
Zohran Mamdani, Trump's 'worst nightmare', may really be a gift to him
FOUR DAYS before New York City's Democratic mayoral primary Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist assemblyman who represents part of Queens, walked the length of Manhattan, 13 miles (21km) from Inwood Hill Park to the Staten Island Ferry terminal. 'New Yorkers deserve a mayor that they can see, they can hear, they can even yell at,' he said. It was reminiscent of Ed Koch, a charismatic mayor in the 1970s and 1980s. Koch would often ask his constituents: 'How'm I doin'?' He was greeted by cheers or jeers, depending on the year and the neighbourhood. By that standard, Mr Mamdani, who beat the Democratic establishment to win the primary on June 24th, already looks mayoral. PREMIUM Supporters and pundits agree that Zohran Mamdani's campaign has demonstrated social media savvy and authenticity.(AP)
Just a few months ago few people outside the district he represents in the state legislature had heard of him. He polled less than 1% when he entered the race in October. Yet he defeated Andrew Cuomo, New York's former governor, who was once one of the biggest names in American politics. Mr Mamdani's unexpected victory delighted progressives and, for different reasons, Republicans.
It is in part a rejection of Mr Cuomo, who resigned because of allegations of sexual harassment and of undercounting the number of New Yorkers who died in care homes during the covid-19 pandemic (he denies wrongdoing). But it also represents something bigger: it is a rejection of Democratic centrism and politics as usual. Democratic-primary voters tend to be more left-wing than the party's average voter. They were not impressed by the endorsement that Mr Cuomo received from Bill Clinton, a former president, and turned off by one from Bill Ackman, a billionaire hedge-fund manager.
Mr Mamdani is an immigrant, which may have helped in a city where 40% of the residents are foreign-born. He was born in Kampala, Uganda. After early years in post-apartheid South Africa his family settled in America when he was seven. He became an American citizen in 2018. He grew up in the shadow of Columbia University, where his father, Mahmood Mamdani, a Ugandan-born expert on colonialism, taught. Mr Mamdani told the New York Times that he had a privileged upbringing. But he also understands what it means to be stateless: his father was expelled from Uganda for several years because of his Indian ethnicity. His mother, Mira Nair, is an Indian Oscar-nominated film-maker known for stories about identity and diaspora. Both of Mr Mamdani's parents have been outspoken critics of Israel's war in Gaza.
Mr Mamdani has also criticised Israel's policies. As a student at Bowdoin College, a small liberal-arts school, he co-founded a pro-Palestine group. More recently, he failed to condemn the phrase 'globalise the intifada', which many Jewish people consider to be a call for violence against them. He said on a podcast that the phrase is not a call for violence, but an expression of the desire for Palestinian 'equality and human rights'. Baloney, say many Jewish New Yorkers.
Before he entered politics, Mr Mamdani dipped his toe into hip-hop, as a rapper by the name of 'Mr Cardamom'. He was not successful. He was also a foreclosure-prevention counsellor, helping people from minority backgrounds in Queens stay in their homes. He entered politics in 2020, when he became the first South Asian elected to the New York State assembly; since then only three of his bills have become law. He recently married an artist.
Unabashedly left-wing, Mr Mamdani belongs to the Democratic Socialists of America, an activist group that believes 'working people' should run things 'to meet human needs, not to make profits for a few'. His campaign theme was affordability. Mr Mamdani wants to make buses free, to freeze rent, to open city-run supermarkets in 'food deserts' and to hit the rich with higher taxes. This scares the living daylights out of many well-heeled New Yorkers.
Left-wing he may be, but likeably so. 'I actually don't think Mr. Mamdani's success is primarily about his ideology. It's about his talent as a new media-savvy politician,' says Jesse Arm of the Manhattan Institute, a think-tank. 'He's run a really smart messaging campaign.' His social-media posts were positive and down-to-earth. Whereas Mr Cuomo's campaign events were rare and orchestrated. Some 46,000 people campaigned for Mr Mamdani. He attracted young voters and moderate ones. He rewrote the city's political map, winning many of the districts that Donald Trump won in the 2024 presidential election. Areas that seem unpromising for a candidate of his ilk, like Hillside in Queens and Tottenville on Staten Island, voted for him.
Mr Mamdani calls himself 'Donald Trump's worst nightmare—as a progressive, Muslim immigrant.' He's the sort of refreshing politician that Democrats have been looking for as an answer to the Visigothic vim of the MAGA movement. But Republicans may be as delighted by his victory as progressives are. Elise Stefanik, who represents part of upstate New York in Congress, told CNN that Mr Mamdani is 'the single most effective foil for Republicans nationally'. After the primary Mr Trump posted on social media that Mr Mamdani is 'a 100% Communist Lunatic'.
