NEPRA cuts basic power tariff by Rs1.15/unit
Nepra has issued its decision to reduce the basic price of electricity for the entire country. As per the decision, the maximum tariff for domestic consumers will be Rs47.69 per unit. However, the tariff for domestic lifeline consumers, using up to 50 units per month has been maintained at Rs3.95 per unit.
According to the Nepra notification, tariff for lifeline consumers, using 51 to 100 units per month, is Rs7.74.
A rate of Rs10.54 per unit has been approved for protected domestic consumers using 1-100 units and Rs13.01 for protected domestic consumers, using 101-200 units.
For the non-protected domestic consumers, Nepra fixed the tariff at Rs22.44 for 1-100 units per-month category; Rs28.91 for 101-200 units; Rs33.10 for 201-300 units; Rs37.99 for 301-400 units; Rs40.20 for 401-500 units; Rs41.62 for 501-600 units; Rs42.76 for 601-700 units and Rs47.69 for above 700 units.
According to officials, Nepra has sent its recommendations to the federal government for the implementation of the new rates. After the approval of the Nepra recommendations, the government would announce the reduction of the power tariff, they added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
NEPRA cuts basic power tariff by Rs1.15/unit
The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) has decided to reduce power tariff by Rs1.15 per unit, offering a big relief to consumers, using 100 to 500 units per month, according to a notification sent to the government for final approval and implementation. Nepra has issued its decision to reduce the basic price of electricity for the entire country. As per the decision, the maximum tariff for domestic consumers will be Rs47.69 per unit. However, the tariff for domestic lifeline consumers, using up to 50 units per month has been maintained at Rs3.95 per unit. According to the Nepra notification, tariff for lifeline consumers, using 51 to 100 units per month, is Rs7.74. A rate of Rs10.54 per unit has been approved for protected domestic consumers using 1-100 units and Rs13.01 for protected domestic consumers, using 101-200 units. For the non-protected domestic consumers, Nepra fixed the tariff at Rs22.44 for 1-100 units per-month category; Rs28.91 for 101-200 units; Rs33.10 for 201-300 units; Rs37.99 for 301-400 units; Rs40.20 for 401-500 units; Rs41.62 for 501-600 units; Rs42.76 for 601-700 units and Rs47.69 for above 700 units. According to officials, Nepra has sent its recommendations to the federal government for the implementation of the new rates. After the approval of the Nepra recommendations, the government would announce the reduction of the power tariff, they added.
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Nepra rejects govt plea to apply revised SoT to KE
ISLAMABAD: National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) has turned down the federal government's plea to apply a revised uniform Schedule of Tariff (SoT) to K-Electric (KE), based on the previously determined tariff for the January–March 2023 quarter— a move likely to frustrate the Power Division. Nepra's decision was revealed in a determination issued on Tuesday, which outlines a revised average uniform SoT of Rs 31.59/kWh for both power Distribution Companies (Discos) and K-Electric for the fiscal year 2025–26. This rate marks a reduction from the earlier Rs 32.73/kWh (excluding duties and taxes), reflecting an average decrease of Rs 1.14/kWh after factoring in a budgeted Tariff Differential Subsidy (TDS) of Rs 250 billion for FY 2025–26. In its formal request (Motion for Leave), the Power Division argued that under government policy, a uniform consumer-end tariff should be maintained across K-Electric and state-owned Discos— even post-privatisation— through a mix of direct and indirect subsidies. To achieve this, the KE tariff should be modified to align with Nepra's approved national uniform tariff structure, incorporating the proposed targeted and cross subsidies. DISCOs and KE: Nepra approves revised average uniform SoT The Power Division also referenced legal provisions— Section 7, 31(4), and 31(7) of the NEPRA Act and Rule 17 of the relevant rules— supporting its appeal for revised consumer-end tariff recommendations for K-Electric, to be effective from July 1, 2025. The motion included a request to update the SoT via an amendment to SRO No. 575(1)/ 2019. During the hearing, K-Electric's Director of Finance Ayaz Jaffer urged Nepra to use KE's most recent tariff (determined on May 27, 2025) instead of the older Jan–Mar 2023 rates to establish the uniform tariff. However, Naveed Qaiser of the Power Planning and Monitoring Company (PPMC) opposed the suggestion, pointing out that the federal government has already filed a review petition against the newer KE tariff determination. Therefore, he argued, the Jan–Mar 2023 tariff should be treated as the valid benchmark. The Authority said it understands that it determines revenue requirement/ tariff for Discos for each year. Ultimately, Nepra decided not to accommodate the Power Division's request. In its official determination, the regulator stated that despite the federal government's plea to use the Jan–Mar 2023 KE tariff as the basis for a uniform SoT, it opted to apply the rates from KE's latest approved tariff for FY 2023–24, as