Minister wants to 'maintain' insurance reforms before approving personal injury pay-out hikes
Fianna Fáil's Jim O'Callaghan told
The Journal
today that he has yet to make a final decision on the judicial council's proposal to increase personal injury pay-outs by 17%, which is due to be discussed by cabinet later this month.
It comes after a report by the Central Bank yesterday said motor insurance premiums are set to continue rising as the number of claims made and repair costs involved are increasing.
As of May 2025, drivers have seen an 8% increase in motor insurance premiums in the last 12 months, the report said.
Asked about an upcoming memo, due to be discussed by ministers this month, O'Callaghan said discussions are still ongoing.
Advertisement
'In the first instance, no decision has been made in respect of the issue about the person injuries guidelines,' he told
The Journal.
'I am, at present, considering them.'
He added that he is 'very conscious' of the changes and is engaging with other departments and ministers as a result of the campaigning for insurance reforms that have been completed in recent years.
'We need to maintain [the progress],' he said. 'I am engaging with other cabinet colleagues, we'll have discussions in respect of it. I think government will make a decision on this matter shortly.'
O'Callaghan added that he was not going to make a decision in respect of the judicial council recommendation by himself and wanted to include other members of government on the decision.
'I have to take account, for instance, of the Central Bank's Claims' Database Report,' he said, referencing its finding that there's already no financial benefit for those who make claims to have their case removed from the Personal Injuries Resolution Board.
He added that government will make a decision on the matter in due course.
Reform activists, such as the Alliance For Insurance Reform, have said that there will be no check on costs if ministers approve the proposed increases. It claims that the cost of insurance premiums is already too high, and increasing monthly.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
Savings scheme for first-time-buyers under consideration by government
A SAVINGS AND investment scheme to help first-time buyers is under consideration by government. In an interview with The Journal , Taoiseach Micheál Martin said such a scheme could incentivise and give first-time-buyers an opportunity to save, adding, 'that's something we would examine, certainly'. 'I'm not going to give a commitment on it, but we're not ruling it out either,' he added. In the UK, such a scheme exists whereby a person can pay in up to £200 each month and the government will top up your savings by 25% (up to £3,000) when they buy their first home. While the Taoiseach would not be drawn on specifics, he indicated the Help-to-Buy scheme, which can provide a maximum payment of €30,000, will not see a boost stating it is a very substantial help for first-time-buyers. He said there is a commitment in the programme for government to keep such supports. Advertisement He noted the number of mortgage drawdowns is continuing to grow, but added the prices are very high, acknowledging that the threshold is often breached now when it comes to the Help-to-Buy scheme not being applicable to some new-build developments now. Martin also stated that he has asked his economists to look at the matter of a new State investment scheme that would fund the delivery of homes, noting that it was a proposal the Social Democrats had put forward also. 'It's a savings and investment scheme, essentially, but that the funding somehow would be ring fenced for spending on housing,' he said. There is a similar scheme in France, whereby the incentivised savings scheme becomes a funding stream for government to build houses. Rent Tax Credit The Renter's Tax Credit, which is currently €1,000 will also see an increase, said the Taoiseach. Prior to the election, Martin said he wanted to 'at least' double the payment. He told The Journal the government will, 'first of all, maintain what it is, but over the lifetime of the government increase it to give further protection to renters'. While he wouldn't go into the specifics of the planned increases in the upcoming budget, he said it's 'a commitment we're focused on'. Related Reads Ireland needs 80,000 new workers to reach housing and infrastructure targets, ESRI says Tax breaks for developers? Harris 'remains to be convinced' it's the best tool to boost supply No protections against rising rents for students leaving private tenancies at end of year 'If you look the last three to four years, protections have increased continuously for renters, but it's the price that is the problem, the cost of renting and the affordability of it, and that really comes back to supply,' he said. 'If we get far more apartments built, and if we get far more housing built, that, over time, moderates the price of the cost of rent. Because at the moment, if you've only 30,000 odd new units a year, that won't be enough to moderate [rent prices],' he said. Separately, the Taoiseach confirmed that the vacant grant scheme, used by those to refurbish a property that has been vacant for over two years, is an important focus for the government. He acknowledged there was an issue with the payouts of the grants and that house buyers must frontload the costs before waiting for the state to pay it back. 'That will be examined… we don't want to be putting people out,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
8 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Talk of revenge after acrimonious week for Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael
There are a few politicians in Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael who will spend this weekend contemplating revenge, maybe even plotting it. It is not a huge cohort, but there are enough there to make up a quorum of motivated individuals eager to maintain the internecine warfare of recent days. It all stems form the shockwaves generated by James Lawless' logical but politically unwise answer on RTÉ's This Week programme, that as things stand student fees could rise by €1,000 this year. Although the worried public outbursts from Fine Gael have ceased, the party remains steadfast in its view that Mr Lawless needlessly wounded the entire Government. One senior figure summed up the week saying, "we have many issues where we will lose support or struggle politically but this one could have been avoided." There is a feeling in the party too, as constituency office calls and emails are "off the charts," that it could be difficult to hold the line until October's Budget. Already there are broad hints that the final figure for student fees will be below €3,000 and the Budget reductions will this time be permanent Fianna Fáil believes it was Simon Harris' intervention that "escalated" the entire episode into a full-blown crisis which dominated Dáil debate for three days. The party's weekly meeting in Leinster House saw several TDs lash out at what was described as "media posturing" by Fine Gael. Those close to Simon Harris contend that he was merely trying to bring clarity to matters given his intricate knowledge of the topic as a former higher education minister himself. That defence drew nothing but guffaws from both Fianna Fáil ministers and TDs. "He's good like that isn't he," one scathingly said. Then there are those who are intent on settling scores. Battle plans from some foot soldiers have identified Minister of Agriculture Martin Heydon's efforts to retain the Nitrates derogation, as a possible point of attack. The Fine Gael tactics board has zoned in on Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan's upcoming decision on whether to accept the Judicial Council guidelines proposing an increase in personal injury awards, against the backdrop of rising insurance costs. Throughout the week, Independent ministers like Kevin 'Boxer' Moran have urged both parties to talk to each other more, and to be mindful of the financial strain many households are experiencing. Further up the chain the sores are felt less intensely though and there is a general view that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael ministers are generally working well together. Reports of friction 'overstated' - minister Reports of deep friction and lasting damage to the Government's cohesiveness were "a bit overstated" according to one influential Cabinet minister. The switching of portfolios after the general election is even said to have boosted a sense of mutual respect with ministers possessing a greater understanding of their colleagues' workload. There is a view in the higher echelons of Government that in the context of the many challenges it faces, this week amounted to little more than a "bit of pushing and shoving" or good old fashioned "ground hurling". The true measure of the coalition's sense of unity will be the Budget negotiations. These will be framed against the worrying reality that the economic good times are most likely drawing to a close. That means caution will be the guiding principle in the months ahead for the Fine Gael's Minister for Finance and Fianna Fáil's Minister for Public Expenditure. Both Jack Chambers and Paschal Donohoe are said to be of a similar mind about the approach required, and their working relationship is described as close. It is that key axis and how it navigates a Budget amid growing uncertainty, and without the option of a cost-of-living package, which will ultimately reveal if the coalition can function collectively.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Race for the Áras: Joe Duffy and Bertie Ahern among names circulating but parties wary of ‘knee-jerk' selection
In 2011, Fianna Fáil had come out of the party's worst election in its long history and had no appetite to run its own candidate in the presidential election that year. Somebody who knew Gay Byrne took it upon themselves to approach the former Late Late Show host (then 77 years old) to see if he might be interested in a tilt at the Áras. It led to serious discussions, including a conversation with party leader Micheál Martin. If Byrne agreed to stand, it would be a considerable coup for the party. Here was a bona fide celebrity candidate who could command widespread support. When word of the talks got out, Byrne was immediately installed as odds-on favourite, even though he had not fully made his mind up. Then, in comments he made at a public event, he said Ireland was being 'run by mad people in Brussels'. Unsurprisingly, that caused a big stir. Now, Byrne was facing intense scrutiny by the media on all kinds of issues and views. Within 48 hours he was out of the race, saying it was more trouble than it was worth. READ MORE Fourteen years – and two presidential terms – later, Byrne's protegee, Joe Duffy, is being mentioned in the same breath at the same period of the electoral cycle. When he retired from Liveline last month, after 26 years at the helm, Duffy gave a tongue-in-cheek response when asked if he would be a candidate. 'I was president of Trinity students' union; I still have the posters. But my face has changed a lot. Maybe my intellect isn't as strong as it used to be,' he said. There was little that could be taken from his comments to suggest a definite interest on Duffy's part. Nonetheless, he did not categorically rule himself out. That was enough to make him something of a talking point in Leinster House this week, with the broadcaster's name being linked with Fianna Fáil, and also with Labour. 'If he stood tomorrow, he'd win,' said a Fianna Fáil TD, one of about half a dozen who mentioned his name to me as a possible contender. Attempts to reach Mr Duffy this week were not successful. With no further comment from him, or from any party, and no confirmation of any contacts, his status at the moment is that of yet another name being thrown into the mix of 'maybes', along with former WHO deputy director Dr Mike Ryan, Ireland's Ambassador to the USA Geraldine Byrne-Nason, and Irish Times columnist Fintan O'Toole. The big three political parties all insist, when asked, it is too early to predict the composition of the field. A senior figure in Fianna Fáil points out that the last time it contested a presidential election, in 1997, its candidate Mary McAleese was not selected until September 19th, just six weeks before polling day. 'Mary McAleese was certainly not a household name back then. Her success depended entirely on how successful that short campaign would be in elevating her standing among the public,' said the source. 