&w=3840&q=100)
Maha govt owes ₹89,000 cr to contractors, 500K await dues since July 2023
Milind Bhosale, president of the Maharashtra State Contractor Mahasangh, told PTI that the protest was organised in coordination with two other bodies — the Builders Association of India and the Maharashtra State Engineers Forum. These three organisations have jointly made representations to the state government seeking prompt disbursal of the overdue payments.
Dues pending since July last year
The pending payments relate to a wide range of government-commissioned projects, including road construction and repairs, building maintenance, and relief and rehabilitation work. Bhosale said that the dues have been outstanding since July 2023.
'A total of 500,000 contractors are yet to receive the promised payments even after delivering on the work,' he said. The unpaid amounts range from ₹1 lakh to ₹20 crore per contractor or entity.
The prolonged delay in payments has put enormous financial pressure on contractors, Bhosale said, adding that many have been unable to clear dues to their suppliers and pay salaries to employees.
'This is leading to a lot of stress for all of us. We have not been able to pay our suppliers and employees, which is bound to impact the overall economic growth in the state,' he told PTI.
Work orders surged before polls
According to Bhosale, the volume of development work announced during FY24 rose tenfold. With Assembly elections scheduled for October 2024, the government had also issued a large number of work orders.
"One budget and two supplementary demands have been presented, but our dues continue to be pending," he said, questioning the rationale behind initiating projects without ensuring adequate financial provisioning.
He pointed out that, under standard procedure, payments are to be released quarterly in accordance with predefined milestones — a timeline the government has failed to follow.
'Ladki Bahin' scheme continues despite crunch
Bhosale criticised the state for continuing with other big-ticket expenditures like the Ladki Bahin Yojana, for which ₹36,000 crore has been allocated in the FY26 budget, even as contractor payments remain stalled.
'Contractors and small enterprises are the second biggest sector in Maharashtra after agriculture. Dozens of people are linked to every entity, and not paying us will have a deep economic impact,' he said.
He said the associations have reached out to a few ministers, including Girish Mahajan, but have so far been unable to secure a meeting with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to resolve the issue.
(With agency inputs)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Manufacturing setback: India's electronics sector faces twin blow from import curbs on gold compounds, rare earths; industry warns of supply disruption
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. India's electronics manufacturing industry is grappling with mounting pressure as recent restrictions on gold compound imports have compounded the sector's ongoing struggle with China's export curbs on rare earth magnets. As per news agency PTI, industry groups have warned that the dual hit could disrupt production lines, delay investments, and weaken India's push for electronics self-reliance under schemes like Make in India and PLI. Gold compounds, especially Potassium Gold Cyanide, are essential in manufacturing high-end electronic components such as semiconductors, printed circuit boards, and connectors, due to their superior conductivity. However, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), in a June 17 order, moved these imports from the 'free' to the 'restricted' category. According to the India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA), the sudden policy shift has caused 'uncertainty in ongoing efforts to scale up electronics manufacturing,' especially in sub-assemblies that rely on gold-based plating materials. 'This unpredictability could deter investment,' ICEA chairman Pankaj Mohindroo warned in a letter to the ministry of electronics and IT, reported news agency PTI. Echoing these concerns, Elcina secretary general Rajoo Goel said customs authorities have begun holding consignments of gold-based compounds, resulting in 'significant delays to production lines.' He emphasised that these materials are used strictly for manufacturing, not bullion trading, and in trace amounts only. Elcina cautioned that such import hurdles threaten the objectives of the Electronics Component Manufacturing Scheme (ECMS), PLI, and SPECS. 'The import restriction will adversely impact the ease of doing business for component manufacturers,' the body said. This challenge comes on top of China's export curbs on rare earth elements like terbium and dysprosium, key for manufacturing NdFeB magnets used in electronics, EVs, and wind turbines. As per PTI, over 21,000 jobs are at risk in Noida and South India's audio electronics segment alone due to these restrictions. Moreover, electronics firms face delays in importing specialised capital goods from China, with companies like iPhone-maker Foxconn recently forced to withdraw Chinese engineers from its Tamil Nadu facility, affecting production schedules. According to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), China's export restrictions now extend to gallium, germanium, graphite, and other critical minerals. GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava said these moves expose India's deep strategic vulnerabilities and urged the government to launch reverse-engineering initiatives to cut reliance on Chinese inputs. 'India must act swiftly to reduce Chinese import dependence,' Srivastava said, calling for industrial labs to develop local substitutes for top imported products. With imports from China rising and exports falling, India's trade deficit with Beijing has widened to $100 billion in FY25. Over 80 per cent of India's needs in laptops, solar panels, antibiotics, and lithium-ion batteries continue to be met by Chinese firms. As the sector calls for urgent government intervention, the electronics industry warns that unless bottlenecks around raw materials and capital goods are cleared, India's ambitions of becoming a global electronics manufacturing hub could face serious setbacks. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