issued on May 27, 2025. Nepra announced a reduction in the uniform average tariff from Rs 35.50/kWh to Rs 34/kWh, indicating an overall decrease of Rs 1.50 per unit. The revised SoT for consumers will be as follows: (i) up to 50 units– lifeline (Rs 3.95/kWh;(ii) 51-100 units- lifeline Rs 7.74/kWh;(iii) 0-100 (protected) Rs 10.51/kWh;(iv) 101-200 (protected)Rs 13.01 /kWh; (v) 01-100(non-protected) Rs 22.44/kWh; (vi) 101-200(non-protected) Rs 28.91/kWh;(vii) 201-300(non-protected Rs 33.10/ kWh; and (viii) 300 & ToU (non-protected) Rs 41.78/kWh. Average uniform domestic tariff will be Rs 27.20/kWh with reduction of Rs 1.13/Kwh from 28.33/kWh. New commercial tariff has been fixed at Rs 45.43 per unit with a reduction of Rs 1.15/Kwh, general services, Rs 43.17/kWh, industrial Rs 33.48/kWh, Bulk Rs 41.76/kWh, agricultural Rs 30.75/kWh, others Rs 32.68/kWh. According to Nepra, total number of electricity consumers is 37,994,210 who are projected to consume 103,558/MkWh. The average tariff has been reduced to Rs 31.59/kWh for FY 2025-26 from Rs 32.73/kWh through re-basing. Power Division explained that capacity charges have been reduced by Rs.186 billion, despite additional impact of Rs.50 billion capacity charges of Jamshoro Coal Plant, as compared to the reference capacity charges for the FY 2024-25. This reduction is mainly on account of termination/ re-negotiations of IPP contracts and change in exchange rate assumption. The Authority also observed that the petitioner in its Motion and also during the hearing submitted that inter-disco tariff rationalisation is not aimed at raising any revenues for the federal government as it is within the determined consolidated revenue requirement of all the Discos for the FY 2025-26; rather the federal government would be providing a subsidy of Rs.249 billion to different consumer categories during the period. The Uniform Tariff so determined by the Authority includes impact of PYA of Rs.58.68 billion, to be passed on in a period of twelve months from the date of notification of the decision. It was further stated that there is no anomaly in the current industrial tariff structure as the total cost of B4— inclusive of both fixed and variable charges—is actually lower than B3, which is again lower than B2. This reflects the benefit of losses for consumers connected at high tension (HT) lines, as opposed to industrial consumers on low tension (LT) lines. It was explained that ToU (Time-of-Use) pricing plays a critical role in maintaining power system stability and economic efficiency. Peak hours are strategically designated to curb demand during periods of high system stress when marginal generation costs are at their highest. However, lowering the peak rate would necessitate an upward adjustment of the off-peak rate to meet the system's annual revenue requirement. This could disproportionately burden smaller industrial consumers and potentially reduce overall electricity sales, thereby exacerbating the revenue shortfall and contributing to further upward pressure on tariffs. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
The Future of Sustainable Logistics
TEXT: Electric vehicles (EVs) aren't a new innovation, they're a revival of a technology that once led the way. By 1900, electric cars accounted for over 30% of all vehicles on the road. Early pioneers like Ferdinand Porsche and Mercedes-Benz were already exploring electric and hybrid concepts, with Porsche's 1898 'P1'model and the 1906 Mercedes Mixte showcasing remarkable foresight. In urban centers, EVs quickly gained traction thanks to their quiet performance and user-friendly designoffering a sharp contrast to the noisy, maintenance-heavy gasoline engines of the era. A 1917 photograph from the UK, depicting electric trucks lined up for charging, captures this early momentum. It's a visual testament to how commercial electric transport was already thriving over a hundred years ago. However, by the 1920s, the dominance of EVs waned. The mass production techniques pioneered by Henry Ford and the widespread availability of cheap gasoline shifted the automotive landscape in favor of internal combustion engines. Today, with the rise of advanced battery technologies and the urgent need for climate-conscious solutions, EVs are staging not a debutbut a remarkable return. We're not inventing the future of transport, we're reawakening it, with more power, purpose, and potential than ever before. Yet the EV journey is more complex than it seems. While we are witnessing a long-overdue revival of electric mobility with roots reaching back over a century today's adoption brings its own set of challenges. As the global focus shifts towards greener technologies, electric vehicles have emerged as the frontrunners in the race for sustainable transportation. However, growing concerns suggest that the EV boom might not be as enduring or universally beneficial as hoped. In regions where electricity production is still heavily fossil-fuel dependent, the true environmental advantage of EVs is called into question. The EV Dilemma: A Partial Solution: Electric cargo trucks have garnered significant attention for their potential to reduce emissions and improve urban air quality. However, their sustainability is somewhat compromised by the fact that much of the world's electricity