logo
On Love, Loss and Living in Kashmir

On Love, Loss and Living in Kashmir

The Wire2 days ago

Loal Kashmir - Love and Longing in A Torn Land (2025), written by Kashmiri filmmaker and writer Mehak Jamal, is a poignant account of human suffering in the region. The book explores the inner lives of lovers and offers an emotional lens into how personal relationships are strained by a brutal conflict. Jamal's work highlights the resilience that ordinary people can exhibit in the face of repression and deception.
As India and Pakistan stood on the brink of a full-blown war last month and Kashmir once again drew national and international attention, academic Bilal Gani spoke to Jamal about her book and the heavy physical and psychological toll the conflict is taking.
This is an edited excerpt from their conversation, where Mehak talks about conflict in Kashmir, the vilification of Kashmiri lives under the rubric of hyper-nationalism and why Kashmir deserves an everlasting peace and dignified existence.
Bilal Gani: The title uses the word 'Lōal,' a tender expression in Kashmiri. How important was it for you to root this book linguistically and emotionally in the Kashmiri experience?
Mehak Jamal: It was certainly imperative since the book is about Kashmir and Kashmiris. Lōal in Kashmiri means love, affection and longing. The name Lōal Kashmir came to me much before I even started interviewing people, and I am glad I wasn't asked to change it later by my publishers for ease of understanding etc. A simple subtitle in the book's name does that job. I have used Kashmiri words, phrases and dialogues wherever possible in the book and they flow seamlessly into the prose. The book touches many facets of regular life in Kashmir, that roots it firmly in the place and culture. For a Kashmiri reader, I hope the book is an emotional and immersive read, and for someone not from the valley, I hope that they learn something new about the place and its people.
Mehak Jamal,
Loal Kashmir: Love and Longing in a Torn Land,
Harper Collins (2025)
Bilal Gani: Many of the lovers in your stories live under the constant threat of curfews, raids and surveillance. How did you manage to portray such vulnerability without losing the dignity and agency of your characters?
Mehak Jamal: The credit for the vulnerability exhibited by the characters lies solely with the contributors who were willing to open up their hearts and lives to me. They were authentic and unabashed in the telling of their own stories, and that's what creates these layers and nuance that you see in the book. For most of the contributors, as for most Kashmiris, living under these constant threats has become a part of life – with a mixture of uneasiness and indifference.
They have learnt to act and adapt to the most volatile of circumstances. This is nothing to be proud of. But in these stories, you discover the kind of agency that the characters exhibit in the most dire of times. This need and urgency to reach out to a loved one, to know that they are okay, is an understandable and universal emotion. But in Kashmir, where there may be an elevated anxiety attached to the same, there's all the more reason for these lovers to out seek each other – to search for 'their constant' in uncertain times.
Bilal Gani: You explore how love in Kashmir is shaped, and often stifled, by the long shadow of conflict. In what ways do you think love becomes a form of resistance in such environments?
Mehak Jamal: The Kashmir conflict is a long enduring one and Kashmiris have been living through it and feeling its repercussions for decades. In a place like this, almost every facet of life is affected by the conflict in some way or other, and love is no different. That people love and want to be loved is a given, in any place. Kashmir is no different.
But when the conflict takes precedence in the documentation of the place, as it should, what falls through the cracks are the lived experiences of the conflict. Lōal Kashmir chooses to look at a small part of these experiences, those of love and longing. In these 16 stories, ranging from the 1990s to the 2020s, we see a myriad of different narratives about lōal in Kashmir.
