$30,000 EV change from tomorrow despite desperate pleas: 'Worst possible time'
It helped shave tens of thousands of dollars off the cost of buying a PHEV, and, despite its success, the government has committed to ending it on Tuesday, April 1. CarExpert.com.au founder Paul Maric told Yahoo Finance that PHEVs had become the perfect middle ground between ICE cars and EVs.
"People are switching away from electric vehicles to plug-in hybrids," he said.
Electric car drivers lose out in Coalition's $6 billion plan to lower petrol prices: 'Save $700 per year'
Rare $1 coin worth up to $3,000: 'Crazy errors'
Centrelink blow for millions on JobSeeker, Age Pension as federal budget denies cash boost
"It's the worst time possible for this kind of thing because the people just don't want to buy electric vehicles and they're going to be removing the only real subsidy that is currently sort of gaining traction."
Research released in October showed that 61 per cent of PHEV owners bought their cars specifically because of the FBT exemption.
Additionally, 90 per cent said the tax break made a "big difference" in their decision.The data from the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association also found PHEVs were the perfect "stepping stone" between an ICE and a battery-powered electric vehicle (BEV).
It's because PHEVs gave drivers the best of both worlds.
They can use petrol on longer journeys where they might have range anxiety or worries about where the next charger might be, and then they can switch to the battery for short trips.
That's why Maric said it was such a shame that the FBT exemption was being dumped tomorrow.
"When you do the sums on it, you can actually go down the path of buying a $20,000 to $30,000 more expensive electric vehicle and still have it cost the same as a cheaper vehicle once you take into account the tax benefits that you get out of it," he told Yahoo Finance.
Several peak industry bodies begged for the FBT exemption to be extended well beyond April 1 as the electric car sector continued to find its feet in the market.
They're worried that removing incentives will cause more people to stick with or switch back to an ICE vehicle.
"We know the FBT exemption is an important tool that is helping more Australians afford and access the latest EVs," Electric Vehicle Council policy head Aman Gaur said.
PHEVs have been growing in popularity, according to the Australian Automobile Association, with 7,556 sales in the December quarter, compared to 4,476 a year earlier.
However, BEVs have stagnated.
There were 21,331 sales in the last three months of 2024, compared to 21,474 in 2023's December quarter.
National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association chief executive Rohan Martin said removing the tax cut was a "lost opportunity".
"Once the bulk of people move into a plug-in hybrid, they're on their electrification journey," he said.
Back in October, the government revealed that PHEVs would no longer be considered "a zero or low emissions vehicle" under FBT law and therefore wouldn't be "eligible for the electric cars exemption".
The only people who will be exempt from this change will be those who continue to have a "financially binding commitment" that was in place before the April 1 deadline.
That type of commitment is what's known as a novated lease.
There are a few ways to ensure that the FBT can still apply to you after April 1:
Optional extensions to your agreement, but it has to be for a pre-determined period of time.
Breaks in novation agreements, however, the car cannot be used or available for personal use during that time off
Changes to the financial obligations under the lease, which include alterations to lease payments or the residual value of the car
Changed employer for FBT purposes, as that results in a new commitment to the application or availability of the car by the new employer
Other changes in the pre-existing commitment for your PHEV on or after April 1, then the FBT exemption will no longer apply.
Ending the exemption means car owners will likely have to fork out more for their payments, and their balloon payment at the end could be higher than expected.
Maric said the second-hand PHEV market could soon be flooded with cars as people seek to offload their rides.
He also said the tax change could see a shakeup in the EV industry.
"I think we're going to see a big shift towards regular hybrids," he said.
"People realise that that is the type of vehicle you need to buy if you want to protect your re-sale value, and if you still want the benefits of having a fuel and energy efficient vehicle.
"Stepping up to a plug-in hybrid or even an electric vehicle, you're adding the complexity of having these batteries and then the charging equipment.
