
'Isolating' Pakistan not in US interest: think tank
A US think tank has advised the Trump administration to pursue a pragmatic and interest-driven relationship with Pakistan, emphasising that isolating the South Asian nation is counterproductive to American national security interests.
"Isolating Pakistan is not in the United States' national security interests. Pakistan's cooperation, even if selective and limited, is better than its intransigence," reads a report of Hudson Institute, a research organization promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future.
Titled "Engaging Pakistan in a New Era of US Foreign Policy", the report is the product of the US-Pakistan Study Group, comprising seasoned diplomats and analysts. Contributors include Former Ambassador Husain Haqqani, Sahar Khan, Michael Kugelman, Ambassador Cameron Munter, Ambassador Anne Patterson, Ambassador Robin Raphel, Harlan Ullman, Dr Marvin Weinbaum, and Uzair Younus.
The report says the United States and Pakistan have a long history of working together. Moving forward, both countries could benefit from identifying common interests and cooperating accordingly. Even selective or limited cooperation from Pakistan is seen as more valuable than disengagement.
The report says the recent India-Pakistan crisis reportedly brought the two nuclear-armed South Asian countries to the brink of war before the United States intervened and pulled them back.
"This crisis highlights the need for continued US engagement with Pakistan, a critical country in a geostrategic location with which Washington has historically had a complex relationship," it adds.
The relationship between Pakistan and the United States has weathered many ups and downs. In the opening months of his second term, President Donald Trump has indicated that he intends to adopt a more pragmatic foreign policy, one that maintains relations even with countries that hold beliefs or values different from his own, according to the report.
As a result, the relationship between the United States and Pakistan has a better chance of improvement than it has enjoyed in recent yearsif both countries' leaders are able to focus on shared interests rather than ideological differences.
In the aftermath of the 2025 crisis, US policymakers are emphasising the importance of engaging with both India and Pakistan to prevent and manage crises between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. Given the serious threat posed by any future conflict or nuclear escalation in South Asia, the United States is encouraged to take an active role in mediation efforts during such crises.
The experience of past administrations has shown that Pakistan's strategic calculus about India is unlikely to change through either incentives or pressure. Instead, a more realistic approach is advisedone that accepts Pakistan's self-perception and works within that framework rather than attempting to reshape it.
Another area of mutual interest is counterterrorism. While the United States continues to monitor terrorist groups, Pakistan also faces internal threats from militant extremist organizations.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
End of politics?
Since the Pahalgam attack on April 22, politicians have almost disappeared from prime-time TV shows in Pakistan. The Pakistan-India conflict and then the Iran-Israel war, these turbulent events led news organisations to troop in national security and foreign policy experts to their studios in place of the regular talking heads. Political discussions evaporated into this air. And politics? Here's the funny thing about politics. It is struggling to return to prime time even now when the conflicts have ended. There's always the politics around these conflicts, but such topics also bring forth the national security brigade of commentators and experts. It is a strange phenomenon and TV anchors, and their teams are struggling to find political topics that can find traction in such times. But the issue is far bigger than TV. The new normal is reflecting a new reality: politics as we know it is slowly receding into the background. The signs are everywhere. The ruling coalition has settled into the rhythm of the hybrid system. Their comfort with hybridity is such that the Defence Minister has praised it on record. The functional power matrix has been firmly superimposed over the theoretical one, and all in the governance structure have embraced it with gleeful willingness. There's not much politics on display inside the Red Zone because the pecking order is as clear as day. The opposition, which usually generates the momentum of politics, is fractured and subdued. No street agitation, no boisterous rallies, no alliance-making and anti-government mass movements, no legislative offensives, and no grand narrative building. It is almost as if the opposition has gone into hibernation. The courts – generators of much news flow – have also stopped making waves. Predictable decisions at predictable times have become yawn-worthy. Gone are the days when the superior judiciary was driving political momentum through its remarks and judgements. So why has everyone gone quiet? Take the ruling coalition first. All parties know full well they are in power because of the requirements of hybridity. Theirs is an inorganic ascent to power. The sustainability and longevity of their power depends fully on their utility within this existing hybridity. This utility is, in many ways, dependent on their ability and willingness to flow gently with the tide and never swim against it. As junior partners within the system, it is expected of them to lend a hand when needed, keep the formal system of constitutional system chugging along, and not create waves when none are needed. When was the last time the ruling parties had a big political event? When was the last time they created noise – even governance related - that reverberated across the country? When was the last time they actually collided with the opposition? Silence suits them. It does not suit the opposition. And yet, silence is what they too are generating. All their initiatives have fallen by the wayside. There is no coherence in the PTI's plans; no clarity in their strategy; and no resonance in their narrative. If they do succeed in making any noise, it is against each other. This may be one reason that PTI's allies have also gone quiet. When was the last time you saw or heard Mahmood Khan Achakzai on the media? When was the last time you heard Shahid Khaqan Abbasi convene a meeting for a grand alliance? The only activity that the PTI can generate is the struggle to get into Adiala jail to see Imran Khan. As for Khan, he cannot expect much relief from the courts. Judgements rendered on military courts trial and on the