Though these stories span decades, the ways in which people carry out their love – equal parts cautious and equal parts unfettered – is an intriguing thing to observe. In times of turmoil, loving someone is no less than a form of revolt, a form of resistance. Because what you are saying is that – you can silence our voices, but not our love.
Bilal Gani: Edward Said says that an intellectual in exile is often best positioned to understand the complexity of conflict at home. You are a Kashmiri but live in Mumbai. How did you reconcile the two and which identity weighed most heavy on you while writing this book.
Mehak Jamal: I'm not sure if the statement pertains to me entirely, since I do divide my time between Kashmir and Mumbai. But I can attempt to explore this for myself. I had not been home in Kashmir in 2019 during [reading down of Article 370] the communication blockade. Like many Kashmiris outside, I was scrambling for bits of information from home and feeling helpless and alone.
Kashmir was in the news but the voices from Kashmir were choked. I was immediately struck by how important it was to document that time, to understand the ground reality and how the inner lives of the people were affected. Maybe for someone living through that time on the ground, this may have felt unimportant. But I felt that collective public memory was the key to make that period undeniable, especially when most narratives pertaining to it were skewed.
Mahak Jamal. Photo: Author provided.
Thus, Lōal Kashmir came to me a year after the abrogation. It was in 2020, when I was home in Kashmir during the pandemic, when I decided to start this project and began interviewing people. Maybe, through the process, I was trying to document the time that I had myself spent in Kashmir, as well as exploring those parts of history and the recent events that I knew little about or had not found accounts of. The two parts of my identity – the one at home and the one way from it – came together in crafting this book
Bilal Gani: For decades, the Kashmiri identity has been eclipsed by the clashing tides of Indian and Pakistani nationalisms. Your book attempts to restore a human lens by making love – a delicate and deeply human emotion – its central theme. How important is it to humanise this conflict?
Mehak Jamal: There is a human cost to any conflict and we are reminded of this in Kashmir time and again. So many different wars and skirmishes have been fought between the two warring nations, and the people of the J&K face the brunt of it. Though both the nations lay claim on the territory and it is the basis of the conflict between them, how regular Kashmiris live and survive is not explored or questioned by them.
The representation of Kashmir and Kashmiris in popular news and media is enough to make this point. When authentic narratives from a place are missing, they create further dissonance in a region that is already misunderstood. Lōal Kashmir is the tip of the iceberg to understand how Kashmiris live, love and go on. There is much more to document, explore and learn to understand the human side of the Kashmir conflict.
Bilal Gani: During the recent military confrontation between India and Pakistan, people in the volatile border areas have faced death and been forced into displacement. Are their lives as precarious as those of the characters in your book?
Mehak Jamal: The recent skirmishes between the nations shows that the people from this region are seen as dispensable. Many people living in Uri, Poonch and other areas around the Line of Control and the international border lost their loved ones as well as faced damage or loss of their property. This is deemed as 'collateral damage' and there has barely been any public outcry or outrage about it.
I would say that the lives of these people are more precarious than many of the characters in my book. Though there are characters in the book who find themselves in difficult circumstances and are sometimes saved from a volatile situation by a whisker, I think it would be insensitive to compare them.
Bilal Gani is an academic and freelance writer, based in Kashmir.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When Kishore Kumar's Songs were Banned
When Kishore Kumar's Songs were Banned

