logo
NHS puberty blocker trial ‘not ethical', finds Trump-backed review

NHS puberty blocker trial ‘not ethical', finds Trump-backed review

Telegraph01-05-2025
An NHS puberty blocker trial is 'not ethical', according to a Donald Trump-ordered review of children's gender medicine.
The US federal review goes even further than Britain's Cass Review by raising 'serious concerns about medical interventions' of any form in children and teenagers.
Its Department of Health and Human Services concluded that 'the overall quality of evidence is very low' to justify giving puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones to adolescents, including in trials such as the Pathways research planned by the NHS.
The highly critical review likens the trial of puberty blockers by the health service to trying to test the harms of jumping out of a plane without a parachute.
It was ordered by Mr Trump within days of taking office, having made gender ideology a central theme of his campaign in the run-up to the election.
Dr Jay Bhattacharya, the director of the National Institutes of Health, which is responsible for public health research in the US and contributed to the report, said: 'Our duty is to protect our nation's children – not expose them to unproven and irreversible medical interventions.
'We must follow the gold standard of science, not activist agendas.'
The findings echo the Cass Review, led by retired paediatrician Baroness Cass, who said gender medicine had been built on 'shaky foundations' and called for an end to the medical and 'affirmative' approach to treating children with gender dysphoria.
While the anonymous authors of the 409-page report agreed with Lady Cass that there was a lack of evidence to support the use of powerful puberty blockers in children, it went further by declaring that the potential for harms to children were known.
They said that for the use of drugs in children experiencing gender confusion, 'the evidence base does not support strong conclusions about their effectiveness'.
And that 'the evidence for harm is less uncertain', arguing that there is a clear biological basis for believing they carry significant risks, and that the lack of thorough studies into the harm caused does not mean it does not exist.
'We can be certain in the ordinary sense of 'certain' that these interventions cause harm, even if we do not have 'high certainty' evidence in the technical sense,' the report said, citing the 'experimental nature' of the interventions, including removing breasts or interfering with the reproductive system.
The authors also liken the trialling of the drugs to an 'unethical parachute test'.
It said: 'The likelihood of infertility when puberty blockers are provided at the early stage of puberty and followed by cross-sex hormones does not have to be demonstrated in a clinical trial. This is because the mechanism is well understood and conducting a trial would amount to an unethical 'parachute test'.'
The work builds on the work by Lady Cass and points to a 'a growing body of evidence pointing to significant risks – including irreversible harms such as infertility – while finding very weak evidence of benefit'.
The federal review also said attacks on Lady Cass by pro-trans US doctors were 'ridden with misrepresentations of the Cass review and contain multiple factual errors'.
But while Lady Cass recommended a trial of the treatment to establish both benefits and harms, those in the US argued it 'may conflict with well-established ethical standards for human subjects research'.
They cited recommendations from the World Medical Association that doctors must understand risks properly before beginning a trial, and point to the Nuremberg Code, which was drawn up in response to Nazi medical experiments and say trials should be designed so that 'the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment'.
They said: 'It is not ethical to subject adolescents to hormonal and surgical interventions used in [child transition], even in a research trial, until and unless the state of the evidence suggests a favourable risk-benefit profile.
'The state of the science does not support a favourable risk/benefit profile, nor does it give researchers a basis for confidence that the risks of [treatment] can be satisfactorily managed.'
The review was contributed to by medical doctors and ethical experts and made up of people across the political spectrum with underlying commitment to scientific principles.
It also criticised the use of phrases such as 'assigned sex at birth', which suggested an 'arbitrary decision' rather than 'the observation of a characteristic present long before birth, namely the child's sex'.
It claimed that activists 'go to extraordinary lengths to avoid the plain use of these [biological] words, and related words such as boy and girl'.
An NHS spokesman said: 'As is the case with any rigorous academic study, the Pathways proposal has been subject to independent academic peer review and a review by the National Institute of Health and Care Research committee – ahead of progressing to the usual strict ethical and regulatory approvals, which ensure stringent safeguards in scientific research.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tears apart 'racist sleazebag' Charlamagne Tha God after he criticized the president in front of his daughter-in-law
Trump tears apart 'racist sleazebag' Charlamagne Tha God after he criticized the president in front of his daughter-in-law

Daily Mail​

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump tears apart 'racist sleazebag' Charlamagne Tha God after he criticized the president in front of his daughter-in-law

