NZ Army Combat-Ready Infantry Platoon Deploys To The Republic Of Korea
The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) has a long-standing commitment to supporting peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and has been deploying personnel to the United Nations Command (UNC) and its Military Armistice Commission since 1998.
Now, for the first time, the NZDF is deploying a combat-ready infantry platoon to work with units from the Republic of Korea Armed Forces and US Army. A second deployment is planned for next year.
The platoon will be the first NZ Army organisation to train at the world-class Korea Combat Training Centre, providing the Kiwi soldiers with another unique aspect to their deployment.
Over the next 90 days, they will undertake a range of infantry training activities with their South Korean and US counterparts.
Land Component Commander Brigadier Jason Dyhrberg said the soldiers would develop new skills while honing others.
This was a great opportunity to gain valuable experience alongside Republic of Korea and US personnel and have access to world class-combat training facilities, he said,
'After three months, our troops will be more familiar with their counterparts' techniques and tactics and be better able to readily integrate into a coalition warfighting environment,' Brigadier Dyhrberg said.
'At the conclusion of their time on the Korean Peninsula, they will have been tested across a range of challenging scenarios and activities and be deemed combat ready under both the South Korean and US systems.
'We know the NZ Army produces world-class soldiers and officers. This deployment presents another great opportunity to showcase our people, to learn new skills and to develop greater levels of combat readiness alongside key international partners. I have no doubt that they will do us proud.'
The New Zealand Defence Attaché to Korea, Colonel Rob Loftus, said the aim of the deployment was to foster cooperation and understanding between the three forces at the platoon level.
'This will provide our soldiers with a fantastic training opportunity to exercise with our military partners on the peninsula. They'll build relationships while putting themselves to the test.
'The platoon will also participate in several cultural and commemorative activities celebrating the 75th year anniversary of the United Nations Command, and Korean War battle anniversaries.'
UNC Deputy Commander Canadian Army Lieutenant General Derek Macaulay said that as the UNC celebrated its 75th anniversary, it was honoured to welcome the NZ Army infantry unit.
'The platoon's presence here reflects New Zealand's steadfast commitment to UNC and to the enduring peace and stability of the Korean Peninsula. For over seven decades New Zealand has stood firm in support of the shared values we defend together.''
The latest deployment builds on the legacy started when New Zealand contributed both naval and ground forces in support of UNC during the Korean War in the early 1950s. More than 6000 New Zealanders served.
The platoon will remain on the Korean Peninsula until the end of October. Further joint training and mission rehearsal activities are being planned for 2026.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Energy Reserve Ensures Security For Next Decade
Energy Minister Simon Watts and Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones have welcomed an agreement by Genesis, Mercury, Meridian, and Contact to establish a strategic energy reserve, which will boost energy security and support affordable energy prices. 'New Zealand needs reliable and stable power so our households and businesses can keep their lights on, even when the wind isn't blowing, the sun isn't shining, and our hydro lakes are low,' Mr Watts says. 'Last year's dry winter highlighted vulnerabilities in our energy system with a shortage of fuel and generation led to high prices and unacceptable pressure on Kiwi industries, businesses, and households. 'This could have been avoided if New Zealand had enough fuel for electricity generation to meet our energy needs. Actions by the previous government, including a ban on new gas exploration and a drive to immediately achieve 100 percent renewable electricity, combined with disappointing drilling results from our gas fields, have left us in this difficult situation. 'I have been extremely clear with power generators that the Government expects them to deliver additional supply so we can reduce the risk of winter power shortages during periods of low lake levels. This will reduce the need for significant commercial power price spikes and the need for businesses to reduce their power use.' Genesis, Mercury, Meridian, and Contact have jointly agreed to a 10-year fuel stockpile, building resilience in the market to ensure consumers have access to fuel even when lake levels are low. 'This announcement is a positive step to show the power generators are responding. It will act as an important buffer during periods of high electricity demand in winter and when renewable generation is low,' Mr Jones says. 'While this is positive news, there is still more to do to ensure New Zealand does not see a repeat of last winter.' The Coalition Government is taking strong actions to further strengthen New Zealand's energy system. These are focused on: Ensuring the security of gas and fuel supplies. Supporting investment certainty and removing regulatory barriers through Fast-track and RMA reforms. Strengthening market competition via the work of the Energy Competition Task Force. 'All of this work is critical to easing the cost of living for Kiwis, ensuring the security and affordability of our energy system, and ultimately removing a significant barrier to economic growth,' Mr Watts says.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