Indian Express

time20 hours ago

  • Indian Express

When Kishore Kumar's Songs were Banned

When Sanjay Gandhi, the unelected son of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, wanted to promote his 20-point programme — a list he put down as socio-economic development initiatives — during the Emergency, he decided to commission members of the film industry to further his reform agenda. He organised 'Geeto Bhari Shaam', the state-sponsored charity event under the aegis of the Indian Youth Congress, in Delhi's Ambedkar Stadium on April 11, 1976. Even as brute force was used for a mass sterilisation drive under the guise of family planning all over the country (11 million were eventually sterilised), the programme went on. This was the time actor Dilip Kumar spoke about population outbreak and need for family planning from the stage. He even used a couplet to highlight his point besides compering a chunk of the programme. Lata Mangeshkar, Asha Bhosle, Mukesh and Mahendra Kapoor crooned under RD Burman's baton. Amjad Khan took on the Gabbar avatar to tell Burman, 'Bahut jaan hai iske sangeet mein,' as the audience went into splits. Amitabh Bachchan recited Sahir Ludhianvi's 'Kabhi kabhi mere dil mein khayal aata hai' just before actors Rakhee and Shashi Kapoor announced the song from the film 'Kabhie Kabhie' (1976). Shabana Azmi and Zeenat Aman shook a leg as Bhosle sang 'Hare rama, hare krishna', the eponymous song from the 1971 film, starring Dev Anand and Aman. While some of the most sought-after names were present in the gathering, Kishore Kumar, a fixture in Burman's numerous songs, such as 'Ye shaam mastani' and 'Ek main aur ek tu', including the recent hit 'Sholay', was missing from the event. He was also that year's Filmfare winner for the title song in the Uttam Kumar and Sharmila Tagore-starrer 'Amaanush' (1974). The Emergency took place at the peak of his popularity. Kumar had refused to be part of the event and said 'no' to singing jingles for the government, even though the directive had come straight from the top. Gandhi was also looking at alleviating despair from people's lives and Kumar's presence seemed necessary for that. According to 'Kishore Kumar, the Ultimate Biography' (Harper Collins, 2022) by Aniruddh Bhattacharjee and Parthiv Dhar, SMH Burney — the then secretary in the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting headed by VC Shukla — had approached Kumar in January 1976 to be part of the show. The singer refused, mainly because it felt like an order and not an invitation. Also read – Kishore Kumar: The Ultimate Biography pieces together the many ups and downs of the actor-singer's life Burney was swiftly directed to arrange a meeting with a few government officials and industry representatives in Mumbai. The meeting took place on April 29, 1976, days after 'Geeto Bhari Shaam' in the Capital. It was attended by GP Sippy, the then head of the All-India Film Producers' Council, director Shriram Bohra, BR Chopra, Subodh Mukerji and Nasir Hussain, among others. It is also reported that Sippy tried to persuade Kumar, who wouldn't budge. He also refused to meet Joint Secretary CB Jain regarding the same. Kumar is quoted from one of his interviews in the book: 'I did what I thought best. Singing at private functions is definitely not an anathema. With genuine love and respect, I am only too eager to bend. However, if someone decides to rest his foot in my head, he will not have the good fortune to witness the best of my courtesies.' Years later, he told Pritish Nandy in an interview, 'No one can make me do what I don't want to do. I don't sing at anyone's will or command.' Kumar's refusal was taken as rebellion and defiance. A sweeping ban on all his songs was imposed on May 4. They were removed from AIR and Doordarshan broadcasts, including on Ameen Sayani's 'Binaca Geetmala'. The sale and distribution of his records were halted. Jain also wanted the BBC to stop the broadcast. According to the book, the note from Burney — approved by Shukla a week after the order came into effect — read: 'All the songs of Sri Kishore Kumar should be banned from AIR and DD and that all films in which he was the playback singer should be listed out so that suitable action can be taken against these films. Besides, the representative of HMV and Gramophone recording companies should be sent for and, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, the sale of Sri Kishore Kumar's records and discs should be frozen.' Eventually, former Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray stepped in and held a meeting with Kumar, Raj Kapoor, Vijay Anand, Dev Anand (who was a vociferous protester of the Emergency) and Shukla. Kumar finally agreed to be part of another show at the Sanjay Gandhi Flying Club. The ban was lifted on June 16, 1976, two days after the meeting.

Prada reps kolhapuri chappals: Grace is always in vogue
Prada reps kolhapuri chappals: Grace is always in vogue