reserved seats, among others, have confirmed that PTI will continue to see its space shrink in every way. The superior judiciary is in no mood to make waves. Is this the new normal then? Scan the months ahead and there is little to suggest that politics will make a grand comeback. The May 9 judgement, when it comes, will create some ripples, but these too will be predictable ones. Token protests by PTI may generate some headlines for a day or two, but that's about it. Inside the parliament, legislative politics will go even quieter. Now that the ruling coalition commands a two-thirds majority after the SC reserved seats judgement, it has no need to engage the opposition for making laws and constitutional amendments. In fact, the power to amend the constitution means that the ruling coalition can now further suppress politics as we know it by making sweeping changes that curtail space for dissent. They say you should be careful what you wish for lest you get it. We have been yearning for stability for years. If such stability means the silence echoing across the land, then yes, we may have what we wanted. The end of politics is upon us. For now. And yet… 'Every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Agenda of sustainable economic progress being implemented: Ahsan
LAHORE: Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Special Initiatives Ahsan Iqbal said on Monday the government is implementing an agenda of sustainable economic progress. 'The government is pursuing a goal of achieving taking economy of Pakistan to one trillion dollar by the year 2035,' Ahsan said, adding: 'Our development model is to transform economic development through exports.' While inaugurating a modern classroom at the Pakistan Administrative Staff College (PASC)/ National School of Public Policy (NSPP) here Monday, Ahsan presented a comprehensive roadmap for governance reforms and institutional performance improvement, emphasising the transition from a procedure-focused to a mission-driven bureaucracy. 'The country is facing a crucial moment requiring data-driven, technology-enabled and accountable governance,' he said, adding: 'We must build institutions that are policy-consistent and shielded from political volatility, ensure transparency in decision-making, foster agility to respond to changing demands and instil responsibility in the use of public resources.' Ahsan Iqbal outlined the government's long-term economic vision under the banner of 'URAAN Pakistan', which aims at making Pakistan a $1 trillion economy by 2035. He said the strategy is built on the five pillars of the 5Es: Exports, E-Pakistan, Environment, Energy & Infrastructure and Equity & Empowerment. The minister said steps are being taken to restore public confidence in good governance, by following the policy of making bureaucracy a stable, transparent, agile and responsible. He also urged the officers to play a leading role in enabling export-led growth, digitising government operations, building climate resilience, improving infrastructure delivery and ensuring inclusive development. He said the civil servants must play their vital role for Pakistan's transformation, adding that the system must be reformed to deliver better outcomes. He introduced the STAR model — Stable, Transparent, Agile and Responsible — as a governance framework to guide civil service transformation. He commended the role of civil servants to make the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) a success which showed the dedication of Pakistan's civil servants. He reminded the participants that public service is a responsibility and leadership in Islam is a duty, not a privilege. The minister encouraged the course participants to take part in the training with a spirit of service, creativity and commitment to the national development. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
High Commissioner of Kenya visits FCCI
FAISALABAD: Lt General Peter Mbogo Nijru (R), High Commissioner of Kenya has appreciated the 'Look Africa' policy of the Government of Pakistan urging upon the business community of Faisalabad to fully harvest its dividends by enhancing bilateral trade and making investment in Kenya. Addressing the business community in Faisalabad Chamber of Commerce & Industry (FCCI), he said that textile was the only globally recognized sector of Faisalabad but he has now come to know that pharmaceutical, chemicals, food processing, IT and other sectors are now also growing at a much faster pace. He said that Pakistani investors could invest in Kenya to produce different commodities in addition to its processing, packaging and exports to African and other countries. He mentioned the African Union and said that products manufactured in Kenya could be exported to different countries without any duty. 'Similarly Kenyan products have duty and quota free access to some European and American markets,' he said and added Pakistani investors could also explore this opportunity. He said that we must negotiate trade agreements between Pakistan and Kenya to give a quantum jump to our bilateral trade. He said that Kenya also offers huge opportunities for the promotion of tourism as it has scenic valleys like Gilgit and Baltistan. He also congratulated FCCI on its Golden Jubilee Year and hoped that it would make tremendous progress in the coming years. Earlier Rehan Naseem Bharara, President FCCI welcomed the Kenyan High Commissioner and said that our Ministry of Commerce was negotiating on an agreement to provide access to the Pakistani exporters to the eight different African countries including Kenya. He said that Pakistan was importing huge quantities of tea and coffee from Kenya and its investors must consider the cultivation and processing of these products in Pakistan. He also mentioned some tariff barriers and said that the Kenyan Government should revisit existing tariffs particularly on confectionary products. He also stressed the need to promote direct contacts between the business communities of the two countries and pointed out that some Pakistani banks are reluctant to accept LCs issued by the Kenyan banks. He said that this issue should be resolved on a top priority basis to streamline the banking channels. Naveed Akram Sheikh, Mirza Zahid Iqbal, Jawad Shafique, Mirza Muhammad Ashraf Mughal and Mian Muhammad Tayyab took part in the question answer session while Qaisar Shams Gucha, SVP offered vote of thanks. Rehan Naseem Bharara decorated Peter Mbogo Nijru with a special pin of FCCI Golden Jubilee. He also presented a FCCI shield to the Kenyan High Commissioner while they also exchanged gifts with each other. Bonface Njoroge Njuguna, Commercial Attaché of Kenya was also present during this meeting. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025