Donald Trump lashed out at Charlamagne Tha God, calling him a 'racist sleazebag' after he openly criticized the president in front of his daughter-in-law. 'The Breakfast Club' radio host sat down with Lara Trump, who is married to the president's son Eric Trump, on Saturday night as she asked him to rate her father-in-law's performance in office over the past six months. 'I wouldn't give it a good rating - simply because the least of us are still being impacted the worst,' Charlamagne, whose real name is Lenard Larry McKelvey, replied. 'Like when you look at something like the 'Big, Beautiful Bill'. That's something that I'm going to benefit from because of the tax bracket that I'm in. But there's going to be so many people that's hurt by that bill,' he added. Trump signed the 'Big, Beautiful Bill', a landmark piece of tax cuts and spending legislation, into law in early July. 'And you know, anything that, you know, takes away Medicaid from people and puts them in a worse financial situation then they were previously in - I'm not for,' Charlamagne, 47, added. Trump was not happy with the comments the media personality made - prompting him to make a scathing post on his Truth Social platform at 1.49am on Sunday. 'The very wonderful and talented Lara Trump, whose show is a big ratings success, put racist sleazebag Charlamagne 'The God' (Why is he allowed to use the word 'GOD' when describing himself? Can anyone imagine the uproar there would be if I used that nickname?),' Trump wrote. The president then ripped into the radio host, who voted for Kamala, for saying his Democratic presidential opponent is currently looking 'pretty, pretty good.' 'But this dope, Charlamagne, would vote for Sleepy Joe or Kamala? Remember, one year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. MAGA!!!,' the commander-in-chief wrote. He went on to call Charlamagne a 'Low IQ individual' who doesn't know what he's saying and does not know about the president. 'He's a Low IQ individual, has no idea what words are coming out of his mouth, and knows nothing about me or what I have done - like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, where Seven Million people have died, and there was no end in sight,' Trump added. 'He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy, where prices and Inflation have come way down, and where STUPID and CORRUPT JOE BIDEN set the record for doing the Worst Job as President, EVER.' During the nearly 30 minute interview with Lara, Charlamagne said Americans are disappointed they are not getting the 'day one change' Trump promised during his campaign. 'Right now people are hurting! He campaigned on immediate change. Day one change,' he told her. Lara then asked: 'And you don't think you've felt any change?' He went on to call Charlamagne a 'Low IQ individual' who doesn't know what he's saying and does not know about the president 'No,' Charlamagne replied bluntly. She then went on to ask him specifically about his feelings on border security and Iran. 'Do you feel safer knowing that Iran will not have the ability to develop a nuclear weapon?,' she asked. 'Sure. If you're telling me that a county won't have the ability to build a nuclear weapon,' Charlamagne responded. When asked if he feels 'better' that American borders are closed, Charlamagne said he does, but he wants to see actual 'criminals and illegal immigrants' being deported, 'Not people who are here trying to go through the process of being in this country legally.' 'When you see people actually getting deported and getting detained and they're actually trying to go through a process of being American citizens, that's not right,' he continued. Although he voted for Harris in the 2024 election, Charlmagne is no stranger to lashing out against Democrats. 'When you look at Democrats' approval rating in this country, when you look at Republicans' approval rating in this county, you see that America's just fed up with it all,' he told the Fox News host. 'Like, Democrats suck. We know that already though. You know what I mean? So it's like…I knew that Trump would probably get in office again and fumble. 'But I also knew that Democrats wouldn't have the team put together properly to recover the ball. So what you're seeing right now from the American people is just a backlash to everything. People want something different.' Lara then asked if he thought the former vice president was the 'best representative' for Democrats in the recent election. 'Yes. If you look right now, she's looking pretty, pretty good because a lot of the things that she said President Trump would do, he actually did,' he answered. 'I did a segment on the Daily Show after he became president, and I was like, "Prove people wrong. Everything that everybody is saying about you, everything that they say you're going to do, all you gotta do is simply not do." But he did it anyway.'

UK to evacuate injured children from Gaza to receive NHS care
UK to evacuate injured children from Gaza to receive NHS care

The Guardian

timea minute ago

  • The Guardian

UK to evacuate injured children from Gaza to receive NHS care

The UK government will evacuate seriously ill and injured children from Gaza to the UK for NHS treatment under a scheme to be announced within weeks. Ministers will enable children in severe need to receive taxpayer-funded care. Three children were brought to the UK this year through a private scheme by the charity Project Pure Hope. A government spokesperson said: 'We are taking forward plans to evacuate more children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care. 'We are working at pace to do so as quickly as possible, with further details to be set out in due course.' More than 50,000 children have been killed or injured in Gaza since the outbreak of the war between Hamas and Israel in October 2023, according to Unicef data. Keir Starmer said last week that the UK was 'urgently accelerating' efforts to bring children over for treatment. The government scheme will operate in parallel to the initiative by Project Pure Hope, which was set up to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to the UK privately for treatment. Through the charity's initiative, Majd al-Shagnobi, a 15-year-old from Gaza, became the first Palestinian child to be flown to the UK for treatment for war injuries. He required complex facial reconstructive surgery after an Israeli tank shell destroyed his jaw when he was trying to access aid in February last year. His treatment at Great Ormond Street hospital in London is being privately funded by Project Pure Hope and is being carried out by a medical team who will all work for free. Earlier this year, the charity secured visas for two girls from Gaza – 13-year-old Rama and five-year-old Ghena – to have privately funded operations in the UK for lifelong medical conditions. News of the government's plans comes after domestic political pressure. More than 100 MPs signed a letter coordinated by Stella Creasy, the Labour MP for Walthamstow, calling on ministers to evacuate 30 severely ill children to the UK for treatment. A foreign affairs select committee report at the end of July said ministers had 'declined to support a medical evacuation of critically injured children to the UK, involving coordinating travel permits, medical visas and safe transport to the UK, where the children can receive specialised care unavailable to them in Gaza'. The Guardian reported last month that the government was facing legal action from a law firm acting on behalf of three critically ill children in Gaza. Other countries have been faster to act. Italy has evacuated dozens of Palestinian children and families for medical treatment, with the first group arriving in January 2024. The Sunday Times, which first reported the story, cited a senior Whitehall source who said up to 300 children could be brought to the UK from Gaza under the government's scheme. They will be accompanied by a parent or guardian and their siblings if necessary, and the Home Office will carry out biometric checks before travel, according to the newspaper. Project Pure Hope welcomed the government's announcement and said it would be sharing its expertise from nearly two years of successful evacuations. 'Our blueprint can help ensure the UK acts quickly and effectively so that every child who needs urgent care has the best chance of survival and recovery,' a spokesperson said. The charity has been urging the government to create a scheme similar to the one established for Ukrainian refugees since November 2023. The UK has been working with the Jordanian government to airdrop humanitarian aid into Gaza in response to the widespread starvation caused by Israel's blockade. Starmer has announced plans for the UK to recognise a Palestinian state in September before the UN general assembly unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank and commits to a peace process leading to a two-state solution.

