
Palo Alto Networks Stock Down 14% On Dubious $25 Billion CyberArk Buy
Santa Clara, Calif.-based cybersecurity platform provider Palo Alto Networks stock has lost 14% of its peak value since inking a deal to acquire Newton, Mass.-based privileged access management supplier CyberArk for $25 billion, according to CNBC.
I wonder whether this deal is a strategic response to Google's $32 billion acquisition of Wiz, a cloud security services provider, which long criticized Palo Alto for its tendency to acquire, rather than build, new cybersecurity services.
Is the dip in Palo Alto's stock a buying opportunity? Here are reasons for skepticism:
Palo Alto and CyberArk are both bullish on this deal. 'Our market entry strategy has always been to enter categories at their inflection point, and we believe that moment for Identity Security is now," Palo Alto Networks Chairman and CEO Nikesh Arora said in a press release.
CyberArk sees this deal as accelerating the company's mission. 'This is a profound moment in CyberArk's journey," Founder and Executive Chairman of CyberArk Udi Mokady said, according to the release.
'From the beginning, we set out to protect the world's most critical assets, with a relentless focus on innovation, trust, and security. Joining forces with Palo Alto Networks is a powerful next chapter, built on shared values and a deep commitment to solving the toughest identity challenges,' he added.
Palo Alto's $25 Billion Deal To Acquire CyberArk
Palo Alto – which operates a platform including advanced firewalls and cloud-based offerings -- will pay $45 a share for CyberArk – specializes in identity security which secures sensitive information and who can access it, noted CNBC.
This $25 billion deal – including $45 in cash and 2.2005 shares of Palo Alto Networks common stock for each CyberArk share – represents a 26% premium to its share price July 25, according to the release.
The merger will help Palo Alto add an important new service to its platform. Palo Alto will extend CyberArk's PAM capabilities to human, machine, and autonomous AI agent identity types while helping CyberArk in its 'journey towards platformization,' noted the release.
Palo Alto's Recent Performance And Prospects Lag CyberArk's
Both companies plan to report their second quarter results next month. However, based on their first quarter reports, CyberArk is growing much faster than Palo Alto.
For example, in the first quarter, CyberArk beat and raised. For example, the company's revenues grew 43.4% to $317.6 million – 3.9% above the consensus. CyberArk also raised guidance for the second quarter above the consensus – suggesting 38.4% growth to a range between $312 million and $318 million, noted Yahoo! Finance.
Palo Alto did not do as well. While the company exceeded revenue expectations, it fell short on gross margin and remaining performance obligations. Palo Alto's fiscal third-quarter grew 15% to $2.29 billion – $10 million ahead of consensus while its non-GAAP gross margin of 76% trailed analysts' estimates of 77.2%, noted CNBC. RPO grew 19% to $13.5 billion, 'at the lower end of expectations of $13.5 billion to $13.6 billion,' noted Proactive.
Potential Advantages And Disadvantages Of This Deal
The acquisition offers significant advantages and risks. If Palo Alto can integrate CyberArk's services into its platform, the combined companies could win more customers and increase the amount each customer buys. However, the deal faces considerable risks – notably, the high price tag, potential integration challenges, and the negative reaction of investors to the deal.
Observers seem to have a negative view:
CyberArk will only be better off from this cash and stock deal if the combined company can grow much faster than investors expect. But at the moment, CyberArk – which seems much better at spurring organic growth – generated a mere 14% of Palo Alto's revenues.
Can the cultures of these two companies align well enough to provide customers an industry-leading platform? It could be years before we know the answer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
5 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Netscape's Lessons for AI Mania
The initial public offering was filed at $14. Everyone wanted shares, so Morgan Stanley set the deal price at $28. As trading started, the stock popped to $74, ending the day at $58. Tech star Figma? The latest SPAC? No, it was 30 years ago this week, Aug. 9, 1995. The Journal's Molly Baker nailed it: 'It took General Dynamics Corp. 43 years to become a corporation worth today's $2.7 billion in the stock market. It took Netscape Communications Corp. about a minute.' Remember, Netscape was a money-losing company with only $16.6 million in sales in its previous six months. Worth $2.7 billion! That's the equivalent of Nvidia shares going up 11 cents today. We've come a long way, baby.