NCEA changes: What led to Government's radical overhaul, why we shouldn't be shocked
The proposal does, however, represent massive upheaval for a sector that has faced its fair share of stop-and-start in the past few years and is a step away from the flexibility beloved by some in the education community. Education Minister Erica Stanford revealed the proposal on Monday morning. Photo / Alyse Wright The Government's proposal would lead to two new certificates being established for Years 12 and 13 that are more structured and subject-driven than the current standards-based model. Instead of students trying to grab every credit they can across disparate standards like kids in a money booth with paper notes blowing around in the air, they will be tested and marked on their knowledge of an entire subject. The return of an 'out of 100' and A to E letter grade is intended by the Government to be a clearer indication to parents, employers and tertiary education providers of a student's knowledge. The package is one of the most consequential steps the coalition has taken this term and will likely be remembered as a landmark moment in this Government's approach to education. Pending any last-minute adjustments during consultation, these changes will have a direct impact on the readiness of future generations entering the workforce and tertiary education. When the Government talks about tackling the infrastructure deficit, improving productivity and ultimately achieving its prized economic growth, there are, of course, short-term initiatives to get the ball rolling. But long-term, it's students in class right now who will have a lot to contribute. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who has spent considerable time working overseas and is known to be personally passionate about education, is clearly concerned NCEA isn't preparing Kiwi kids to be the top of class internationally. You only have to look at an OECD study released last year that found New Zealanders aged 16 to 24 had below-average literacy, numeracy and problem-solving skills. The results have worsened compared to a similar study in 2014-15. Asked by the Herald last month about possible fixes, Luxon made it clear the Government was readying for a 'fundamental overhaul' of secondary school assessments. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has a passion for education. Photo / Michael Craig What led to change? This hasn't come out of nowhere. Stanford has been looking to make changes to NCEA for years, including when she was National's education spokesperson in Opposition. The then-Labour Government announced a programme of work to deal with various issues facing NCEA. It devised new literacy and numeracy co-requisites and fewer standards to refocus students, but there were delays as the sector asked for more implementation time. Stanford believed the change programme was 'fundamentally flawed' and thought simply making tweaks wasn't enough. After taking office in late 2023, she pushed out the introduction of some reforms. But the new minister didn't have enough time to halt the Level 1 amendments set to begin just a couple of months later. So she later commissioned a review by the Education Review Office (ERO), which found that despite the overhaul, Level 1 remained 'difficult to understand' and was not preparing students for future achievement. It said one option was to drop it entirely. That report was hugely influential and formed the basis for discussions about what to do not just with Level 1, but the entire qualification. Stanford told the Herald last month that ERO 'unearthed a lot of things that we weren't possibly expecting'. Over the following year, Stanford received more briefings, including papers from the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) the Herald got hold of. They warned of a credibility crisis over 'overused' flexibility, a lack of coherent vocational education pathways and an over-reliance on internal assessments. They also showed nearly half of Year 12 students who achieved Level 2 last year did so 'without engaging in a full programme of coherent subject-based learning'. About a third of Year 12 and 13 students who achieved Level 2 or 3 relied on unit standards from 'disparate' subjects. Education Minister Erica Stanford has been thinking about reform since her time in Opposition. Photo / Mark Mitchell A more prescriptive approach While this was happening behind the scenes, Stanford was beginning to announce reforms focusing on primary and intermediate schools. This sequencing was important. Stanford believed to address issues with students at high school, you first had to start with the challenges facing them earlier in their school life. The Government instructed teachers to spend an hour a day teaching reading, writing and math. Structured literacy and numeracy was rolled out, while standardised testing was brought in much earlier in a child's school life. The actions showed the Government's prescriptive approach. Today's secondary school qualification proposal keeps to that pattern, rolling back some flexibility and replacing it with more direction. The