Indian Express

timea day ago

  • Indian Express

Prada reps kolhapuri chappals: Grace is always in vogue

Long before it gave its name to one of the most iconic patterns in fashion, Paisley was just another Scottish town. Its star rose in the 19th century, when it became so well-known for its imitation Kashmiri shawls that the shawls' traditional 'buta' pattern was soon named 'paisley'. This erasure of the pattern's origin, removing it from the specific cultural context in which it was first created — the 'buta' is said to be inspired by the shape of either a pinecone or mango — makes it an early instance of cultural appropriation. But is this also what is happening with the footwear — strongly resembling Kolhapuri chappals — that the Italian fashion house Prada featured as part of its Spring-Summer 2026 collection this week? In its show notes, Prada described the footwear as 'leather sandals', with no reference to an Indian connection. This has infuriated many in India's fashion community as well as traditional makers of Kolhapuri chappals. The history of fashion, of course, is one of crosscurrents and confluences, with textiles, motifs and styles passing from region to region, and wardrobe staples in one place inspiring luxury creations in another. But fashion labels in the West have a history of appropriating and flattening different cultures — often tipping over into controversy, such as when Gucci sent out models wearing Sikh-style turbans in 2016. This understandably leads to wariness among designers and craftspeople in the Global South. Change, however, is already underway, with labels like Dior and Louboutin starting to look for collaborators, not just ideas, in other cultures — the former worked with Mumbai's Chanakya School of Craft for its pre-fall 2023 line, while the latter teamed up with designer Sabyasachi Mukherjee for a capsule collection in 2017. With Prada yet to make the details of its latest collection public, it still has the chance to give credit where it's due. Grace, after all, is one of those things that never go out of style.