Digital Trends
34 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
That moment when I told ChatGPT it needed a history lesson, and it agreed with me
I had an experience this week which forcefully reminded me that ChatGPT and Google's Gemini were great but not perfect. And to be clear, I have jumped into the AI pool with both feet and am enthusiastic about the long-term prospects. However, I believe that we need to tap the brakes on the irrational exuberance and belief that AI can do everything, everywhere all at once. The specific project that broke ChatGPT's back was obscure on the one hand but should not really have been that tough. My daughter is finishing her doctoral dissertation and was trying to generate a map that compared the borders of the Byzantine Empire in the years 379 AD versus 457 AD. Recommended Videos Here is the prompt that I used against deep research: Create a detailed map that overlays the borders of the Byzantine empire in 379AD at the start of the reign of Theodosius the Great versus the borders in 457AD at the end of the reign of Marcian. I need both borders shown clearly on a single map. Use a historical map style and highlight major cities. The Deep Research option is powerful but often time-consuming. As it runs, I enjoy watching the play-by-play in the details window. ChatGPT did an excellent job of generating a text analysis of the changing borders, major cities, and historical events. The wheels fell off the bus when I asked ChatGPT to turn its text analysis into an easy-to-read map. Without digging too deeply into the minutiae of the fifth century world, the point is that it made up names, misspelled names and placed cities at random. Notice that Rome appears twice on the Italian peninsula. What is particularly frustrating about this effort is that the names and locations were correct in the text. I tried patiently asking for spelling corrections and proper placements of well-known cities without success. Finally, I told ChatGPT that its results were garbage and threw up my hands. To its credit, ChatGPT took the criticism in stride. It replied 'Thank you for your candor. You are right to expect better '. Unfortunately, things did not get better. After a few minutes of cursing out that platform I decided to give Google Gemini a shot at the identical query. Shockingly its results were even worse. If you look at the image below, you will see 'Rome' in the middle of the Iberian Peninsula. Antioch appears three or four times across Europe, but many of the other names are right out of fantasy novels. I was complaining about this mapping chaos to a friend. He shared a similar story. He entered a photo from a small offsite meeting into ChatGPT. He asked it to add the words 'Mahalo from Hawaii 2025' above a photo of a group of colleagues. Instead of just adding the text, the engine totally changed the image. It made people skinnier; it changed men into women and an Asian into a Caucasian. Another friend told me that an AI generated biography of him talked about his twin children which he does not have. It even provided a link to a non-existent source. Yikes. Ronald Reagan used to say: Trust but verify. My point is not to suggest that we run away from AI and cancel all our subscriptions. Rather, it is to remind everyone (me included) that we cannot hand the keys to the AI engines and walk away. They are tools that can assist us but, in the end, we need to look at the output, see if it looks and smells right, and decide whether to accept it or not. It is clear that the performance of AI engines is uneven; excellent at some projects and terrible at others–such as mapping. We will probably see the rise of the machines someday–but today is not the day.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ruben Amorim makes exciting claim about Man United's transfer plans
Manchester United head coach Ruben Amorim has dropped an extremely positive message regarding the club's transfer ambitions. United's summer transfer window so far Heading into the ongoing summer transfer window, bolstering the attacking department was United's top priority, following a goal-shy 2024/25 season. United have partially achieved this through the acquisitions of Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo from Wolverhampton Wanderers and Brentford respectively. They were two of the league's most dangerous attackers last term, notching a combined 35 top-flight goals. The Red Devils also announced the arrivals of youngsters Diego Leon and Enzo Kana-Biyik. Leon's move to Old Trafford was however negotiated and agreed in January. The Paraguayan has been integrated into the first team while Kana-Biyik was sent out on loan to INEOS-owned FC Lausanne Sport in Switzerland. At the moment, United's focus appears to be on securing the services of a top-class striker, with RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko believed to be the leading name on their list. But, Amorim also recently expressed a desire to sign a goalkeeper amidst uncertainty over the long-term suitability of Andre Onana and Altay Bayindir. Italian journalist Fabrizio Romano also relayed that United are likely to recruit a midfielder. United's financial troubles have been well-documented and the sentiment has consistenly been that the club needs to sell before they can dip into the market but Amorim has insisted that money to spend on players is available. Amorim on United's transfer activity The Portuguese coach told The Telegraph, 'I think if we were in a different moment, I would be more concerned about that [rival clubs spending more than United].' 'I'm really happy with the players that we bring in. They proved themselves in the Premier League, so I'm not concerned about the physical aspect. All the players that we want to bring to Manchester, any coach would want them.' 'I can guarantee you, if you bring any manager here, they will say: 'Bryan, thank you. Matheus Cunha, thank you.' And then you have the potential of these kids that are really important for us.' Many may feel that United are smiles away from challenging for football's most prestigious trophies like the Premier League and Champions League. However, Amorim does not share this opinion. He noted, 'I have no doubts because there are some things that you cannot buy and this club has that – the pedigree, the history, the fans.' 'We have that. I think that is clear. Then the money. We have money. We have money without the Champions League. So we can. We'll have money and more money in the future. And we are doing everything.' 'You talk with Omar and all these guys, they are making all the strategy to have more money in the future. So that will not be a problem. And then I think it's clearly the culture. If we have a different culture, with all the pedigree, the money, all these things, we can return to our place. And that is clear.' Featured image George Wood via Getty Images online polls Follow us on Bluesky: @