Beloved grandma who ‘knew everyone' choked to death when care home staff gave her the wrong meal, inquest told
Beloved grandma who ‘knew everyone' choked to death when care home staff gave her the wrong meal, inquest told

Scottish Sun

time30 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Beloved grandma who ‘knew everyone' choked to death when care home staff gave her the wrong meal, inquest told

HEARTBREAKING END Beloved grandma who 'knew everyone' choked to death when care home staff gave her the wrong meal, inquest told Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A BELOVED grandmother choked to death after being fed the wrong food in a care home. Joan Whitworth died at the Oaks Care Home in Northumberland after staff prepared her meal in a way which "did not comply with her diet plan". 3 Joan Whitworth, 88, tragically died after choking on her food Credit: NCJ Media 3 An inquest heard the grandmother was living at the Oaks Care Home Credit: Google Maps 3 The 88-year-old's meal had not been prepared correctly Credit: NCJ Media An inquest heard the 88-year-old had lived with her daughter Gillian but moved into the facility when her dementia progressed. When eating a meal on March 3, 2023, Joan began to display signs of choking. But the inquest heard how a care assistant did not intervene and had to ask another staff member for help to deliver back slaps and abdominal thrusts. And, CPR was not performed due to the "inaccurate understanding of a registered nurse". Read More CLIFF TRAGEDY Woman found dead at bottom of cliff hours after pair died near same spot Following the hearing, Northumberland's senior coroner Andrew Hetherington has written a "prevention of future deaths" report. The care home and NHS trust have 56 days to respond. The coroner concluded Joan died "in a care home as a result of choking". And in his written report, he outlined a total of six "matters of concern". Of these, one was regarding the NHS trust and five were directed to the care home's operator Hillcare. The first issue was found with the speech and language team. Joan's assessment had not been written down in a formal report, meaning observations of her eating had only been passed on verbally. The coroner also concluded that a nurse and care assistant at the home "were not in date with their training in Basic Life Support and First Aid at Work". The coroner added: "I am concerned that a chef in evidence at the inquest was not aware that breaded fish was not a suitable food stuff in the diet identified for the deceased. "I am concerned that other residents could be fed inappropriate food stuffs that are not in line with their identified diet plans." Bryan Smith, Joan's son-in-law, told ChronicleLive: "Right from the start, we knew what had happened - that they hadn't given her the right food. "We knew she hadn't been looked after. "The reason we have pursued this is that we knew what had happened." Bryan added how the family had been "shocked and astounded by the quantity and severity of the mistakes" that were highlighted in the inquest. He told how many families have shared similar "painful and shocking experiences". In a statement on behalf of the family read in court, they paid tribute: "Joan was a well loved character in Blyth. She was manager of Robson's shoe shop and then moved to the Water Board. "When we used to go shopping with Joan, it would take you an hour to get past the car park - as she knew everyone in Blyth with a tap or a pair of shoes!" A Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust spokesperson said: 'All referrals to our speech and language therapy service are robustly triaged using a risk and evidence-based approach to inform the most appropriate care for that individual. This includes information on the referral form and discussion with the patient and / or those who care for them daily to gather the most up-to-date information. "We cannot comment further on this case due to patient confidentiality, but would like to offer our sincere condolences to Mrs Whitworth's family and loved ones." A spokesperson for The Oaks Care Home said: "We acknowledge the Coroner's report relating to the death of Joan Whitworth at our home in March 2023. Our thoughts remain with her family and loved ones. "Following the incident, we carried out a full review and made all necessary changes to our practices and procedures. These have been in place for some time and will be reflected in our formal response to the Coroner's report. The safety, dignity, and wellbeing of those in our care remain our highest priorities."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store