Malaysian tycoon Ong Beng Seng's guilty plea postponed in Iswaran graft case, pre-trial conference set for July 8
According to The Straits Times, the 79-year-old was initially expected to plead guilty on July 3 to charges linked to former transport minister S Iswaran's corruption case.
Ong faces two charges filed in October 2024, mirroring those for which Iswaran pleaded guilty in September last year.
The Malaysian-born businessman is accused of abetting Iswaran in securing an all-expenses-paid trip to Doha in December 2022 worth approximately S$20,850, which included flights on Ong's private jet, accommodation at the Four Seasons Hotel Doha, and a business class return flight.
A second charge alleges Ong abetted the obstruction of justice by helping Iswaran pay S$5,700 in May 2023 for a flight ticket, after anti-graft investigations had commenced.
Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), where Ong served as managing director, previously said in a Singapore Exchange filing that Ong intended to plead guilty to obstructing justice and have the other charge considered during sentencing.
Ong stepped down from his role at HPL on April 29, citing the need to focus on managing his medical condition.
He is currently undergoing chemotherapy for bone marrow cancer and was previously granted permission to travel abroad for treatment.
Iswaran, who was sentenced to 12 months' jail in October, began home detention on February 7 and has been out of prison custody since June 6.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
‘The public's eyes and mine are watching': Tengku Maimun urges govt, next CJ to protect judicial independence
KUALA LUMPUR, July 3 – Former Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat officially launched her book Behind the Gavel today, providing would-be readers with deeper insight into the experiences of the country's first female top judge. Now retired, Tengku Maimun said she still finds it hard to believe she spent six years of her life as Chief Justice and that someone thought her tenure worthy of a book. 'Like this book, I hope my tenure shows that I did my part for this nation and for the rule of law,' she said during her speech at the Asian International Arbitration Centre here. In her closing remarks, Tengku Maimun said the bigger challenge now lies not with her, but with the next Chief Justice and the Malaysian government to uphold the independence and integrity of the judiciary. She said she no longer has to carry that burden. 'The larger issue that I must highlight, as I have repeatedly done as Chief Justice, is the matter of judicial independence and integrity. 'The public's eyes, including mine, are on the government and the next Chief Justice on how they lift up the standards of judicial independence and integrity,' she said. Today's launch event was also graced by Chief Justice of Singapore Sundaresh Menon, and included distinguished individuals from both the judiciary and the Malaysian legal profession. At almost 800 pages long, the book is divided into three distinct parts. The first part contains personal excerpts of those who had worked with and known Tengku Maimun closely; the second part contains a selection of reproduced notable judgments personally written and selected by Tengku Maimun; the third part contains curated speeches she made during her tenure as Chief Justice.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Rafizi backs plans to develop Ambalat with Indonesia
Former economy minister Rafizi Ramli said the Ambalat block contains significant oil and gas reserves, which is especially crucial considering Petronas's declining output. PETALING JAYA : Former economy minister Rafizi Ramli says he supports Malaysia's plans to work with Indonesia to develop the disputed Ambalat area off the east coast of Borneo, amid claims by Perikatan Nasional that such joint ventures could jeopardise the nation's sovereignty. In a statement on X, Rafizi highlighted the importance of such joint development plans to the country's coffers. He said the Ambalat block contains significant oil and gas reserves, which is especially crucial considering Petronas's declining output. The Pandan MP said similar exploration efforts between Malaysia and Thailand in areas over which they had overlapping maritime claims had paid off handsomely as these projects now produce nearly one-third of Peninsular Malaysia's gas supply. 'Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto have, in principle, agreed to explore joint development between Malaysia and Indonesia to unlock the oil potential in Ambalat. 'I agree and support this. In fact, this was one of the matters I brought up when I was in the Cabinet. 'The federal government must engage in simultaneous discussions with both the Indonesian government and the Sabah government to ensure the state's interests are protected and that a fair share of the profits goes to the people there. 'But if this becomes a political football and the joint development plan stalls, the country and the people, from Sabah to Perlis, will continue to lose billions of ringgit in revenue every year at a time when our oil revenues are already in decline.' Malaysia and Indonesia have had overlapping claims over the waters of the Sulawesi Sea known as the Ambalat block – located between East Kalimantan, Indonesia, and southeast Sabah – since Malaysia published a map in 1979 showing the maritime border area within Malaysian waters. Anwar and Prabowo announced plans last week to jointly develop the Ambalat block in the Sulawesi Sea while continuing legal and diplomatic discussions on maritime sovereignty over the 15,000 sq km area. Yesterday, opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin, who served as home minister under former prime ministers Muhyiddin Yassin and Ismail Sabri Yaakob, claimed that a joint development agreement with a foreign country claiming maritime sovereignty over the area to be developed could jeopardise Malaysia's national interests. Muhyiddin, meanwhile, said developing the Ambalat block without a clear ruling on maritime borders by the International Court of Justice or other recognised legal bodies could set a dangerous precedent and this might be used in future to undermine Malaysia's claims over this and other disputed areas. In his post on X, Rafizi said that while PN had the right to oppose such plans, such objections should only be raised after examining the full merits of the case. 'Don't just oppose (such plans) blindly,' he said.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Fifty MAF retirees appeal to Federal Court over pension adjustment ruling
PUTRAJAYA, July 3 — Fifty retired Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) personnel have turned to the Federal Court to seek leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision regarding their pension adjustment claim. Lawyer Mohamed Hanif Khatri Abdulla, representing the retirees, confirmed that the notice of motion was filed today and said the Federal Court has fixed August 4 for case management. In their application, the applicants are seeking the Apex court's determination on two questions of law concerning the pension adjustment issue. On June 4, the appellate court three-man bench overturned the High Court's earlier ruling which held that MAF retirees who retired before January 1, 2013 were entitled to have their pensions adjusted to the rates and methods applied to the retirees who retired after Jan 1, 2013. The Court of Appeal held that the MAF retirees failed to prove that the government, the prime minister, the senior defence minister and the Malaysian Armed Forces Council had breached the provisions under the Federal Constitution. Fifty MAF personnel of various ranks, including major, lieutenant, staff sergeant and private, filed an originating summons in the High Court on November 17, 2022, seeking a declaration that the government had violated the provisions in the Federal Constitution read together with Section 187 of the Malaysian Armed Forces Act 1972 for their respective failures to implement a new pension adjustment for the MAF retirees who retired before January 1, 2013. They claimed the government had failed to implement new pension adjustments for all MAF retirees who retired before January 1, 2013, causing a significant pension gap between the MAF retirees who retired before January 1, 2013 and those who retired after January 1, 2013. — Bernama