On Love, Loss and Living in Kashmir
On Love, Loss and Living in Kashmir

The Wire

time2 days ago

  • The Wire

On Love, Loss and Living in Kashmir

Loal Kashmir - Love and Longing in A Torn Land (2025), written by Kashmiri filmmaker and writer Mehak Jamal, is a poignant account of human suffering in the region. The book explores the inner lives of lovers and offers an emotional lens into how personal relationships are strained by a brutal conflict. Jamal's work highlights the resilience that ordinary people can exhibit in the face of repression and deception. As India and Pakistan stood on the brink of a full-blown war last month and Kashmir once again drew national and international attention, academic Bilal Gani spoke to Jamal about her book and the heavy physical and psychological toll the conflict is taking. This is an edited excerpt from their conversation, where Mehak talks about conflict in Kashmir, the vilification of Kashmiri lives under the rubric of hyper-nationalism and why Kashmir deserves an everlasting peace and dignified existence. Bilal Gani: The title uses the word 'Lōal,' a tender expression in Kashmiri. How important was it for you to root this book linguistically and emotionally in the Kashmiri experience? Mehak Jamal: It was certainly imperative since the book is about Kashmir and Kashmiris. Lōal in Kashmiri means love, affection and longing. The name Lōal Kashmir came to me much before I even started interviewing people, and I am glad I wasn't asked to change it later by my publishers for ease of understanding etc. A simple subtitle in the book's name does that job. I have used Kashmiri words, phrases and dialogues wherever possible in the book and they flow seamlessly into the prose. The book touches many facets of regular life in Kashmir, that roots it firmly in the place and culture. For a Kashmiri reader, I hope the book is an emotional and immersive read, and for someone not from the valley, I hope that they learn something new about the place and its people. Mehak Jamal, Loal Kashmir: Love and Longing in a Torn Land, Harper Collins (2025) Bilal Gani: Many of the lovers in your stories live under the constant threat of curfews, raids and surveillance. How did you manage to portray such vulnerability without losing the dignity and agency of your characters? Mehak Jamal: The credit for the vulnerability exhibited by the characters lies solely with the contributors who were willing to open up their hearts and lives to me. They were authentic and unabashed in the telling of their own stories, and that's what creates these layers and nuance that you see in the book. For most of the contributors, as for most Kashmiris, living under these constant threats has become a part of life – with a mixture of uneasiness and indifference. They have learnt to act and adapt to the most volatile of circumstances. This is nothing to be proud of. But in these stories, you discover the kind of agency that the characters exhibit in the most dire of times. This need and urgency to reach out to a loved one, to know that they are okay, is an understandable and universal emotion. But in Kashmir, where there may be an elevated anxiety attached to the same, there's all the more reason for these lovers to out seek each other – to search for 'their constant' in uncertain times. Bilal Gani: You explore how love in Kashmir is shaped, and often stifled, by the long shadow of conflict. In what ways do you think love becomes a form of resistance in such environments? Mehak Jamal: The Kashmir conflict is a long enduring one and Kashmiris have been living through it and feeling its repercussions for decades. In a place like this, almost every facet of life is affected by the conflict in some way or other, and love is no different. That people love and want to be loved is a given, in any place. Kashmir is no different. But when the conflict takes precedence in the documentation of the place, as it should, what falls through the cracks are the lived experiences of the conflict. Lōal Kashmir chooses to look at a small part of these experiences, those of love and longing. In these 16 stories, ranging from the 1990s to the 2020s, we see a myriad of different narratives about lōal in Kashmir. Though these stories span decades, the ways in which people carry out their love – equal parts cautious and equal parts unfettered – is an intriguing thing to observe. In times of turmoil, loving someone is no less than a form of revolt, a form of resistance. Because what you are saying is that – you can silence our voices, but not our love. Bilal Gani: Edward Said says that an intellectual in exile is often best positioned to understand the complexity of conflict at home. You are a Kashmiri but live in Mumbai. How did you reconcile the two and which identity weighed most heavy on you while writing this book. Mehak Jamal: I'm not sure if the statement pertains to me entirely, since I do divide my time between Kashmir and Mumbai. But I can attempt to explore this for myself. I had not been home in Kashmir in 2019 during [reading down of Article 370] the communication blockade. Like many Kashmiris outside, I was scrambling for bits of information from home and feeling helpless and alone. Kashmir was in the news but the voices from Kashmir were choked. I was immediately struck by how important it was to document that time, to understand the ground reality and how the inner lives of the people were affected. Maybe for someone living through that time on the ground, this may have felt unimportant. But I felt that collective public memory was the key to make that period undeniable, especially when most narratives pertaining to it were skewed. Mahak Jamal. Photo: Author provided. Thus, Lōal Kashmir came to me a year after the abrogation. It was in 2020, when I was home in Kashmir during the pandemic, when I decided to start this project and began interviewing people. Maybe, through the process, I was trying to document the time that I had myself spent in Kashmir, as well as exploring those parts of history and the recent events that I knew little about or had not found accounts of. The two parts of my identity – the one at home and the one way from it – came together in crafting this book Bilal Gani: For decades, the Kashmiri identity has been eclipsed by the clashing tides of Indian and Pakistani nationalisms. Your book attempts to restore a human lens by making love – a delicate and deeply human emotion – its central theme. How important is it to humanise this conflict? Mehak Jamal: There is a human cost to any conflict and we are reminded of this in Kashmir time and again. So many different wars and skirmishes have been fought between the two warring nations, and the people of the J&K face the brunt of it. Though both the nations lay claim on the territory and it is the basis of the conflict between them, how regular Kashmiris live and survive is not explored or questioned by them. The representation of Kashmir and Kashmiris in popular news and media is enough to make this point. When authentic narratives from a place are missing, they create further dissonance in a region that is already misunderstood. Lōal Kashmir is the tip of the iceberg to understand how Kashmiris live, love and go on. There is much more to document, explore and learn to understand the human side of the Kashmir conflict. Bilal Gani: During the recent military confrontation between India and Pakistan, people in the volatile border areas have faced death and been forced into displacement. Are their lives as precarious as those of the characters in your book? Mehak Jamal: The recent skirmishes between the nations shows that the people from this region are seen as dispensable. Many people living in Uri, Poonch and other areas around the Line of Control and the international border lost their loved ones as well as faced damage or loss of their property. This is deemed as 'collateral damage' and there has barely been any public outcry or outrage about it. I would say that the lives of these people are more precarious than many of the characters in my book. Though there are characters in the book who find themselves in difficult circumstances and are sometimes saved from a volatile situation by a whisker, I think it would be insensitive to compare them. Bilal Gani is an academic and freelance writer, based in Kashmir. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store