Opposition sees this as the Beehive enforcing 'one-size-fits-all' and has argued the minister is moving too fast. But the Government thinks the 'back to basics' style is easier for students and parents to understand, and also simpler for teachers. Stanford wants an overall education package driven by consistency, with the hope children can move between schools and expect the same level of learning, driven by the same assessments and standards. Whether that works out will depend on how well the changes are implemented and if the minister is able to bring those in the sector along with her. Stanford is critical of how reforms were being rolled out under Labour, though Chris Hipkins – current Labour leader and former Education Minister – says they were disrupted by factors such as Covid-19. He believes Labour's work provided insights into NCEA's issues. Labour's main point of concern on Monday was not directed at the substance of the proposed changes, but instead around the uncertainty caused and ensuring teachers, parents and others had an appropriate period to share their views. The Post-Primary Teachers' Association responded to the proposal by saying while no system is perfect, the current one has 'clear advantages' over the previous qualification and no changes should be made 'for change's sake or political legacy'. 'The lack of adequate support for, and political flip-flopping on, NCEA means teachers are left trying to fill the gaps. We need stability and certainty.' Consultation will take place over the next six weeks, while any new qualification won't be introduced until the end of the decade. Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Replacing NCEA To Transform Secondary Education
Rt Hon Christopher Luxon Prime Minister Minister of Education The Government is proposing to replace NCEA with new national qualifications that ensure young people have the knowledge and skills they need to succeed, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford say. 'We want every New Zealander to reach their full potential and contribute to a thriving economy— and that starts with our students,' Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says. 'The evidence shows NCEA is not consistent and can be hard to navigate. It doesn't always deliver what students and employers need. 'New Zealand's future depends on our young people having the skills to succeed in the modern global economy. We're backing Kiwi kids with a new internationally benchmarked national qualification designed to do exactly that,' Mr Luxon says. 'While NCEA was designed to be flexible, for many students that flexibility has encouraged a focus on simply attaining the qualification. This has come at the cost of developing the critical skills and knowledge they need for clear pathways into future study, training or employment,' Education Minister Erica Stanford says. The proposal includes: Removing NCEA Level 1, requiring students to take English and Mathematics at Year 11, and sit a foundation award (test) in numeracy and literacy. Replacing NCEA Levels 2 and 3 with two new qualifications (The New Zealand Certificate of Education at Year 12 and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education at Year 13). Requiring students to take five subjects and pass at least four to attain each certificate. Marking clearly out of 100 with grades that make sense to parents like A, B, C, D, E. Working with industry to develop better vocational pathways so students are getting the skills relevant to certain career pathways. The new qualification will be underpinned by a new national curriculum for Years 9-13 that will clearly outline what students need to learn in each subject and when, providing more consistency. 'This is about making sure our national qualification opens doors for every young person, whether they're heading into a trade, university, or straight into work. Parents can be assured their kids will get the best possible opportunity to thrive,' Ms Stanford says. 'Our Government's major education reforms are well underway in primary and intermediate. Every student is already taught at least an hour a day of reading, writing, and maths, we've banned cell phones in classrooms, we've introduced a world-leading Maths and English curriculum, mandated structured literacy and maths programmes, equipped teachers and students with high-quality resources, made huge investments into learning support and stopped building open-plan classrooms,' Ms Stanford says. 'It's time to ensure that when students reach secondary school, our national qualification reflects the same high standards and ambition we expect throughout their education,' Ms Stanford says. 'The Government is focused on growing the economy, creating jobs, lifting wages and help Kiwis with the cost of living. Supporting our young people to succeed and develop their skills is a key part of how we do that,' Mr Luxon says. Notes: Consultation is open until 1 September before final decisions are made before the end of the year. Changes are proposed to be phased in from next year, beginning with the new national curriculum in 2026, the Foundational Skills Award in 2028, and the new Certificates of Education in 2029 and 2030 for Years 12 and 13. During the transition period, students will either be assessed through the current NCEA and curriculum or the new qualification and updated curriculum. The full proposal and instructions on how to provide feedback are available here:
