morning. 'Protein is clearly a sub-segment in the food and beverage category that is growing fast,' Ramon Laguarta, the chief executive of PepsiCo, said. 'Consumers are adopting protein solutions in their diet at a pace that was not the case a few months or years back. We're trying to offer the consumer solutions. Not small solutions, but big solutions with some of our big brands.' The company didn't offer specifics on which snacks or beverages might be made with additional protein or fiber, but hinted they would most likely first appear in some beverages and Quaker snacks. It said it was in the midst of relaunching two of its big brands, Lay's and Tostitos, with no artificial colors or flavors by the end of this year. PepsiCo also plans to introduce a line of Cheetos and Doritos with no artificial colors or flavors in the future, the company said. The company highlighted the success it has seen globally in its sugar-free colas and other beverages. The heightened focus on healthier or more functional snacks and beverages comes as consumers are increasingly seeking out those types of products and as the Trump Administration is applying pressure on companies to move away from artificial colors and toward more natural ingredients. Late Wednesday, President Trump posted on social media that Coca-Cola had agreed to switch to real cane sugar in its drinks sold in the United States. Coke, which currently sweetens its beverages in the United States largely with high-fructose corn syrup, did not say whether it had agreed to the change or not. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store