Cannabis and Lung Cancer: A Link Stronger Than It Appears
Pauline Pradère, MD, pulmonologist at Marie Lannelongue Hospital in Paris, France, and a leading researcher on this topic, discussed the effects of cannabis on lung health during this year's ALBATROS International Addictology Congress.
Inhaled Cannabis Use
'France holds the unfortunate distinction of being the leading cannabis consumer in Europe,' said Pradère. In 2019, it was estimated that by the time they turned 17, 1 in 5 French individuals had consumed cannabis at least once in the past month. Most of this consumption is through inhalation of cannabis resin joints, often mixed with tobacco. Given the high prevalence, it is crucial to understand the potential impact of cannabis on respiratory health.
While many studies focus on the neuropsychological effects of cannabis, Pradère emphasized that its inhalation, which introduces the substance directly into the lungs, may have significant pulmonary effects — effects that remain under-researched, particularly regarding lung cancer risk.
Cannabis and Lung Cancer
Pradère referenced a well-known study published in Chest in 2018, which suggested that smoking cannabis does not cause emphysema or impair inspiratory function. Although biopsies of cannabis smokers showed precancerous lesions, the study did not strongly connect these findings to lung cancer.
Another 2018 meta-analysis, often cited to 'clear' cannabis consumption of lung cancer risk, concluded that there were insufficient data to draw definitive conclusions. Pradère criticized this study for not specifically examining cannabis use and its unique effects. While evidence links cannabis consumption to an increased risk for testicular tumors, the connection to lung cancer remains unclear.
A recent review published in The New England Journal of Medicine also examines the chronic effects of cannabis, focusing primarily on its neuropsychiatric impact. However, the review makes no mention of its effects on the lungs, noted the pulmonologist. Additionally, there are other studies that highlight the potential therapeutic properties of cannabis in cancer care, such as managing cancer-related symptoms, treatment-associated pain, and even its possible antitumor effects. One such article, provocatively titled Can Cannabis Cure Cancer? , further fuels the debate surrounding cannabis' medical use.
Stronger Evidence for Harmful Effects
Despite the conflicting data, several factors suggest a harmful role of chronic cannabis inhalation in lung health. The first is a toxicologic argument. 'Even without considering the resin and tobacco association, significant carcinogens are found in joints,' explained Pradère.
The second argument, recognized by those with asthma, is that tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive component of cannabis, has a bronchodilatory effect, likely leading to deeper inhalation of carcinogens than with tobacco smoking.
Histologic studies have shown that cannabis smokers develop precancerous lesions similar to those found in tobacco smokers. These findings further suggest a possible link between cannabis use and lung cancer.
Epidemiologic Data
While research remains limited, Pradère highlighted epidemiologic studies that suggest cannabis use is a risk factor for lung cancer. A Canadian study, for example, showed that cannabis use reported at the age of 20 years significantly affected the later development of lung cancer. Adolescents who smoked more than 50 joints during their teenage years were found to have more than double the risk of developing bronchial carcinoma.
Why the Discrepancy?
To explain the reassuring findings in some meta-analyses, Pradère pointed to challenges in studying the link between chronic cannabis use and lung cancer. She noted that many cannabis users also smoke tobacco, and in France, the illegal status of cannabis leads to the addition of other substances to cannabis resin, further complicating research.
Additionally, a significant underreporting of cannabis use by patients contributes to these gaps in data, especially when clinicians fail to directly ask about cannabis use. This underreporting is one of the reasons Pradère pursued her research in this area.
Pradère works at a center specializing in lung cancer surgery, where she has observed a high prevalence of cannabis use among patients. Over 3 years, she studied patients younger than 50 years who had undergone lung cancer surgery at three major hospitals in the Île-de-France region. She then followed up with these patients post-surgery to gather more information about their cannabis consumption.
Study on 75 Patients Younger Than 50 Years
'We contacted 75 patients who had undergone surgery for lung cancer over 3 years, and none of them refused to participate,' Pradère explained. 'We found that 43% of our young patients were chronic cannabis users.'
On average, these patients smoked 150 joints per month, and for 61% of them, no healthcare provider had ever asked about their cannabis use. 'They had seen general practitioners, anesthesiologists, surgeons, and pulmonologists, but no one had ever asked,' she added.
When comparing the three patient groups — those who smoked both cannabis and tobacco, those who smoked only tobacco, and nonsmokers — the results showed that the cannabis-smoking group, which represented a significant proportion, was predominantly men. Their tobacco consumption was similar to those who smoked only tobacco. However, they presented with more emphysema and poor prognosis carcinomas, such as poorly differentiated large cell carcinomas.