"Whereas with a hybrid, we're seeing them hold their value extremely well, and anything electric at the moment is depreciating."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Millionaires Are Skipping Homeownership—Here's Why They Say Renting Beats Buying Right Now
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Homeownership has been touted as the American Dream for many years, but more people are opting out of this fantasy. While higher living costs have forced people out of the housing market, even high earners are choosing to rent instead of owning property. A high-earning couple recently shared on Reddit that they have a $1.5 million net worth with $800,000 in liquid funds. Despite this advantage, the couple doesn't see themselves buying a house due to the math. They view renting as cheaper and even account for housing appreciation and rent inflation. Other high earners jumped in the comments and shared their thoughts about staying put in rental properties instead of buying a home with their extra cash. Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Price Distortions Are Rising Throughout The Country Although rent has been touted as throwing your money away, the numbers paint a different story. Several Redditors commented on the price distortions between renting and buying, and one high earner shared their own numbers. "I'm paying $3,500 per month to rent in a VHCOL area in SoCal; the equivalent mortgage is over $7,000. Sure is nice having fixed costs and $3,500 per month of free cash flow," the high earner said. Those savings are hard to ignore, especially since you don't have to put down a massive down payment just to own the property. High earners are opting to rent with these numbers instead of buying property. Then, they can invest the difference into a brokerage account. Mortgage rates remain elevated, and housing prices haven't gone down. These two factors are part of the reason why the current price distortions exist. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. People Move When The Prices Get Too High Some high earners mentioned that landlords can raise rent each year and catch people by surprise. That's one of the disadvantages of being a tenant instead of a homeowner, but some high earners had a counter to this argument. You can always move if rent gets too expensive and look for more affordable options. Some people move out of their units every few months so they can explore various cities. Renting makes more sense if you are traveling for most of the year. However, it's not for everyone. Renting can become a massive pain if you have a family, and one Redditor opted to buy instead of rent due to this consideration. "I knew families that rented and would move every three to five years because they'd get booted. Even now, one of my old friends had that happen when she was literally about to give birth to her first. I knew I did not want that for my family. I prioritized buying for that reason," the Redditor A Property Is For Peace Of Mind Buying a property does not make sense from an investing standpoint. You can put your money to work in the stock market and earn a higher return with stocks than with a primary residence. If you do not view your house as an investment, it is easier to justify the purchase. While the numbers don't justify homeownership, having your own property offers a level of peace that you can't obtain as a tenant. When you own a house, you don't have to worry about the rent going up each year, getting kicked out of the property, or having to deal with bad neighbors who are directly above or below your unit. Sure, you might end up with bad neighbors, but when you own a house, there's typically more distance between you and your neighbors. Buying a house allows you to establish your family roots. Having to move out of your rental unit every three years can prevent your child from establishing themselves in a community and making friends. Those constant moves may be exciting for a professional in their 20s, but those same moves can create an uphill battle for a family. Buying a house has some headaches, but it also puts an end to some of the headaches you will experience as a tenant. Read Next: With Point, you can Image: Shutterstock This article Millionaires Are Skipping Homeownership—Here's Why They Say Renting Beats Buying Right Now originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
You can now Venmo the US Treasury to help pay down the national debt — should you give a patriotic 'gift' to Uncle Sam?