'It's too early in July. Our approach will be measured and not knee-jerk.' Forward momentum in this campaign has hit the doldrums in recent weeks. The Opposition party leaders (all representing left and left-of-centre parties) held informal talks earlier this year with a view to finding an agreed candidate. Nothing has come of them as yet and all that urgency has faded. There have been no meetings lately, though the parties plan to reconvene before the summer recess to continue the search. With all becalmed, there has been inertia. Last week, one of the people who might be seen as an agreed candidate of the left, Senator Frances Black, said she was ruling herself out '99.5 per cent'. No party has approached her to date, she confirmed. The subliminal message was that her patience had run out. [ Opposition parties cooling on possibility of joint left candidate for presidential race Opens in new window ] There is another undercurrent that might explain the dearth of people coming forward. That is the view that presidential campaigns have become personalised and brutal, which has a chilling effect on prospective candidates. Labour TD Alan Kelly certainly thinks so. 'There are people who would make a very good president of Ireland, very rounded people, with huge capacity and integrity. It's become clear to me that very few of them would ever put themselves through this campaign, as they've seen what has happened in the past. This is a real issue for society,' he says. He recalls the bruising experience of Labour candidate Adi Roche in 1997, in which she and her family were the subject of a smear campaign. Dana Rosemary Scallon has talked in recent weeks to Oliver Callan on RTÉ of how traumatic the 2011 campaign was for her. Gavin Duffy was a candidate in 2018 and found himself under similar unyielding scrutiny. In his case, it was in connection with his involvement in a crash 40 years earlier in which a young woman was seriously injured. Then 18, he was convicted for careless driving and for being uninsured. Duffy says he was realistic enough to know before then that he was not a contender. The incident being brought up, however, was difficult to respond to from both a personal and a campaign perspective. Speaking not of his own candidacy but in general terms, he says: 'It's not an election, it's a process of elimination. 'Something is spun in a way to appear like a serious character flaw, and therefore confidence is undermined. The candidate drops in the polls, and eventually the last man or woman standing is elected.' Comparing 2018 and 2025 is not a like-for-like exercise, Duffy says. Back then, President Michael D Higgins was seeking reelection. Sinn Féin was the only party that fielded a candidate. The rest were independents. 'This election is very different. We are going to get a higher calibre of proven, established politicians running with the backing of their political parties.' In other words, it will be a more serious, less visceral contest. Right now, there are signs that bigger parties are finally beginning to swing into action. Fine Gael will open its nominations on Monday and close on July 15th. If there is more than one candidate, the party will hold hustings in late July and conduct a postal ballot in August, using its electoral college system. It is widely expected that former EU commissioner Mairéad McGuinness and sitting MEP Seán Kelly will seek nominations. [ Fine Gael's Seán Kelly 'could do a lot' as president but stops short of declaring run Opens in new window ] In a letter to members, Fine Gael general secretary John Carroll set out the timeline if there is a bout: 'The result will be announced, and the candidate ratified, at an event in early September.' By that time, Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil will be close to reaching their decisions. Sinn Féin consulted widely with its membership last month on its best approach. A spokesman said this week the process will conclude in early autumn and added that a no-candidate scenario was not envisaged. Essentially that means it will have its own candidate, or support someone whose political space is contiguous to Sinn Féin's. Finding the ideal candidate might prove a challenge, though. The same questions face Fianna Fáil. Talking to its TDs and Senators in Leinster House on Wednesday and Thursday, most were strongly of the view that the party should field a candidate. The last Fianna Fáil candidate was McAleese 28 years ago. 'We are the biggest party. We can't exclude ourselves in this election for three decades,' said a veteran TD on Thursday. A few names have been mentioned, including Bertie Ahern, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Mary Hanafin. On Thursday, former minister of State, and head of Unicef Ireland, Peter Power, was on manoeuvres around Leinster House, gauging the support levels of colleagues. He is said to be interested in running. The party's nomination process is a straight vote of its TDs and Senators. All who spoke to The Irish Times said that – in realpolitik – Taoiseach Micheál Martin would effectively make the final decision on running a candidate, and probably on the identity of the candidate. [ Fianna Fáil is in desperate need of a candidate for the presidential election. Applications are invited Opens in new window ] In the past, those seeking nominations were often serving TDs. No such figure has emerged this time. The feedback from senior party figures is that for it to contest the election, it will need a candidate of status who is capable of winning. There is a sense that such a candidate has yet to be identified. Could there be a dark horse? Some independents will succeed in getting a nomination and Duffy can see a serious contender among them. 'Somebody could emerge from left field who can appeal to people under 35 who don't vote [along party lines],' he said. 'I think there is a lot of angst about housing. If somebody can play into that stream, they could do very well.' He and others believe there will be four to six candidates - one each from Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin, a candidate representing smaller left parties, and one or two independents, who have secured their nominations by getting the backing of four local authorities.