His Republican rival in the mayoral election in November will be Curtis Sliwa, founder of the Guardian Angels, who patrolled the subways in red berets starting in the crime-ridden 1970s, and an unsuccessful mayoral candidate in 2021. Perhaps a bigger obstacle to Mr Mamdani's mayoralty is Eric Adams, the incumbent. The Department of Justice indicted him for corruption (then dropped the case on Mr Trump's orders) and he lost the Democratic Party's nomination. He plans to run as an independent. Mr Cuomo is staying in the race, too, at least for now, as an independent.
If Mr Mamdani is elected, he would be the first Muslim mayor in New York City's history. He would also be the youngest, and the first immigrant in decades. More important, he will be the first political star of the left to emerge during Mr Trump's second presidency. What is not yet clear is whether Democrats of his kind will lead the party out of the wilderness or deeper into it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Diljit Dosanjh receives support from BJP amid calls to revoke citizenship over 'Sardar Ji 3'
— rpsinghkhalsa (@rpsinghkhalsa) Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Punjabi singer and actor Diljit Dosanjh has gotten support from BJP national spokesperson RP Singh and former DSGMC chief Manjit Singh G amid backlash for his film ' Sardaar Ji 3 ' starring Pakistan actor Hania a post on his X account on Friday R P Singh described Dosanjh as "a national asset and a global ambassador of Indian culture" and slammed the Federation of Western India Cine Employees for demanding action against the celebrity."FWICE's call to revoke his Indian citizenship over an inadvertent and pre-incident film shoot is not only unfair but shockingly disproportionate. The film featuring a Pakistani actress was shot before the Pahalgam attack. If there is anguish, it can be expressed through a boycott or by urging that the film not be screened in India. But attacking Diljit's patriotism and demanding such an extreme step is simply irrational," he wrote."Did FWICE or others object then? TV news channels routinely invite Pakistani guests to boost TRPs. Should those anchors now relinquish their citizenship too? Let's not cheapen nationalism or weaponise patriotism. FWICE should reconsider its stance—such targeting of our own talent only weakens our moral standing," he Punjabi actor and BJP culture cell convener Hobby Dhaliwal extended support to Diljit at a press conference at the party's Chandigarh said that Diljit was not just an artist but a globally respected face of Punjabi culture . "At a time of national tension, attempts are being made to defame him with baseless allegations. This is unfortunate and condemnable," he said."Diljit is the son of this soil. Punjab stands with him—and India too," Dhaliwal expressed regret and disappointment over certain elements demanding the cancellation of the artist's citizenship and a ban on his films."Every citizen is patriotic, but using this as a pretext to target a single artist is wrong. BJP stands firmly with Diljit Dosanjh," he Akali Dal leader and former Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee chief Manjit Singh GK too issued a statement in Diljit's support and questioned "selective targeting" of Diljit.(With TOI inputs)


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
‘Don't care if I am trolled'—BJP leader stands with Diljit Dosanjh as FWICE demands his ouster
Ever since the film's trailer dropped on 22 June, Dosanjh has faced relentless criticism for acting alongside Hania. The trailer has since been removed from YouTube in India, and both the All Indian Cine Workers Association (AICWA) and the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) have spoken out against him, calling for a boycott of the film. FWICE went a step further, writing to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and demanding that Dosanjh's citizenship be revoked. '.@diljitdosanjh is not just a celebrated artist—he's a national asset and a global ambassador of Indian culture. FWICE's call to revoke his Indian citizenship over an inadvertent and pre-incident film shoot is not only unfair but shockingly disproportionate,' the senior BJP leader wrote on X. New Delhi: Amid backlash against Diljit Dosanjh's upcoming Punjabi film Sardaar Ji 3 , which features Pakistani actor Hania Aamir, BJP national spokesperson RP Singh has come out in support of the singer-actor. Singh criticised the calls to suspend Dosanjh's Indian citizenship. .@diljitdosanjh is not just a celebrated artist—he's a national asset and a global ambassador of Indian culture. FWICE's call to revoke his Indian citizenship over an inadvertent and pre-incident film shoot is not only unfair but shockingly disproportionate. The film featuring a… — RP Singh National Spokesperson BJP (@rpsinghkhalsa) June 27, 2025 'No individual who publicly aligns with voices that glorify terrorism and insult India's sovereignty should be permitted to carry the credentials of Indian nationality,' FWICE stated. Singh, however, contends that this is a mere 'publicity stunt' by FWICE. 