BIT network expansion in fast lane: India in talks with 12+ nations; Saudi Arabia, Russia among priority partners
AI image India is actively negotiating bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with more than a dozen countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel, Oman, the European Union, Switzerland, Russia, and Australia, a senior government official said. Talks are also underway with Tajikistan, Cambodia, Uruguay, Maldives, Switzerland, and Kuwait, with some treaties likely to be finalised and announced in the next 3–6 months, PTI reported. These agreements are aimed at protecting and promoting investments in each other's countries. As India moves toward becoming the world's third-largest economy and a global manufacturing hub, the government is working to strengthen its investment regime and attract more foreign investors. In line with this, the government announced in the last Budget that it would revamp its current model BIT to make it more investor-friendly. India signed BITs with two countries in 2024 and implemented BITs with the UAE and Uzbekistan in 2023. Unlike investment facilitation chapters in free trade agreements, BITs offer broader investor protections, including a wide range of obligations enforceable by international arbitration. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Искате да научите повече за новото BMW 2 Gran Coupe? BMW Научете повече Undo Notably, India has a provision requiring foreign investors to exhaust local legal remedies before seeking international arbitration — a clause designed to protect public funds and reduce legal costs. Under the India-UAE BIT signed this year, the mandatory waiting period for local remedies was shortened from five years to three, indicating a flexible yet cautious approach. "India remains committed to negotiating agreements that safeguard its economic interests while balancing investor confidence and domestic policy space," another government official said, quoted PTI. The broader goal is to rebuild India's BIT ecosystem to pre-2015 levels but on modernised terms. India is seeking a balance of interests between investors and host state obligations while aligning with global protection standards to offer a stable framework for foreign capital. Deloitte India economist Rumki Majumdar said BITs give India the opportunity to pursue tailored partnerships based on complementary strengths, without the compromise typically required in multilateral deals. 'Bilateral treaties will allow India for case-by-case negotiation, ensuring that the terms reflect the specific economic complementarities between itself and its partner countries,' she said. Majumdar also emphasised that BITs should not be treated as mere legal tools but as 'strategic economic enablers' to unlock greater value from India's competitive and comparative advantages. According to the Economic Survey 2024–25, India must 'pull out all the stops' to improve tax certainty and regulatory stability if it is to boost FDI inflows. Foreign direct investment into India crossed the $1 trillion mark in the April 2000–March 2025 period, reinforcing its image as a safe and attractive global investment destination. In FY25 alone, FDI stood at $81 billion. Mauritius accounted for 25% of the inflows, followed by Singapore (24%), the US (10%), the Netherlands (7%), Japan (6%), the UK (5%), and the UAE (3%). Germany, Cyprus, and the Cayman Islands accounted for 2% each. The sectors drawing the most FDI included services, computer software and hardware, telecom, trading, construction development, automobiles, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'No requirement': Centre after news agency Reuters' X account witheld in India
The Centre has responded to social media platform X blocking the account of news agency Reuters in India, saying that it is a mistake on the part of the Elon Musk-owned company. The government had legally demanded the withholding of the Reuters X account and several others during Operation Sindoor in May(X) 'There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem,' a government spokesperson said. The government has asked X to explain the ban and has asked the company to reverse it Sources quoted in a PTI news agency report said the government had legally demanded the withholding of the Reuters X account and several others during Operation Sindoor in May. While many were withheld, Reuters remained accessible. The social media giant seems to have acted on that request and blocked Reuters' X handle in India. Since the issue isn't relevant now, the government has asked X to explain the blocking and lift the embargo. "An order was issued on May 7 (during Operation Sindoor) but it was not enforced. X seems to have enforced that order now which is a mistake on their part. Government has reached out to X for resolving it at the earliest," PTI quoted an official source as saying. Are all Reuters handles withheld in India? Reuters's official X handle, along with Reuters World, remains inaccessible in India, while all the affiliated handles on the social media platform, such as Reuters Tech News, Reuters Fact Check, Reuters Asia, and Reuters China, can be accessed. X users attempting to access the main account can see a message that reads: "Account withheld. @ Reuters has been withheld in IN in response to a legal demand." The social media company has an explainer about such messages on its help center page titled "About country withheld content". The message means X was compelled to withhold the entire account specified or posts in response to a valid legal demand, such as a court order or local laws.