'The tumors were more often located in the upper lobes, where the majority of inhaled toxins concentrate. Additionally, their surgery durations and hospital stays were longer, likely due to underlying lung damage,' Pradère pointed out.
Prospective Study of 150 Patients
Building on her earlier work, Pradère led a multicenter prospective study, supported by the French National Cancer Institute, which included 150 patients younger than 60 years diagnosed with primary lung cancer.
'We collaborated with the Toxicology Department, led by Jean-Claude Alvarez, MD, PhD, at Garches University Hospital, where we conducted toxicological analyses on patients' hair and administered anonymous self-report questionnaires outside the medical office,' Pradère explained. The study aimed to evaluate both the prevalence of cannabis consumption among these patients and whether the lung cancer of cannabis smokers differed from that of tobacco smokers.
Though the manuscript is still under review, Pradère shared some preliminary findings. 'We observed a high prevalence of cannabis use in this group of young patients with highly lethal lung cancer. 38% were cannabis smokers, with an average consumption of four joints per day over a median period of 26 years.'
Lung conditions among cannabis smokers included more emphysema, including bullous emphysema, which increases the risk for pneumothorax. Pulmonary function tests revealed greater damage in gas diffusion than in tobacco smokers, even though their exposure to tobacco was similar. The study also found that cannabis smokers had a higher incidence of poor prognosis cancers, such as poorly differentiated carcinomas and sarcomatoid carcinomas.
New Perspectives and Concerns
Pradère emphasized that her research aligns with recent studies in France, such as the KBP study, which has increasingly focused on the potentially harmful effects of cannabis. However, she believes pulmonologists have not fully addressed the issue and that many still struggle to provide clear guidance to patients on cannabis-related health risks, including how to manage cannabis withdrawal — often a more challenging process than quitting tobacco. 'I believe this is an area where we must make progress within the medical community,' she concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
100 years ago, scientists thought we'd be eating food made from air
In the early 1920s, on the left bank of the Seine just outside Paris, a small laboratory garden bloomed on a plot of land sandwiched between the soaring Paris Observatory and the sprawling grounds of Chalais Park. Unlike a typical garden filled with well-groomed plants and the smell of fresh-turned soil, this garden had an industrial feel. Dubbed 'the Garden of Wonders' by a contemporary journalist, the plot was lined with elevated white boxes fed with water from large glass canisters. Nearby greenhouses included equally unusual accessories. But it's what happened inside the low-slung laboratory buildings that made this garden so wondrous. In August 1925, Popular Science contributing writer Norman C. McCloud described how Daniel Berthelot—a decorated chemist and physicist from France—was conducting revolutionary 'factory-made vegetable' experiments in his Garden of Wonders. Berthelot, son of Marcellin Berthelot, a renowned 19th century chemist and French diplomat, was using the garden to expand upon his father's groundbreaking work. Starting in 1851, the elder Berthelot began creating synthetic organic compounds, such as fats and sugars (he coined the name 'triglyceride'), from inorganic compounds like hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. It was a revolutionary first step toward artificial food. '[The younger] Berthelot already has produced foodstuffs artificially by subjecting various gases to the influence of ultra-violet light,' wrote McCloud. 'These experiments,' he added, quoting Berthelot, 'show that by means of light, vegetable foods can be manufactured from air gases.' But Berthelot's experiment didn't exactly catch on. A century later, most food is still grown the traditional way—by plants—but the idea of manufacturing food in controlled, factory environments has been gaining ground. In fact, Berthelot's revolutionary idea may finally be bearing fruit—just not in the way he imagined. A revolution in food chemistry Berthelot never fully accomplished his goal of trying to artificially reproduce what plants do naturally. Nonetheless, his experiments, as sensational as they might seem today, would have been considered quite plausible in 1925. That's because his father's discoveries had unleashed a revolution in chemistry and a tidal wave of optimism about the future of food. By the 1930s, chemists had begun synthesizing everything from basic nutrients, like vitamins, to medicines, like aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), to food additives, such as artificial thickeners, emulsifiers, colors, and flavors. In an interview for McClure's magazine in 1894 dubbed 'Foods in the Year 2000,' Berthelot's father boldly predicted that all foods would be artificial by the year 2000. 'The epicure of the future is to dine upon artificial meat, artificial flour, and artificial vegetables,' wrote Henry Dam for McClure's, articulating Marcellin Berthelot's vision. 