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. We adhere to strict standards of editorial integrity to help you make decisions with confidence. Some or all links contained within this article are paid links. It's no secret that America has a debt problem. But did you know you can now help pay it down the same way you'd split a meal with a friend? Shop Top Mortgage Rates Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes That's right. Under the 'Gifts to Reduce the Public Debt' section on the U.S. Treasury now accepts payments via Venmo and PayPal — in addition to debit cards, credit cards and bank transfers. The update was spotted by NPR's Jack Corbett, who shared a screenshot of the new payment options via X on July 23. The post quickly went viral, racking up millions of views from users, many of whom were not impressed. 'You can also take your hard-earned money and put it in a fire pit and burn it,' reads one comment. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it It's easy to see why people are skeptical. The U.S. national debt has ballooned to $36.7 trillion — and it's growing at an alarming pace. Since 1996, Americans have personally contributed approximately $65 million toward the national debt, according to Treasury data. Hardly a dent. Others pointed out that they already 'help' the Treasury by paying taxes. But the reality is, while the government does collect trillions in taxes, it consistently spends more than it takes in. In fiscal year 2024, the federal government brought in $4.92 trillion in revenue, but spent $6.75 trillion — resulting in a deficit of $1.83 trillion. So, no, a Venmo payment won't fix America's debt crisis. And according to some experts, the consequences of a high national debt could be severe. 'A debt death spiral' — and how to protect your money Ray Dalio, founder of the world's largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates, warned earlier this year that the U.S. is headed for what he calls 'a debt death spiral.' 'A debt death spiral is that part of the cycle when the debtor needs to borrow money in order to pay debt service and it accelerates,' Dalio said. 'And then everybody sees that and they don't want to hold the debt.' Highlighting the dire situation, he noted that the U.S. federal government now spends almost $1 trillion a year just on interest payments. When debt loads become unsustainable, lenders start fearing defaults. But according to Dalio, the U.S. is unlikely to default in the traditional sense. The bigger threat? Depreciation of our currency. 'There won't be a default — the central bank will come in, and we'll print the money and buy it,' he says. 'And that's where there's the depreciation of money.' To protect your wealth, Dalio emphasized the role of one time-tested asset. 'People don't have, typically, an adequate amount of gold in their portfolio,' he noted. 'When bad times come, gold is a very effective diversifier.' Gold's role here is straightforward: unlike fiat currencies, the yellow metal can't be printed at will by central banks. It's also widely regarded as the ultimate safe haven. Gold is not tied to any one country, currency or economy, and in times of economic turmoil or geopolitical uncertainty, investors often flock to it — driving prices higher. Over the past 12 months, the price of the precious metal has surged by more than 35%. One way to invest in gold that also provides significant tax advantages is to open a gold IRA with the help of Priority Gold. Gold IRAs allow investors to hold physical gold or gold-related assets within a retirement account, thereby combining the tax advantages of an IRA with the protective benefits of investing in gold, making it an option for those looking to help shield their retirement funds against economic uncertainties. When you make a qualifying purchase with Priority Gold, you can receive up to $10,000 in precious metals for free. Read more: BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — A time-tested income play Gold isn't the only asset investors rely on to preserve their purchasing power. Real estate has also proven to be a powerful hedge. When inflation rises, property values often increase as well, reflecting the higher costs of materials, labor and land. At the same time, rental income tends to go up, providing landlords with a revenue stream that adjusts for inflation. Over the past five years, the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price NSA Index has jumped by more than 50%, reflecting strong demand and limited housing supply. Of course, high home prices can make buying a home more challenging, especially with mortgage rates still elevated. And being a landlord isn't exactly hands-off work — managing tenants, maintenance and repairs can quickly eat into your time (and returns). The good news? You don't need to buy a property outright — or deal with leaky faucets — to invest in real estate today. One option is Homeshares, which gives accredited investors access to the $35 trillion U.S. home equity market — a space that's historically been the exclusive playground of institutional investors. With a minimum investment of $25,000, investors can gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning or managing property. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, this approach provides an effective, hands-off way to invest in owner-occupied residential properties across regional markets. Another option is First National Realty Partners (FNRP), which allows accredited investors to diversify their portfolio through grocery-anchored commercial properties without taking on the responsibilities of being a landlord. With a minimum investment of $50,000, investors can own a share of properties leased by national brands like Whole Foods, Kroger and Walmart, which provide essential goods to their communities. Thanks to Triple Net (NNN) leases, accredited investors are able to invest in these properties without worrying about tenant costs cutting into their potential returns. Simply answer a few questions — including how much you would like to invest — to start browsing their full list of available properties. A finer alternative It's easy to see why great works of art tend to appreciate over time. Supply is limited and many famous pieces have already been snatched up by museums and collectors. Art also has a low correlation with stocks and bonds, which helps with diversification. In 2022, a collection of art owned by the late Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen sold for $1.5 billion at Christie's New York, making it the most valuable collection in auction history. Investing in art was traditionally a privilege reserved for the ultra-wealthy. Now, that's changed with Masterworks — a platform for investing in shares of blue-chip artwork by renowned artists, including Pablo Picasso, Jean-Michel Basquiat and Banksy. It's easy to use, and with 23 successful exits to date, every one of them has been profitable thus far. Simply browse their impressive portfolio of paintings and choose how many shares you'd like to buy. Masterworks will handle all the details, making high-end art investments both accessible and effortless. Masterworks has distributed roughly $61 million back to investors. New offerings have sold out in minutes, but you can skip their waitlist here. See important Regulation A disclosures at What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's latest trade salvo revealed a new approach to setting his tariffs: tiers
President Trump is moving forward on a new suite of tariff rates with an approach increasingly focused on grouping countries into tiers, as opposed to a previous approach of simply looking at the trade balance. The new approach remains heavily influenced by either a trade surplus or a deficit but has grown more complex — some might say more subjective — leading to some consolidation in rate levels and the lowering of rates for many countries to a key new standard of 15%. The new landscape was reflected in Thursday night's executive action announcing rates, which centered around the 15% rate set to be in place next week in about 40 countries. Countries facing that rate include major trading partners that recently struck deals, such as Europe and Japan, as well as smaller nations, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. More than 100 countries were excluded altogether from this week's announcement, meaning their rate will stay at 10%. Meanwhile, a third group of about 30 countries will see higher rates ranging from 18% to 50%. Trump and his team are taking an approach that could simplify future negotiations and be more in line with global trade dynamics. Recent months have seen America's trading partners focused on their potential rate and how they stack up with direct competitors in nearly equal measure. A White House official confirmed the tiered approach to Yahoo Finance on Friday, suggesting that the 10% rate is largely but not exclusively reserved for countries with a trade surplus, the 15% rate is for those with a deal or a "small deficit," and that higher "bespoke" rates are further up the chain. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Those 'bespoke' rates Those countries facing rates above 15% offer a wider array, but even some clear tiers are there. Ten nations with a 19%-20% rate all have one thing in common: a location in South or Southeast Asia. These are trading partners often in focus for their role in China's orbit and the target of Trump's keen focus on issues like transshipping. Prior deals with Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines put those nations in that rate range, with other nations, from Thailand to Taiwan, now set to join them. India is now an outlier in the region, facing a 25% rate as trade talks there have grown contentious but continue. Thursday's order focused on the transshipping issues. Trump threatened an extra 40% tariff on any product deemed "to have been transshipped to evade applicable duties," without providing a further definition on what would meet that standard. In addition to India, five countries, including Mexico, face 25% tariff rates at least for the next 90 days. Even more punitive tariffs include 30% rates on nations like South Africa, 35% on Canada, 39% on Switzerland, and 50% on Brazil to top it off. A more complex formula this time around The White House official said the rates were determined using an array of factors, such as the trade deficit, existing non-tariff barriers, and how talks are going. They noted, for example, that Switzerland is a wealthy country more able to absorb tariffs. That contributed to the 39% rate applied by Trump, which shocked officials there and led to a scramble Friday. That account of how things were decided tracks with how the president himself described his approach in recent weeks. He told reporters he was considering a range of factors when setting rates, from hard numbers like the trade deficit to his own instincts. The contrast is notable when compared with early April, when Trump's team came up with his "reciprocal" tariff formula much more simply. Trump's trade representative at the time acknowledged that those rates were set using a calculation that, once parts that cancel each other out were removed, determined a rate based only on any given country's trade surplus with the US. Meanwhile, other details of this week's rollout — most notably a seven-day delay on tariffs going into effect — mean things could continue to change in the days and weeks ahead. As Capital Economics put it in a note Friday, "this is unlikely to be the final word," noting the chances for new deals and the legal challenges — with some importers looking to strike down these tariffs — could continue to change rates. For his part, Trump told NBC News on Thursday evening that he views his tariff rollout as going "very smooth," adding that it's "too late" for other countries to avoid the rates now set to take effect in seven days but that he's always willing to negotiate. "It doesn't mean that somebody doesn't come along in four weeks and say we can make some kind of a deal," he said. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data