'Who has given the right to some organisation to ask for his citizenship [to be revoked]? Boycott his film, do not show [it] on any OTT [platform], and if he speaks [anything] anti-India, do criticise him. But the citizenship bit is taking it too far,' Singh told ThePrint. 'Do not care if I am trolled' Singh's post has attracted strong reactions online, but the BJP leader is unbothered. 'I don't need a certificate of nationalism or patriotism from anyone. The way Dosanjh presents himself, he is a humble soul, and he represents India wherever he goes. As long as he wears a turban, he is Indian, and we must remember that,' Singh said. In his X post, Singh also questioned whether there would be similar outrage over Indian cricketers playing against Pakistan in Dubai a month before the Pahalgam terror attack, or against TV anchors who host Pakistani panellists on debate shows. 'This is ridiculous. And I do not care if I am trolled. My views are clear,' he added. Dosanjh recently completed a successful concert tour with Dil-Illuminati and made international headlines with his Met Gala debut in May this year. He paid tribute to his Punjabi roots with an ensemble that nodded to Maharaja Bhupinder Singh, the erstwhile ruler of the princely state of Patiala. Meanwhile, FWICE remains firm in its stance. 'We do not want a citizen like him. He thinks he is God. Sardaar Ji 1 and 2 didn't do well. In this film, [Hania] Aamir has been cast so that everyone talks about it. Since he doesn't want to replace her, we will make sure he is replaced, not just from Border 2 and other films, but [from] our country too,' FWICE president BN Tiwari told ThePrint. FWICE's warning to Dosanjh Dosanjh has yet to issue an official statement addressing the widespread criticism. But in an interview with BBC Asia, he explained the decision to go ahead with the film's release. 'When the film was being made, the situation was OK. After that, there's been a lot of things…that are not in our hands,' said Dosanjh. Sardaar Ji 3 will not be released in India while it was released overseas, including in Pakistan, on 27 June. Early reports say the film's initial screenings in the neighbouring country have been 'houseful'. Meanwhile, FWICE has written a letter to Bhushan Kumar of T-Series, which is backing Border 2. The letter called the decision to retain Dosanjh in the cast a 'blatant violation' of its directive to boycott him. 'By choosing to collaborate with an artist who has so brazenly ignored the ongoing tensions and national sentiment, your production has directly undermined the stand taken by the Indian film industry in solidarity with the nation,' read the open letter, dated 24 June. Border 2 is the sequel to JP Dutta's cult classic war film Border (1997), set during the India-Pakistan war of 1971. Dosanjh plays a key role in the film. 'We have written to the National Defence Academy and [Defence Minister] Rajnath Singh about not giving permission to Border 2 for shooting. Dosanjh is challenging the entire country. It is a matter of national security,' said Tiwari. FWICE has not yet received a response from either the government or the makers of Border 2. The film workers' union also issued a letter to Dosanjh on 26 June. 'As an Indian, your first responsibility is towards your country. You have failed in that regard, and your professional choices have made it abundantly clear that the nation's interest is not your priority,' the letter states. It goes on to inform Dosanjh of the punitive measures being initiated. 'FWICE hereby issues a Non-Cooperation Directive against you with immediate effect. All associations affiliated with FWICE and their members are instructed not to cooperate with you on any current or future projects until such time as you publicly disassociate from the said collaboration and issue an unconditional apology to the Indian film fraternity and the citizens of India,' it further warns. (Edited by Prashant)


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?
Last Updated: Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': In a late-night post on social media, Trump declared a 'GREAT VICTORY' after the bill cleared the Senate Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': Senate Republicans took a major step toward delivering President Donald Trump his ' big, beautiful bill" late Saturday. The bill cleared a key procedural vote, 51-49. Republican leaders must now satisfy numerous holdouts still demanding changes to the bill. In a late-night post on social media, Trump declared a 'GREAT VICTORY" after the bill cleared the Senate, offering praise to four key senators who shifted their votes to get the procedural bill over the finish line. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, however, doubled down on his criticism of the White House's 'Big Beautiful Bill", calling it 'utterly insane" and 'political suicide". The Senate must agree on a final version of the bill before sending it to the floor for a vote. The BBC report said that as it is likely to include some of the changes to the original House bill, it will return to the House for another vote where it may see more challenges. With BBC, CNN, Agencies Inputs About the Author Manjiri Joshi First Published: June 29, 2025, 14:52 IST News explainers Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?