'Wheat fields and corn fields are to disappear from the face of the earth. Herds of cattle, flocks of sheep, and droves of swine will cease to be bred because beef and mutton and pork will be manufactured direct[ly] from their elements.' Welcome to the Garden of Wonders Such was the vision that the younger Berthelot was pursuing in his Garden of Wonders. His goal, he told McCloud, was to produce 'sugar and starch from the elements without the intervention of living organisms.' To achieve this, Berthelot envisioned a factory with 'glass tanks of great capacity.' Gases would be pumped into the tanks, and 'suspended from the ceiling [would] be lamps producing the rays of ultra-violet light.' Berthelot imagined that when the chemical elements combined 'through the glass walls of the tank we shall see something in the nature of a gentle snowfall that will accumulate on the floor of the tanks…our finished product—vegetable starches and vegetable sugars created in a faithful reproduction of the works of nature.' By 1925, he had succeeded in using light and gas (carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen) to create the basic compound formamide, which is used to produce sulfa drugs (a kind of synthetic antibiotic) and other medicines as well as industrial products. But his progress toward reproducing photosynthesis ended there. Berthelot died just two years after McCloud's story ran in Popular Science, in 1927, without ever realizing his dream. Despite the bold predictions of the time, producing food from only air and light was wildly aspirational in 1925, if for no other reason than photosynthesis was poorly understood. The term had only been coined a few decades earlier when Charles Barnes, an influential American botanist, lobbied for a more precise description of a plant's internal mechanisms than the generic 'assimilation' then in favor. Chlorophyll had been discovered in the prior century, but what happened at a cellular level in plants remained largely theoretical until the 1950s. Although Berthelot may have been onto something with his experiments, adding to the momentum that became the artificial food industry, he was a long way from replicating what comes naturally to plants. We still are, but recent discoveries may have enabled a workaround—depending on your definition of 'food.' A modern answer to Berthelot's innovative garden From vertical indoor farms to hydroponics to genetically modified crops, since the 1960s commercial agriculture has been focused on coaxing more yield from fewer resources, including land, water, and nutrients. The drive began when Nobel Peace Prize winner Norman Borlaug, an American biologist, helped spark the Green Revolution by selectively breeding a grain-packed, dwarf variety of wheat. The theoretical limit of that revolutionary goal would liberate food production from traditional agriculture altogether, eliminating all resources except air and light—Berthelot's original vision. In the last century, we've inched toward creating food from nothing, making progress by teasing apart the incredibly complex biochemical pathways associated with plant physiology. But if we've learned anything since Berthelot's experiments, it's that photosynthesis—what plants are naturally programmed to do—can't be easily replicated industrially. But that hasn't stopped a handful of companies from trying. In April 2024, Solar Foods opened a factory in Vantaa, Finland—a sleek facility where workers monitor large tanks filled with atmospheric gases. Inside the tanks, water transforms into a protein-rich slurry. Dehydrated, the slurry becomes a golden powder packed with protein and other nutrients, ready to be turned into pasta, ice cream, and protein bars. The powdery substance, Solein, resembles Berthelot's vision, as does the factory, which uses atmospheric gases to enable 'food production anywhere in the world,' according to a 2025 company press release, 'as production is not dependent on weather, climate conditions, or land use.' But the similarities with Berthelot's vision end there. Solar Foods may not require land or plants to produce food, but their technology derives from a living organism. Using a form of fermentation, it relies on a microbe to digest air and water to produce protein. Related Archival Stories 100 years ago, scientists predicted we'd live to 1,000 years old 100 years ago, the battle for television raged A century ago, suspended monorails were serious mass-transit contenders 100 years of deep-sea filmmaking and ocean exploration 100 years of aliens: From Mars beavers to little gray men The U.S.-based company Kiverdi uses a similar microbial fermentation process, first devised by NASA as far back as the 1960s for deep space travel, to convert carbon dioxide into protein. Austria-based Arkeon Technologies has developed its own microbial fermentation process to also produce food from carbon dioxide without the need for land or other nutrients. Microbial fermentation may represent a promising new chapter in synthetic foods, but don't expect tomatoes or corn to materialize from thin air anytime soon—it's not artificial photosynthesis. While Berthelot's understanding of photosynthesis was primitive a century ago, he was ahead of his time in many ways, and his vision was remarkably prescient. Although we still haven't figured out how to replicate photosynthesis chemically—literally growing fruits and vegetables as plants do from air and light—it's worth acknowledging the strides we've made in just the last decade: Companies like Arkeon Technologies and Kiverdi may help remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere while offering solutions to future food shortages. Or they may not. Only the next century will tell. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
🩺 The Athletic: Real Madrid completely overhauls medical department
As reported by Mario Cortegana in The Athletic and Alberto Pereiro on Onda Cero, Real Madrid has begun a complete restructuring of its medical department following a season with a high number of injuries, especially muscular ones, that severely affected key players such as Carvajal and Militao. Dr. Felipe Segura, present at the club since 2021, now assumes full control of the medical area. His leadership is expected to bring cohesion and a renewed focus on injury prevention and treatment, marking a change of course after the criticisms accumulated in previous campaigns. Similarly, Dr. Manuel Arroyo, previously at Granada, has been hired and enjoys a great reputation. With these initiatives, Real Madrid seeks not only to respond to an accumulated physical crisis, in which it suffered more than 50 injuries during the previous season, but to establish a new philosophy of prevention and consistent performance for the upcoming season This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here. 📸 MARCO BERTORELLO - AFP or licensors
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lung cancer warning for foods which make up ‘half the average diet' after new study
Ultra-processed foods filled with preservatives, additives and flavour enhancers have been linked to an increased risk of lung cancer. In the UK and US, more than half of the average diet consists of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), such as ready meals, fast food and fizzy drinks. A previous BMJ study in 2024 linked UPFs to 32 harmful health effects including a higher risk of heart disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes, adverse mental health and early death. Now, eating UPFs has been linked to lung cancer - the most common cancer in the world, according to the World Cancer Research Fund. There were an estimated 2.2 million new cases and 1.8 million deaths from the disease worldwide in 2020, researchers of the study published in the respiratory journal Thorax said. But limiting consumption of these foods may help curb the global impact of the disease, the researchers say. Although there is no exact definition of a UPF, these foods typically undergo multiple processing steps, contain long lists of additives and preservatives, and are ready-to-eat or heat. Researchers drew on data from the US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials, involving 155,000 participants aged 55 to 74 who were randomly assigned to either a screening or comparison group between November 1993 and July 2001. Cancer diagnoses were tracked until the end of 2009, and cancer deaths until the end of 2018. A total of 101,732 people (50,187 men and 51,545 women, with an average age of 62) who completed a questionnaire on their dietary habits upon entry to the trials were included in the study. Foods were categorised as: unprocessed or minimally processed; containing processed culinary ingredients; processed; or ultra-processed. The researchers focused in particular on UPFs that included sour cream, as well as cream cheese, ice cream, frozen yoghurt, fried foods, bread, baked goods, salted snacks, breakfast cereals, instant noodles, shop-bought soups and sauces, margarine, confectionery, soft drinks, sweetened fruit drinks, restaurant/shop-bought hamburgers, hot dogs, and pizza. The three types of food that featured the most were lunch meat (11 per cent), diet or caffeinated soft drinks (just over 7 per cent) and decaffeinated soft drinks (nearly 7 per cent). Participants were tracked for 12 years and in that time, 1,706 new cases of lung cancer were diagnosed, including 1,473 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 233 of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). After accounting for potentially influential factors, including smoking and overall diet quality, participants who ate the most UPFs were 41 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer than those who ate the least. Overall, they were 37 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with NSCLC and 44 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with SCLC. Because it was an observational study and no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, researchers acknowledge that they weren't able to factor in smoking intensity, which may have been influential. Dietary information was collected only once, so they could not account for changes over time, and the number of cancer diagnoses was small. But researchers do highlight the low nutritional value of UPFs and the excessive amounts of salt, sugar and fats they contain. 'The rise in UPF consumption may have driven global increases in obesity, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, cancer and mortality, as these foods are confirmed risk factors for such conditions,' the researchers suggested. 'Industrial processing alters the food matrix, affecting nutrient availability and absorption, while also generating harmful contaminants,' they added, highlighting acrolein, which is found in grilled sausages and caramel sweets and is a toxic component of cigarette smoke. Packaging materials may also have a role to play, they suggested. 'You can't say from this study that UPFs cause cancer as it's observational, so we're looking at associations, not direct effects. But it does strengthen the case for looking more closely at the food environment many people are living in where UPFs are cheap, convenient, and heavily marketed, making them a go-to for many,' Rob Hobson, nutritionist and author of Unprocess Your Family Life, told The Independent. He suggested, rather than 'pointing figures at individual foods', to instead make small shifts towards a healthier diet. 'That might mean cooking more from scratch where possible, adding in more whole foods like vegetables, beans and grains, or just becoming more aware of how often UPFs show up in your day,' he said. 'It's not about being perfect, it's about balance and understanding how your food choices could be supporting or undermining your long-term health.' Solve the daily Crossword