is still generated from fossil fuels. In Pakistan, approximately 59% of electricity is produced from fossil fuels. According to the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority's (NEPRA) 2022 yearly report, Pakistan's total installed power generation capacity is 43,775 MW, with 59% of energy coming from thermal (fossil fuels), 25% from hydro, 7% from renewable sources (wind, solar, and biomass), and 9% from nuclear. This heavy reliance on fossil fuels means that the environmental benefits of EV trucks are mitigated by the carbon footprint of the energy used to charge them. Currently, Pakistan's EV charging infrastructure is underdeveloped. The country has only a handful of EV charging stations, which are insufficient to support widespread adoption. Expanding this network would require substantial investment and development, which presents a significant challenge given the existing constraints of the national grid. For short-haul operations, EVs are indeed suitable. Their lower operating costs and reduced emissions make them a compelling option for urban and regional deliveries where distances are manageable. However, for long-haul trucking, especially in large countries like China, Pakistan, the USA, the European Union, India, and Russiawhere trucks frequently travel over 1,500 kilometres in one directionEVs face significant limitations. The current range of most electric trucks, typically 200-300 miles per charge, is insufficient for long-distance routes without frequent and lengthy recharging stops. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Trucks: A Cleaner, More Practical Alternative: Hydrogen fuel cell trucks present an exciting and highly viable alternative to battery-electric vehicles. Unlike EVs, these trucks powered by fuel cells that generate electricity through a chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen, emitting only water vapor as a byproduct. This makes them a zero-emission option that does not rely on the electricity grid. One of their biggest advantages lies in infrastructure adaptability. Hydrogen refueling stations can be established by modifying existing fuel station setups, requiring far less investment than the wide-scale rollout of EV charging networks. On the road, hydrogen trucks shine in range and refuelling efficiency. They can travel up to 500 miles on a full tank—outpacing most electric trucks that typically manage 200–300 miles per charge. Even more promising is the future cost trajectory: hydrogen production currently averages $3–$5 per kilogram, but is projected to fall to $1.50/kg by 2030, making it comparable to the electricity costs for EVs. Take, for example, Nikola's Class 8 Tre fuel cell electric truck. In trials, it achieved 8.13 miles per kilogram of hydrogen, exceeding expectations of 7.1–7.2 miles/kg. With five 14-kg tanks (totalling 70 kg), it delivers approximately 500 usable miles per fill. Its average refuelling time of 22.2 minutesjust slightly longer than a diesel fill-upvastly outpaces EV charging times for heavy-duty vehicles. Operational efficiency is also impressive: overall uptime reached 95.4%, factoring in both vehicle and station availability, with the trucks alone logging 92.9% uptime. Now consider the local context. In Pakistan, commercial electricity costs average $0.157 per kWh. Given that heavy-duty EV trucks typically consume around 3.2 kWh per kilometer, the operational cost works out to approximately $0.50/kmsignificantly higher than ($0.21/km) what hydrogen fuel cell vehicles could potentially achieve as hydrogen prices fall. Pros and Cons of EV Trucks: Pros and Cons of Hydrogen Trucks : Pakistan's Road Network and Truck Demand: Pakistan boasts a road network that spans over 264,000 kilometres, with an increasing demand for efficient cargo transport solutions. The trucking industry is a crucial component of the national economy, with over 300,000 trucks currently operating. The demand (approx. over 50,000 units) for trucks is projected to grow due to increasing trade and infrastructure development. The Path Forward: Sustainable Logistics for Pakistan: For Pakistan, hydrogen fuel cell trucks aren't just an innovation they're a smart, strategic leap forward in logistics. By leveraging existing fuel station infrastructure and offering greater range with faster refueling, hydrogen technology provides a practical answer to real operational needs. Investing in this next-generation energy source aligns with Pakistan's sustainability vision, building a more resilient and future-proof supply chain. But it doesn't stop there. It will also act as a catalyst for economic growth drawing international investment into hydrogen generation plants and fuelling infrastructure, while simultaneously attracting global cargo vehicle manufacturers to establish local assembly plants. This convergence of clean tech and industrial development will help the country meet future transport demands in a smarter, more scalable way. As global logistics shifts gears toward cleaner alternatives, hydrogen-powered fleets could be the defining move that helps Pakistanand other emerging economies balance environmental responsibility with industrial progress. AnwaarNizami, Chief Executive Officer DSV Solutions and Road Pakistan Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
